Slashdot Mirror


Are Indian High Schoolers Manning Your IBM Help Desk?

theodp writes "IBM CEO Virginia M. Rometty's Big Blue bio boasts that she led the development of IBM Global Delivery Centers in India. In his latest column, Robert X. Cringely wonders if customers of those centers know what they're getting for their outsourcing buck. 'Right now,' writes Cringely, 'IBM is preparing to launch an internal program with the goal of increasing in 2013 the percentage of university graduates working at its Indian Global Delivery Centers (GDCs) to 50 percent. This means that right now most of IBM's Indian staffers are not college graduates. Did you know that? I didn't. I would be very surprised if IBM customers knew they were being supported mainly by graduates of Indian high schools.'"

52 of 237 comments (clear)

  1. No shit sherlock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You don't need a college degree to know how to work a phone. I know the HR hysteria in the USA would have you believe otherwise, but trust me! It's not that hard...

    1. Re:No shit sherlock by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Funny

      You don't need a college degree to know how to work a phone. I know the HR hysteria in the USA would have you believe otherwise, but trust me! It's not that hard...

      Haven't seen the dang phone system we just had bestowed upon us, have you? Geez. Why not just drill my skull and put an implant in and get rid of this Cisco stuff.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:No shit sherlock by JDG1980 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You don't need a college degree to know how to work a phone. I know the HR hysteria in the USA would have you believe otherwise, but trust me! It's not that hard...

      But one of the big justifications for outsourcing call centers to India was that you could get college-educated workers for cheap. If you're going to be staffing the call centers with people who have just a high school education, then you might as well do that in the United States and not deal with the language/accent barrier. Workers without a college degree are cheap enough in America as it is. Moreover, it's strongly implied that IBM is misrepresenting the educational level of the employees in these outsourced call centers. Regardless of whether workers in call centers should need a college degree, it's not kosher to say or imply that your workers do when in fact they don't.

    3. Re:No shit sherlock by jo42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, but some fumbducktard MBA decided that you need a college degree to follow a script to deal with support issues.

      Have you ever tried to call one of these help desks -- and get any real help? You're better off wacking yourself over the head with a 2x4 repeatedly.

    4. Re:No shit sherlock by hawguy · · Score: 5, Informative

      You don't need a college degree to know how to work a phone. I know the HR hysteria in the USA would have you believe otherwise, but trust me! It's not that hard...

      But one of the big justifications for outsourcing call centers to India was that you could get college-educated workers for cheap. If you're going to be staffing the call centers with people who have just a high school education, then you might as well do that in the United States and not deal with the language/accent barrier.

      You're missing the cheap part -- highschool grads in India are cheaper than high school grads in the USA. That's why they deal with the language/culture/accent barrier.

      Workers without a college degree are cheap enough in America as it is.

      Pay range for entry level agents in India is $200 - $350/month. Where are these cheap Americans that will work for $1.75/hour?

      Moreover, it's strongly implied that IBM is misrepresenting the educational level of the employees in these outsourced call centers. Regardless of whether workers in call centers should need a college degree, it's not kosher to say or imply that your workers do when in fact they don't.

      Where is this implied? I never assume that first level tech support agents will have any kind of relevant college degree - they all seem to follow a script (and I wish they'd just publish the scripts online so I could follow them myself).

    5. Re:No shit sherlock by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Pay range for entry level agents in India is $200 - $350/month Where are these cheap Americans that will work for $1.75/hour?

      That may be so, but American companies that contract with Indian outsource firms are *certainly* paying more than that.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    6. Re:No shit sherlock by hawguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Pay range for entry level agents in India is $200 - $350/month Where are these cheap Americans that will work for $1.75/hour?

      That may be so, but American companies that contract with Indian outsource firms are *certainly* paying more than that.

      And American companies that pay their call center agents $10/hour are still billing them out for more than that to account for benefits and overhead (including agent training, facilities, administration, etc). But since nearly everything is cheaper in India, the final bill rate for an Indian call center agent still ends up being less than an American call center agent.

    7. Re:No shit sherlock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So then... Because I-BM finds yet another way to circumvent the labor laws of the US Americans should sit quietly?

