Slashdot Mirror


Feds Ban 'Buckyballs' Magnets

SicariusMan writes "Looks like warnings and other precautions were not enough to save Buckyballs Magnets. According to this report, the Consumer Product Safety Commission is concerned about the increase in children swallowing the rare earth magnets, and has issued its first stop-sale order in 11 years. Amazon and others have already agreed to stop selling the toys. 'Although the commission issued a safety alert in November, it has received more than a dozen reports since then of children ingesting the magnets, with many requiring surgery, it said. More than 2 million Buckyballs and at least 200,000 Buckycubes, a similar cube-shaped magnet, have been sold in the United States.'"

31 of 820 comments (clear)

  1. My stockpiling has paid off! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thanks to Woot! I now own several million Buckyball magnets. I was waiting for the rare Earth metal market to skyrocket before cashing in, but this may be my chance. Hello Ebay!

  2. Blackmarket Buckyballs by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Funny

    Soon we'll be battling the Buckyball cartels in the streets of America. I say end prohibition now!

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:Blackmarket Buckyballs by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Funny


      First they took away the Buckyball magnets from the Communists,
      and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Communist.

      Then they took away the Buckyball magnets from the the trade unionists,
      and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.

      Then they took away the Buckyball magnets from the Jews,
      and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew.

      Then they came for my Buckyball magnets
      and there was no one left with any Buckyball magnets to speak out for me.

      Or perhaps


      Those who would give up Buckyball magnets to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Buckyball magnets nor Safety

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  3. Re:Only in America! by Brandano · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Something that can be dangerous when grossly misused can be outright banned.

    Unless it's a weapon

  4. Glad I already have mine... by The+Raven · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have 7 sets of them. Well... technically about 6.7 sets. It's hard not to lose one here or there when you play with them nearly daily. I'm just glad that I got them now, before the ban... they are my third favorite toy, behind my computer and my phone. I make bracelets out of multiple colors as transient art (lost as soon as they stretch out and get rearranged), play with them on my desk, and use them as temporary tie tacks if I leave my mine at home.

    Yes, tie tack. Don't knock it, it works!

    --
    "I will trust Google to 'do no evil' until the founders no longer run it." Hello Alphabet.
  5. How many... by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The article states that dozens of children have swallowed the magnets and 12 required surgery. There are over 60M children age 14 and younger in the US. Isn't this a bit of an over-reaction? I'm curious as to how many children have had problems after swalling coins and other items that people may have on their desk (ie paper clips, thumb tacks, etc.)?

    Seems the shootings in Colorado hurt a lot more people, but for some reason, they haven't banned the sale of bullets.

  6. Alternative Toy by Solstice · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like I'll just have to get my kid Lawn Darts for Christmas instead.

  7. Re:First my beloved Viper fighter, now this by darkpixel2k · · Score: 5, Funny

    How about a ban on stupid trailer-park dumbass kids who ruin it for the rest of us?

    They already tried that. You may have heard of "Planned Parenthood"...

    --
    There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
  8. Re: stupid trailer-park dumbass kids by macraig · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I modded you flamebait, but decided I'd rather tell you to your face that this comment is every bit as ignorant and prejudiced as any I've heard uttered by the so-called trailer trash I've encountered. I don't know if this really reflects your beliefs or you're just trying to be controversial, but at face value that's stereotypical trailer-trash talk.

  9. I'm not saying.. by HexKrak · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm not saying lets kill all the stupid people, I'm just suggesting we remove all the warning labels and let nature sort it out.

  10. Zen Magnets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I think the sales of Zen Magnets are about to increase...

    (For those who don't know, Zen Magnets are *exactly* the same thing as buckyballs except for a very slight increase in quality and price. That would also mean they'd be more dangerous due to higher magnetic strength.)

  11. Re:First my beloved Viper fighter, now this by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Fucking crazy. Some schizophrenic lunatic can buy thousands of rounds of ammunition of the Internet, but God forbid anyone should buy a Buckyball magnet.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  12. Re:Here come the lawsuits... by Anpheus · · Score: 5, Informative

    My understanding is that it is different, the intestine isn't blocked, but actually ruptured because the magnets pull through it.

  13. Re:Seriously by bennomatic · · Score: 5, Informative

    These are small and unusually powerful magnets. Swallow one, and then another a half-hour later (or any time before passing the first), and they will pull together, pinching your internal organs, and they'll never come out without invasive surgery.

