Slashdot Mirror
Ecuador Grants Asylum To Julian Assange
Several readers have submitted news that as expected, Ecuador is formally accepting Julian Assange's request for political asylum. paulmac84 writes "The Guardian are live blogging the Ecuadorian Foreign Minister's announcement that Ecuador is to grant asylum to Julian Assange. In the announcement Minister Patino said, 'We can state that there is a risk that he will be persecuted politically... We trust the UK will offer the necessary guarantees so that both governments can act adequately and properly respect international rights and the right of asylum. We also trust the excellent relationship the two countries have will continue.' The Guardian also carries a translated copy of the letter the UK sent to Ecuador regarding the threat to 'storm' the Ecuadorian embassy."
Also at Reuters.
The Guardian also carries a translated copy of the letter the UK sent to Ecuador regarding the threat to 'storm' the Ecuadorian embassy.
Where exactly is that 'storm' quoting from? You're supposed to use quote marks to indicate that you're quoting something. The relevant bit of the letter says this:
You should be aware that there is a legal basis in the U.K. the Diplomatic and Consular Premises Act which would allow us to take action to arrest Mr. Assange in the current premises of the Embassy. We very much hope not to get this point, but if you cannot resolve the issue of Mr. Assange's presence on your premises, this route is open to us.
Do you see the word 'storm' in there? I don't.
Slashdot - News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters, in ISO-8859-1 Has just realised that beta makes this signature redundant
How sad for Ecuador. Why would you WANT narcissistic rapists in your country, any way?
Why would the UK or Sweden "guarantee" that he won't be extradited? If the US has not requested it, and a court has not ruled, then no guarantee could be made.
Does anyone on Slashdot realize that we have laws and courts for a reason? You can't justify any activity based on speculation about a future ruling in a future case that doesn't even exist yet.
If Assange were to be extradited, I assume it would be via a proper legal mechanism. If the extradition laws were not followed, THEN there would be an issue.
So I can't have my own opinions? Cool. Good to know.
Yeah, "check out my homepage".
The one that is linked directly from every slashdot post I make and make no effort to hide? That one?
Do you have a bias? How do I know you're not being paid for your post?
Newsflash: people can have positions different than yours, and it doesn't mean they're "astroturfing" or being paid.
But cool story, bro.
Also, you have zero evidence that the US will have Assange "abducted, tortured, and likely killed." Bradley Manning is getting a trial.
After having been abducted and tortured. Granted, he is still alive, poor soul.
May we live long and die out
Got that? It's officially not terrorism if a government does exactly the same things as, say, Hamas does.
I define you as wrong, and me as right. Definitions are always right, therefore I am right, and you are wrong. Good day sir.
Semantics... they'll fuck you every time.
#fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
Would you let Assange marry your daughter! Although he's probably been dry humping the legs of every female member of staff since he's been there :)
Working for the (other) man