      I realize they are one of many corps that justify their actions by citing the corporate manifesto of profits over patriotism but that won't stop people like me calling as it is.

    8. Re:No shit sherlock by larry+bagina · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Pay range for entry level agents in India is $200 - $350/month. Where are these cheap Americans that will work for $1.75/hour?

      They're in 1971. Where minimum wage was $1.60/hour. $200/month isn't good or bad in and of itself, only relative to the cost of living. Rampant inflation has fucked us up the ass like Jerry Sandusky in the shower with a 10-year-old boy.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    9. Re:No shit sherlock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is the point.

      Indians will work for pennies on the dollar. Hell you can outsource to Canada for cheaper than the US and not get the entire culture/accent barrier. Trust me worked in a outsourced call center, twice. My jobs got sent to India and the Philippines.

      As a native English speaker, I can certainly attest to the amount of abuse Americans hurl at those they suspect of not being American. Canadians don't get nearly as much abuse unless they sound Indian or Asian. There were representatives who came from the Arab world with weak accents who get subjected to so much racist shit because of 9/11.

      If you, as a business owner, want to outsource here's some simple rules to keep everyone happy:
      1. Outsource only non-core business. Customer Support and Technical Support are core businesses in ALL businesses that offer a service.
      2. Outsource only material that if it fell into a criminal's hands, they would be unable to use. So for example you should NEVER outsource billing/payments. Because companies like Verizon and AT&T run credit, they should absolutely NOT be doing this from outsourced centers, since stealing the data is worth almost 10 years worth of pay. Much of this problem is how SSN's are used as part of phone authentication process, and americans don't even question it. If a government policy banning the use of SSN's for ALL non-IRS purposes, many companies would be up shit creek.
      3. Outsource non-core work. So for example if your company has a website that doesn't have customer interaction, you can probably outsource this. As soon as a credit card is required, this work must be done in-house. Outsource basic customer support to in-house forum systems (eg your customers are also your customer support) and then just employ in house staff to make sure things stay sane.

      One of the most frequent problems I notice, is how understaffed companies become once they outsource. This is because they try to replace inhouse staff with outsourced staff on a 1:1 ratio when this isn't anywhere near the requirement.

      Your in-house staff likely has experience, or training with your products and services first hand. Your outsourced support staff only has documentation to work from. When I worked for the mobile phone company, they provided us with exactly one mobile phone... for the entire call center of 500 people. And since they don't provide service here, we couldn't even use the phone for any level of troubleshooting. There were countless times where simply having the equipment available would have been useful. They could have setup a pico-cell inside the call center so that troubleshooting could be done directly on the network and not having to relay through several layers of people. So if you're paying one US citizen 20$/hr to do this, they may be the first and last contact. But when you're paying someone in Canada, India, China, whatever, 1/3rd or less (The going rate in Canada is upwards of 12$/hr) you end up needing three or four times as many staff because the staff are unable to troubleshoot problems because they aren't in the customers location. Basically anytime you have a technical problem with a mobile device, you're much better off taking it to the company owned store (more on that in a moment) and having them call dealer customer support using the internal number that bypasses the outsourced centers.

      Also I worked the warranty exchange queue for business. That was a load of fun. Now remember what I said above about being better off taking devices to a company owned store? Well some people don't know the difference between a dealer and a company owned store. So you get lots of people who buy the most profitable phone for the dealer, calling in when the device breaks, and being told to return it to the dealer. The problem is that dealers make commission, so if you return a device, they lose their commission. So they will pretty much waste your time or charge you a fee for returning the item. Some of them get told to do a warranty exchange... even when the device i

    10. Re:No shit sherlock by hawguy · · Score: 2

      So then... Because I-BM finds yet another way to circumvent the labor laws of the US Americans should sit quietly?

      I realize they are one of many corps that justify their actions by citing the corporate manifesto of profits over patriotism but that won't stop people like me calling as it is.

      They aren't circumventing the labor laws of the USA -- they are working within the labor laws in India. Even though I work in a job that is often outsourced I don't think that outsourcing should be banned - in many cases it makes a lot of sense, in others not so much. I try to make sure I keep skills and knowledge that is hard to outsource.

