Slashdot Mirror


Starbucks Partners With Square

Square, the start-up mobile payment service that aims to bring credit card transactions to anyone with a smartphone, has formed a partnership with Starbucks, a move that vastly increases Square's reach and visibility. According to the NY Times, "This fall, Square will begin processing all credit and debit card transactions at Starbucks stores in the United States and eventually customers will be able to order a grande vanilla latte and charge it to their credit cards simply by saying their names. Though smartphone payments have a long way to go before they replace wallets altogether, Starbucks’s adoption of Square will catapult the start-up’s technology onto street corners nationwide, and is the clearest sign yet that mobile payments could become mainstream. ... At first, Starbucks customers will need to show the merchant a bar code on their phones. But when Starbucks uses Square’s full GPS technology, the customer’s phone will automatically notify the store that the customer has entered, and the customer’s name and photo will pop up on the cashier’s screen. The customer will give the merchant his or her name, Starbucks will match the photo and the payment will be complete."

145 comments

  1. Free Coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally we could have some free coffee

    1. Re:Free Coffee by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Will they still take cash?

      These days, I'm going more and more back to trying to do only cash transactions for daily needs (groceries, eat out....etc). I really am not a fan of giving up my purchasing patterns to all these corporations just so they can try to sell me more or sell me crap I don't want or need.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  2. Crap coffee meets crap payment system by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mediocrity loves company.

    1. Re:Crap coffee meets crap payment system by jehan60188 · · Score: 2

      tell me more about this mediocre coffee that has stores across the nation

    2. Re:Crap coffee meets crap payment system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please elaborate, about Square not Starbucks.

    3. Re:Crap coffee meets crap payment system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flavored milk...

    4. Re:Crap coffee meets crap payment system by Nimloth · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dunkin Donuts?

    5. Re:Crap coffee meets crap payment system by cupantae · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...because everyone knows that the best things are the most popular. Don't you just love Rihanna, Justin Bieber, Beyoncé...

      --
      --
    6. Re:Crap coffee meets crap payment system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I haven't used their cell phone payment system, but my business has been using Square for the past year, and we fucking love it. What do you hate about it?

      Also: yes, Starbucks coffee is shitty. They burn their beans to make a "distinctive" flavor.

    7. Re:Crap coffee meets crap payment system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh for the love of god, it's a place that sells coffee and coffee-like drinks. They obviously do a better-than-average job at it.

      Are we really going to go all hipster-douche, arguing over whether or not it's not the finest, orgasm-inducing, flavored water on earth?

    8. Re:Crap coffee meets crap payment system by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

      I'm not the gp, but I'm wondering what kind of deal Starbucks got on the rates. They certainly wouldn't settle for the pricing on the cover.

      I do like the SB mobile payment app. I don't do well with keeping individual loyalty cards handy and loaded, but I've always got my phone on me. Did Square always have an API so they can continue to process with them, using their existing point of sale hardware?

    9. Re:Crap coffee meets crap payment system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, there are those who dismiss anything sufficiently popular as crap. In this particular instance, all these self-proclaimed coffee gourmands couldn't pick out a particular brand of coffee in a blind test. They think they can, but they're wrong.

    10. Re:Crap coffee meets crap payment system by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

      I'd give Rihanna some love, does that count?

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    11. Re:Crap coffee meets crap payment system by graphius · · Score: 1

      I can't pick out coffee brands, because a lot of them are crap.
      My coffee of choice (when I am not home*) is an americano (espresso + hot water, for those that don't know) from a couple of independent coffee shops. Starbucks, like McDonalds with their hamburgers, are more concerned with consistency than flavour.

      *When at home I do have a couple of espresso machines, and, when I want more caffeine, a bodem. I grind my own beans that I buy from one of a few local roasters.

    12. Re:Crap coffee meets crap payment system by the+phantom · · Score: 4, Funny

      By your logic, McDonalds makes an obviously-better-than-average burger, Taco Bell serves an obviously-better-than-average taco, and Pabst Blue Ribbon is an obviously-better-than-average beer.

    13. Re:Crap coffee meets crap payment system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can't pick out coffee brands, because a lot of them are crap. My coffee of choice (when I am not home*) is an americano (espresso + hot water, for those that don't know) from a couple of independent coffee shops. Starbucks, like McDonalds with their hamburgers, are more concerned with consistency than flavour.

      *When at home I do have a couple of espresso machines, and, when I want more caffeine, a bodem. I grind my own beans that I buy from one of a few local roasters.

      This is your defense in reply to a thread where someone asked if we're going to get all hipster-douche about it?

    14. Re:Crap coffee meets crap payment system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True - popular does not always mean better. The flipside being that popular does not always mean bad either.

    15. Re:Crap coffee meets crap payment system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not exactly a masters of logic, are we. Here we'd actually have, "McDonalds obviously does a better-than-average job of selling inexpensive, salty, fast food, just as Starbucks does a better-than-average job as a store that sells 'good' coffee-type drinks."

      What's 'good' in the way of your preferred drink is subjective, so I'll leave it to the unwashed masses to argue over.

    16. Re:Crap coffee meets crap payment system by icebraining · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, but the average in the US is terrible. There's a reason why Starbucks isn't all that successful here in the Mediterranean countries, where good coffee is well established and cheap.

    17. Re:Crap coffee meets crap payment system by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Ugh, Americano. Diluted crap for pansies ;)

    18. Re:Crap coffee meets crap payment system by FacePlant · · Score: 1

      Are we really going to go all hipster-douche, arguing over whether or not it's not the finest, orgasm-inducing, flavored water on earth?

      It sure looks that way.

      Cream and sugar?

      --
      My Heart Is A Flower
    19. Re:Crap coffee meets crap payment system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You had me until you started hating on PBR.

    20. Re:Crap coffee meets crap payment system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By your logic, McDonalds makes an obviously-better-than-average burger, Taco Bell serves an obviously-better-than-average taco, and Pabst Blue Ribbon is an obviously-better-than-average beer.

      If you consider the set of all things burger or taco or beer, then yes, those companies make an above-average product.

      If you disagree, you clearly have never experienced all things burger, taco, or beer.

    21. Re:Crap coffee meets crap payment system by the+phantom · · Score: 2

      A brand becomes popular because it offers something that people want. Quality is only one possible metric out of many. To say that Starbucks is popular, therefore they must sell better-than-average-coffee, is a fallacy. Personally, I would hazard to guess that Starbucks is popular because it is fast and consistent (i.e. I can get the same slightly burned cup of coffee at any Starbucks in the world).

