Slashdot Mirror


US Is Finally Cleaning Up Agent Orange In Vietnam

derekmead writes "It only took 40 years. And yes, Washington still disputes Hanoi's claim that up to 4 million Vietnamese suffered contact with the defoliant, which was dumped en masse in a U.S. air campaign to scorch away the dense jungle cover under which guerilla fighters hid. But the AP reports that the U.S. is finally set to start cleaning up the mess. The numbers are staggering: Between 1962 and 1971, the U.S. military sprayed some 20 million gallons of Agent Orange and a galaxy of other herbicides on nearly a quarter of former South Vietnam. The defoliant ate through about 5 millions acres – a tract comparable in size to Massachusetts – of forest. An additional half-million acres of crops were decimated."

46 of 277 comments (clear)

  1. If I was cynical... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would think that the clean up was a pre-requisite to the large resort chains going in and buying up the beach front...I hear it's beautiful there.

    1. Re:If I was cynical... by slashmydots · · Score: 2, Interesting

      yeah, cuz people LOVE jungles and snakes and 120F + 99% humidity and bugs and everything trying to eat you and unfriendly natives and polluted water.

    2. Re:If I was cynical... by Penurious+Penguin · · Score: 5, Funny

      So I see you've been to Florida lately. It works well enough here, doesn't it?

      --
      Forward! -- Emperor Norton, 2012
    3. Re:If I was cynical... by mister2au · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They indeed do ... even if you were being funny.

      With 6 million annual visitors and a 20+% growth rate, it currently is ahead of places like Argentina, Brazil, India, Japan and Australia ... while rapidly closing in on Hawaii, Portugal, South Africa and Egypt.

      Also for the US audience - already twice the tourism level of Cancun - so don't doubt the big money that is about to pour into that place.

      Vietnam is clearly heading to replace Thailand for many people.

    4. Re:If I was cynical... by Krommenaas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Have you even been to Vietnam? I've travelled a lot and the Vietnamese are among the happiest bunch of people I've met.

    5. Re:If I was cynical... by flyneye · · Score: 2

      Probably safer than Cancun in this day and age.
      Probably the same scam-the-tourist games from cabbies and locals too, different language.
      No red tequila though. *sigh*

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  2. Re:20 million gallons I know... by dgatwood · · Score: 2

    About 82 cubic feet, if you include storage on the roof. Though how they managed to send it back in time is still an open question. Or perhaps they meant a Galaxie.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  3. Re:Decimated? by HornWumpus · · Score: 3, Funny

    How do you get nine acres to beat another acre to death?

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  4. That's nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But what about our fathers who also had this shit sprayed on them and told to fuck off and die of cancer?

    1. Re:That's nice by bogie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or their children who were born with birth defects...

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    2. Re:That's nice by LordLucless · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your fathers are Darwin award winners.

      +1 Unwitting Stupidity

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    3. Re:That's nice by Angrywhiteshoes · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or their children who were born with birth defects...

      Exactly. It's a life-time battle just for a US Vietnam Vet to prove he was in the place he was in at the time this shit got sprayed on them, let alone get help for their children.

      I can't imagine slowly dying of cancer and know that their children are 2nd generation casualties of this shit. This goes for both sides of the battlefield.

    4. Re:That's nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      You're fathers went to war to kill people in a spot of land that as none of are business. Your fathers are Darwin award winners.

      Or they were drafted or conscripted - like mine.
      And then their allies, the Americans, forgot to tell the Aussies - "Yo, spraying some nasty shit over here, might want to get out".
      And then their kids (me), were born deaf and lost a father to cancer as a result of it.

      So yeah, fuck you.

    5. Re:That's nice by burningcpu · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My father served in Vietnam as a truck driver. The foliage on the sides of the roads were a main target for the agent orange deployments, and the truck drivers likely received a proportionally higher dose due to their continuing contact with the agent.

      He major inflammation of the heart 6 months after returning from Vietnam, and a series of heart attacks from Ischemic heart disease over the next few decades. He had a multitude of other illnesses that are typically associated with exposure.

      I was born with several birth defects. They are mostly manageable with medicine, but still, it sucked being 18 and having to take beta-blockers so my heart wouldn't tear itself to pieces.

      My Father's illnesses are under presumed status, meaning that all he had to demonstrate in order to receive benefits was that he was in Vietnam during the time period agent orange was deployed, and that he had a disease recognized to be caused by exposure. This recognition did not happen until a few years ago. He had spent the last 15 years in near poverty as he could no longer work due to the advanced heart disease, which required a quadruple bipass.

      The causality for my health issues is less defined, and I'm basically on my own for the treatment.