    11. Re:No shit sherlock by msauve · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd rather get support from a HS grad who knows the product, than someone with a masters in anthropology, who doesn't.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    12. Re:No shit sherlock by tsotha · · Score: 3, Informative

      You wouldn't do that, not because US high school graduates are too expensive, but because a US high school degree isn't a good indication of literacy. Maybe in India a high school degree means something (I don't know one way or another). But in the US, a BS is the new high school diploma.

    13. Re:No shit sherlock by funwithBSD · · Score: 3, Informative

      Except that is exactly what IBM is doing in the GDF centers (Fishkill, Dubuque, Colombia)

      They are hiring high school grads and putting them in first line jobs. If they stick with it, and get their certs/education (certs are provided by IBM) they can move up in the system. (I joined with no degree, although I have one now. I was not a entry level position either)

      The pay is somewhere in the $10 to $15 range, and yes, it is hard to get people to sign on at that wage.

      These resources are replacing India resources as those resources are getting harder to get. Not surprisingly, years of outsourcing to India has built an in country demand. The best and brightest head there because the hours are better, and often the pay is better too.

      As for the Indian work quality... it varies. I have worked with some that were as good as any US tech, and some that are mere chair warmers.
      It definitely takes 2 to 4 to match a quality US resources, but you can afford to do that.

      Any customer can demand US only resources if they are willing to pay for it... but they are willing to do so.

      The GDF centers get US resources in close parity, a 15 to 25% premium. Many customers are opting to use those resources in place of overseas resources. Work is still shipped over there in "backoffice" type support of the US based teams, such as provisioning of disk, etc, but the customer is not in contact with them.

      There is also a growing need for "US Only" based on regulations. Governments are expanding regulations to require data and systems are handled by US citizens only because of the nature of the data. That is a fast growing quarter.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    14. Re:No shit sherlock by doesnothingwell · · Score: 2

      Americans that will work for $1.75/hour?

      If my healthcare was covered %100, no transportation costs, and my taxes were 0%, I could do it without a family in tow. But I'm not going to work balls to the wall at that rate.

      --
      They can have my command prompt when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
    15. Re:No shit sherlock by realityimpaired · · Score: 2

      Indians will work for pennies on the dollar. Hell you can outsource to Canada for cheaper than the US and not get the entire culture/accent barrier. Trust me worked in a outsourced call center, twice. My jobs got sent to India and the Philippines.

      Maybe in the past, but certainly not now. When the Canadian dollar was worth about $0.65 US it made economic sense. Now that the Canadian dollar is brushing against parity, some days worth more some days worth slightly less than the US dollar, it doesn't make economic sense for a US company to outsource to Canada at all. Canada has a higher minimum wage than the US, and requires more benefits be paid. The only thing that made it economical in the past was that our dollar was worth so much less than the US dollar. The only places in Canada where it's economical to outsource call center jobs are economically depressed areas where they can get away with paying minimum wage. Even then, it's pushing it... minimum wage, even in poor/economically depressed parts of Ontario or Manitoba is $10/hr, and the same work could be done in central Ohio for $7.85/hr. Here in Ottawa, where the unemployment rate is the lowest in the country and even a call center employee can reasonably expect $15/hr to start, it just doesn't make economic sense at all.

      India is becoming less economical to outsource to as well... the wage has gone up significantly in India over the last few years, and they're right now at about 2/3 what gets paid in Canada or the US for the same work: working in a call center is an upper middle class job in India, and has been known to attract scientists and medical doctors away from their careers for better pay and better hours. With the drop in customer satisfaction that accompanies outsourcing, it's very quickly becoming uneconomical to outsource there. Right now, most of the new call centers are being opened in the Philippines and North Africa, with some in central and south America.

    16. Re:No shit sherlock by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 2

      These resources are replacing India resources as those resources are getting harder to get. Not surprisingly, years of outsourcing to India has built an in country demand. The best and brightest head there because the hours are better, and often the pay is better too.

      As for the Indian work quality... it varies. I have worked with some that were as good as any US tech, and some that are mere chair warmers.
      It definitely takes 2 to 4 to match a quality US resources, but you can afford to do that.

      Any customer can demand US only resources if they are willing to pay for it... but they are willing to do so.