      That being said, I just reread the original post to which I relied, and it seems that the poster was taking this into account (he said that they do a better than average job, rather than saying that they serve a better than average cup of coffee, which is how I read it originally). Reading comprehension fail on my part.

    22. Re:Crap coffee meets crap payment system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pabst Blue Ribbon >is an obviously-better-than-average beer.

    23. Re:Crap coffee meets crap payment system by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

      That may be the case in Europe, but in Asia, Starbucks is incredibly popular. I do have to admit, however, that walk into any Starbucks there and it's a near certainty that the place will be spotless and you'll get a good cup of coffee. Pathetically, the same cannot be said about a Starbucks in the US, even one situated in an upscale neighborhood.

    24. Re:Crap coffee meets crap payment system by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Wow, guess we smashed that argument. Starbucks is awesome awesome, although they seemed to have fucked up their iced coffee. I found out about their iced coffee years before it became popular, but now it seems different. Maybe my addiction has ruined all the fun.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    25. Re:Crap coffee meets crap payment system by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 2

      I'll tell you some other things Starbucks provides their customers that keeps them (well, me, at least) coming back. They manage to provide some of the feel of a European cafe, in which I have no qualms about ordering just a cup of coffee and sitting in an actual chair for a while to read or converse with a companion. The people who work there actually interact with the customer and care about getting the order right. After a few visits, they acknowledge that they know you are a repeat customer, and after a bit more, they may even prepare your "usual".

      This isn't to say I believe Starbucks is the end-all or be-all. I still much prefer independent coffee shops, and I delight everytime I find one; however, the fact is that before Starbucks entered my market (D.C. suburbs) 20 years ago, there was nothing like it around here. I would even venture to say that the suburban independents who have gone into the same service model wouldn't have dared doing so if they hadn't seen Starbucks succeed at it.

      To return to the original topic, though, I don't believe I'd like being identified by this new payment system. I hate faux familiarity, and I hate being tracked by my phone.

      --
      "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
    26. Re:Crap coffee meets crap payment system by the+phantom · · Score: 1

      I don't doubt that Starbucks provides a service that people are willing to pay for, any more than I don't doubt that PBR profitable product that people are willing to pay for. I was replying to the idea that Starbucks provided better-than-average coffee, which, as I pointed out down-thread, seems to have been a reading comprehension fail on my part.

    27. Re:Crap coffee meets crap payment system by graphius · · Score: 1

      compared to what? A Latte?

    28. Re:Crap coffee meets crap payment system by icebraining · · Score: 1

      No, pure espresso like we drink here in Portugal (and Spain, Italy, etc). After all, the Americano was invented because the US soldiers in France couldn't handle the coffee drank by the locals; they had to dilute it to make it closer to drip they were used to.

    29. Re:Crap coffee meets crap payment system by graphius · · Score: 1

      A shot of espresso is nice, but it is over too fast.
      Sometimes a shot of rye will hit the spot, sometimes you want to add a bit of club soda to make it a more social drink...

    30. Re:Crap coffee meets crap payment system by graphius · · Score: 1

      PS, and don't tell my you put sugar in your coffee....

    31. Re:Crap coffee meets crap payment system by icebraining · · Score: 1

      No, of course not, that ruins the best part of the flavor.

  3. I Was Super Confused By the Headline by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Uh, yeah, I'll have a double Crono frappuccino and a venti Cloud -- be sure to leave room for Chocobo."

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:I Was Super Confused By the Headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Uh, yeah, I'll have a double Crono frappuccino and a venti Cloud -- be sure to leave room for Chocobo."

      "Great—what's the name?"
      "Cid."

    2. Re:I Was Super Confused By the Headline by eyenot · · Score: 1

      Role-playing and caffeine seem like a natural marriage, though.

      --
      "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
    3. Re:I Was Super Confused By the Headline by cupantae · · Score: 4, Funny

      "One bard, please. Extra spoony."

      --
      --
    4. Re:I Was Super Confused By the Headline by Omegawar · · Score: 2

      Glad I'm not the only one. I was picturing the girl making the coffee dressed up as Tifa.

    5. Re:I Was Super Confused By the Headline by DroolTwist · · Score: 1

      How are mimes supposed to take advantage of this? Seems pretty exclusionary to me.

    6. Re:I Was Super Confused By the Headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Glad I'm not the only one. I was picturing the girl making the coffee dressed up as Tifa.

      That's quite possibly the only thing that could get me into a Starbucks...

  4. interface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For being a technology site, slashdot sure has a shitty mobile interface..just sayin

    1. Re:interface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just mobile, my roving friend.

  5. Square and Starbucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Was it just me who thought this would be about making sure Square-Enix developers stayed focused?

    1. Re:Square and Starbucks by FilmedInNoir · · Score: 2

      Yes... I thought maybe some coffee related RPGs were going to be produced like Latte Quest or Final Cappuccino.

      --
      Sig. Sig. Sputnik
    2. Re:Square and Starbucks by cupantae · · Score: 1

      I, on the other hand, imagined a revamped Starbucks menu system involving "junctioning" of customers' pets to improve coffee attributes such as size, caffeine, flavour and fairtradeness. Sadly, this is not the case.

      --
      --
    3. Re:Square and Starbucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      would have been awesome though :(

    4. Re:Square and Starbucks by neminem · · Score: 1

      I was just imagining Final Fantasy themed coffee drinks, a la these, only coffee. I was disappoint.

  6. No cashier needed by davide+marney · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If they can track customers as they walk in the door, why even have a line at the cashier? You walk in the door, you get a push notification to confirm or change your standing order on your phone, and then you take a seat. Once your drink is ready, you get another notification, go to the pickup counter where they confirm your photo and give you your drink.

    --
    "We receive as friendly that which agrees with, we resist with dislike that which opposes us" - Faraday
    1. Re:No cashier needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How is this easier (or more desirable from any viewpoint) than the current system? I fail to see what problem is being solved.

    2. Re:No cashier needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem of paying a cashier to stand and take orders? This would allow the line to move faster or starbucks to have one less staff member working.

    3. Re:No cashier needed by badfish99 · · Score: 2

      Why bother with customers at all? Just track the people walking past the store, charge each of them $5, and leave the country with a big bag of cash before the police can catch up with you.

      Credit card transactions with no audit trail: what could possibly go wrong?

    4. Re:No cashier needed by sh00z · · Score: 1

      GP appears to desire minimal interaction with other humans, and the steps outlined would help achieve that.