      Growing up dealing with this, and watching my Dad fight PTS and his illnesses made me very suspicious of the government at a young age. Sadly, all that insight has seemed to gain me is a disgust for the blind and ignorant patriotism most people I meet seem to display.

    6. Re:That's nice by Johann+Lau · · Score: 2

      Fuck you. You are displaying the bullshit armband attitude that makes this stuff possible in the first place. Just because soldiers (or truck drivers, for that matter) have "American" in their passport, doesn't exactly they're the ones who profit from the wars they're used as cannon fodder in.

      And even if it did: punishing children for what their fathers did? Fuck you.

  5. Agent Orange by TubeSteak · · Score: 2

    Created by responsible corporate citizens under the auspices of the Defense Production Act

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  6. That's funny.... by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 2

    The US barely helps allies it bombed.

    Unless Laos got a gift card I'm unaware of?

  7. Re:Decimated? by artor3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Congratulations, in your haste to be OUTRAGED, you missed the fact that the GP was just making a (lame) joke about the definition of the word "decimated".

  8. Re:Um... by Bespoke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My guess would be that Monsanto and Dow now have an Agent Orange clean-up chemical to sell and have been lobbying for this to boost their profits.

  9. Re:What a waste of tax payer money! by NouberNou · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So you plan to build the next mars rover? How about just the road to get to the place where the next mars rover will be built? Let us give private citizens and companies the power to do all of that and see how far they want to go spending their money. Quit thinking like a child and realize that there is a reason you are taxed, and its a good one.

  10. Re:Five million acres by deesine · · Score: 2

    Do the trees know the difference?

    --
    damaged by dogma
  11. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Still our enemy "technically?" Relations with Vietnam were normalized years ago. We have an embassy there. We have trade agreements with them. I mean, yes, if you consider them to be gooks, then I guess you need to consider them our enemy but that's an individual thing.

    Really, who gives a shit if we supply some technical support to cleaning up crap that we sprayed. Regardless of what you think of the war and the VC, it was a pretty fucking lame thing to do. Kind of like the military equivalent of peeing on someone. Poisoning their ground and water. Ill-conceived nonsense like that should be handled properly; god help us if we take the high ground for once. Oh noes...we're showing weakness...we're not a super-power anymore, we're a bunch of weak kneed socialists. Short-sighted is short-sighted. In that part of the world, it's just as valuable having friends and influence now as it was when we did it by fighting in the jungles.

  12. Re:What the...? by number11 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not sure if you're aware, but wars are not contests in being selfless and giving towards your opposite. Generally the point is to win.

    Yup. But the point was, this was an unnecessary war that was mostly being conducted because Lyndon Johnson couldn't figure out a way to withdraw that wouldn't result in people blaming him. And, like most wars, those who suffered were mostly civilians.

    Sometimes I think that no country should be allowed to go to war, if it hasn't has a war on its own soil in the last fifty years. We (the USA, or rather the former Confedracy) last had a war on our soil in 1865 (if you don't count a few skirmishes in WW2), so we can't identify with the horror.

  13. Re:It's their land by sco08y · · Score: 2

    Ya, you shit the world, kill millions of humans, ruin their countries and let them deal with it....

    Typical American.

    You do realize Vietnam was a French colony, right?

  14. Re:Tough luck by neonsignal · · Score: 2

    Define "won". And then try explaining it to a Vietnamese civilian who went through that war.

  15. Re:What a waste of tax payer money! by agm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So you plan to build the next mars rover?

    Not by myself, no. But if even people want one built then they should use their own money to built one. If not enough people want to build one, then one will not get built.

    How about just the road to get to the place where the next mars rover will be built? Let us give private citizens and companies the power to do all of that and see how far they want to go spending their money.

    People can spend their money on what ever they like. They should not have it forcibly removed from them so it can be spent on something that *someone else* likes.

    Quit thinking like a child and realize that there is a reason you are taxed, and its a good one.

    The end is not the important part here, the means is. And the end does not justify the means. Compuslory wealth redistribution is nothing short of corrupt.

  16. Pssst, hey IRAQ, I heard about US WMDs by Maow · · Score: 2

    Interesting that US WMDs are still poisoning a country half a world away, whilst US forces are in another country, nearly half a world away (other direction) on a hunt for bogus WMDs.

    If I were cynical, I'd call that hypocritical.

  17. Re:Tough luck by darkfeline · · Score: 2

    Look at US politics. US logic: Buying friends works all the time here, so why not internationally?

  18. Re:Tough luck by MtHuurne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They won in the sense that they kept fighting until the US decided to pull out. It's not like they were marching on Washington DC. Your reasoning would only make sense in a symmetric war.