      Please don't call them that. It's dehumanizing. They're people, perhaps employees, staff, or workers, but not "resources". Show some respect - they're the people that keep companies producing and keep the managers (who call them resources) employed.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
  2. Skill Requirements by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps, that is all the skills that is required for the job. Just like car mechanics, IT support is becoming less and less of a highly skilled job.

    1. Re:Skill Requirements by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2

      Perhaps, that is all the skills that is required for the job. Just like car mechanics, IT support is becoming less and less of a highly skilled job.

      Actually, car mechanics nowadays is more of an IT skill, in that the diagnostics are run by instrumentation.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    2. Re:Skill Requirements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Perhaps, that is all the skills that is required for the job. Just like car mechanics, IT support is becoming less and less of a highly skilled job.

      Actually, car mechanics nowadays is more of an IT skill, in that the diagnostics are run by instrumentation.

      Fantastic! That means that the next time I need my car serviced I just need to find an Indian high school student!!!

    3. Re:Skill Requirements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, it isn't. It's still a highly skilled job, it's just that we've moved the title and position further from the end users. Those people are called troubleshooters now, and they make good money. (I know, I was one). The "tech support" or better yet, "help desk" positions are nothing but robots reading scripts, and soon enough, they will literally be robots. That doesn't change the fact that in order to actually be HELPFUL they have to know more than how to type.
       
      Your standards of service are an affront, please raise them.

    4. Re:Skill Requirements by couchslug · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "IT support is becoming less and less of a highly skilled job."

      Not even close. Auto mechanics requires far MORE skill and broader knowledge of theory than it did forty years ago.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  3. Big deal? by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What's the big deal about that? Tier 1 helpdesk doesn't need a degree. A high-school education (even a US one) is more than enough to understand and speak English at a high-school level and follow a script and checklist. You don't need to be a cordon bleu chef to cook burgers at McDonald's either.

    1. Re:Big deal? by Trepidity · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I believe that was typically the case at U.S. call centers too, back when there were more of them. In the late-90s and early-2000s, working helpdesk was a common way for techies without degrees to make some money (either to help pay for college, or just to pay rent).

    2. Re:Big deal? by Microlith · · Score: 2

      The big deal is that they can pay the Indian post-high school worker a pittance compared to what they'd have to pay the US post-high school worker.

      That's why Mrs. Rometty spent the better part of the last 10 years moving over 100K IBM jobs out of the US and to India. I'm sure she'd move everyone but the executives over if she could find a way to do so and still claim all the benefits of being "US based."

    3. Re:Big deal? by sjames · · Score: 2

      Given how much U.S. executives make, he'd be better off outsourcing that to just about anywhere else and keeping the rest in the U.S.

  4. Degree Overrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    If they're required by policy to follow a script, does it matter if they have a degree? I'm more concerned about fluency in english, an understandable accent,quality of the voip connection, and quality of the inter-cubicle sound isolation.

    1. Re:Degree Overrated by baegucb · · Score: 2

      Hello, my name is Debbie (yeah, right lady). Welcome to 1-800-IBM-SERV (said in a thick accent over a scratchy VOIP line). Even Oracle does better, with world wide call center support.
      I deal with support vendors every day. IBM has had the worst call center support for years. Oracle is even better than IBM. At least all the local support guys are usually good. I just have to get the ticket opened, then layer explain to the CE (old terminology) or FE, what the issue is.
      Not that Oracle is so great. Our platinum contract means they call every few hours, to "verify" information they were already given. That way they keep in contract compliance. But Oracle second level support is pretty good in my experience. I've talked to people from Ireland, India. and Rumania iirc, and gotten way better phone support than IBM.
      Debbie: Z as in zebra, O as in oscar, S as in sam.
      Dang. I think my wife has better luck talking to Charter than anyone at work talking to a vendor.

    2. Re:Degree Overrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Most of the time it's just quicker to skip level 1. Open an electronic ticket and get a call direct from level 2. If you actually call level 1, all you're doing is having them transcribe the ticket entry for you - and generally are folks that are on the end of a poor quality VOIP connection and quite often poor English skills.