    5. Re:No cashier needed by AmIAnAi · · Score: 2

      But then I wouldn't get to chat to the attractive cashier while they took my order. Seriously though, I can see the advantage if you're getting a coffee to go and can simply go straight to the collection point, but if I'm going to sit down its nice to have someone say hello and smile as you give your order, ask how you are and comment on the weather.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature.
    6. Re:No cashier needed by tomhath · · Score: 2

      Sadly, that's how coffee shops used to be. When I worked in one I knew the regulars and had their order ready before they sat down. Now get off my lawn.

    7. Re:No cashier needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My phone has a weather app.

    8. Re:No cashier needed by complete+loony · · Score: 0

      GPS? Why not use connecting to the in store wifi as the trigger, and then talk to the register directly. I bet this is implemented with a central service that will fail with the slightest internet connection issue.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    9. Re:No cashier needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets be honest. It takes a very long time to swipe a credit card. It has to go all the way from the top of the reader to the bottom, query a database, and enter a transaction.

      This shortens that time by allowing people to connect to their wifi, query the database, pull up a photo of the person, and then the cashier will be able to identify that person.

      Much quicker, right?

      Also this stops credit card fraud, because everyone that steal credit cards immediately buys $4 coffee for themselves and their friends - instantly running up 10's of dollars on the victims card.

    10. Re:No cashier needed by Anubis+IV · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In computing terms, it's the difference between serial and parallel. In this case, allowing anyone to check themselves out via their phones would mean that more transactions could be handled per minute, even though each transaction may take longer to accomplish. It would also be a less frustrating experience, since customers could go in, sit down, and make the transaction in their own time from the comfort of a nice seat, rather than having to stand in line for an interminable amount of time while the lady at the front forces the poor cashier to repeat back to her the 17 adjectives describing her "coffee" drink, just to make sure he didn't mess up the order.

      Now, I'm sure we'll still need a cashier to handle people like her who want to place custom or unusual orders that aren't handled easily via Square, but for the majority of people, it can be used to speed them along. Apple has actually been using a system like this for a few months now, where any customer with an iOS device can download a retail store app, find the product they want in the store, and simply purchase it from their device, then walk out the door, all without having to ever talk to a salesperson. It sounds crazy to me, to be honest, but the people I've talked to who have done it think it's absolutely great.

    11. Re:No cashier needed by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

      So what happens when the system goes down? You've suddenly got nobody there who is capable of taking the orders. If it's anything like the coffee shop I had the misfortune of working for the staff aren't allowed to take on each other's roles if there's a problem. I was once threatened with disciplinary action because whilst working alone I was taking orders and serving at the same time (standard practice in the bar trade).

      The upshot? I was told to take all of the orders before I started making coffees, so I did. As a result I was still taking orders an hour later and several people were going ballistic at the boss who was trying to explain that the company's systems would ensure they were served quicker (which was untrue to the point of hilarity). I asked her, in front of the customers, if I could demonstrate how one person could both take orders and serve at the same time. The response? "Our other staff can't do that, if customers get that service from you they'll expect it in our other outlets."

      Coffee shops (collectively) need to get their heads out of their backsides and train their staff to do two jobs at once, not try to eliminate jobs with flakey tech based ordering systems.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    12. Re:No cashier needed by hawguy · · Score: 1

      So what happens when the system goes down? You've suddenly got nobody there who is capable of taking the orders. If it's anything like the coffee shop I had the misfortune of working for the staff aren't allowed to take on each other's roles if there's a problem. I was once threatened with disciplinary action because whilst working alone I was taking orders and serving at the same time (standard practice in the bar trade).
       

      The same thing that happens at the airport when the airline's automated check-in kiosks are down - they muster all of the employees they can to manually take orders meanwhile the queue backs up out the door and everyone is unhappy, but Starbucks saved a few bucks on labor so it looks good to investors even if it annoys customers.

      Fortunately, there's still some little competition for coffee, but if Starbucks continues to buy up small chains (like Peets), that may not be the case forever. Small coffee shops aren't always where you want them, Starbucks is everywhere.

    13. Re:No cashier needed by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 1

      Uh, speed? The benefits are obvious. Any time a customer can walk into a store, and have the store know exactly what they want, it's faster.

      Think of it as similar to phoning an order in prior to going in. You just float to the pickup counter, pay, and leave. Much as the baristas will miss out on flirting with you, from a business standpoint it's a huge win, assuming they can pull it of even 10% of the time.

    14. Re:No cashier needed by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 1

      Most coffee shops are NOT like the one you worked at. My girlfriend is a barista, and has been at several large chain shops. Cross-training is a requirement.

      Perhaps you're thinking of Starbucks during Shultz' retirement (which ended up being a sabbatical, as he came back to save the shareholders). It's still the Walmart of coffee, but in an emergency, a well run store won't just go retarded (perhaps, any further retarded) on you.

    15. Re:No cashier needed by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 1

      The interaction would still be there for those that want it. Coffee shops have historically been a place where you can sit and chill, and if the barista is friendly (and you're not a dick) when things slow down you'll have your chance to chat.

      Besides, if you are attempting to chat and have a grand old time expecting fluffy feelings of human interaction when there's a line to the door, you're simply an asshole, just like those folks that don't know what they want to order in a busy bar.

    16. Re:No cashier needed by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 1

      Half of all coffee shop transactions are still cash, believe it or not. It's easy to tell by the way my girlfriend's tips are split out; on a good day, she'll get a 50/50 split between cash and credit card tips.

      In fact, since Starbucks doesn't allow CC tips, only cash tips, this will actually hurt their baristas badly, who usually make minimum wage (or even far less, in some shops/chains) plus tips.

    17. Re:No cashier needed by Mitreya · · Score: 1

      Credit card transactions with no audit trail: what could possibly go wrong?

      Hah! If it's good enough for our democratic elections, it's good enough for buying coffee!

  7. what?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is our economy now based on the honour system?!

    what could possibly go wrong!

  8. WOO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't wait to exploit this.

    Free (crap) coffee! Paid for by the nearest sucker with a smartphone.

  9. How by TheEffigy · · Score: 2

    How is this even possible, the accuracy of standard GPS and size of starbucks stores ensures there must be a high margin of error - unless I'm misunderstanding.

    1. Re:How by Nimloth · · Score: 1

      Don't know about you but my phone can usually find me within 6 to 10 meters.

    2. Re:How by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      There are lots of Starbucks where you can't get a cell phone signal or a GPS ( urban canyons, grocery stores) .

    3. Re:How by Mr.+X · · Score: 1

      Wi-Fi triangulation should be pretty accurate, since pretty much any Starbucks store is guaranteed to be broadcasting a Wi-Fi signal.

