Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Man Builds His Own Prosthetic Hands

New submitter macbeth66 writes "Almost 10 years ago, Sun Jifa lost his hands in an explosion. Unable to afford the prosthetic hands recommended by the hospital, he built his own. From the article: 'After eight years of tinkering, he says he finally developed a working model that allows him to grip, hold, and mimic other necessary movements via a system of pulleys and wires.'"

144 comments

  1. Impressive! by steppedleader · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seems like this would be hard to do without hands...

    1. Re:Impressive! by Compaqt · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why do you say that?

      After all, Abraham Lincoln built the log cabin he was born in with his own hands.

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    2. Re:Impressive! by bored_engineer · · Score: 2

      My first reaction was the same as yours. I 'm pretty darn impressed. I'm also perversely pleased to see that fishing with dynamite isn't just for my cousins. Fishing with dynamite: the equal opportunity dipshit thing to do. (The article, of course didn't explicitly say so, but I can't figure any other way that fishing and dynamite would go together. Can anybody offer enlightenment?)

    3. Re:Impressive! by Sussurros · · Score: 1

      Hard to do without hands maybe but harder to do without determination and cussedness and harder again to do without brains but hardest of all to do without friends.

      --
      I said - don't look Ethel!..., but it was too late..., she'd already looked.
    4. Re:Impressive! by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Hacker of the year award?

    5. Re:Impressive! by wierd_w · · Score: 5, Informative

      Dynamite is very effective at causing a major shockfront in the water, that ruptures the fish's swim bladders, which are used to control the fish's altituded in the water. Once ruptured, the fish can no longer swim, and will float listlessly on the top. It is usually also directly fatal to the fish.

      It is a very indescriminate way to fish, but also *very* effective. It can completely denude a body of water of all fish.

      if this man really was using dynamite to fish, it sounds like he got hold of one with a very fast burning fuse, which happens when the sticks get old. He is lucky to be alive at all.

    6. Re:Impressive! by DriedClexler · · Score: 4, Funny

      He had help from M. C. Escher.

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    7. Re:Impressive! by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      true, if he lost his hands above the elbows, it would have been even harder for him. OTOH many people who have no hands learn to use their legs and feet very effectively, so maybe he could build it anyway, also he does have relatives (looks like from one of the pictures), they could help.

    8. Re:Impressive! by steppedleader · · Score: 1

      if this man really was using dynamite to fish, it sounds like he got hold of one with a very fast burning fuse, which happens when the sticks get old. He is lucky to be alive at all.

      I've had enough experience with firecrackers that have fast fuses -- fast fused dynamite just sounds bad.

    9. Re:Impressive! by wierd_w · · Score: 5, Informative

      Quite.

      Dynamite (Authentic) is nitroglycerine, suspended in an inert matrix. Originally sawdust, but other inert matrices have also been used historically, such as diatomaceous earth.

      The sawdust form is especially vulnerable to becoming old and "sweaty". Essentially, the suspended nitroglycerine wicks its way out of the matrix, and toward the surface, where it forms a "coating." This is bad for a large number of reasons:

      1) Nitroglycerine is easily and readily absorbed through the skin, and is a well known cardiac-suppressant.

      2) Nitroglycerine, without the stabilizing matrix, is a notoriously sensitive contact explosive.

      3) The sweated nitroglycerine can wick up into the fuse, making it burn VERY quickly; FAR too quickly to throw away once lit, making old sticks unsafe for any purpose. It will explode almost instantly.

      For these reasons and several others, the use of genuine dynamite has fallen out of favor in nearly all developed and developing countries in favor of more stable and less toxic/sensitive high explosives, like PentaErythritol TetraNitrate (PETN), and TriNitroToluene (TNT).

      Genuine dynamite is fairly rare, and it is much more likely that this chinese fisherman was using home-made devices, like nitrogen fertilizer bombs made from ammonium nitrate and kerosine, but it could be possible he has/had access to the genuine article.

       

    10. Re:Impressive! by thoughtspace · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sort of like hammering the last nail when you try to crucify yourself.

    11. Re:Impressive! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously he took a leaf from the Computer Science book, specifically the chapter on compiler bootstrapping. How do you compile a compiler?

      You build by hand a crude compiler and use it to compile a more complex one, use that to compile a more complex one, use that to compile a more complex one, etc

      Obviously he started with hooks and worked his way up to full hands from there.