  5. College not needed... by cavtroop · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...the problem is, they're not allowed to think for themselves. Education is completely irrelevant - they have to follow the scripts they have in front of them, and not deviate or they get dinged. I know, I've had to write some of these scripts for them (not IBM, but another large multinational co that does outsourced helpdesk work). The last step in any of the scripts is to escalate to Tier 2/3 - which 90% of the time is an actual employee of the company and not part of the outsourced help desk.

    So how is having a college educated phone bozo any better than a high school educated one if they're not allowed to deviate from the scripts they're given?

  6. Doesn't surprise me one bit... by erp_consultant · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Have you ever spoken to these people? I used to work for a big IT company that rhymes with Hell, and they staffed all of their call centers with undertrained, underpaid Indian nationals. One time it took me 5 calls just to get a password changed...and I was on a client site at the time and desperately needed it fixed. Frustration does not even begin to describe how I felt. It's bad enough when you use it for your own internal support but using it for customers paying big bucks for support contracts? Inexcusable. I bet that IBM is working on training monkeys to follow a support script cause, you know, the wages are starting to go up in India and we've got to make our numbers this quarter - damn it!

  7. Presumptuous by KnightBlade · · Score: 2

    The term "graduate" means different things in US and India. You can hold a 'diploma' that's 10+3. This 'diploma' isn't considered a graduate in the US. It's not a degree because it's shy of the typical 4 year course structure. It could just mean they have a 3 year 'degree' than a 4 year bachelor's degree. Your assumption is flawed. 1 year of additional education can make a lot of difference if you're a developer or something else, but for a help desk job, I doubt it would add much value. Also, if you have a 4 year degree, why wouldn't you aim for a dev job?

  8. Inflammatory title of course by beltsbear · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Inflammatory title of course, it implies that the people manning the desks are in high school or of high school age not just adults that only went to high school.

    1. Re:Inflammatory title of course by frosty_tsm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      +1

      High Schooler != High School Graduate

  9. Why pay for unused skills? by cockpitcomp · · Score: 2

    I thought we were supposed to complain about job ads with ridiculous lists of required skills. And if you need a college degree to do PC administration tasks, your OS is in bad shape.

  10. Same as it was here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Did you know that 10 years ago, if you called Dell, Gateway, HP, WellsFargo, Netgear, etc etc etc etc, that you spoke to someone making $10.50/hr, who most certainly did not have a college degree, and whom the technical skills test was "here, type this". The only difference now is, those people aren't in the united states, and they don't make anywhere near 10.50$/hr. Then or now, they never had any chance of actually helping you solve a problem.
     
    NDA be damned, Dell had 5 solutions for ANY problem. Is it on. Check. Is it installed correctly. Check. Reformat, does it work now? Check. Does the rest of the computer work without it? Check. Replace it. DONE. This is essentially what all their scripts say. Oh sure, there are minor detailed differences, and some small portion of the people they employ to read the scripts even understand the differences. Most do not, never did and never will. They are paid to go through those scripts AS FAST AS POSSIBLE. They are not paid for your satisfaction, and in fact, you can't commend or condone them in any way, because you don't know if you were talking to 'joe' at Dell's Texas headquarters, 'Joe' at the Beaverton Oregon Call center called Stream, or some other third party call center. You can call to complain, and customer service will no doubt apologize, coddle you and then do absolutely nothing.
     
    One customer always comes to mind when I talk about this issue. She called in over 50 different times. She spoke to as many different people. She went through every script, every troubleshooting guide. Her modem was replaced. 5 times. The motherboard was replaced, twice. The CPU, Memory, hard drive and case were replaced once each. Her ENTIRE computer (include the mouse and cables) was replaced twice. Nothing solved the issue. She called in, and got me. Now, it's 12:30am, I'm quietly handling technical calls for Dell, but I'm in Oregon at STREAM intl. She explains her story, and I look it up. Holly crap, they have done just about everything that can be done... well crap. Tell me what the problem is. "Well, the last tech said..." No lady, I want you to tell me the problem, not what anyone else said it was. "my modem won't stay connected, and often won't connect at all". OK I say... any other issues..."well yeah, I get weird lines on my screen when I try and call out, or if I walk to close while on the phone". Alright, please do something strange for me, just reach down and touch the computer, but watch the screen. "It flashed with snow". OK do you happen to have power lines in your back yard. "yes, how did you know". Lucky guess. I know this isn't reasonable, but I need you to move the whole computer to the opposite side of the house, and call me back at this number xxxxxxxxxxx. She did, and you know what, it fixed the problem. 51+ phone calls, and the problem was outside interference, which isn't on any of the scripts. This isn't a problem of language, or culture, or race, or which country your phone call goes to. It's a problem that "technical support" is neither technical, nor support. Which is why it's mostly called "customer service" now. I think Carlin best described what that means.