  10. Bit of an invasion of privacy isn't it? by blackest_k · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am quite uneasy about all this gps tracking and logging which is going on these days?
    Sure it's just a coffee in this case but do you really want everything logged and recorded?
    How long before your inbox is getting spammed with we notice you haven't been in starbucks for a while here's a voucher to super size your coffee on your next visit. Should there be records of your movements associations and purchases.

    Facebook has gotten ever more intrusive, especially with timeline they are recording where you go and who you meet up with.

    Your smartphone will tag your location with gps when you take a photo in the exif information (firefox has an extension to read the exif and locate it on a map for you). I noticed facebook strips the exif data from photographs but facebook is still likely to retain it for their own purposes and of course facebook will turn over everything it has to the Police should they so request.

    I'm all for using technology when it is useful to the user, but this constant casual surveillance is beginning to get more than a little creepy. You don't have to live in Syria to find a goverment who will use technology against you given the opportunity.
     

    1. Re:Bit of an invasion of privacy isn't it? by outsider007 · · Score: 2

      It's not for you. They're selling mocha frappuccinos to yuppies. When they start accepting smartphone payments for tin foil hats your feedback will be welcome.

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    2. Re:Bit of an invasion of privacy isn't it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More interesting that probably many stores have wifi, so they probably don't even need gps information because they can track what access point you're using and know what store you arrive to.

    3. Re:Bit of an invasion of privacy isn't it? by w_dragon · · Score: 1

      May work some places, but last time I was in a major city I was on the 20th floor of a hotel and I had access to about 20 hotspots, including several starbucks. GPS would tell them that I was a couple hundred feet above the store location, and thus probably not physically in the store.

    4. Re:Bit of an invasion of privacy isn't it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ubiqutous tracking of your smartphone makes it easy to set up an alibi ... just lend your phone to a friend and go commit a crime ... later you can reference your timeline and say "see officer I was at Starbucks" =)

    5. Re:Bit of an invasion of privacy isn't it? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      You'll be happy to know then, that this is entirely optional. After all, how would they serve customers without smartphones? Square is already in use at my local coffee shop, but the only interaction it has with me is via my credit card and my e-mail. The coffee shop is basically just using it as a traditional POS, with them taking my order, punching it in, swiping my card, and then turning the iPad around so that I can provide a tip if I want to and sign my name on the screen. After that, I chose to give Square my e-mail address (which was entirely optional), so it e-mails me a receipt.

      That's it. No pictures of me. No GPS. They have no knowledge of my phone whatsoever. I seriously doubt a company like Starbucks would alienate customers who want to pay in cash or who lack a smartphone, even though smartphone-toting types are their main demographic.

    6. Re:Bit of an invasion of privacy isn't it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Optional. Until it isn't.

      Its only a matter of time before some controlf-freak "digital generation" genius decides cash is too yucky, cumbersome, difficult, or risky to handle, and "frees" the baristas from having to deal such 20th-century detritus.

      This is the year, as I predicted, that the control-freak crowd started their propaganda campaign disguised as sociological research, to show that anyone without a Facebook account should be viewed with great suspicion.

    7. Re:Bit of an invasion of privacy isn't it? by Raenex · · Score: 1

      just lend your phone to a friend and go commit a crime ... later you can reference your timeline and say "see officer I was at Starbucks"

      Then they'll pull the Starbucks video and say, "No you weren't, that was your friend Joe Blow from Facebook. Now your alibi just became circumstantial evidence of you trying to cover up your crime.

    8. Re:Bit of an invasion of privacy isn't it? by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      To be honest I like good coffee, so you're right but for the wrong reasons.

      It doesn't make financial sense paying for coffee by card the retailer pays a transaction fee and a percentage for processing the card and your bank probably charges you for using the card.

      Granted profit margins are huge on coffee sales but for most small purchases it can cost the retailer to sell to you when the payment is plastic

  11. Yikes by Venner · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Am I the only one whose first knee-jerk thought was, "Wow, that's great! And from now on, I use nothing but cash!"

    What's wrong with a simple asymmetric encryption system keyed to a particular cellphone, to be activated at checkout?

    GPS-revealing apps already weird me out -- along with peoples' obliviousness to personal safety and/or security -- but automatically promulgating your name and photo to the store you enter quite exceeds creepy. At least this service is optional...for now.

    --
    A preposition is a terrible thing to end a sentence with.
    1. Re:Yikes by zippthorne · · Score: 2

      My yikes was a different one.

      Square seems to be going for the paypal market - being a middle-man between the credit card companies and the merchants.

      Just like with paypal, I cannoth fathom why the credit card companies would allow this to go on without offering a similar service themselves, and I also cannot understand how it could possibly be anything but more expensive per transaction for the merchant.

      The pay-by-phone tech that I would be interested in is this:

      Merchant requests a payment token from my phone via a low-power short-range communication protocol (bluetooth, perhaps, though I'm not sure how to speed up the discovery so it requests payment from the right device), and I review the request on my on phone, which itself contacts the cc processor to obtain a unique token for this transaction to give to the merchant.

      For convenience, I would like to have settings to specify what kind of authentication is required for various sized transactions, a daily cutoff that bumps up the authentication requirement, and per-merchant settings to bump up or down the requirements. Perhaps with the ability to pre-authorize certain merchants for authentication-free transactions for certain amounts during a certain time-window - e.g. the morning coffee mentioned above.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    2. Re:Yikes by hawguy · · Score: 2

      Exactly -- when I saw that they'd Sbux scan a barcode, I thought that sounded ok (but what happened toe NFC being the ultimate solution to contactless pay-by-phone!?). But when I saw that Square wanted to be able to track my movements at all times via GPS so my phone can automatically authorize payments at a merchant anytime I walk in the door, that's when I realized that I'm sticking to credit cards.

      I don't even mind letting the merchant know that I've walked in their door since they're going to know one way or another, whether I use my phone to pay, my credit card, or my starbucks card, but I don't want to let Square track my every move 24 hours/day and then sell that data to other merchants ("Hey, hawguy walked in your store 23 times over the past month, but he only made a purchase twice. Pay us $$ and we'll pop up an ad on his phone next time he walks in your store"). Or worse, send me promotions based on where I've been so my wife will say "Hey honey, why does Square keep sending you Victoria's Secret promotions when you haven't set foot in that store for years -- who are you buying lingerie for!?!"

    3. Re:Yikes by cob666 · · Score: 1

      Square seems to be going for the paypal market - being a middle-man between the credit card companies and the merchants.

      Just like with paypal, I cannoth fathom why the credit card companies would allow this to go on without offering a similar service themselves, and I also cannot understand how it could possibly be anything but more expensive per transaction for the merchant.