    12. Re:Impressive! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Swoosh?

    13. Re:Impressive! by nukenerd · · Score: 2

      If he can build a set of working hands without hands, more than most people could do, why does he need the hands?

    14. Re:Impressive! by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 2

      Imagine what he can build now.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    15. Re:Impressive! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and I bet they're fake...oh wait.

    16. Re:Impressive! by RabidReindeer · · Score: 3, Funny

      Obviously he took a leaf from the Computer Science book, specifically the chapter on compiler bootstrapping. How do you compile a compiler?

      You build by hand a crude compiler and use it to compile a more complex one, use that to compile a more complex one, use that to compile a more complex one, etc

      Obviously he started with hooks and worked his way up to full hands from there.

      The hard part was getting past the stage where he had scissors.

    17. Re:Impressive! by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Genuine dynamite is fairly rare, and it is much more likely that this chinese fisherman was using home-made devices, like nitrogen fertilizer bombs made from ammonium nitrate and kerosine

      How exactly does one detonate such a mixture in a reasonably small amount? I've always thought that in order to detonate these mixtures, you need a sufficient amount of it and at least a brick (a few hundred grams?) of high explosive, e.g., TNT, which in turn requires a blasting cap. All this stuff That's not exactly practical for fishing.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    18. Re:Impressive! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...the use of genuine dynamite has fallen out of favor in nearly all developed and developing countries in favor of more stable and less toxic/sensitive high explosives, like PentaErythritol TetraNitrate (PETN), and TriNitroToluene (TNT).

      So, TNT isn't dynamite? Someone tell AC/DC.

    19. Re:Impressive! by Dodgy+G33za · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You do realise that by asking a question like that you might find yourself on a list somewhere? Maybe not at the top where Julian Assange rules supreme after OBL's demise, but on the list none-the-less.

      Oh bugger, that probably means I am on it now too.

    20. Re:Impressive! by Dodgy+G33za · · Score: 3, Funny

      Fancy using OTOH on this article, you insensitive clod!

    21. Re:Impressive! by Dodgy+G33za · · Score: 1

      A better set of hands?

    22. Re:Impressive! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe that's why it took 8 years.

    23. Re:Impressive! by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      yeah, well, it doesn't have to be a full hand!

    24. Re:Impressive! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rochambeau?

      He'd always lose.

    25. Re:Impressive! by Tyler+Durden · · Score: 1

      Don't bother. You won't win that fight.

      --
      Happy people make bad consumers.
    26. Re:Impressive! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      He is lucky to be alive at all.

      Well, lucky he got to a hospital before he bled to death. Usually in an explosion it's not the shock wave that kills you, it's the debris from that shock wave. Remember, water is a lot denser than air.

    27. Re:Impressive! by nighthawk243 · · Score: 1

      Also Chinese fuses are not up to snuff for safety/reliability. Hence why I don't buy the cheap Chinese Visco. It is too damn volatile.

      China has a poor record of giving a damn about human lives, so keep that in mind when buying certain things where safety is a major concern (such as cars). Go watch a few Chinese car crash tests, it is hilarious how they crumple like a Faygo can.

    28. Re:Impressive! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tony Stark was able to build this in a cave!

    29. Re:Impressive! by craash420 · · Score: 1

      ... like a Faygo can.

      Violent Jay, is that you?

      --
      Extra medication for all!
    30. Re:Impressive! by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      Nice try you Nike shill!!!

    31. Re:Impressive! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you serious? AC/DC never said TNT and dynamite were identical (maybe in interviews, but not in the T.N.T. lyrics). They just alluded to the explosive force.

      That TNT and dynamite have nothing in common (except both TNT and nitroglycerin being nitrated polyalcohols ...) is easy to see from the corresponding Wikipedia articles. And that dynamite is not nitroglycerin is easy to see from the Wikipedia article about dynamite ...

    32. Re:Impressive! by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      That's strange, I just read the wikipedia article on dynamite, and it clearly does say it is nitroglycerin... and no, I did not vandalize the page.

      What page were you reading?

    33. Re:Impressive! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then read again (and I also didn't vandalize the page):

      Dynamite is an explosive material based on nitroglycerin, initially using diatomaceous earth (AmE: kieselgur; BrE: kieselguhr), or another absorbent substance such as powdered shells, clay, sawdust, or wood pulp.

      Emphasis mine. Nitroglycerin is a liquid (at room temperature), dynamite is a solid mixture of nitroglycerin and a stabilizing substrate.