    A normal magnet, if swallowed, will just pass. And if it's big enough to have the same pull that these rare earth magnets have, it'll be uncomfortable enough during the swallowing that most kids won't do it twice, so that pinching thing likely won't happen.

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
  14. Re:First my beloved Viper fighter, now this by AK+Marc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not the kids, or even their parents that are banning this stuff.

    It's the parents who killed their kids who are looking to blame others that are calling for the ban. The government didn't call for the ban. There wasn't an independent investigation that found them unsafe. It was parents begging the government to ban them that got them looked at. And the democratic government looked at the wishes of the citezens and responded.

    The issue is either that democracy is bad, or the parents are to blame.

  15. Re:First my beloved Viper fighter, now this by geekoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The kids aren't dumb asses. Kids are kids. Young kids put things in their mouth, it's human nature. Dumb ass parents, and dumb ass owns of these magnets are why it happens.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  16. Re:First my beloved Viper fighter, now this by v1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I found a load of these on the ground in a park. Never mind how they got there, how do you expect children to read the warning which isn't present with these things?

    Never mind that nail, rock, and used condom over there on the ground. What if someone's kid picks that up and tries to swallow it? Lets ban all that stuff!

    No. How about you teach your kid common sense and save the entire world the trouble of looking after them for you? I'm not going to run around the world slapping warning labels on stuff for your kid that may not even be old enough to read yet.

    "Don't childproof the world - worldproof the child."

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  17. Re:First my beloved Viper fighter, now this by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

    nail, rock, and used condom...

    Call me old fashioned, but I always preferred rock, paper, scissors.

  18. Re:Here come the lawsuits... by Petron · · Score: 5, Informative

    Buckyballs are *NOT* for kids!

    They are marketed to adults. Designed for adults. There are 6 warnings on the package, instructions, plastic storage box, etc that is so expressive, it's to the point where I'm not sure a child should LOOK at it. Really, above and beyond on warnings that kids should not go near these things.

    --
    if (it != oneThing) it = another;
  19. Re:First my beloved Viper fighter, now this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The best part is when the dumbasses say things like "we did much worse things in my day and *I* survived!". Of course you survived, you fucking asshole, all the kids who didn't aren't here to say they died.

  20. Re:First my beloved Viper fighter, now this by Dahamma · · Score: 5, Funny

    Rock dulls nail, condom covers rock, nail breaks condom!

  21. Re:First my beloved Viper fighter, now this by pla · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The kids aren't dumb asses. Kids are kids. Young kids put things in their mouth, it's human nature. Dumb ass parents, and dumb ass owns of these magnets are why it happens.

    So if parents ignore age rating on a goddamned dildo, can we sue the manufacturer for child sexual abuse?

    At some point, it comes down to "don't be an idiot". If you buy your kids a gun and they blow their heads off - don't blame Remington, try a frickin' mirror.

  22. Re:First my beloved Viper fighter, now this by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I couldn't disagree more. Buckyballs are not toys for kids. They're toys intended for adults, marketed for adults. Arguing that they should be banned because kids play with them and get hurt is just as nonsensical as arguing that the Ferrari should be banned because parents can give their five-year-olds the car keys and those kids can drive the car off a cliff. There is zero difference. Both are toys designed for adults, and clearly labeled as such.

    These products already have prominent warning labels on their packages saying that these are dangerous when swallowed, and that they are not intended for children under 13 years of age. Most kids stop swallowing random objects by about age three, so that's a solid ten year safety margin. To the extent that some of them might have been sold prior to when that warning label was added, they should be held liable for any injuries resulting from those early sales. However, it is not the CPSC's responsibility to protect parents who are so clueless that they buy a product that is clearly marked for ages 13+ and give it to a two-year-old. The only way to achieve such a standard would be to ban all toys designed for children over three years of age. No sane person would say that this is a good idea.

    As for younger kids getting their hands on them accidentally, it is the parents' responsibility to watch their kids, and to ensure that anything potentially dangerous is kept out of reach. You don't see people trying to ban household cleansers because kids can be killed by drinking them. You don't see people trying to ban all medications because kids can climb into the medicine cabinet and OD. And yet all of these are things that children of the very same age do. There really is absolutely no difference here. The products are properly labeled, so to the extent that there is a problem, in much the same way as we have poison control ads, the right solution is public service announcements to educate the public about the risks of kids swallowing magnets, not a ban on the products.