      The difference is that Square is actually a Merchant Service Provider, for all intents and purposes, they ARE the credit card company. Paypal is more like an escrow service. I own a small business and have a merchant service account through a decent provider, the rates are pretty good and the money shows up in my bank pretty quickly. After reviewing services like Square and Intuit's GoPayment I realized that once I factor in the monthly fee I'm currently paying my provider, any fees associated with my POS terminal as well as yearly compliance fees I can get a MUCH better rate by using Square or GoPayment (I decided to go with GoPayment because of the integration with QuickBooks).

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law - Aleister Crowley
    4. Re:Yikes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Starbucks already has video of you. Every Starbucks I've gone into (about 5-6 of them over the past decade) has had multiple video cameras recording pretty much everything in the place. As Starbucks adds support for Square payments, the need to save this video will increase, so most of it will end up going to Starbucks HQ to be datamined and sold to various customers, i.e. Facebook for more shadow profiles, government contractors, etc.

      I haven't gone into a Starbucks for about 4-5 years and don't plan on going into one again. There is nothing there of value.

    5. Re:Yikes by stretch0611 · · Score: 1

      GPS-revealing apps already weird me out -- along with peoples' obliviousness to personal safety and/or security

      I agree. I look at all the popular titles on android and there are so many I will not install because it requests either "your location" or "phone identity".

      There are exceptions for actual apps like google maps or gas buddy, where location is actually needed to enhance the usefulness of the app. However, Angry Birds and many other games will never see the light of day on my phone.

      --
      Looking for a job?
      Want your resume written professionally?
      DON'T USE TUNAREZ!!!
    6. Re:Yikes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's so bad about phone identity?

  12. Silly Wabbit by glebovitz · · Score: 1

    I must be missing something. Square allows me to say my name to purchase coffee and saves me the great pain of opening my wallet and taking out my credit card and handing it to the cashier. I know I am a lazy fuck, but I seem to always have the energy to take my credit card out of my wallet. I know there must be more to this. Perhaps Square intends to offer debit card like services with lower transaction fees in the future and cut Visa and MasterCard out of the picture.

    I am not sure I want Starbucks to track me on my phone as I enter the store, or even as I walk by the store. I definitely don't want to provide them with more data about me. I definitely don't want my children subscribing to Square. Who knows who will be tracking them.

    1. Re:Silly Wabbit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've obviously never actually tried to get a wallet out of skinny jeans.

  13. Too hard by vlm · · Score: 1

    Starbucks will match the photo and the payment will be complete

    Can your average employee handle that? Seems like a risk of clicking the wrong victim. If they require the employee to type in the name first, then if they allow users to select their "screen name" or "nick name" you just know jokers like me will have nick names like "Mr Goatse" or "Mr Hugh G Rection"

    The other part is I don't want retail establishments to know who I am. Not because I'm a crook but because its too creepy. I already hate having shelf stockers and oxygen wasters at Best Buy bug me every 30 seconds when I'm picking up something I already researched online at Amazon so having them call me by name is going to be even creepier and more annoying.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    1. Re:Too hard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The average Starbucks employee? Yes.

      The average Starbucks till that:
      - is running WinXP at the lowest RAM and processor speed possible
      - that can't keep up with the barista's input
      - that craps out at least twice a day
      - that takes over five minutes to reboot
      - that takes down all the other tills in the store with it when it crashes

      Absolutely not.

      P.S. You already have those names.

  14. Three problems by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

    One: I don't like vanilla lattes, so a grande would really be out of the question.

    Two: my wife and I use the same account-- her with the card, me with the phone. How does this let us share?

    Three: it is the human interaction that makes a place like Starbucks special and worth $3 for a disposable cup of colored water. Convenience and efficiency are great, but destroying that culture will be killing the goose that laid the golden egg.

    1. Re:Three problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your point three is way off. I do drink Starbucks regularly, and I don't go there for the human interaction.

  15. square's other cool tech = reenabling petty theft by xeno · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Square? You mean the purveyors of the butter-slice sized "I-can't-believe-it's-PCI-compliant!" (tm) mobile payment system? The first time I had some hipster process my card with his iPhone, I was apalled that there was a system that *can't* issue a physical receipt. I know, I know, most people swipe their cards and wave off the receipt, taking it on faith that the merchant will charge only the amount shown on the till and not a little more... or the maximum I just authorized with the card-present swipe. If the charge is off, you have no proof, no way of coming back, nothing at all.

    Oh sure, I can stand there for another 2-3min while I ask said hipster to email or text me a "receipt" (at least it has a transaction number) usually accompanied with a lot of huffing and puffing about how giving me a receipt is a hassle and why do I want one anyway....? Because I just did the electronic equivalent of laying my wallet on the counter and saying "Take what you need." I'd like some acknowledgement of what was taken. Is that such a burden? I still write a few checks for bills and such so there are multiple transaction types debited against a single account, and I like to reconcile payments and balance my account periodically like a grownup.

    I might slide more easily into the paperless future if the rate of "error" (not really) wasn't going up. Even in my run-o-the-mill consumer usage, I've had a few instances in the past year where a person (a local drive-up barista, a dude selling t-shirts at Comicon, etc) where there was a discrepancy between what I was told and what was punched in. It's never in my favor, and if I didn't catch it in tiny print on a smudgy screen before faux-signing with my finger... And when I ask for a receipt -- even a text pseudo-receipt -- they got all flustered, and one even refused (that was the one who'd added an even two dollars). Persoanlly, if you're that hard up to steal a buck from me, you can have it. But that doesn't mean it's right.

    All of a sudden this older type of "skimming" is coming back into vogue, something that I haven't seen since... well, ever in my lifetime. My parents used to talk about deli guys with a finger on the scale, and cashiers with pennies on the counter to count how many dollars in the till they'd lifted from customers (so they could balance the till by pocketing the right amt of cash at the end of the day), but I thought they were funny old-people stories. Any now Square comes along with a magical box that re-enables a petty crime by depricating auth logs... and few people seem to give a crap.

    Everything old is new again.

    --
    I think not...(*poof*)
  16. Girls Around Me Drinking Coffee by tekrat · · Score: 1

    New app! Ok, so now Starbucks can virtually stalk me. Not that corporations don't already stalk all of us, but once that kind of data becomes accessible, Apps like "Girls Around Me" come to bear, and then we're all suddenly creeped out by the lack of privacy...

    But hey, if I have to give up my privacy for a 1-second time-savings while buying a coffee, I guess we're all with it, then, eh?

    And it only takes one moderately border-line wacko working at Starbucks to know the home address of the cute blonde that asked for a grande half-caf soy latte. Or the identity thief that decides that working at Starbucks is the way into everyone's retirement account.