    1. Re:Same as it was here by JDG1980 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Did you know that 10 years ago, if you called Dell, Gateway, HP, WellsFargo, Netgear, etc etc etc etc, that you spoke to someone making $10.50/hr, who most certainly did not have a college degree, and whom the technical skills test was "here, type this".

      Oh, yes. In fact, 10 years ago, I was one of those employees without a college degree earning $10.50 an hour taking outsourced calls for Gateway. (Well, actually it was only $9 an hour.) The difference is that they hadn't yet rolled out the dumbass scripts, so I was able to actually help customers most of the time, as long as they weren't asking for something that violated a specific support boundary (e.g. we didn't fix problems with third-party software). It was in about 2003, when I had transitioned to SBC (and fortunately been promoted to Team Lead and therefore taken off the phones) that they started telling techs that they had to follow the flowchart no matter what. At this point, there's no point having human employees at all; you might as well integrate the flowchart into the phone system and only hire tier 2 techs for problems that can't be fixed by doing the simple stuff. For all I know, they may have done this in some places already.

  11. What if college is a distraction? by nido · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They don't want us to realize that the reason college is so important is because children in the U.S. are deliberately prevented from learning anything valuable in their first 13 years of "education".

    My dad had a friend in high school who taught shop class. He helped me about 6 years ago with his shop tools. He was forcibly retired a few years later because the administrators decided that woodworking and metal working aren't important to people who are going to college, which is all that matters in a globalized society.

    Apparently that's the feedback loop: Grade school gets you ready for middle school, middle school for high school, high school for college, college for graduate school, graduate school for unemployment.

      According to a book from the 1970's I found at a thrift shop years ago ("The Screwing of the Average Man"), College used to be something that the upper class sent their children to, so they'd have a leg up on the un-credentialed proletariat. After WWII Congress passed the GI Bill to pacify all those ex-soldiers, and college became affordable for everyone. I was going to say that college is a waste of money, but the real waste is in K-12 - at least in College you mostly take only the classes you care about.

    --
    Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
    www.teslabox.com
    1. Re:What if college is a distraction? by rohan972 · · Score: 2

      Children don't require government compulsion to become interested in a variety of topics and they learn comparatively poorly when they are not interested. Having those who aren't interested compelled to be in the class guarantees disruption, requiring effort from the teacher that could be put to better use actually teaching.

      What we have now is a system where your concept of broadening horizons through compulsory desk work is so rigidly enforced that active children who can't cope with the tedium of sitting still for hours at a time are drugged into docility so they can "reach their full potential". The attributes that made me a "bad" kid in school help me excel in my physically active job.

      I do agree though that some things need to be taught regardless of interest, such as literacy and numeracy, as they make you capable of learning the other things that you become interested in. Also that a broad range of subjects should be available.

  12. You Get What They Pay For by Greyfox · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I worked IBM's support line in the early 90's. The whole cost efficiency question had not yet come up when I started there, and we were the best-rated customer service in the industry. When you called support you went through a screener who took down your info and got a sense of the problem you were having. Based on what you told them, they'd give you a problem number and route you into one of the support buckets. That's where we picked it up and would be the next people on the phone with the customer. The record would already be written up and the screener would have made sure the customer was eligible for support. At the time, IBM was talking about all of us "Level 1 analysts" picking up their "OS/2 Certified Engineer" certification.