    Oh, and more importantly, educate doctors, nurses, and poison control centers so that when you ask them if you should worry after a kid swallows one of these things, they immediately tell you to go count them and make damn sure the kid swallowed only one.

    People trying to get products banned because of egregious misuse and abuse are what drives us rapidly towards being a nanny state in which anything interesting, useful, or fun is outlawed to protect us from our own stupidity. That isn't a world I want to live in.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  23. Re:First my beloved Viper fighter, now this by Gaerek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I agree, this isn't a case of "It's a dangerous product!" It's a case of parents who don't read warnings and let their kids have access to something that clearly isn't safe for them. According to a quick Google search in 2002, over 1 million children were hospitalized due to accidental poisoning, and in 2001, 96 were killed as a result. Following the lead of the Buckyball ban, let's ban all substances that can poison a child! http://www.preventinjury.org/PDFs/POISONING.pdf

  24. Re:First my beloved Viper fighter, now this by The+Rizz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Banning the sales of ammo would be unconstitutional, regardless of any statistic.

    So what you're saying is that someone needs to make a gun that shoots Buckyballs, and then we can buy them again?

  25. Re:First my beloved Viper fighter, now this by dark12222000 · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's called a right to bear arms. It's a right because it was considered necessary for the defense of our basic rights.

    In addition, most gun related homicides stem from drug or gang violence - and a large percentage of those cases are using illegally obtained firearms.

    Some of those "homicides" (depending on the statistic set you're using) may be self defense cases.

    So, I'm going to argue that we shouldn't be banning magnets just because some kid is stupid enough to swallow one. I'm also going to argue that banning guns, opposed to banning Bucky balls, does more harm then good, if only because gun ownership does not correlate with homicide.. (Some recent numbers for you)

  26. Re:Is surgery really needed? by makomk · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes, the surgery is needed. If swallowed the magnetic balls stick together through the intestine walls, cutting off circulation and eventually punching holes in the intestines through which the intestinal contents leak into the abdomen. That's just a little fatal without surgery.

  27. Re:First my beloved Viper fighter, now this by starburst · · Score: 5, Informative

    According to Alive Past 5 .com

    The Top Five Causes Of Unintentional Injury involving children:

    1. Car Accidents: Kill 260,000 children a year and injure about 10 million children. They are the leading cause of death among children and a leading cause of child disability.
    2. Drowning: Kills more than 175,000 children annually. Up to 3 million children each year survive a drowning incident. Due to brain damage in some survivors, nonfatal drowning has the highest average lifetime health and economic impact of any type of child injury.
    3. Burns: Fire-related burns kill nearly 96,000 children a year.
    4. Falls: Nearly 47,000 children fall to their deaths every year, but hundreds of thousands more children sustain serious injuries from a fall.
    5. Poisoning: More than 45,000 children die each year from unintended poisoning.

    Looks like there is a whole lot more that needs to be banned, or re-labeled. Think of the children.

  28. Re:First my beloved Viper fighter, now this by sumdumass · · Score: 5, Informative

    Automatic weapons are not banned. Whoever gave you that idea. I have two of them sitting beside me right now. Well, actually, they are locked in my gun safe but all you need to do is get a tax stamp for them. I suggest you stop imagining things and take a trip to the machine gun festival and see how many private citizens own fully auto weapons. You might be surprised to find that ordinary citizens can and do own explosives too.

  29. Re:First my beloved Viper fighter, now this by MHolmesIV · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sorry, it's you who didn't read the facts here. This administrative action is against _all_ buckyballs, not just the old 13+ ones (which were fixed in 2010)

    You're looking at 2 year old actions and assuming they relate to today's one, but they're only tangentially related.

    Here's the press release about the current action: http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml12/12234.html
    You'll note that in this release they point out that in both the previous actions, the company was cooperative. That is also pointed out in the actual complaint here: http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml12/12234.pdf

    The founder's bizzarre political allegations aside, they are not being misleading about the CPSC complaint.

  30. Re:First my beloved Viper fighter, now this by couchslug · · Score: 5, Informative

    "So what you're saying is that someone needs to make a gun that shoots Buckyballs, and then we can buy them again?"

    They already do!

    A "T"-size steel shotgun pellet is about Buckyball size. I don't have a reloading press or any Buckyballs to load, but it would be interesting to shoot a few rounds loaded with nonmagnetic steel shot and compare their pattern on target to that of Buckyballs.

    http://www.thefirearmsforum.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=52612&stc=1&d=1318459735

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."