Slashdot Mirror


Mac OS X Mountain Lion Gets Three Million Downloads In 4 Days

hypnosec writes "Apple has announced that its latest Mac OS X version, Mountain Lion, has had three million downloads in just four days thereby making it the most successful OS in Cupertino's history. Philip Schiller, iPhone maker's senior vice president of Worldwide Marketing, said, 'Just a year after the incredibly successful introduction of Lion, customers have downloaded Mountain Lion over three million times in just four days, making it our most successful release ever.'"

13 of 397 comments (clear)

  1. Depends on Why... by localman57 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Remember that Windows 7 was Microsoft's most successful OS ever, in terms of adoption speed. Part of it had to do with the new features that 7 introduced, but part of it also had to do with how incredibly craptacular Vista was. Not saying that's neccesarily the case here; just saying you have to think a bit past the marketing hype.

    1. Re:Depends on Why... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know that reading is hard, but Phil Schiller said "Just a year after the incredibly successful introduction of Lion, customers have downloaded Mountain Lion over three million times in just four days, making it our most successful release ever."

      No one made a direct comparison between Mountain Lion's sales and Windows 7's sales, until you just did right before disproving it. This is what we call a classic straw man argument.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  2. Re:Actual title should be by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Haterade Addicts get Another Opportunity to Bitch About Apple!

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  3. Re:Actual title should be by Torp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't know about the 2999999 other sheep, but i will be upgrading my laptop from snow leopard to mountain lion indeed. I liked some features in Lion, but they sounded like they needed improvement. Mountain Lion may be it.
    Also, it's cheap.

    --
    I apologize for the lack of a signature.
  4. Re:Actual title should be by DJRumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Can't agree more. /. is becoming a joke as a 'news for nerds' site. They turn into the trollfest we see above. Every single post above is flamebait.

    The fact that OS X broke out of the marginal OS arena is good news for any non-windows platform, regardless of who makes it. It's also of interest to the enterprise crowd looking for alternatives to Windows 8, and not only due to the fact that this happens to be OS X but also because they may look at other alternatives if Windows grip on the computer market isn't rock solid.

  5. Re:Actual title should be by FreshlyShornBalls · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Indeed. It boggles the mind as to why they finally fixed that feature, but still have not enabled simple file operations (copy / paste / rename / etc.) in the File Open and File Save dialogs. I can't tell you how pissed I get when I have to stop what I'm doing, open a Finder window and then navigate all over again to a location just to rename a folder, for example.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank.
  6. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    You're full of shit.

    Not only that, but if it's actually true then you're a fucking idiot. Hurrdurrr, old operating system was broken, so that's a reason NOT to upgrade to a new one that includes bug fixes... HURRRDURRR

  7. 2007 Mac Mini couldn't be upgraded by mpetch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yesterday I went to the App Store, only to learn that my 2007 Mac Mini (Purchased in 2008) didn't have the hardware requirements to run OS/X Mountain Lion. I have a 64bit CPU, 2GB ram, but only have 32bit EFI. Apparently the video in this unit isn't supported. I was a bit surprised that 5 year old equipment just isn't worth it to Apple to support. If someone asks why I needed to upgrade - it was required to build and test some open source projects I work on.

  8. Re:Actual title should be by jedidiah · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why Apple? This has very little to do with Apple actually. This is more about a lame tech press that treats every Apple press release like something that's going to win them a Pulizter.

    "Apple sees record downloads after it pushes users to downloads"

    That's not news, that's the kind of math that PolySci professors think you don't need to learn.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  9. Re:Ok... but why? by jedidiah · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "runs better on systems with less than 4G of RAM"

    Tempted to add my own remarks but this kind of speaks for itself.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  10. Re:But the big question... by Pieroxy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You must be joking... Steve Jobs spent more than half a decade to design an OS from the ground up (UI wise) to make it useable on a tablet, and you think, citing Jobs, it would be a good idea to bring Jobs's other OS to a tablet?

    I honestly cannot think of anything more ridiculous. That's basically what Microsoft tried before the iPad which failed so miserably that everyone forgot tablets existed before the iPad.

    You're looking for a job? Try applying to the CEO position of Miscrosoft. You seem to be as smart as he is.

  11. Re:Actual title should be by i+kan+reed · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hear there's actually a few competing products for your operating system money that do just that. In fact, it's safe to say that limited power user oriented features have been one of the chief complaints with apple operating systems for years.

  12. Re:Actual title should be by jbolden · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would have tried OSX ages ago, if only Apple let me install it on hardware I already owned instead of purchasing new hardware which is spec'd damn near the same as what I've already got.

    I would have tried Black Berry OS 10 if only RIM would let me use it on iPhone. Huh?
    Apple is not Microsoft, they do not sell operating systems. If you are unwilling to buy an Apple then why would they care if you try OSX?