    34. Re:Impressive! by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      And how is that different from what I said earlier?

      Dynamite (Authentic) is nitroglycerin, suspended in an inert matrix

      The actual explosive in dynamite is nitroglycerin. The inert matrix does not contribute to the explosive yield any any meaningful way.

    35. Re:Impressive! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was me thinking it was actually built with logs.

    36. Re:Impressive! by HArchH · · Score: 1

      Wow. Impressive. Did you make all that up yourself?

    37. Re:Impressive! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how is that different from what I said earlier?

      It does not. Your comment #41021243 was right, the later #41032015 was not.

      The actual explosive in dynamite is nitroglycerin. The inert matrix does not contribute to the explosive yield any any meaningful way.

      But it does contribute to the process of creating dynamite from nitroglycerin. Dynamite is the mixture. If you ask somebody on the black market to give you some dynamite and he presents a liquid, this is not what you want (whatever that liquid is). I know I must sound nit-picky, but you obviously know what dynamite really is, so you must know that dynamite is not identical to nitroglycerin.

    38. Re:Impressive! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...used to control the fish's altituded in the water. Once ruptured, the fish can no longer swim, and will float listlessly on the top."

      I believe they call it depth, and they would actually list quite a bit, about 90 degrees in most cases. /snark

  2. That glorious by vencs · · Score: 4, Funny

    High five he had after finishing it!

  3. It's not just that he built his own prosthetics by andreicio · · Score: 2

    It's that he did that with no hands!

    1. Re:It's not just that he built his own prosthetics by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 5, Funny

      He's a handyman.

    2. Re:It's not just that he built his own prosthetics by Sussurros · · Score: 1

      Who keeps a foot in every door.

      --
      I said - don't look Ethel!..., but it was too late..., she'd already looked.
    3. Re:It's not just that he built his own prosthetics by furbearntrout · · Score: 1

      that's why it took him 10 years

      --
      Crap. What did the new CSS do with the "Post anonymously" option??
    4. Re:It's not just that he built his own prosthetics by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      He's a handyman.

      Not only that, he's a self-made handyman to boot.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  4. Groovy by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I went from 'go Chinese man!' to 'one of those could have been a chainsaw!' remarkably quickly.

    I'm trying to decide if that makes me bad.

    1. Re:Groovy by Penurious+Penguin · · Score: 1

      If he installed Linux on them badboys, could he send eveything he didn't like to /dev/null just by saying "Talk to the hand."?

      --
      Forward! -- Emperor Norton, 2012
    2. Re:Groovy by Sussurros · · Score: 2

      I apologise in advance for this but imagine a beowulf cluster of those!

      --
      I said - don't look Ethel!..., but it was too late..., she'd already looked.
    3. Re:Groovy by Penurious+Penguin · · Score: 1

      If he was running as root, even distant black-holes would whimper.

      --
      Forward! -- Emperor Norton, 2012
    4. Re:Groovy by ed1park · · Score: 1

      If you throw in a pair of "D cups of Justice", it makes you a comic genius in my book.

      Sealab 2021: Learn it. Love it.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTFHUbwtieg

    5. Re:Groovy by amiller2571 · · Score: 1

      No need for a chainsaw, a flamethrower would be better or both that would work to

  5. Exchange rate by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 1

    The 10,000 yuan man.

    --
    Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
    1. Re:Exchange rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6M US dollars = 38M Chinese yuan

    2. Re:Exchange rate by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      Those hands don't look like they're worth $6M. 10,000 yuan sounds right

  6. Handy by dark+grep · · Score: 2, Funny

    He must have become progressively handy over the years, since he did it himself and no one gave him a hand. I wonder if we will hand off the project now? I guess if nothing else, he has become more handsome as a result of his efforts.

    1. Re:Handy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      boo! hiss!

    2. Re:Handy by Cryacin · · Score: 1

      facepalm

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    3. Re:Handy by dark+grep · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey, at least he has come to grips with the digital age.

    4. Re:Handy by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      He must have become progressively handy over the years, since he did it himself and no one gave him a hand. I wonder if we will hand off the project now? I guess if nothing else, he has become more handsome as a result of his efforts.

      Wow. Did you just write all this stuff off-hand? I have to hand it to you.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  7. See communism works after all by zippo01 · · Score: 4, Funny

    See communism works after all. You start with a need, put in a little hard work and entrepreneurialism and poof, new arms. Of wait that's capitalism. Disregard.

