Slashdot Mirror


Sally Ride Takes Her Final Flight

fructose writes "Sally Ride, America's first woman in space died today at age 61. She succumbed to pancreatic cancer according to her office in San Diego. Here's to wishing her a safe trip on her final journey."

38 of 251 comments (clear)

  1. RIP Sally by slasher999 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I still remember that historic launch. Her name was one everyone who was old enough to remember knew and never forgot from that day forward.

    1. Re:RIP Sally by Hatta · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What I didn't know until now is that she was a lesbian. Which is fair enough, if she was out back then she probably wouldn't have been considered a good role model. Good for her, she broke ground in more ways than one.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  2. true pioneer by frovingslosh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sally Ride was a true pioneer and hero.

    I suspect that many if not most of the people who follow Slashdot don't believe in religious superstition. I find it truly unfortunate that someone would take advantage of her untimely passing and use it as an opportunity to preach his own religious views. And yes, I expect other supposedly "religious" people will now resort to name calling to mod me down rather than enter into discussion.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:true pioneer by ClickOnThis · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sally Ride was a true pioneer and hero.

      I suspect that many if not most of the people who follow Slashdot don't believe in religious superstition. I find it truly unfortunate that someone would take advantage of her untimely passing and use it as an opportunity to preach his own religious views. And yes, I expect other supposedly "religious" people will now resort to name calling to mod me down rather than enter into discussion.

      As she literally flew, if you will, to "the heavens" during her lifetime, I see nothing wrong with suggesting metaphorically that she's doing it now for the final time. Yes, the imagery is religious. But it seems to fit the situation well.

      Goodbye, Sally.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    2. Re:true pioneer by jhoegl · · Score: 3

      tolerance of superstition is not tolerance.

      What?

    3. Re:true pioneer by RearNakedChoke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      tolerance of superstition is not tolerance.

      when you are dead you are dead. there isn't any 'safe trip' about it.

      let the myth of afterlife 'die' already!

      Of course its tolerance, regardless of what you think about it. You live most of your life based, not on logic, but on personal preferences and emotional impulses that have little scientific justification. And I do too. And so the other 7 billion people on this planet.

    4. Re:true pioneer by bmo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      tolerance of superstition is not tolerance.

      As a militant agnostic, I have to point out that your post is nothing but flamebait.

      It is devoid of argument outside of assertion. It has no foundation. It is an accusation with nothing behind it. You are almost begging people to flame you.

      Intolerance of belief is just as bad as intolerance of non-belief. Indeed it gives those with a system of religion ammunition to fuel whatever persecution complex they're nursing. So it leads to backlash. You decried the Moral Majority in another post. Stop giving them bad things to say about us.

      To quote the Letter to the Touro Synagogue: The Citizens of the United States of America have a right to applaud themselves for having given to mankind examples of an enlarged and liberal policy: a policy worthy of imitation. All possess alike liberty of conscience and immunities of citizenship. It is now no more that toleration is spoken of, as if it was by the indulgence of one class of people, that another enjoyed the exercise of their inherent national gifts. For happily the Government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance requires only that they who live under its protection should demean themselves as good citizens, in giving it on all occasions their effectual support. ...

      May the children of the Stock of Abraham, who dwell in this land, continue to merit and enjoy the good will of the other Inhabitants; while every one shall sit in safety under his own vine and fig tree, and there shall be none to make him afraid. -- G. Washington.

      Go sit under your own fig tree.

      --
      BMO

    5. Re:true pioneer by humanrev · · Score: 2

      What the fuck man? Are you one of those "all or nothing" types who don't understand the concept of degrees?

      Most of the people in the world are religious. You will therefore find yourself constantly rubbing people the wrong way if you're unable to tolerate their beliefs in at least a passive way (as in "that person is religious - OK then", and move on). Having said that, it's correct that you SHOULDN'T tolerate things like your first example - stupid parents thinking that only God can cure an illness and denying their child the help of modern medicine. Such thinking leads to unnecessary death and suffering and shouldn't be tolerated... yet most religious people don't think like that, so why bash those who are light or moderate believers if they're not harming anyone?

