Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Amazon Offers To Help Train Workers For Other Jobs

Posted by Soulskill on from the living-the-dream-at-clown-school dept.

itwbennett writes "Amazon, which has come under attack for harsh warehouse working conditions, on Monday announced a new training benefit program for fulfillment center employees. The program will cover 95% of the cost of vocational training for jobs that Amazon determined to be in high demand and that pay relatively well, including aircraft mechanics, computer-aided design, machine tool technology, medical laboratory science and nursing." Two limitations of note: the maximum Amazon will contribute is $2,000/year for four years, and the employees need to have worked full-time for three consecutive years before they can take advantage of the program.

42 of 148 comments (clear)

  1. Yikes... by SomePgmr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Three full years in an Amazon.com warehouse? From the stories, that sounds like a death sentence.

    1. Re:Yikes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What do you expect Amazon to do? Give a free full ride to anyone who asks? In order to stay in business, amazon must turn a profit, and in order to do that, it must maintain a level of productive throughput at an affordable price.

      Sure, the work sucks, but it is the work that customers are willing to pay for. Sure, it takes three years before the education options become available, but were it not for this offer, people who can't find any better-paying work would only have lifelong debt as their alternative.

      The only thing forcing Amazon to do this at all is public sentiment. If you don't think it is enough, feel free to tell Amazon that as you boycott them.

    2. Re:Yikes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If Amazon improves working conditions and/or pays more, and must charge more to cover the costs, then competitors like walmart, sears, target, etc can suddenly start undercutting Amazon in price. Of course, they will do so by having the same low-waged working situation that Amazon does now.

      In order to compete against them despite the higher prices, Amazon will basically have to convince droves of potential customers to buy humanitarianism along with their products. Do you think they can pull that off?

      Maybe a few noble souls are like you, and don't mind paying more. The majority of people are too ignorant to know the difference, or too apathetic to care, and just buy cheap.

      If you can figure out how to make the masses care (and act), you could accomplish a whole lot more than the improving of working conditions at Amazon.

    3. Re:Yikes... by datavirtue · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Philosophy doesn't work on the pocketbook over the whole economy. People buy the cheapest available equivalent product, period. I always chuckle when I see "buy local" signs because it is such a naive idea that is completely detached from reality. How do I know that when buying local that I'm really creating any benefit? I find it silly to adjust my spending based on something that is not rooted in obvious economic value. If you want better treatment for workers there are two possibilities: unions or government regulation. The government union/regulation introduces the economic incentive to act in the interests of the workers.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    4. Re:Yikes... by blackraven14250 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Bush took away the ability for student loans to be discharged during bankruptcy in 2005, and that move has been criticized heavily since then. Discharging student loan debt isn't some grand new concept - it's going back to the way things were before some idiot fucked it up.

    5. Re:Yikes... by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      erm After 3 months you would consider paying your employees to learn skills needed to leave your service?

      At this point you wouldn't even have covered the cost of training let alone the cost of hiring new employees, and you're already ensuring that they will have a very short tenure with you.

      Reasonable and generous? Hell I've never heard of someone being paid to learn something unrelated to their current career by their current employer.

    6. Re:Yikes... by rtfa-troll · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I will agree with your comment that government involvement, however imperfect, is probably needed. A free market requires full information and it is almost impossible for people to understand how things are produced without somebody outside the companies following up, checking and ensuring that information gets from the production to the consumer. Unfortunately, the current situation is that the people in government are of the "government is for the companies" or "government doesn't work" persuasion and are setting out to prove it. Food labelling means that something which is labelled as "strawberry flavour yoghurt" can have nothing to do with strawberries. At one point the US government was trying to make it impossible to label meat as growth hormone free. For now at least you need to do something yourself. If nothing else so that some of the small, traditional or careful producers continue to exist when / if your government wakes up. Look at how fat most Americans are; understand most nations are catching up. That is, at least partly, the effect of eating crap. Eat better food and it will be better for you.

      [...] People buy the cheapest available equivalent product, period. I always chuckle when I see "buy local" signs because it is such a naive idea that is completely detached from reality. How do I know that when buying local that I'm really creating any benefit? I find it silly to adjust my spending based on something that is not rooted in obvious economic value.[...]