    We just had an article posted on Slashdot yesterday about some writer who's iphone, ipad and imac were wiped out because of lax security on the part of major corporations -- who allow you to tie together too many services making it easy to break everything. Now comes Starbucks, who will soon make it easy for others to use their account for other nefarious purposes.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:Girls Around Me Drinking Coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you expect from a company that steals underpants for a living!

  17. Wat by Enry · · Score: 2

    Starbucks already has a mobile payment system for smartphones that uses a barcode. I haven't had to carry my starbucks card in my wallet for months. That makes is slightly more secure since my wallet can be stolen while my Android phone can be remotely wiped and is PIN-locked.

    As soon as you enter a Starbucks, you're in a wifi area (attwifi) that you have to click-through before you get Internet access. If most Starbucks customers are like me, they use it. So the instant you walk into a store, there's no way for the phone to communicate to the store that you've entered, since the internet connection is being blocked by the clickthrough. This isn't a problem for the existing smartphone app since it already knows your card number and can generate the barcode. The balance and ability to reload won't work, but that may not be necessary for the transaction.

    And yes, I like Starbucks. Their decaf is one of the few drinkable varieties.

    1. Re:Wat by beaverdownunder · · Score: 1

      ...er, but couldn't the phone communicate over 3G/4G data?

      Somehow I doubt the 'typical' Starbucks customer doesn't have data on their phone plan...

    2. Re:Wat by Enry · · Score: 1

      You must not use a smartphone.

      When you enter an area that has a wifi SSID you've used before, the 3/4G data shuts off and you get data via wifi. Even though you're now on wifi you won't have access to the Internet until you've opened a browser window and confirm you've accepted the terms of service.

    3. Re:Wat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your phone auto connects to the open wifi and stops using 3/4G, but has no net access if you haven't clicked through the intercept page.

    4. Re:Wat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On Android, if an app requests the cellular network, it will get it (if you're in range of a tower) even if WiFi is on and you're connected to a hotspot. For example, T-Mobile's "MyAccount" and voicemail and such apps use this to verify the subscriber, which they can't do (easily) over WiFi. (I'm sure most other carriers' My Account type apps do the same).

      You'll see this in the app permissions list as "System Tools -> change network connectivity", so that's the one to look for if you don't want apps that exhibit this behavior.

      I assume that the upcoming Starbucks app will request this permission and Starbucksers will go ahead and grant it, seeing how the whole idea is that they're already giving their fine-grained GPS location to the store anyway.

    5. Re:Wat by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      Surely the clickthrough software has a whitelist that they can use to allow access to their own systems though? Even more so if the system is operated locally.

    6. Re:Wat by Enry · · Score: 1

      Possible. Doesn't work that way now.

  18. Re:Better than average by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You tried to snark, but you lose.

    McDonald's, through their (insert three adverbs here) ____ ____ ____ processes, produce fries that give the best in the country a run for the money *if you time the batch cycles right*. That is, you watch the current batch of fries, wait until they burn on 4 customers, and maneuver your way to the first of the new batch. Beats EVERY TIME the nasty "home fries" that the indie restaurants seem to think taste good.

    Taco Bell that you tried to hate on, has an even stronger case. You can't get out of a standard mexican restaurant under $15. (remember tips?) They have SEVEN of the best low cost meals I have ever had at fast food outlets. (Five if you count the Non-KFC Co-branded ones.)

    What these lowballer corps do is force everyone else to offer something else besides price.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  19. Headlong rush to insanity by Stickerboy · · Score: 1

    Not that it hasn't been ongoing already...

    My wallet stays in a secured, not-readily-accessible pocket, and only comes out when I need it. My phone is shown and changes hands everywhere, so friends and acquaintances can look at photos, videos, or use an app. I understand the big corporate push to monetize your smartphone - it's part of the neverending drive to depersonalize and devalue money so corporations can more easily separate it from you - but why do people buy into it? Is the minute convenience of not having to converse with the barrista or pulling out your wallet really worth the NFC security risk? No thanks! I might as well wear my credit card number, expiration date and CVV on a T shirt.

    --
    Light a fire for a man and he'll be warm for a day. Light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
  20. focus by nathanbeach · · Score: 1

    It's strange that they're only targeting Grande Vanilla Lattes. But they must know what they're doing!

  21. The King doesn't care, why should you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q0VdFi8p_wM

  22. Re:Better than average by RKThoadan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Their fries are pretty good and their non-nugget chicken products are pretty decent as well. However, none of that excuses the horror of the substance which they refer to as "cheese". It's an insult to cheesemakers everywhere.

  23. Couldn't Find One for Coffee... by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  24. grande vanilla latte!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That should please the idiots at Microsoft who designed 'The Ribbon' and 'Windows Metro'... what a bunch of arrogant, out of touch morons they must be, as they sit round, trying to come up with even more stupid and unfriendly user interfaces...

  25. Re:Better than average by colinnwn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Taco Bell that you tried to hate on, has an even stronger case. You can't get out of a standard mexican restaurant under $15. (remember tips?) They have SEVEN of the best low cost meals I have ever had at fast food outlets.

    Taco Bell is not Mexican food. It is Tex-Mex inspired junk food. That's not to say I don't enjoy it on occasion, especially a green buritto and a MexiMelt. But there are at least 30 good Mexican restaurants in Dallas I can go to for under $15 (food, non alcoholic drink, tax and tip), many under even $10. And there isn't a single meal at Taco Bell I would consider one of my favorite low cost meals. Del Taco just opened in Dallas, and I personally like it better.

  26. How is that different than online shopping? by langelgjm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The first time I had some hipster process my card with his iPhone, I was apalled that there was a system that *can't* issue a physical receipt.

    How is that different than shopping online? You're relying on online vendors to present you with a confirmation page, which you can then choose to print on your printer, or have e-mailed to you. If you're buying a physical object, you might get a receipt with your shipment, or maybe just a packing list. If not, where's your physical receipt? It's up to you to print it.

    Square will e-mail or text you a receipt. Is it that hard to enter 10 digits to get a text? If the person you're buying from is complaining, the problem is them, not the system.

    --
    "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    1. Re:How is that different than online shopping? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even better, Square can set up their app to print to a Bluetooth receipt printer. Bam-- receipt right there on the premises. Problem solved.