      âoeSo I say, âoeLive and let live.â Thatâ(TM)s my motto. âoeLive and let live.â And anyone who canâ(TM)t go along with that, take him outside and shoot the motherfucker. Itâ(TM)s a simple philosophy, but itâ(TM)s always worked in our family.â
      â George Carlin

      --
      Most people on Slashdot are fucking idiots.
    6. Re:true pioneer by Creedo · · Score: 2

      Apparently you have not heard of China, North Korea, Vietnam, Cuba, Venezuela, Equador and Bolivia.

      China embraced capitalism.
      Viet Nam is mixing Capitalism with Marxism.
      Cuba is embracing capitalism.
      Venezuela is failing at constructing a Communist economy.
      Brazil has prospered by not governing from hard left principals.

      That leaves you with Ecuador(a mix of capitalism and communism) and North Korea(a completely failed state). That doesn't seem to match up with your paranoid narrative, though, does it?

      And you have not heard of the latest developments in Marxism, created by Antonio Gramsci, Herbert Marcuse and Theodor Adorno.

      The latest deveopments? From a series of authors who have been dead for decades? Care to elucidate what makes these particular dead men so dangerous to your worldview?

      Cultural Marxism is alive and kicking in the West. Just go to an average university and see what books the philosophy/geography students read.

      That's funny. I had enough philosophy for a minor, and I never once had a philosophy professor mention Marxism more than in passing. And geography? Care to list out the horrible things students are learning?

      Check out what "moderate socialism" did to the economy of Europe.

      Oh, you mean the debt based economic problems? How is that different from the US? How is it the fault of socialism?

      The Bible says "Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's, and unto God the things that are God's" What happened in the Middle Ages was a perversion of Christianity. AND IT HAPPENED 400 YEARS AGO.

      WTF are you talking about? I never said anything about the Dark Ages.

      Saying that "bin Laden is religious" is as relevant as saying "bin Laden has a long beard".

      If you think that bin Laden's actions were due to something other than his religion, then you are so wildly misinformed that I'm not sure where to start.

      The probability of a Christian commiting terrorism is the same as a long-bearded man commiting terrorism. Being "similar" to bin Laden in one aspect does mean one is a terrorist.

      Holding an irrational belief as your core philosophy is always dangerous.

      Pat Robertson is more a politician then a pastor; and he is a televangelist.

      No True Scotsman fallacy.

      You don't find this kind of rhetoric in Catholic churches.

      You are wrong. Moreover, the Catholic church is quite comfortable in claiming that homosexual marriage will result in the destruction of the fabric of society.

      The crimes primarily happened 30 YEARS AGO, during the ecclesial chaos that followed the revolution of 1968.

      The crimes were horrific. The cover up by the entire Vatican heirarchy was arguably worse. And that cover up and and denial persists to this day. The Catholic church still wants to brush this under the rug.

      On average, a Catholic priest less likely to comit such a crime then a publich school teacher, and a Catholic bishop is less likely to cover it up than a public school principal. But you conveniently focus on priests.

      And those priests and bishops claim to speak with t

      --
      All that is necessary for the triumph of good is that evil men do nothing.
  3. Rest well Sally by ravenswood1000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Rest well Sally. Sorry you passed away because of such a horrible condition. You did good maam.

  4. Re:Safe trip? by cpu6502 · · Score: 4, Informative

    People do not want to admit that death==nonexistence so they make-up imaginary "trips" to some other place (heaven, hell, Elysian Fields, space, whatever). In reality Sally Ride's personality dissolved into nothingness at the moment her brain's neurons broke connection with one another when they were deprived of oxygen.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  5. Re:Safe trip? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

    as 'computer savvy people', we can all related to the analog of a computer running for a very long time. suppose its a calculation that is running for decades. its adding more info and detail to its result, converging in, getting closer to an answer, and, then ....

    someone comes by, unplugs the power cord and the computer is thrown away, data and all.

    is the data saved anywhere? not really! 2nd hand info could be saved but not the actual running program or its internal data.

    it all gets turned off, thrown away and forgotton.

    this is what life is. and its whole concept is stupid (from a conciousness POV).

    some people need to make up stories to be ok with this absurd concept. they can't deal with the fact that an 80 year process just simply loses its power, all data is destroyed and that is that. the universe does not 'care'. there is no one there to care. all your work for your lifetime is ruined, destroyed, forgotton. you and I don't matter. none of us matters.

    this drives people insane. or, it can. and so, our 'wise men' have created bedtime stories to keep those with simpler minds happier during their 80 year (or so) run.