      No; you buy the cheapest available product; I buy local sometimes. Most importantly, I try to buy conciously most of the stuff that I buy. Learn about the products where you can. How do you know you are creating benefit? Go and visit the farm. Seriously. Almost any small producer will be happy to show you around. They will explain many things. Small farms in many countries often have accommodation ("agrotourism") as a side line. Spend a couple of days staying there, seeing what they do. When you know your farmer personally you will be much more likely to trust him.

      For some things local just isn't relevant. When you buy products with the real Fair Trade logo then you can be pretty sure it's better than the alternative. Partly this is better for the farmers. Also the certification includes production standards which are likely better for you. Just beware that there are some fake Fair Trade style groups (the "Rainforest Alliance" and "Fair Trade USA" and so on) which you should only buy when there is no alternative.

      How about for example toys? Everybody keeps complaining about how terrible "Chinese" plastic toys are. Then they complain when there is a recall with lead paint. Tell your friends and especially family that you don't accept cheap plastic toys. Buy Lego. They have completely different levels of product safety. The quality is also better; you will still find your kid playing with stuff five years later where normal toys seem to last about a week.

      Basically, what I'm saying: there are economic factors you don't see. Products which make you sick cost you money, it's just that you don't directly see the link. Products which pay their workers more mean your company gets more business; again, this is hard to see but it's a real "economic" factor. "Local" is a useful way to guess that something has them. Specific producers with a brand, a reputation and an interest in quality are another way. Specific labels are yet another way. Try to look not just at the price but the broader economic picture. Think about what hidden costs to you are included in any product and choose the best product.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    7. Re:Yikes... by stephanruby · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What do you expect Amazon to do? Give a free full ride to anyone who asks?

      But that's the thing, their temps didn't ask for a full ride, nor did they ask for extra training. They only asked for the dock doors to be opened so they get could get some ventilation in.

      So not only, Amazon didn't respond to the issue at hand, the fact that their people are getting heat strokes. They're not even addressing the right people. It's not their "full-time employees" that are getting heat strokes, it's mostly their temporary employees that are getting them because it's their temps that are the most vulnerable in the company.

      And not only, are they not addressing the main complaint that managers are routinely bullying their employees during the height of their heat strokes to sign papers saying that the root cause of their heat strokes are not work-related, but now they're trying to regurgitate those same manufactured statistics back to the public -- in the form of even vaguer comparisons -- as if they had not even read the original complaints against them.

      What the hell are their PR people doing? Are they so out of touch? There are a thousand ways the company could have responded better to these criticisms.

    8. Re:Yikes... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I always chuckle when I see "buy local" signs because it is such a naive idea that is completely detached from reality. How do I know that when buying local that I'm really creating any benefit?

      Seems like a cynical view to me, and almost certainly incorrect. I often buy local if I can, for various definitions of local.

      I tend to buy local (same county) for bread, flour, beer (often), cider (occasionally--I don't drink much) and a few other things where possible. The products are frequently fresher/better/more unique and interesting first, and secondly, I happen to like living somewhere where not everything is homogonised into a few very large national brands.

      I buy fruit and veg local if possible, frmo my home country next and wider Europe next. I try to avoid buying much from further afield. The benefits are that actually, if you restrict yourself to seasonal stuff it tends to be better and it just seems wasteful to eat asparagus air-freighted from Peru.

      It means I also have a smaller environmental impact and support local and regional businesses.

      I also avoid Tesco and Sainsbury's because they're evil, and I let the presence of independent shops and other supermarkets influence my decision on where to move house to.

      There's not point in complaining about such things going bad if one isn't prepared to do something about it.

      If you don't act on them, then principles are merely fond notions.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    9. Re:Yikes... by RaceProUK · · Score: 2

      $13USD shipping

      Then select a cheaper shipping option.

      --
      No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
    10. Re:Yikes... by dkleinsc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, the work sucks, but it is the work that customers are willing to pay for.

      Probably not. If Amazon is like most companies, if you doubled the money spent on all hourly workers (either doubling wages, or spending money on improved working conditions, or hiring more workers, etc) involved in the product, it would probably make a difference of maybe $0.20 per item (I can't provide exact estimates here since Amazon refuses to tell anyone how many workers they have, but that's not an unreasonable guess). The effects of this would probably amount to each item being on average $0.10 more expensive, while EPS might be down $0.01 to account for the other $0.10.