      I've never had a problem in the many, many... okay, one vendor who used Square and was asked for an electronic receipt (business trip). Sure, it's a pain in the ass to issue a receipt through email, largely because it's a pain in the ass to tap an email address on a touchscreen. One way to get around this is an NFC reader or voice input, but those would open up some new cans of worms-- hence, Square's new tentacle: a mobile payment app that doesn't need NFC and uses a real-life challenge-response authentication protocol: if the vendor sees the customer's face and the customer confirms his or her name, the transaction is approved by the vendor. If the customer is also registered with Square, sending the transaction data to the customer's email address can be easy, fast, and secure, assuming the devs code it right.

    2. Re:How is that different than online shopping? by xeno · · Score: 1

      Online retailers don't process cards the same way as a "card-present" (Visa/MC/PCIco's term) transaction, don't get full track data, have different terms, easier chargebacks, etc etc. OTOH Square reads full-track data, and processes it thru an uncontrolled consumer device with encryption that terminates at the next proxy... Yeah. So I have the highest-disclosure type of activities happening thru the highest-risk type of merchant processing. 's no good.

      --
      I think not...(*poof*)
  27. Re:Better than average by timeOday · · Score: 1

    McDonald's has sort of won me over too... I like their hot fudge sundae and for about $2.50 total I can get that, plus a 32 oz diet Dr. Pepper. Fountain drinks aren't always equally good everywhere, but IME theirs are consistently good. Subway for dinner then McDonalds for dessert and I am happy.

  28. Wake me when Walmart signs up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously. We are not talking about a major mover here. We are talking about a company (Starbucks) which sells a great deal of one thing. When Walmart or Home Depot or someplace that sells many millions of dollars of different items signs up then this is important. Starbucks using Square is just the company trying to stay 'current', 'cause Square is what all the cool kids are using now.

  29. Re:Better than average by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "produce fries that give the best in the country a run for the money"

    I will accept this if you exclude fries made out of sweet potatoes from your comparison.

    You cannot beat sweet potato fries. This is very important.

    Otherwise, I'm fine with your post.

    If you haven't had sweet potato fries, do yourself a favor and acquire some. Then you will understand the occasion for my post.

  30. Re:Better than average by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Taco Bell that you tried to hate on

    Just "hate". Not "hate on".

    Do you "love on" or "like on" things? No, of course you don't.

  31. Re:square's other cool tech = reenabling petty the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Couldn't you hack the receipt printer to send out the wrong amount?
    I guess this just makes it easier, and like you're saying, the problem comes mostly at the direct interaction level.

    One of my managers at McDonald's (some time ago) would work drive-thru on the headset all by himself -- he was the cashier, order taker, and hand-out guy. He would tell customers a slightly higher amount than they really owed and then pocket it. I guess he would just skim the extra cash immediately so the change matched the receipt, and since it's all verbal, it's hard to trust yourself or give proof when you're looking at a printout or complaining (to my manager) at the store.

    And it's not common to be keenly aware of small details in any sort of constant fashion in everyday life. As far as I knew, he got away with it. I don't think he did it on every order either.

    "Personally, if you're that hard up to steal a buck from me, you can have it." But that doesn't mean it's right.

    I think this is a good attitude. It certainly isn't right, but it is unwise to be disproportionately angry over such things.

  32. Re:square's other cool tech = reenabling petty the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know, I know, most people swipe their cards and wave off the receipt, taking it on faith that the merchant will charge only the amount shown on the till and not a little more... or the maximum I just authorized with the card-present swipe.

    At which point you dispute the charge. Hell, my bank's website has a little "dispute" link next to each card-based purchase in the transaction history view. And the best part is, if the transaction was a non-signature purchase (which they are by default if you never see a receipt, obviously), you pretty much win by default!

  33. Re:square's other cool tech = reenabling petty the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Do you own and operate a brick & mortar small business? Do you take credit cards as a part of that business? If yes, how much was the initial cost of the setup? What percentage do you pay to each respective company for each transaction? If no, what percentage of your customers wished they could have purchased more, but were lacking their checkbook + enough cash on hand to pay?

    The Square has done wonders for small businesses that otherwise would not be able to offer card transactions. And yes, if there is a mistake on the transaction, you can call up the company and ask to get it fixed. A $12 tip at a restaurant that should have been $2 gets refunded in 1-2 business days. If the merchant refuses or is otherwise unavailable, you dispute it with your credit card company.

    Your other points are valid with respect to having a better audit system available and physical receipts. A mini, mobile printer that could integrate with the Square sounds like an excellent idea. Other mobile devices already offer this, and I can see the Square benefiting from this as well. If you have the resources, I would encourage you to develop and sell such technology to Square, you'd probably make a nice profit from it. Otherwise, it probably will be offered as an add-on in the future, just wait for it.

  34. Phone app doesn't require interaction with phone? by MichaelJ · · Score: 1

    “Pay With Square, Square’s cellphone app, which eliminates even having to take the phone out of your pocket or sign a receipt.” Okay, so how does the cell phone app work if I don't actually unlock the phone or run the app? And while you're at it, if I'm inside a shopping mall, the GPS location is going to be completely wonky and it will have no idea what store I'm actually in.

    --

    Michael J.
    Root, God, what is difference?
  35. Re:Better than average by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, thanks. I've tried "sweet potato" fries a dozen times, and they always manifest at best, a nasty aftertaste reminiscent of moldy spinach.
    The only things worse are beets and brussels sprouts.

  36. back in the real world... by dAzED1 · · Score: 2
    "If the charge is off, you have no proof, no way of coming back, nothing at all."

    You must have really, really horrible credit cards. Get an AMEX. If a charge is off, call them - they'll fix it. I even had a situation where a mechanic shop charged me $1k for /not fixing/ my harley, so after a bit of protesting I walked out the door, called AMEX, and let them handle it. I did have to send in a little form defending my protest of the charge, but only because it was $1k, versus the $10 charge for a $3 coffee that would be much faster. The business is the one who is responsible for creating an audit trail they can not modify - when have you ever used the slip of paper (which fades to unlegible in microseconds anyway) to protest a charge after the fact?

  37. Hey does that mean they are releasing... by tnk1 · · Score: 1

    Kingdom Hearts Mocha Latte?

    Oh sorry, wrong Square.

  38. Re:Better than average by the+phantom · · Score: 2

    Regarding McDonalds fries, I suppose that is a matter of taste. I prefer a thicker cut fry. That still doesn't change the fact that the product that McDonalds is best known for---their bugers---are mediocre to terrible. As you rightly point out, McDonalds is not competing on quality, but on price and speed. There are many places where I could get a better burger (and better fries, too), but I am going to have to pay more or wait longer (or both).

    Regarding Taco Bell, you have once again made my point for me. I can go to a real Mexican restaurant and get a great taco, but it will likely cost me more than a Taco Bell taco. You buy a taco at Taco Bell not because you want a high quality meal, but because you want a fast, cheap meal.