    I do understand the origin of the 'stories' but they are still very poor stories and they can do more harm than good.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  6. Re:Safe trip? by thereitis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    some people need to make up stories to be ok with this absurd concept. they can't deal with the fact that an 80 year process just simply loses its power, all data is destroyed and that is that. the universe does not 'care'. there is no one there to care. all your work for your lifetime is ruined, destroyed, forgotton. you and I don't matter. none of us matters.

    When a process dies, all the work it has accomplished remains. Same with a human.

    I could counter your belittling of people who use these "bedtime stories" with this: those who have no belief in the possibility of a greater being are uncomfortable with the thought of something being inexplicable - ever.

  7. Let me clear it up for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is simply pointing out a belief in Secular Frisbeeism.
    The "final flight" is when your soul goes up on the roof and gets stuck for all time.

    - May you find the shingles soft Sally! -

  8. Sally Ride was a Lesbian by adisakp · · Score: 5, Informative

    I found out reading her obituary that she had a partner of 27 years, a fact that - despite her status as an American Hero - was not publicly announced until after her death.

    1. Re:Sally Ride was a Lesbian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Except she wasn't (publicly) a lesbian when she rode the shuttle. She was married to Steve Hawley (another astronaut). They married in 1982, she got her seat on the shuttle in 1983. She got together again with Tam O'Shaughnessy in 1985 (they were childhood friends), and she divorced Hawley in 1987. I would suspect that the marriage to Steve Hawley was more a political move (on her part, at least) to dispel any question within NASA about her sexuality and secure her position as the first American woman in space. Had she been an admitted lesbian in 1983, I seriously doubt she would have gotten her shot to go into space. The fact that she left NASA the same year she divorced Hawley lends credence to the possibility that the revelation of her sexuality (at least, internally within the organization) ended her space career.

    2. Re:Sally Ride was a Lesbian by RabidReindeer · · Score: 2

      I cried a little when I heard she died.

      Then I read about her having a "partner" and cried a little more. I would have loved to have her fly me to the moon. Dang.

    3. Re:Sally Ride was a Lesbian by Swampash · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ride's partner of 27 years, Tam O'Shaughnessy, will be denied federal benefits because the Defense of Marriage Act says that was an unrelationship, not like the real relationships that good Christian hetero real Americans have.

      U-S-A! U-S-A! U-S-A!

  9. Re:Safe trip? by sootman · · Score: 4, Funny

    > ... personality dissolved into nothingness at the moment
    > her brain's neurons broke connection with one another
    > when they were deprived of oxygen.

    Cool, I'm totally putting that on my tombstone.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  10. Re:Awesome Gal. by camperslo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Condolences to her family.

    And condolences to her partner of 27 years, Dr. Tam E. O'Shaughnessy

    Sadly even hero status didn't bring the right to legal marriage during their time together

  11. Re:She's dead. by riverat1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's a metaphor son.

  12. fuck you cancer by decora · · Score: 2

    god i fucking hate cancer.

  13. Why did it take so long? by sageres · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The first woman in space was Valentina Tereshkova. She flew on June 16th, 1963. That was two years after the first man flew into the space.
    On the other hand, the first American woman (Sally Ride, RIP) flew in 1982.
    Question: Why did it take NASA almost two decades to send the woman in space?

    1. Re:Why did it take so long? by SternisheFan · · Score: 2

      The first woman in space was Valentina Tereshkova. She flew on June 16th, 1963. That was two years after the first man flew into the space. On the other hand, the first American woman (Sally Ride, RIP) flew in 1982. Question: Why did it take NASA almost two decades to send the woman in space?

      Answer: At that time it was still very much a male dominated society in the U.S. Ms Ride shattered that way of thinking then, made a lot of then male-chauvinists begin to think, 'differently'. She knowingly 'rode an untested controlled bomb', in the search of knowledge. That is quite a brave feat that many males would have been too afraid to do. Gotta' respect that

    2. Re:Why did it take so long? by arth1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The first woman in space was Valentina Tereshkova. She flew on June 16th, 1963. That was two years after the first man flew into the space.
      On the other hand, the first American woman (Sally Ride, RIP) flew in 1982.
      Question: Why did it take NASA almost two decades to send the woman in space?