      The real story is this: It's possible to make decent money while paying and treating your work force well, and many companies do just that. It's possible to make more money while paying your work force peanuts and treating them like crap. Wall St and upper management don't care about whether they're people end up sick or injured or dead because of poor working conditions so long as (a) there are a bunch of desperate unemployed people to hire, and (b) the cost of doing something to improve things is greater than the cost of the lawsuits, fines, and workers comp premium changes. The difference between the profitability of good guys versus bad guys is built on the backs of lives destroyed. Could you sleep at night knowing you made lots of money by inflicting human suffering on other people?

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    11. Re:Yikes... by danbert8 · · Score: 2

      But dear lord, do you know what UPS workers have to put up with? I can't imagine they are paid much more than the Amazon workers... So you are saying you should pay more for Amazon to treat their employers better, but screw those damn UPS workers, pay them at little as you can.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    12. Re:Yikes... by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 2

      It means I also have a smaller environmental impact

      That's actually up for debate. Transportation costs are only a small fraction of the environmental effect of agriculture, and spreading farming out into lots of smaller, less-efficient operations doesn't necessarily reduce transportation costs.

      There's actually a lot of potential problems with the "buy local" movement... Freakanomics wrote an article about it last year, for instance.

      That being said, if you PREFER local products (I think the Sausage at my local farmer's market is a lot closer to the sausage I grew up with than the stuff in Supermarkets, for instance), then by all means buy them. But don't do so because you assume what you're doing is somehow morally, ethically, fiscally, or environmentally better... In the grand scheme of things, chances are it's not.

      --
      Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
      Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    13. Re:Yikes... by BVis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      After paying salaries, taxes, insurance, unemployment insurance, and vacations, Christmas bonuses, my warehouse workers are a high cost against already low margin sales.

      This assumes you're hiring permanent employees. I'm assuming that you are not based in the USA.

      Salaries - N/A. You cut a check to the temp agency and they pay THEIR employee. Since they take their cut, there is that much less to pay the worker.

      Taxes - 100% of what you pay a temp agency is deductible as a 'business expense'. You don't even have to worry about payroll taxes or paying into that annoying socialist un-American terrorist program called Social Security, either; the temp agency manages that.

      Insurance - Temp employees don't get insurance, apart from what they're entitled to by law. This usually means worker's comp and nothing else. No life insurance, no short- or long- term disability, and DEFINITELY no health insurance.

      Unemployment insurance - The temp agencies pay as little as possible into the pool. This means that every claim gets fought. Temp agencies are notorious for going into these hearings and telling bald-faced lies, because they know that the ex-worker won't be able to prove otherwise. Or, before the worker can file a claim, they offer them an assignment that is either blatantly illegal or they physically cannot accept due to massive safety issues or those pesky 'laws of physics' that prevent you from showing up for an assignment that starts in 20 minutes, when you're 30 minutes away from the location. Then, at the hearing, they'll be able to (technically correctly) argue that you turned down an assignment and therefore voluntarily quit.

      Vacations - Temp employees don't get vacation days. Or any other paid time off. You want a sick day? You're fired. You come in anyway, even though you're so sick you can't do your job? You're fired. Your child dies in an auto accident and you want to go to the funeral? You're fired. You're in an auto accident and are in the hospital with three broken limbs? After you go bankrupt because you can't pay the hospital bill (because of course, you have no health insurance), you're fired.

      Christmas bonuses - That's the funniest thing I've heard all week. NOBODY in the USA gets ANY KIND of bonus anymore, unless you're a C-level executive at a big company, in which case you can get a bonus for keeping expenses down (for example, creating an atmosphere in which you can pay the temp agencies as little as possible, since they're desperate for clients.)

      Exacerbating the problem is the fact that it's 100% legal for your employer to turn to you and say "OK, you're fired, if you want to keep working here, call this temp agency." The company being able to get the same work for less pay is a good enough reason to fire someone, especially in low-skill jobs like warehouse work (since it costs next to nothing to hire a replacement). Technically, since most states are at-will employment states, they don't even need the slightest pretense to fire you. I have literally been told, to my face, when I asked why I was being fired, "We don't have to tell you."

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    14. Re:Yikes... by lessthan · · Score: 2

      to buy humanitarianism along with their products.