    1. Re:See communism works after all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The major difference between Communism and Capitalism is that in the first the workers own the means of production, in the latter these are owned by someone else. Neither has anything to do with building new stuff. If anything, what he did is related to hacking (and a lack of access to good, free/cheap, medical care).

    2. Re:See communism works after all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Communism is collective ownership of the means of production.

    3. Re:See communism works after all by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      No, state provides for everyone unless you're not high up in the party. Wait, that's communism.

    4. Re:See communism works after all by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The means of production in this case being hands?

    5. Re:See communism works after all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, I thought communism was where a rich elite pretends that the people own the production, saying 'Why would you need to advance when you're already part-owner?' Whereas the Capitalist approach is to tell them if they work hard enough someday they too will be able to own their own means of production (ignoring the fact that said owner or their family cheated somebody out of the money to start the business up, and will never pay their employees enough to actually bootstrap their own means of production since, after all, they don't like competition.) :)

    6. Re:See communism works after all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How is China a Communist state?

    7. Re:See communism works after all by sa666u · · Score: 1

      There is absolutely no difference for the common people whether a country's economy is "free" or planned. You still end up a lifetime slave to interest groups. This man would have built his hands regardless of the economic policies of the Chinese government.

    8. Re:See communism works after all by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      yeah, in a true communist fashion, the system was supposed to take something from those, who 'has the ability' and give it to somebody who 'has the need', so the system was supposed to hack the hands off some other schmuck, because he had them and give them to this guy, after all, private property is not a right under communism at all, and all private property starts with your own body. Freaking communists, never live up to their own ideals. Well, I guess it's everybody.

    9. Re:See communism works after all by houghi · · Score: 5, Funny

      Communism is bad, because he needed to pay for his own medical needs. Of wait that's capitalism. Disregard.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    10. Re:See communism works after all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because the chinese system as it is currently is TOTALLY communism

      You fucking idiot.

    11. Re:See communism works after all by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Yeah in reality the "state" controls the means of production on behalf of the workers, because who would let a bunch of illiterate peasants actually control the means of production. And that's where the fun begins...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    12. Re:See communism works after all by rohan972 · · Score: 2

      The major difference between Communism and Capitalism is that in the first the workers own the means of production, in the latter these are owned by someone else.

      Yet here I am, a worker who owns my own means of production. Not the pseudo ownership of state control, which isn't ownership for the masses in any meaningful way, but me personally having the right to my own tools and equipment to be productive in my chosen occupation, so I can negotiate contracts to work without a "boss" as an intermediary taking the profits.

    13. Re:See communism works after all by martin-boundary · · Score: 1
      Really? Do you own a truck? Do you do deliveries? If so, do you own the roads that you're driving on? Or are you an information worker? Do you own a computer? Do you own the phone lines that connect you to the internet?

      Nobody owns all the means of production in capitalism. It's always about owning some small fraction of the means of production, and fudging the numbers on everything else that's needed (a.k.a. externalities).

    14. Re:See communism works after all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See universal health care works (for the dumb) lets give up our rights and dive in.

    15. Re:See communism works after all by Dodgy+G33za · · Score: 1

      As I have got older I have come to believe that there is NO major difference between any political system. There are always rich bastards at the top to whom the law does not apply. And always poor people at the bottom, who get treated like shit and to whom the law will always mean oppression, not redress.

      Just when you think you live in a *free and fair* society the GFC comes along to remind you of the ugly truth.

    16. Re:See communism works after all by raddan · · Score: 1

      How is China a Communist state?

      I recently traveled to China for a conference, and this exact question was a recurring thought to me. Aside from the restrictions on the internet (no Facebook, Google mostly doesn't work), and the large number of bored-looking (and sometimes sleeping-on-the-job) police, there were few reminders that the place was communist. To me, it seemed very much like a developing nation-- people were entrepreneurial and resourceful. To me, the main difference between the US and China for your average person is that many more Chinese live in what we'd consider poverty, and that the people there are not exactly safety-conscious.

    17. Re:See communism works after all by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you didn't build that!

    18. Re:See communism works after all by rohan972 · · Score: 1

      Well I'm not arguing for extremes. I live in Australia which is fairly socialist compared to the US and even some of the work I do is government contracting. Nevertheless I work in a trade and there is a lot of difference between owning your own equipment and using equipment owned by someone else, not so much difference between getting paid a wage by a company or government department. It doesn't make me a financial and productive island, I still live in society, what I'm challenging is the idea that workers in socialist systems own the means of production in any meaningful sense.