    Fast forward a few months and they started talking about the cost of the support. Turns out, it cost IBM $30 on average for their screener to answer the phone. That was just the cost of the OS/2 support operation divided by call volume I suppose. So they started cutting costs. First thing to go were the screeners. That meant the support reps were the ones getting the customer's information and verifying that they were eligible for support. The call center also got way more touchy about call times. If you couldn't answer the question in about 10 minutes, they wanted you to requeue for a level 2 analyst call back. No more spending half an hour talking a customer through recovering their desktop. And OS/2 lost its desktop a lot.

    They killed the operating system before they had a chance to move that call center to India, but I'm sure that would have been the next step. The fact of the matter throughout the industry is that the support line is populated with meaty paperweights and is designed to encourage you to solve your problem on your own. If you actually have a problem that you can't solve on your own, they'll grudgingly schedule a callback from a level 2 analyst after making you reboot your device. In this way the people you talk to now are like less-able screeners from back in the early IBM support days. They filter out most of the plonkers, do a mediocre job of finding out what your problem is and schedule a callback from a level 2 analyst.

    Does that level of skill require a college degree? Not really. Always talking to a guy with a college degree would cost more than most of their customers are willing to pay. I'm sure they'd be happy to negotiate a private support contract with an SLA. It's just a matter of how large of a suitcase of cash you want to give them.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  13. "High School Graduates", not "High Schoolers" by billstewart · · Score: 5, Informative

    "High Schoolers" says that the people manning the help desk are kids who are still in high school. "High School Graduates" implies that they've finished high school but don't have college degrees. There are some help desk jobs for which that's really just fine (as long as they've learned enough English that they can understand the concepts and get some practice with speaking it), and others for which you need a lot of specialized training, much of which depends on concepts you'd learn in college.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  14. Re:IBM has been circling the toilet by rubycodez · · Score: 2

    15% rolling twelve month profit margin, $220 billon market cap. yeah, going down like a cheap whore....

  15. Re:Watson by arth1 · · Score: 2

    I'm kind of surprised that they haven't farmed this out to Watson yet.

    Why pay for high-school grads, when you can get them less educated? How less educated? Elementary, my dear Watson.

  16. "I see you have help desk experience!" by Tekoneiric · · Score: 2

    Most of the help desks in the US are manned by people without degrees. There are plenty of people working help desk jobs while working towards a degree also. It’s kind of the new fast food job. The biggest difference between help desk workers with a degree and those without is the ones without don't owe huge student loans. I've seen plenty of people get a degree and stay in the help desk job. One of the biggest problems is if you have a degree and have a help desk job on your resume; employers will say "I see you have help desk experience!"

    --
    *It's not what you can do for the Dark Side but what the Dark Side can do for you!*
  17. Worst Customer Service Ever = IBM by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2

    I have to support a piece of software and IBM bought the company a few years ago, so when it came time to move to a new version I got to deal with IBM.

    I spent 14 hours on the phone trying to get a price for a piece of software, most of the time I was shuttled around support people in India who couldn't help me, I was told that software prices were "restricted information", searching IBM's site for contact numbers got me developer's desk phones and they didn't know why the hell their numbers were posted on IBM's site.

    Then I had months of weekly calls from sales people wanting to get a commission.

  18. Smaller is better by Blue23 · · Score: 2

    Try calling for support from a small or medium business. Too small to outsource, their staff is more likely than not to have lots of contact with the people who made the stuff in the first place. You can get good results.

    I work at a larger place than that, but instead of the traditional three levels of support we effectively have two - second level and third level, all internal. The people you get on the phone when you call know how to think, and solve 90% of incoming calls (including many tougher calls because problems have escalated before and documentation and training have come down from third level so we don't need to get bothered.) If we had a lesser help desk we'd have to hire more expensive headcount to actually deal with issues - it makes good business sense to keep them in-house and well trained. Oh, and we promote heavily from within, so everyone on the desk knows it's in their best career interests to soak up as much as they can. It makes them more hire-able internally and externally. I think they handle north of 30K calls a month with 24/7 coverage, it's pretty impressive what they do with a fairly small and focused group.