      You know, that is an awesome idea. Make it an optional charity thing like McDonald's does. At the check-out page have a box saying "Do you want to contribute to the Amazon Education fund?" At worst, it would produce some interesting statistics about generosity.

        And before I see anyone else do it, I'll bring up unions. This is why they were spread across an entire occupation. That way, no matter where a company went to hire a professional 'X', the company would have to pay the same. To offer lower prices, the company would have to focus on making their processes cheaper, rather than come up with more creative ways to screw their employees. (I say more creative, but it always comes down to more work for less pay.)

      --
      Space Shuttle was a program that strapped humans to an explosion and tried to stab through the sky with fire and math
  2. NYT: Self-Congratulatory Move by Amazon? by theodp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    An Amazon Education: "Sucharita Mulpuru, the retail analyst for Forrester Research, was unimpressed. "It seemed self-congratulatory," she said in an interview. "Most companies, when they treat their workers well, that's just what they do. They don't say, "This is a reason you should do business with us.'"

  3. Re:astounding generosity by TWX · · Score: 2

    Hey, it may be a shit sandwich, but at least it's a sandwich, which is more than they got before...

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  4. This just discourages hiring full-time workers by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 5, Funny

    I imagine we'll see more contract, part-time employees and a rash of mysterious sackable offences from employees at 2 years and 364 days.

    1. Re:This just discourages hiring full-time workers by assertation · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That is probably already the case.

      Hiring people for 39 hours instead of 40 hours a week is the oldest trick in the book for avoiding health coverage costs.

      Hiring temporary/contract people is also fairly standard for shitty working conditions. Such people tend not to have the resources to fight back.

  5. I work here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was a temp, got converted, then hired into IT. Luckily there was a career path I was interested in... Due to what the company is and does, there just isn't much room for upward mobility or different career paths. They listened to the warehouse workers and gave them this option, which everyone loves. You put in your time and do your job, and after three years you can do what you want, and Amazon will pay for it.

  6. So, in comparison by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How well or poorly does NewEgg treat its warehouse workers? How about Overstock, or Buy.com, or any of the other comparable online retailers?

    And really, while people here will complain about Amazon's treatment of its workers - if they have the lowest price, will you truly not buy from them because of it? Or will you just dodge the question and say "XYZ.com always beats them on price anyway, so I shop there"?

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:So, in comparison by SoupIsGood+Food · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How well or poorly does NewEgg treat its warehouse workers? How about Overstock, or Buy.com, or any of the other comparable online retailers?

      Most warehouse work is well paid with reasonable working conditions. An honest day's pay for an honest day's work is something that's fallen out of fashion in the Great Recession - Amazon just took it to the next level, and leveraged its considerable IT expertise to wring every last dime out of people desperate for work. Once the recession fades, they are going to be in real trouble when there's competition for their workforce, their reputation as an employer is permanently stained. If it doesn't fade, the workers will unionize and take what the company refuses to give - fair wages and decent working conditions - and they'll be in even deeper trouble when they can no longer meet their obligations to Prime customers, as the local distribution center is on strike.

  7. That does not compute. by gman003 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "The program will cover 95% of the cost"
    "the maximum Amazon will contribute is $2,000/year for four years"

    2,000 $/yr * 4 yr = .95 X
    X = $8421

    So apparently you can become a trained aircraft mechanic for not much more than $8,000. Which is about 1/3 to 1/4 the cost of a common Bachelor's degree.

    Yeah, either the summary dropped a zero somewhere, aircraft mechanics are trained far less than you would think, or that 95% figure is *way* off.

    1. Re:That does not compute. by ComfortablyAmbiguous · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not to encourage article reading, but they cover 95% of the cost of tuition, up to a maximum of $2000 dollars a year. So if your tuition is $1000 per year ( yea, yea, I know, ridiculously low) they would reimburse you $950. If your tuition is $10,000 a year, you get $2000. What Amazon is willing to pay has nothing to do with what it actually costs. All of which reinforces the fact that this is more of a PR move than a real, viable help with a serious education. There are a number of low-end jobs (yes, even McDonald's) that offer tuition assistance to some degree or the other. This isn't looking like an especially fine deal.

    2. Re:That does not compute. by colinnwn · · Score: 4, Informative

      An Airframe & Powerplant training program that gets you eligible to take the FAA license test takes just under 2 years, and costs between $8,000 for community college programs, up to $30,000 for private schools.