      I pay for my internet connection and for the right to use the roads on an ongoing basis, in tolls, vehicle registrations and drivers license fees, I don't own them. Yet with my tools, let's say a friend or someone that sees me working asks me to do a small job for them (this happens on a regular basis):
      1) If I own my tools and charging by contract I am free to do that job and keep the whole price of it (less taxes and expenses).
      2) If I am getting a government wage I am not free to use government tools for private work at all.
      3) If I am getting a wage from a company I can do the job but my boss owns the profit.

      Who owns the road is irrelevant. If you are free to enter into contracts and keep the profits of your labour, that's capitalism, even if you have to pay some taxes to use government owned infrastructure. Similarly for information workers, if they own the computer and aren't being paid wages they own the profits of their work, even though they don't own the lines their internet connection goes over. If the government owns the computer and pays their wage, they do not own the result.

    19. Re:See communism works after all by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      Communism is bad, because he needed to pay for his own medical needs. Of wait that's capitalism. Disregard.

      Whats the difference between Communism and Democracy? In each, the 1% have the wealth and power and the 99% are the "want to haves" or "need to haves".

      Which is more fair? That I cannot answer, as I have never lived under communism.

      My son worked in Latvia after the communists left, and the majority of the people wanted it back. -- Always have a job, good medicare, good vacations, and only a few shortages or high prices for luxury goods. And communists do not want dissent, but neither do the capitalists.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  8. Gotta hand it to him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    That is quite a feet.

    Puns totally intended.

    1. Re:Gotta hand it to him by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you didn't mean any 'arm by it.

  9. Hello to all you with the smart remarks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    One day one of you sorry smartass pricks is going to face a challenge in life.

    It is doubtful you will meet the challenge as well as this man did.

    Think about that when the day comes, which I assure you it will.

    But in the mean time I hope your smart mouth gets you an ass whipping,
    and soon.

    1. Re:Hello to all you with the smart remarks by VortexCortex · · Score: 0

      One day one of you sorry smartass pricks is going to face a challenge in life.

      It is doubtful you will meet the challenge as well as this man did.

      Think about that when the day comes, which I assure you it will.

      But in the mean time I hope your smart mouth gets you an ass whipping, and soon.

      First off: My smart mouth has no ass to whip.
      Secondly: I have overcome MUCH in life.
      Finally: If I couldn't laugh and make smart remarks about it all then I'd have off'ed myself long ago.

    2. Re:Hello to all you with the smart remarks by Penurious+Penguin · · Score: 2

      Oh come now my dear AC, don't be so drab; we all know the Chinese will be taking over shortly and just want to have a little fun before hand

      --
      Forward! -- Emperor Norton, 2012
    3. Re:Hello to all you with the smart remarks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not to mention most of these jokes were made in celebration...not actually making fun of the guy.

    4. Re:Hello to all you with the smart remarks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One day one of you sorry smartass pricks is going to face a challenge in life.

      It is doubtful you will meet the challenge as well as this man did.

      Think about that when the day comes, which I assure you it will.

      But in the mean time I hope your smart mouth gets you an ass whipping,
      and soon.

      Burma Shave.

    5. Re:Hello to all you with the smart remarks by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 1

      Bein' a smart-ass prick...that's a paddlin'.

      --
      (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
  10. Inspiring by asmkm22 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Say what you will about the Chinese but, if this were an American, he'd be shopping for a book deal and making millions as a motivational speaker. He'd probably get some weird Craftsman sponsorship as well. Instead, he seems genuinely interested in helping other people get access to what he built. It's inspiring, to say the least.

  11. 3D printing for cheap prosthetics by Morgaine · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This man deserves a medal for ingenuity under extreme hardship.

    One thing that added unnecessarily to his misery though was that the hospital recommended a prosthetic that he couldn't afford. It's not a huge stretch of the imagination for hospitals to run cheap RepRap-type 3D printers for such needs and print out basic parts on demand. Both the building and running costs are very low indeed.

    Of course such parts would be very poor compared to professional prosthetics or even professional 3D printing, but when the choice is between that and nothing, it's hard to argue against it. And the flexibility of such printing means that it is easily adapted to evolve with individual requirements, and replacement of printed parts is almost cost-free when they break or wear out.