      While part of the answer undoubtedly is misogyny and discrimination against women in general, part of it is a cultural taboo - female plumbing. Female cosmonauts used diapers, and thought little of it. Female astronauts probably would have (not alluding to the one that did) if male-dominated NASA hadn't spent millions and countless years on designing a space toilet and non-intrusive "devices" to let women pee in space.

  14. Sally at JPL, circa 1985 by Xilinx_guy · · Score: 3, Informative

    I met Sally (briefly) at JPL, after her 1984 Challenger mission. My impression was of someone who was confident, supremely able, and didn't worry a lot how she dressed. I got this impression since she showed up at the lab wearing shorts, and seemed instantly at home, like she'd been working there for years. Her later partnership with Tam was a surprise, since she gave no hint of that during her astronaut years. But yes, getting a ride on the big machine in the early 80's was a very political game, as much about appearances as it was about ability. And ability she had in spades. During the October 84 Challenger mission, all kinds of shit went wrong. An RF antenna cable on the radar overloaded and started arcing, causing the SNR to radically drop. The monitoring equipment at Johnson acted up, showing loss of TDRS downlink data when it was actually fine. I also seem to recall that Sally had to take apart parts of the shuttle with a wrench to get access to the data recorder, because of some malfunction or other. So overall, the mission was a disaster. But Sally took it all in stride. Best wishes, Sally. Some of us remember you.

  15. Re:Safe trip? by Capsaicin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Over the same 20 year period that you have been slipping into ... what should we call it ... spiritualism, my wife has been nursing in ICU and cardiac wards. Though she was raised to be religious, the many deaths she has witnessed have moved her from the "imaginary" position (to quote OP) to one more in keeping with the available evidence: that is something not dissimilar from OP's observation that "personality [is] dissolved into nothingness at the moment the brain's broke connection with one another."

    Despite all the chatter of "weird unexplainable shit" happening, no-one has yet been able to provide any persuasive evidence of human consciousness existing absent a functioning human brain.

    Old man, after you die, chances are you won't be aware that the surprise never came.

    --
    Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
  16. The cat food can by andyring · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wow. I'm honestly quite surprised at what is a fairly high level of vitriol over what people choose to believe or not believe from a religious standpoint. C'mon, people. Can't we just let someone hold their religious beliefs without going out of our way to mock and deride them because you think you know better?

    Ponder your cat. It has it's own world, it lives life freely, is fairly intelligent. It can plan, make decisions, etc. And yet it is not remotely possible for that kitty to understand, when you open the cat food can, how that food got there. All kitty understands is that you open the can and the food is simply there. Kitty's mind is not able to comprehend how that cat food came to be created, how it was packaged, labeled, transported, sold, etc. Kitty's brain isn't capable of understanding it. To kitty, it's not even a known unknown, it's an unknown unknown (to use some military/war/intelligence terminology).

    Why couldn't us mere humans be the same way? Why couldn't there be a God or similar being whose entire existence completely and totally transcends ours? I realize that *could* open the face-two-mirrors-at-each-other paradox, but lets set that aside for the moment. To put it simply - just because you cannot conclusively prove that a God does not exist DOES NOT mean that God doesn't exist.

    1. Re:The cat food can by gumpish · · Score: 2

      To put it simply - just because you cannot conclusively prove that a God does not exist DOES NOT mean that God doesn't exist.

      Russell's teapot

      To put it simply - just because you cannot conclusively prove that an invisible Bob Newhart is not trying to steal your brain DOES NOT mean that he isn't.

  17. Re:Safe trip? by gumpish · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I like how you gloss over the fact that science has been quite successful at ushering members of the set of inexplicable things to the set of understood phenomena.

    I for one am glad that there are rational humans who chafe at the inexplicable - that's what drives them to discovery.

    I would rather have progress than convenient, reassuring bedtime stories.

  18. Re:Safe trip? by fructose · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Original story submitter, here. I am an atheist, but I don't believe that death=nonexistence. Her accomplishments, her impacts, and her memories will continue to affect others for a long time. In a way she is still with us, especially to those whom she was closest to. Her final flight is in to our collective memories and our history.