  8. Re:Of course they don't have to keep you employed by TheLink · · Score: 2

    Not much except potential backlash from human customers. Amazon still depends on very many human customers. So they have to boil the frog slowly and carefully.

    They're not far from being able to get rid of most human workers in their warehouses:
    http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/123765-automation-warehouse-robots-come-of-age-as-amazon-buys-kiva/3

    You don't need that much brains to do this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWNuaPE4DTc
    So a more fancy pick-n-place robot could replace the human in that job.

    --
  9. Noticed Between the Lines by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "You should buy stuff from us instead of WalMart because we treat our employees about 50% better than they do."

    separate matter: the folks here who are saying that working three years in a warehouse is a death sentence should get out and meet some real people, and try a bit harder to not be entitled pricks. One caveat: if you do meet a real warehouse worker (or dock worker, or other transportation/inventory logistics person), watch out for your teeth.

    Here's another angle: people who have the self-discipline to work in a tough job like that for at least three years without quitting and going home to live in their parents' basement stand a good chance at managing the demands of the work/school balance and will likely complete their coursework.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:Noticed Between the Lines by SomePgmr · · Score: 2

      As the guy who said it originally, someone who worked in a warehouse, and someone who is surrounded by people that work in warehouses all day, that's precisely what I was getting at. It was about Amazon's working conditions, not a slight against anyone based on their job description.

      I'm not worried about anyone punching me in the mouth, or some random slashdotter getting all indignant about it, but it was worth clarifying. Thanks.

    2. Re:Noticed Between the Lines by assertation · · Score: 2

      Great points, but it sounds like you are the one with the attitude problem.

      I've seen a number of news articles about the lousy working conditions at Amazon over the years so I tend to think that those conditions are real and really bad, not an exagerration of an overpriveleged bacon eating basement living libertarian IT worker.

      Given that it is likely conditions at Amazon are that bad, your anger should be directed at Amazon, not people commentators on Slashdot...........but that wouldn't be as easy.

  10. Only $2k? by fragMasterFlash · · Score: 3, Informative

    US businesses can deduct up to $5250 per employee per year in schedule C federal income tax filings for tuition reimbursement. I guess Amazon would rather pay taxes than help employees realize their full potential.

    1. Re:Only $2k? by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Er, the tax rate is less than 100%. So it is always better to pay tax, than to give away money. In this, case by keep the rest of the money, $3250, they pay a tax of 15% on it, which means they get to keep a lot it.

  11. harsh warehouse working conditions by Osgeld · · Score: 4, Insightful

    sorry, I had been a box monkey for most of my 20's, the work is mindless, dirty, hotter than hell during summer, cold as shit during winter and requires long hours of physical activity and standing on your feet all while getting meh pay...

    and yet whenever you see an amazon warehouse, they have padded mats to stand on, roller tracks, and fairly new equipment and the place is pretty organized and clean... I only had one warehouse job during that time and I considered it pretty cushy ... though a honest days work.

    harsh is trodding a 1,100 lb palette of car batteries 50 yards in 112 degree heat on a palette jack with a lumpy wheel that liked to drag, but I did it for 3 years to keep the rent paid while in school. I would love to see what is harsh is in a state of the art warehouse that's not ran by two hillbilly brothers and only 1 forklift in the building that's busted half the time and a leaky roof.

    yea get off my lawn, but at the same time quit being a pussy, there are a lot tougher jobs out there than box monkey #21.

    1. Re:harsh warehouse working conditions by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      You should have gone on welfare instead. You make more money, and don't have to work. It's nobody's fault but your own you have some sort of bizarre self-sacrificing gene that requires you to do stupid things and complain about it afterwards. There is no glory in work, you're just a tool of the capitalist bankers. Sit back and relax, enjoy wealth redistribution instead.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  12. Re:astounding generosity by Sir_Sri · · Score: 5, Informative

    For some community college programmes that might be reasonable.

    http://www.alameda.peralta.edu/apps/comm.asp?$1=20092

    Lists aviation maintenance technology as a total cost of 3200 dollars including tuition and tools. Which presumably you could do in 1 year straight out of school, or in 2 or 3 if you're working at amazon, but hey, it's better than minimum wage at the end of it, and if you can't get student loans, or don't want to have them or whatever it's a better than nothing option.