    It seems a good fit for this kind of unfortunate situation, and it might have made this man's days more bearable as he worked on his own solution, or indeed contributed to it where plastic is more appropriate than steel.

    --
    "The question of whether machines can think is no more interesting than [] whether submarines can swim" - Dijkstra
    1. Re:3D printing for cheap prosthetics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This man is a badass. If you look at the pictures everything is made from scrap.

      Problem is the egregiously high cost of some medical devices. Outrageous in most cases.

      However, once he starts building them for others his costs are going to go up, or he will have to absorb a huge amount of liability. It's not always that simple since the majority of most medical device costs are the insurance. That's most often why something that would be a few thousand is all of the sudden 20k in the medical industry. Nothing all that different in the specs, just the insurance.

      Material costs will go up once he starts using different materials as well.

      We could send this guy a 3D printer and some materials (assuming he has the sophistication to use the software) and it might just end up getting him in trouble with the authorities or landed in court.

      All that being said it would be awesome if this guy could get paired up with a Chinese engineer and they could build low cost prosthetic based on his design.

      Definitely an inspiration.

    2. Re:3D printing for cheap prosthetics by PSVMOrnot · · Score: 2

      For that sort of application most of the prosthetic would/should be mass produced. As awesome as 3D printers are they are really for prototyping and customization rather than cheap manufacturing. I would see it more as using a 3D printer to print off some parts for customized fitting to the patient, and using off the shelf parts for the rest.

      On the other hand, there are plenty of robotic hand projects which could be adapted to function as prosthetics. So, go take a look and see if you get inspired.

    3. Re:3D printing for cheap prosthetics by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      This man deserves a medal for ingenuity under extreme hardship.

      "lost his hands in a fishing-related explosion" is the polite way of saying "lost his hands while building a bomb to fish illegally"
      There's a reason that blast fishing is illegal almost everywhere in the world, China included.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    4. Re:3D printing for cheap prosthetics by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Why would hospitals make cheap prosthetics instead of just recommending a company that make cheap prosthetics?

    5. Re:3D printing for cheap prosthetics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While i agree blast fishing is a dickish thing to do in most cases, i don't really see how it diminishes his achievements regarding the prosthetics.

      Even if he had lost his hands while trying to blow open a vault he was robbing, it's still impressive for someone with a major handicap to put in the enormous effort and
      ingenuity, and against all odds manage to create a functioning replacement.

    6. Re:3D printing for cheap prosthetics by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      or he will have to absorb a huge amount of liability.

      Not necessarily. I believe that liability legislation is directly proportional to cost, all other things being equal. If the guy takes half an hour to sit down with you and walk you through the device, what it does, and what it doesn't do, and the device costs $20, you're not going to be too upset if/when it breaks. But if the device costs you $200,000 you are going to want it to last forever and do everything you can dream of and then some, and are going to be pissed if it doesn't.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    7. Re:3D printing for cheap prosthetics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would hospitals make cheap prosthetics instead of just recommending a company that make cheap prosthetics?

      Do you know of such a company? Apparently the hospital didn't, and nor did the man nor his family.

      Hospitals aren't stupid nor deliberately malicious in general, so the most likely explanation is that all commercial prosthetics are expensive (certainly true in the West), and for a typical Chinese fisherman, beyond astronomic.

    8. Re:3D printing for cheap prosthetics by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      Bit late to the party, but... If your goal is quick prototyping/customization curve, possibly cheaper manufacture of properly-customized limbs, and ensuring as much of the base tissue is preserved, this actually would be feasible. You use it as a temporary solution--especially since we're moving more and more towards integration with the nervous system, the sooner that you can get a prosthetic slapped on the better--and perhaps have final versions done via a combo of mass-produced parts and use of a professional 3D printer for anything that isn't shelf. (Or keep the 'temporary' going which is, in countries where the concern for human quality of life is often low, better than you could otherwise expect.)

      Of course, given the levels of testing required in the US for a medical device, this is not workable as long as the FDA is doing its best to prove that no, really, they need every single one of their employees, even when there are questions on if they understand the science involved better than a randomly-selected 6th grader from a public school in one of Chicago's bad neighborhoods. (One of the ones who isn't a member of Future Meth Cooks of America.) It appears that it is not true that those who can't teach; they regulate instead.

  12. Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess the self-made man still means something these days.

  13. Burying the lead by LSDelirious · · Score: 0

    Fishing related explosion!? go on....