  39. Re:Better than average by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    McDonalds fries are processed food products poisoned with various toxic chemicals. None of these chemicals will drop you dead in your tracks, so ignorant people believe they are "good food" because the combination of fat and salt pushes the right neurons. The health issues that people get from eating at McDonalds has been well documented. Even a casual observer can see the people coming out of a McDonalds and tell there is something amiss. Many of these people are obese or misshapen or seem to have mobility challenges or motor control difficulties. Regardless of shape, most of them are poor. McDonalds, along with the other fast food places, is where poor people go to eat so they die quicker. Like Goldman Sachs, but in a different industry, McDonald's does "God's work".

  40. Re:Better than average by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    I think I can still get a 'better than average' fish taco at San Loco for $1.50. Beats the hell out of Taco Bell. I suspect your standards are pretty low. Oh, and home fries are not the same things as french fries.

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  41. Re:Better than average by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... I like their hot fudge sundae and for about $2.50 total I can get that, plus a 32 oz diet Dr. Pepper...

    why the "diet" dp? trying to cut back on sugar, are ye?

    duh, wunder if yer 'merican.

  42. Re:Better than average by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Same AC as the one you replied to.

    I happen to like beets and brussel sprouts. Last week, I ate a small can of beets, and I have a pack of frozen brussel sprouts in my freezer, waiting to go in the steamer.

    I suppose I didn't notice any aftertaste to sweet potato fries because I just kept eating them...

    Ever have sweet potato chips? (American definition for chips) Those are likewise fantastic.

  43. Re:Better than average by timeOday · · Score: 2

    why the "diet" dp? trying to cut back on sugar, are ye? duh, wunder if yer 'merican.

    I agree the "diet" appellation we still use here in the US sounds a bit odd compared "lite" as used most other places.

    But yeah, it's the sugar. In a 32 oz drink that would be 90 grams of sugar and 360 calories. That's like eating an entire second hot fudge sundae (370 cal), except ALL of it is sugar.

    A plain McDonald's ice cream cone has 150 cal, 18g sugar, 4g protein, 2g sat. fat, so it's actually relatively sane for a treat. I know, it's not the same as Haagen-Daaz, but personally I like it.

  44. Re:square's other cool tech = reenabling petty the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The first time I had some hipster process my card with his iPhone, I was apalled that there was a system that *can't* issue a physical receipt."

    The first time my card was processed on a phone, the customer service guy walked over to a printer and tore me off a receipt.

  45. Department of Pre-Coffee by 0xG · · Score: 1

    You are near a Starbucks.
    Our analytics predict that you are thirsty.
    And we just charged you for a venti pink frilly-frally-frappuccino.

    So you might as well come in and drink it.

    --
    A pox on web designers who feel that window.innerWidth == screen.availWidth
  46. Re:square's other cool tech = reenabling petty the by ScentCone · · Score: 2

    You've never really used this system, have you? Or does it actually take you two to three minutes to type in your e-mail address on a pad? Really? Two to three minutes? Because it's swipe, sign, optionally-type, done. I've done hundreds of Square transactions, and it takes seconds. You don't know what you're talking about.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  47. Termination of latte access by SnowHog · · Score: 1

    How many cups do I need to purchase to have my account flagged for suspicious activity?

  48. Re:Better than average by datavirtue · · Score: 1

    I would gladly pay the price for real cheese. The extra .20 would be worth it.

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  49. Re:Better than average by datavirtue · · Score: 1

    Haagen-Daaz sucks. Ben & Jerry's blows that shit out of the freezer.

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  50. Re:square's other cool tech = reenabling petty the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And to sum it all up....

    Get off my lawn you punk kids!

      =P

  51. Re:Better than average by Raenex · · Score: 1

    I happen to like beets and brussel sprouts.

    Which is probably the reason you like sweet potatoes. I don't like any of those foods, as they taste bitter to me. It's a genetic trait.

  52. Re:square's other cool tech = reenabling petty the by xeno · · Score: 1

    > it's swipe, sign, optionally-type, done.
    > I've done hundreds of Square transactions, and it takes seconds. You don't know what you're talking about.

    You are clearly an unusually adept expert. Oh wait.... no.

    The standard *actual* usage scenario is... hand my card over, wait for the person to dig out his/her phone from their pocket, wait for them to dig out the Square dongle from some other pocket or purse, wait for them to plug it in and swipe, swipe, swipe to find the app, start it, fiddle with the dongle because it's not reognized, pull it out, plug it in again, swipe the card, set it down, check the amount, type it in, no wait... clear, and type it in again, hand it to me to "sign", take it back to submit, I ask for a receipt, they say they don't know how to do that, I say click the 'receipt' option, they ask their partner/manager/boyfriend whether that's ok, there's a minute of mumbline and quibbling, they push a button and hand it back to me... I type out a number, then they click submit... and wait... and wait... and if we're lucky, THEN the transaction "takes seconds." If we're not, the transaction fails for any number of reasons (mostly crappy signal/data service drops off), and I'm standing there even longer watching some slackjawed yokel tapping at his ifruit, wasting my time.

    You're either an atypical client in a stable location (in which case you could get a much better rate elsewhere), or you're a salesperson for Square.

    --
    I think not...(*poof*)
  53. Re:square's other cool tech = reenabling petty the by ScentCone · · Score: 1

    So your compaint is about small-time retailers who don't understand the value of your time, and thus aren't prepared to cashier your order. You'd have the same complaint if they used a classic wireless credit card terminal, but didn't have it turned on or loaded with paper until after you handed them your credit card.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  54. Re:square's other cool tech = reenabling petty the by celery+stalk · · Score: 1

    It seems as if xeno is just itching for a reason to complain, when it would have been easier for everyone involved if he just had cash on hand. The vendor obviously isn't forcing him to charge the transaction, or even preferring it. Otherwise they'd have the dongle already attached to their iPhone or iPad, have the app running, and likely have been using it without incident (gasp! Even sending SMS/email reciepts!) many times that day and before.

    I have a Square dongle, and a GoPayment one. I've used the Square to clear the remaining oddball balance from a Visa gift card into my checking account, and it was easy as "Open app, plug dongle. Enter amount, swipe card, sign something, click "Continue to receipt". Type a phone number or email, click Submit (or skip receipt)." That's it.

    In fact, I just charged myself $1 from another bank's card...which will cost me $0.03 (no big deal). It took not even 30 seconds from when I unlocked my phone, to getting the confirmation text. For someone who has used it before to run transactions, or even many times as a small vendor should have, it's not that complicated!

    --
    aaaand...whee!