    You have to consider what 2000 dollars is relative to their existing pay. Amazon claims their fulfillment centres pay '30% more than a retail job', which are, apparently (http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes412031.htm) 25k. So an employee making ~ 32k is getting offered 2k (tax free? not sure how that's like in the US), so 6% of your pay for a chance to get out of it. And at 32k you can at least live, not live well, but live, and not be in debt at the end of it. It's not spectacular, but it's still a lot of money.

  13. Re:Scam by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 2

    Amazon sells 'how to' books doesn't it?

    Education....solved.

  14. Re:Scam by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

    and a really, really nasty one. Take a look at the 'in demand' jobs. Aircraft Mechanic? CAD? What is this, 1980?

    Actually, those jobs may very well be in demand - aircraft mechanics (remember, Amazon is headquartered in Washington, home of a rather well-known aircraft manufacturer).

    And a good A&P will never be out of work - if you're not working on big iron, there's tons of jets or even little single engine pistons going around.

    These are trade jobs - and for a lot of university bound students, they may be better off doing a trade than getting a university degree and debt. Depending on the trade, you can make quite a bit of money at it as well.

    Considering a warehouse fulfillment job is a no/low-skill job, being able to get trade education is extremely valuable. I'm sure Amazon would allow you to learn to be an electrician, plumber, as well.

  15. Re:astounding generosity by jhoegl · · Score: 2

    and when it comes time to get a raise, they can hold this over your head.
    Id rather take a 2k/yr raise than this BS.

  16. Re:Scam by J.+T.+MacLeod · · Score: 5, Informative

    Did you even read the article?

    It's not a diploma mill. Amazon is funding tuition for any accredited school, as long as the coursework is in the list of in-demand fields. There aren't kickbacks (Although if there were, so what? It would just mean it's not as generous, not that it's a scam.).

    Amazon is also willing to pay for 95% of the cost, up to their annual limit. At a community college, that will generally cover everything. There is no saddling anyone with ridiculous debt.

    This is a genuinely good program. There is no scam or any taking advantage of anyone. How did you even invent this in your imagination?

  17. Amazon is switching to robots by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative

    Amazon just bought Kiva Systems, which makes warehouse fulfillment system robots. Kiva already powers orders from major brands including Crate and Barrel, Soap.com, Dillards, Drugstore.com, Gap, Office Depot, Saks, Staples, Timberland, Toys-R-Us, and Walgreens. This is what order fulfillment is like with those robots. It takes about two minutes to learn the job and there is no chance for advancement.

    The people being "retrained" will be laid off soon.

    1. Re:Amazon is switching to robots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I really don't think this has anything to do with personal development as much as it has to do with the upcoming cattle call for peak season.This is more or less another carrot to dangle since it's getting harder to get people to come back. People don't like being led on and generally treated like shit from managers that act as if they are running a military operation.It gets old after the first week or so. I spent a few years there and still feel bad for the way temps. were treated. I've seen Kiva in action and am not at all impressed - lot of down time.

  18. McDonalds, UPS.... by sonamchauhan · · Score: 4, Informative

    Educational assistance is fairly common...

    McDonalds, UPS...
    http://work.lifegoesstrong.com/article/don-t-turn-your-back-free-education

    "McDonald's tuition assistance program will reimburse up to $5,250 a year (which is the maximum IRS exemption), and $2,000 for part-time employees, which in effect adds two dollars an hour to someone's earnings. UPS has a program called Earn and Learn where students can have their tuition, expenses and transportation paid for if they work a part-time schedule; since 1999, UPS has paid out more than $47 million in tuition assistance alone."

    B&N
    http://www.barnesandnobleinc.com/jobs/benefits/benefits.html

    "Continuing Education
    Our continuing education program offers full-time booksellers tuition assistance if you choose to further your business career by taking courses toward a job-related degree. "

  19. Re:Scam by bitingduck · · Score: 2

    These are trade jobs - and for a lot of university bound students, they may be better off doing a trade than getting a university degree and debt. Depending on the trade, you can make quite a bit of money at it as well.

    Considering a warehouse fulfillment job is a no/low-skill job, being able to get trade education is extremely valuable. I'm sure Amazon would allow you to learn to be an electrician, plumber, as well.

    And many of those trade jobs are hard to offshore. Electrician can be a pretty decent job, and it's always hard to get good machinists and tool makers.