  19. Re:Safe trip? by Capsaicin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There is no conclusive evidence of life after death, but there is no evidence of any sort against it. Soon enough you will know, so why fret about it?

    Heinlein misspoke. Surely that should be "there is no evidence of any kind of life after death, but there is no conclusive evidence against it." If I didn't know any better I might think that the author stemmed from a time and place in which the belief in life after death was generally accepted.

    One can postulate any number of imaginary things for which there is no, or cannot be, any evidence of their non-existence. Which is why we usually don't waste too much effort establishing the non-existence of things for which there is no prima facie evidence.

    As regards post-mortem consciousness, we have a) an absence of any empirical evidence, b) no necessary logical inference from the nature of existence and c) a compelling psychological reason for self-deception. Although post-mortem consciousness may not be impossible, we cannot establish at a high probability that it does occur. Thus contra Heinlein, there is no good reason to believe that we will "know" soon enough ... chances are, we simply won't know.

    --
    Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
  20. Re:rest in peace by SternisheFan · · Score: 2

    Yeah, there's a name for it. It's "Hero(ine) Worship.". And the kid in you sure picked a good one to 'idolize'. Sally Ride was tough, advenureous, brave and strong. She had what they call "sand". Grit. True grit, if you will. A fine choice you made.

  21. Re:Not first person in space by colinrichardday · · Score: 2

    I don't discriminate between men and women.

    That doesn't mean no one else does.

  22. Re:Safe trip? by fremsley471 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Several people I have known have appeared to me in my dreams as they died. One recent apparition was during the day, in an idle moment my thoughts were a tumble of old memories of an old acquaintance as they died of cancer (which I was unaware of). They don't haunt me, and only in one case has there been any interaction; someone I went to school with was stabbed, I was shaking him awake in my dreams, although I was 200 miles away at the time. I told his cousin on the Monday morning, after he asked "Did you hear what happened to Mark?" Mark died on the operating table, but was bought back. There have been several other incidences, but nothing supernatural happened when my father died when I was eight, or my mother in my arms a few weeks back.

    These are the most amazing events that have happened in my life. I know that were are more than a bunch cells. However, and it's a big however, I also understand that the most likely explanations are I'm a big, fat liar or it's all just coincidences. It's impossible to refute the first, it's all about that beautiful word, trust. I'm also a scientist and understand the concept of proof and how coincidences work. But we're 30 years on, and still haven't dreamed about Mark again.

  23. Re:Safe trip? by Ultracrepidarian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm an atheist, but have given this a great deal of thought in the last few months since my wife's death after a long illness. My wife is gone, and I shan't see her again, but I can see the imprint she left on those around her. She left this world a better place by inspiring those around her to better things. Perhaps it's just a localized reversal of entropy. Sally Ride was one of those people who has left the wold better than she found it. Some are just along for the ride.

  24. Re:Agressiveness and arrogance prove one is wrong by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

    if you want to get into it, lets go!

    yes, I hate the belief in god. its a weakness, it causes fights and violence due to the us-vs-them syndrome. its more of a means to separate us than to bind us.

    mental illness is mental illness. being in fashion does not excuse the fact that its harmful and is a flaw that should be fixed.

    mass delusion does not mean the masses are correct. the masses were wrong and the size of the gullible group does not make their viewpoints any more correct.

    what else do I hate about the whole religion thing? the fact that we used to (still do, in some places) fear for our lives just by speaking how we feel. do YOU get threatened by staying you believe in sky fairies? no, you don't. you can't understand what its like to be persecuted and threatened with violence simply because you won't buy into the groupthink that everyone else was forced to go along with.

    and yes, its forced. how many children have a free choice in their indoctrination? almost none of them. they get you while you are young, impressionable and defenseless.

    the only difference between a cult and a religion is the size of the groupthink and how many followers they have. we don't 'like' cults but we seem to tolerate religions.

    I hate illogic and intentional misdirection. that is what religion is mostly about and so I do hate it. I hate what it does to people and I hate that its so lodged in society that its near impossible to remove (safely).

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  25. Re:Not even the first *woman* in space by SternisheFan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    American press did not report that fact an awful lot, and U.S. schools really did not teach much to kids of the Soviet space-race achievments, basically only U.S. progress got any airplay during those post cold war days. Not one of our best moments. But that's why it's not as ingrained in the American psyche.