  19. Re:Five million acres by timeOday · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Do the trees know the difference?

    The fact that they're de-toxing the soil 40 years later tells me there's a difference. Simple slash-and-burn at least allows regrowth if the farmers go away.

  20. Re:Tough luck by Sollord · · Score: 2

    Pretty much this but not sure it its in the sense you meant it... The US is buttering up Vietnam because of China and we Vietnam isn't really against being friends with eh US now it counters China's influence in the region it's also why they're working with Russia it's all about containing the influence of China and the negative impacts i might have in Vietnam

  21. Re:Tough luck by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 2

    Fair point. Now I'm sad...

  22. Nasty stuff that Agent orange? by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 3, Interesting


    I was in Nam towards the end ('73) while in the Army, I was stationed at an abandoned
    Air Force hospital (flush toilets, hot water, Hooch's) - a Mash unit at Tuy Hoa.

    Apparently different companies "downsized" together into one. A conex that had
    been some groups bagage had been sitting alone outside of our hospital since I'd been there.

    Bored I poked through it one day. It was filled with stuff I couldn't explain then nor now. A lot
    of atropine self injectors (they make lousy darts), cases of them and new rubber suits.

    Imagine Dracula's cape with a hood, I wanted one for myself. It was made
    entirely out of a thick soft rubber, with it and other items I found, one could be
    completely covered and safe from nerve gas (my first impression).

    I haven't heard of anything thing that could justify such an outfit, except agent orange.
    If it were used in it's dispersion, Agent orange was seen as some nasty stuff
    by those who used to own that conex.

  23. Re:Five million acres by macraig · · Score: 2, Informative

    Vietnam simply gets more attention due to the long-term effects of Agent Orange.

    And in that respect it's not unlike a nuclear blast (or meltdown), right? The "long-term effects" makes those far more destructive to an ecology and economy than even the most severe conventional warfare. The Chernobyl disaster was more destructive than German bombs and artillery of World War II; at least a bombed-out building can be rebuilt, but Chernobyl was like a real estate version of "denial of service"... can't even rebuild when the entire environment is still lethal. And don't forget the long-term effects to however much of the human element of the ecology that was exposed to it. Agent orange was the chemical version of the nuclear option.

  24. Re:Um... by Immerman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hear, hear. Considering that the US's days as the uncontested military superpower are likely numbered (I'd give us a few more decades at most), it seems to me it makes good long-term strategic sense to start cultivating friendships and good will now, when our actions still matter. Especially considering the massive loss of global good will we've suffered in the last decade.

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  25. No, you are not by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Vietnam is opening up to foreign investors, and the United States is increasingly in competition against the Chinese in the influence game in South East Asia

    While the Vietnamese communist government may want to get on the side of the US to counter the red China, most people of Vietnam just do not trust Uncle Sam

    What took place in the village of My Lai and the Gulf of Tonkin incident have burned into the brains of many Vietnamese

    BTW, the clean up of Agent Orange should not only be done in Vietnam, but also in Laos and Cambodia

    Too many deaths, sufferings, and deformations had resulted from the Agent Orange - and Uncle Sam must be man enough to acknowledge what they had done, and to amend the damages that they had caused
     

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:No, you are not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      ...most people of Vietnam just do not trust Uncle Sam

      That is the opposite of the impression I got when I travelled Vietnam for three weeks earlier this year. "We love Hillary and want to chop off the heads of the Chinese" to quote one guy I talked to. I have no impression that anyone holds any grudges because of the Vietnam war atleast in the younger population. China is seen as a big threat and USA / the west as the good guys.

    2. Re:No, you are not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Too many deaths, sufferings, and deformations had resulted from the Agent Orange - and Uncle Sam must be man enough to acknowledge what they had done, and to amend the damages that they had caused

      Agent Orange is not the only weapon that stays behind when the soldiers leave. The U.S. still refuses to sign any international agreements on not using landmines. In the next three decades mines are going to keep killing in Iraq.

    3. Re:No, you are not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The U.S. still refuses to sign any international agreements on not using landmines. In the next three decades mines are going to keep killing in Iraq.

      International agreements are rarely worth the paper they're written on- they're mostly just publicity. There are plenty of reasons why we haven't signed any of the proposed unilateral landmine treaties, but I doubt you're actually interested as to why. I will point out we already are phasing out most types of landmines in most situations. http://www.state.gov/t/pm/wra/c11735.htm
      I'll also mention we HAVE signed agreements regarding the use of landmines, among other weapons, and I'll also point out we're not the only major power who refused to agree to broad treaties restricting their use.

