Slashdot Mirror


US Viewers Using Proxies To Watch BBC Olympic Coverage

DavidGilbert99 writes "NBC is the sole broadcaster of the London 2012 Olympics in the U.S., having paid $1.1bn for the privilege. While NBC is providing live streaming through its website, you need to have a valid cable subscription in order to view the events. This has seen many tech savvy U.S. viewers turning to proxy servers to view the BBC's Olympic coverage, which doesn't need any sign-in to view — once your IP address looks like it is coming from the UK. One provider of VPN services has seen a ten-fold increase in new customers signing up for their services since last Friday."

16 of 373 comments (clear)

  1. Expect networks to run to Congress by crazyjj · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Great. Here comes another amendment to the DMCA. The "Protect Our Networks, Mom, and Apple Pie--And I Support The Colorado Shooting Victims Act of 2013" which will make it illegal to circumvent the licensing agreements of your local network affiliates and outlaw all VPN's that refuse to turn over all server and user data to the FBI and NSA. And it will sail through Congress, and be signed immediately by President Obama--who will say to liberal supporters that he really doesn't WANT to sign it, but is doing so anyway.

    --
    What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    1. Re:Expect networks to run to Congress by macromorgan · · Score: 5, Funny

      Normally I'd agree with you, but after the SOPA/PIPA debacle the Internet community is mobilized and on alert for crap like this. Although it would be interesting to see the Cat Signal be turned on...

    2. Re:Expect networks to run to Congress by ciderbrew · · Score: 5, Informative

      In Britain we all have to pay a T.V. licence fee. This money funds the BBC. Watching without paying is illegal. So you are "stealing".
      I'm happy for overseas people to pay to be able to get access. I see no reason why overseas subscription isn't an option. The BBC is wonderful and the content should be seen.

    3. Re:Expect networks to run to Congress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Of course the best part of this is that US viewers are apparently abandoning the oligopoly of US television for...a state run (nominally) broadcaster in another country.

      The ironing is delicious.

    4. Re:Expect networks to run to Congress by h4rr4r · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I wish we could pay.

      You give me Sherlock, Dr Who and sporting events live and available for a month after showing and I would gladly pay right fucking now.

      INSERT TAKE MY MONEY PLEASE SIGN HERE.

    5. Re:Expect networks to run to Congress by h4rr4r · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is not true.
      You can get out of paying it if you do not own a TV, not sure about computers.

      I wish the USA had something like this, or if the BBC would let us sign up.

    6. Re:Expect networks to run to Congress by JustOK · · Score: 5, Funny

      catchup services?
      First, it's ketchup.
      Second, what a strange service to provide.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
  2. Cable Subscription? by macromorgan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If NBC is a broadcast network, why do you need a cable subscription to watch online anyway? I mean other than the obvious that NBC is now owned by a cable company...

  3. Finally by j-cloth · · Score: 5, Funny

    As a Canadian, it's fun to watch the Americans finally have to struggle to find content. We've been forced to use proxies for years.

  4. NBCs coverage has been appallingly bad by AdmV0rl0n · · Score: 5, Interesting

    To be blunt, the Olympic organisation needs to step up in its bid process to make sure that not only is it about getting money in to work within the machinery of an Olympics, but that any partner, and in particular its broadcast partners behave with minimum standards. These would be max advert time per hour, and min coverage required.

    Any broadcasters who paster the coverage with advert time and clearly ruin the spectable could be eliminated. Any that don't plan to cover enough get the chop and so on. It should not merely be about the money.

    I'm not a fan of the BBC. But its coverage of this Olympics has been stellar, and I can watch any - and all events. No coverage has ever been this vast or all encompassing.

    --
    We`re all equal .. Just some of us are less equal than others.
    1. Re:NBCs coverage has been appallingly bad by KermodeBear · · Score: 5, Insightful

      NBC's coverage has ALWAYS been bad. The worst part is that they smother everything with "human interest" stories to the point where you're not sure if you're watching the Olympics or some daytime talk show. Also, they commentary has been ridiculous - and sometimes outright offensive (particularly during the opening ceremonies).