    Also I hope his fingertips aren't rounded or Apple might have already patented that!

    --
    Slavery is the legal fiction that a person is property; A Corporation is the legal fiction that property is a person.
    1. Re:Burying the lead by Penurious+Penguin · · Score: 1

      For God's sake man! I think you just inadvertently discovered the final solution to world peace! Apple patents Explosions! .. i m a g i n e

      I am an avid reader/fan of Paul Theroux and remember his descriptions of dynamite-fishing, which were pretty depressing. It's a super practical way to obtain fish (and other debris), especially in third-world situations where environmental impacts are at best, abstract and strange concepts. I don't remember where it was exactly, but somewhere off the coasts of South-East Asia, Paul was camping on an island when visited by (modern) pirates and after giving one them a tin of mackerel, in guerrillian gratitude the guy handed him a grenade -- which was presumably intended to be used for fishing. Blast-fishing is a problem for sure, though I honestly don't know how effectively it competes with plastic islands and the mass-eutrophication of modern industry.

      --
      Forward! -- Emperor Norton, 2012
  14. Fullmetal alchemist!... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...Fullmetal alchemist!

    1. Re:Fullmetal alchemist!... by Jade_Wayfarer · · Score: 2

      Yes, it even looks like automail. But this is Slashdot, people here are not eager to admit their knowledge of these "ugly Japanese cartoons". Now, if only you had mentioned some obscure real-life technology, an instantly assembled group of 4-6 digit id geeks would appear here in comments. They would brag about "good old times", when they worked on most advanced personal computer of that time (Apple 2, of course), and how they built their first ham-radio module in kindergarten, and once had a dinner with Heinlein and Clark at the same time, and it was so awesome, that everybody else have to immediately get off their lawns.

      For everything else there is TVTropes.

      --
      Absence of proof != proof of absence.
  15. Addams Family by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *Drum Roll*........... Ladies and Gentleman........... Please put your hands together for CHINESE THING!

  16. NHS by isorox · · Score: 0

    Once again, the UK shows the way with the NHS. While in China, Afghanistan, the US and North Korea, only the elite get medical treatment, in the UK everyone gets it (and it's half the price per head than the U.S. system).

    1. Re:NHS by Weatherlawyer · · Score: 0

      Half price heads?
      Must be losing money hand over fist.

      For dollars you could get a second hand for the price of ... ermmm....
      First hand in... ah feckit you work it out.

       

    2. Re:NHS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as they don't think you're too young (Hi Terry Pratchett!) to have that disease or too old or sick to be worth treating.

      Turns out that if you are, you better have sufficient £s to GTFO to somewhere where they'll just go "Okay, sure! Just pay your bills."

  17. looking at the photos.. by hldn · · Score: 1
    --
    http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  18. Clever dick! by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    Clever dick!

    Sorry, couldn't resist an oldie...

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  19. I wonder by birdspider · · Score: 2

    why no one bothers to hire him. I can imagine that his (hands-on) experience, both form producer and consumer side regarding prosthetics is quite rare and china has to be in great demand of such skills, that is being such a large and industious country.

    1. Re:I wonder by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      His corners are not round enough to be able to work at the Apple factory.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:I wonder by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      He doesn't have a degree and the years he spent building these left a huge employment gap. UNEMPLOYABLE!

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  20. You're doing it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't dare fish
    With dynamite
    Lest you want to build
    Arms left and right
    Burma-Shave

  21. Few float by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually only a few will float to the top if you use explosives. The majority will sink to the bottom and go to waste. If you want to do it right, stun them with electricity, but not enough to kill them, and then they will float to the top. That way you can also release live the ones you won't eat. I've seen the DNR gather fish for their surveys using stunners and the equipment is rather simple.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
    1. Re:Few float by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      True story.

      You can stun fish (still illegal without special permits) using some jumper cables and a running vehicle's alternator.

      You can also chemically stun them with juglones and other phytotoxic substances as well.

      Dynamite is simply highly portable, and relatively easy to use: light, and toss.

    2. Re:Few float by hey! · · Score: 1

      True story. My wife went to a presentation by a graduate student in which he proposed to do an ecological study of a small pond by rapidly freezing everything in place, thus getting a "snapshot" of the pond at one instant of time.