    --
    LITTLE GIRL: But which cookie will you eat FIRST? C. MONSTER: Me think you have misconception of cookie-eating process.
  19. Not just inflation by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've got cleaner water, better health care. Laws that make sure my food isn't poison. I've got a social safety net that keeps bands of thieves and kidnappers to a minimum. My air is also much, much cleaner. Sure, 80% of Indians never have these problems, but for the other 20% life just sucks. America put a lot of effort into closing that gap. For those of us that don't just live a charmed life we want that.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  20. Race to the bottom by byteherder · · Score: 2

    I worked for IBM for 3 years so I have first hand knowledge how bad their tech support is. IBM staff has to use the same tech support that their customers use. Eating your own dog food they call it, or dog shit as the case may be.

    Let me briefly describe the process you have to go through, Call in, work you way down 5 layers of automated phone messages and finally get a live person. That person barely speaks English and really hates their job. This is Tier 1. They ask you a few simple questions and to describe the problem. Lastly, he or she asked what priority you want to make it, Level 1 - call back in 24 hours, Level 2 - call back in a week, Level 3 - call back in ???, hell, I don't know, never made any level 3. You have to make it a Level 1 or you will won't get anybody to look a it for a week. Every help ticket is now a Level 1.

    So the next day, you get a call from Tier 2 support. Really, this is a Tier 1 person, who has had a month's worth of training. He goes down a script of all the typical problem, tell you what you need type. Oh course, you have already done this because the those are all online. He then waste another 15 minutes of your time fumbling in the dark and then gives up.

    Another 24 hours pass, then you get a call from Tier 3 support. This guys has a year or more experience and is familiar with all the features of the product. He listens to your attempts, then asks you to do something and actually fixes the problem in about 5 minutes. He is the rare bird in IBM Tech support. Also, he is so overworked because Tier 1 and 2 are close to useless that he burns out and moves to so other division just as soon as he can.

    That's it. That's how IBM tech support works..


    Sincerely, Ex-IBMer

  21. worst artical ever by codman1 · · Score: 2

    worst artical ever.... who really care's? as long as they have the correct answer to your question when they call and they are nice to talk to does it really matter. i am not more than high school educated and i do just fine, i have been in technical support for the best part of 15years. due to the massive expense of higher education in the UK i have not done it. the only thing that higher education gives you is a better earning potential but that is not at the top of everyone thougths...

  22. Re:The whole article is bullshit by sociocapitalist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Separately, we have a saying in India, which is drilled into the brains of BPO trainees. It says; 10=35. The IQ of an average 10-year old Indian kid is about the same as the IQ of the average 35-yr old American. Reading the many infantile responses to this article, I begin to suspect this might not be far from the truth.

    Your post is as immature and offensive as many of the posts seen on here and is, additionally, hypocritical to boot.

    --
    blindly antisocialist = antisocial
  23. Re:The whole article is bullshit by kbolino · · Score: 2

    Does anyone realize that IQ scores are normalized with respect to age? The IQ of an average anybody is 100. That statement is no more an insult to Americans than it is a compliment to Indians. In fact, it reflects how poorly the speaker understands IQ.

  24. Got it backwards by junkgoof · · Score: 2

    Statements like these permeate the outsourcing industry and encourage VPs to offshore. Then you interview the offshore employees and they don't know anything technical, can't produce reports/statuses, and can't use simple logic. There are good people in India, but nowhere near as many as the industry thinks there are and the good ones are not working for peanuts. The going rate for competent people is pretty close to US rates, the people work gets offshored to, who can't make those rates really can't do much.

    CVs from offshored employees are pretty funny and almost universally fictional (based on 25 interviews over multiple projects). The guys we hire are pretty much as competent as the ones I deal with at IBM and Oracle, and the problem is the offshoring industry (with some help from the Indian educational system that is much more stratified than the US one).

    I know people who do offshoring properly (they do 55% to 65% of work onshore, pay $15-20 an hour for offshore juniors, know people offshore and know the business culture there) and make it work, but they save 5-10% not the 60% the big outsourcers are aiming for.

    And clients have to figure out that if you replace one person onshore with 5 people offshore who cannot, as a group, do the work of the one person they replaced, the client is NOT saving money. "But now you have FIVE people, you can do SHIFTS." Sigh... You can change the SLA from 2 hours to five days but you are not helping your business.

    --
    You got me into this! You were the ideologue! I'm only a poor assassin! - Twenty evocations, Bruce Sterling