      And just to clear the record- We didn't lay down the minefields in Iraq which are going to keep killing people. They are deployed as a defense tactic, not as part of an offense. We had some fields setup as part of defensive areas around bases and other military installations, and those were cleared when we closed down the facilities. The ones which are going to keep killing people are the unknown and unmarked ones the Iraqi's put down themselves.

    4. Re:No, you are not by FudRucker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't trust Uncle Sam either and I am a US Citizen born and raised right here, the US Gov has a record of criminal activity so big they would have to use a goddamn freight train to move it anywhere,

      you would have to be either crazy or retarded to trust the government

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    5. Re:No, you are not by flyneye · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Whoa, kinda nit picky there fella.We all know war is terrible and Vietnam happened right in front of our eyes. War isn't fair. It isn't a game with referees like basketball, that can blow a whistle and stop play.Bad shit happens to innocent people in EVERY WAR.Now quit acting like the U.S. military invented sin.

      If Vietnam works like the rest of the world, there will be a percentage that love us and a percentage that hate us and a smaller percentage that do not care. Just like our civil war, more than a century ago, still has opinions tied up in generations of people involved.
      We all know the war is over. Some, to this day, believe the south had the right to secede and the north was wrong to stop it. Some remember Lincoln for the racist,atheist,shyster he was. Some believe Blacks are to punish for their role. Some Blacks believe they should get paid lots of money for their predecessors pain and suffering. Some know the war is over and it has nothing to do with anything ,anymore. There will always be a variety of opinions and they will shift over time in factuality, strength and percentage for a variety of reasons, mostly disinformation, misinformation, propaganda and media ineptitude.

      Atrocities are where you find them. Frankly we've come a long way and Vietnams woes are a walk in the park compared with suffering in history. So quit whining like a stupid 60s hippie with a Jane Fonda poster in the bathroom and take a META look at the situation. We are all so boooooored with the same propaganda informed 60s activist peace-nick crap shoved in our face the last 40 odd years. Hippies did nothing and accomplished nothing ,but helping their foes by being exactly the ridiculous clowns they appeared to be. We need fewer ACTIVISTS and waaaaay more THINKTIVISTS.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    6. Re:No, you are not by Ash+Vince · · Score: 2

      the us has not sewn fields of random landmines in iraq. they have used landmines exclusively for base perimeter defense and even then it is doubtful that there is much or even any of that in iraq (it is primarily used in the DPRK DMZ, where it makes sense). your claim about the future use of landmines is anti-american nonsense. in vietnam, the us had nearly zero use of landmines. the landmines in cambodia are almost entirely of Soviet origin (to balance it out and to blame americans on the issue in cambodia, the fiction of 'unexploded cluster mines' is used - to believe this, you'd also have to believe ridiculous overestimates that 10-20% of us air-dropped cluster munitions failed to explode).

      The reason people count cluster munitions as landmine is because the US loves using weapons like this to prevent a hostile area being moved through freely by enemy forces:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BLU-43
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GATOR_mine_system

      That is why people could them as "Unexploded Cluster Munitions". The problem is the dud rate of mines that do not explode after 15 days and just sit there until some child picks it up and shakes it or something thereby bridging whatever electrical contact broke when was deployed. Additionally the self-destruct time is a relatively new concept, it did not exist in the BLU-43. The other issue is that most of the time the US considers the use of these weapons as classified.

      With regard to Cambodia though you are spot on, most of them were laid by the Kymer Rouge so they probably were Soviet made:

      http://www.mekong.net/cambodia/mines.htm

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
  26. Re:Um... by Jiro · · Score: 2

    The losing side pays reparations if the winning side is capable of forcing them to. If the winning side is not capable of forcing them to, the losing side doesn't pay reparations.

    The West couldn't even force Germany to pay all their reparations after World War I, and trying to force them was one of the things that helped start World War II.

    And I don't think Iraq was made to pay any reparations to Kuwait after the Kuwaitis drove them out (with the help of a foreign power, same as Vietnam did). Nor has the Taliban paid reparations to the US over 9/11.

  27. Re:Economical sanctions by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

    So, the next time Palestine bombs Israel, we just confiscate Palestine. And how do you steal the wealth of a country without invading it? Those intending to break the rules would shield their wealth.

  28. Re:The atrocities by Khyber · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "No, it was not "very common"."

    Not according to journals from my Grandfather, Lt. Col USMC, who served it all from WWII up to Korea/Vietnam.

    That shit happened DAILY.

    You're starting to sound pretty ignorant of history. THAT is foolish.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  29. Re:Economical sanctions by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

    The punishment for war is we war all over you. Why does it sound like a parent giving their child a spanking for hitting another kid while chanting "hitting never solved anything" between blows.