      Since making water ice is obviously too energy intensive and slow, he proposed to use a compound that when dissolved in water set to a plastic-like compound via a rapid exothermic reaction. The climax of his presentation was a small-scale demonstration. Unfortunately the reaction was not *quite* instantaneous, and the goldfish he was using as a demonstration subject jumped out of the water and landed on the floor. Discreetly kicking the fish under the desk, the student calmly continued his presentation as if all had gone as planned.

      Offtopic, I know, but juxtaposed with this story I guess the moral is that while only a few people appear awesome to others, everyone is awesome in their own imagination.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:Few float by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like in fashion, simple can still be stunning.

    4. Re:Few float by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      My god, somebody stop that idiot before he gets the ice-nine out.

  22. ObScifi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's get the "I made your eyes, Roy" and Luke Skywalker gags over and done with...

  23. The man.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The man puts the 'auto' in automail.

  24. Communism Universal Health Care? by KickAir+8P · · Score: 1

    Touched on above but I'm not seeing it answered (and my google-fu was weak) so: China's a Communist country, why was this guy expected to buy his own prostheses? Isn't one of the benefits of Communism supposed to be that the State takes care of that?

  25. Many things go boom, not just TNT by dlingman · · Score: 1

    Nowhere in the article does it say that he was using explosives, merely that he suffered a fishing related explosion. It could have been something as simple as the gas tank on his boat blew up. Don't diminish the accomplishment of him building arms he can control with his elbows out of scrap metal. I'm thinking Tony Stark should be talking to this guy.

  26. You know... by buddyglass · · Score: 1

    He's very handy.

  27. Impressive... by Last_Available_Usern · · Score: 1

    Just think of the hands he can make now that he actually has hands.

  28. the Real Iron Man? by JigJag · · Score: 1

    That guy made me think of Tony Stark who build himself an armour out of spare parts in a cave, except that Tony had hands to do it and also this guy can't fly.

    --
    "The hallmark of humanity is the ability to move beyond sensory inputs" - Mary Helen Immordino-Yang
    1. Re:the Real Iron Man? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and also this guy can't fly.

      Yet.

    2. Re:the Real Iron Man? by Weatherlawyer · · Score: 0

      Or again, maybe.

  29. Re:Communism Universal Health Care? by __aarzwb9394 · · Score: 1

    Surely you understand the difference between an untryable theory ("from each according to ability to each according to need" won't work because people are greedy/selfish/rationally self interested) and the dictatorship currently in power in China?
    Dictatorship of the proletariat will always become dictatorship over the proletariat.

  30. "love normally"? by crndg · · Score: 1

    I'm still trying to figure out if "I can work, love normally and feed myself just like anyone else," is a typo, or if he is just really comfortable talking about his sex life. Either way, he's an inspiration.

    1. Re:"love normally"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wondered about that too. It can't be that a broke handless chinaman is getting more cooter than the average bidextrous slashdotter.

    2. Re:"love normally"? by Geeky · · Score: 1

      He should be careful with that, just ask Wolowitz

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
  31. Army of Darkness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reminds me of the arm that Ash built for himself in Army of Darkness!

  32. Groovy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Groovy!

  33. Edward? Is that you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone wonder if these hands are just a collection of various cutting tools? Could come in very handy if you want to be a gardener, a pet hair stylist, a people hair stylist, or if you just want to be able to stab the asshole-boyfriend of the cutie-daughter of the folks who took you in after Vinnie the P. died in their ultra-suburban home.

  34. Confusing instructions.. by alpha17 · · Score: 1

    Instructions too confusing. Got dick stuck in prosthetic.

  35. Abraham Lincoln - Cyborg by sanman2 · · Score: 1

    But Lincoln could have killed more vampires with mechanical hands than he could with a log cabin.

    Emancipator 2: Judgement Day

  36. Info available at pyro sites by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

    There are a lot of pyro sites, search for them, and you will find lots of answers that you are looking for

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  37. So, I wonder if he told himself... by Debian+Cabbit · · Score: 0

    "I can rebuild myself, I have the technology!"

  38. Aussie Aussie Aussie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out Mark Lesek in Australia, he's doing the same thing but a whole arm, based on an early 1900s patent with modern improvements.

  39. Obama would say, by JBaustian · · Score: 1

    "You didn't build that!"

    But Sun Jifa obviously did.

  40. this story has emboldened me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as a result of geezerhood, i have a useless body part. time for a prosthesis

  41. The invisible hand at work by n7ytd · · Score: 1

    Capitalism wins again!