      I am incredibly annoyed that the Olympic Committee has started this broadcast monopoly business. It's terrible. NBC paid cash, so they can be as terrible as they want with impunity.

      Which is why I have a new VPN account so that I can watch the BBC's coverage.

      I would be happy to pay $20 or so for an Official Olympics Streaming Account or somesuch.

      --
      Love sees no species.
  5. UK coverage can't be worse that the US one. by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I watched the Olympics a bit last night when I visited my father, I was pretty heavily annoyed with the coverage.
    With constant focus on pouty teens and their families, i was half convinced I was watching some new drama show.
    If I want to know more about the athletes themselves, I'd watch the news. Please just stay focused on the performances. |:

    --
    What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
  6. NBC deserves it. by gblues · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In my opinion, NBC hasn't gotten nearly enough shit over their treatment of the opening ceremony. Constant chattering, inane commentary, and the absolutely insulting audacity to cut to commercial during the 7/7 London Bombing memorial.

    The coverage of the games themselves hasn't been too great, either. I'm not going to bitch about a tape delay because that's just a fact of life when the games are 7 hours ahead of local time. But when results are spoiled by fucking promotional commercials just minutes ahead of the event in question, that's just incompetence.

    So, screw NBC. I hope someday the BBC allows foreigners to pay for access to its content without having to do VPN hacks. I know I'd subscribe in a heartbeat (hello, Doctor Who Series 7).

  7. balkanization turning web into TV 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    With the balkanization of #London2012 and other worldwide events, the web is being turned into TV 2.0 by the content cartels. Originally one of the beautiful things about the web was that content was open to all. Someone from Mozambique had access to all the same data and resources as someone from USA or France. But increasingly, everything is becoming locked down and controlled for the benefit of the big media companies. Only through illegal means most don't even know about can this be circumvented, so a few tech savy people manage, but the vast majority do not.

    Who is to blame for this? Well, sure, those media companies, but all of the web users are to blame. As long as we support this balkanization, it will continue to happen. As long as we are tuning into their content en mass, they will never stop this. The end game is TV 2.0, rather than the open and free internet we COULD have had. If we let this happen, it's our own fault.

  8. Re:Not just Cable... by hey! · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Plus it would be nice to have coverage that wasn't oriented toward idiots.

    It started before the opening ceremonies, with the NBC presenters delivering what sounded like drug-addled, free association platitudes over a montage of US athletes. It went on through the parade of nations when one of NBC's presenters gave us a fat dose of his personal political opinions. It was not so much that the leadership of those countries he targeted wasn't contemptible, as that I don't need a sports announcer to tell me what to think. It goes on through interview after interview where the idiot interviewers ask "how does it feel to win" and try to pump as much emotion out of the athletes as possible. Discuss how the event went, or cut to a sport you're not covering, for Pete's sake.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  9. Total crap... by MaWeiTao · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's outrageous enough that you need to be a subscriber of their services and partner companies to watch anything online. But then they mislead you all the way in. They advertise it on tv and online make it seem like all you need to do is click on a feed and start watching. So despite having logins for three of their services I couldn't watch with any because I didn't have one of their crappy cable networks as part of those packages.

    And to add insult to injury, coverage on NBC has been abysmal. Take last night's broadcast of women's gymnastics. There was no rhyme or reason to it. They showed a bunch of random events, several times not even waiting to show scores. They barely showed any of the competition, so who the hell knows why China ended up being so far behind, for example. They wasted too much time with goofy drama. And despite being so overly America centric, for whatever reason they spent the first hour in primetime broadcasting diving which featured no American even close to being in medal contention. And, last but not least, let's not forget the endless commercial interruptions.

    It's pathetic and my interest in following the Olympics for anything to other than medal counts is quickly evaporating. NBC seems incapable of handling a broadcast of this scale. You'd think that for prerecorded broadcasts, with the massive staff devoted to the games that they'd do a better job of editing.