Slashdot Mirror


IT Industry Presidential Poll: 'Not Sure' Beats Both Obama and Romney

CIStud writes "A new poll conducted of IT industry executives and integrators shows a divided and unsure industry regarding which presidential candidate is better for Information Technology to prosper. The poll, conducted by JZ Analytics on behalf of CompTIA, shows 'Not Sure' winning in four out of five areas. President Obama holds and edge over Mitt Romney in every category, including which person is best for the IT industry in terms of tax policy (remarkably), access to capital, tech exports, education and privacy."

10 of 238 comments (clear)

  1. Lack of Options by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I posit that the only reason 'Not Sure' was the number one response is likely because 'None of the Above' wasn't an option.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  2. Re:The toilet water guy?!? by Wrexs0ul · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "And there was a time in this country, a long time ago, when reading wasn't just for fags and neither was writing. People wrote books and movies, movies that had stories so you cared whose ass it was and why it was farting, and I believe that time can come again!"

    Change we can believe in.

    --
    --- Need web hosting?
  3. Re:What's the difference? by Kenja · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Main difference is where they fall on support for the middle class & social programs. In addition, while I dont think of myself as partisan, I find the actions of the Republicans in their attempts to disenfranchise lower class and minority voters to be down right evil. Stuff like the voter id laws and redistricting they are pushing through shows that they have such a low opinion of their own policies that they feel it necessary to cheat to win. That combined with their obstinate position of "anything they say, we're against" in congress makes me want to vote against them, if not for their Democrat opponents.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  4. Re:What's the difference? by Feyshtey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How dare the republicans attempt to determine that you actually have a legal right to vote. The demons. I bet they eat babies for sport.

    On the topic of redistricting, do some homework. Republicans and Democrats both use this is a regular tactic and mechanism to control voting results.

    Why is it that the President can run on a campaign that includes a promise to reduce the debt, increase the debt by multiple trillions, and then have his supporters tell Republicans that they are the party of NO for trying to get the debt under control?

    --
    "But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it,..." - Nancy Pelosi
  5. Re:False choice by trout007 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is because you are very closely aligned with the status quo. Romney isn't really going to deregulate banks. He's not going to get rid of fractional reserve banking and go to 100% hard money. He is just going to use the power to benefit a different group than Obama.

    From the libertarian point of view both of these guys just want to use their power to punish their enemies and reward their friends. Would you call it socialist, capitalist, or fascist or some other term?

    --
    I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
  6. Re:What's the difference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Al Franken "won" by 312 votes in an election where 1,099 felons voted illegally.

    Unless you can show that 312 of those 1099 felons voted for Al Franken, what precisely does your statistic prove? For all you know, all 1099 voted for the other guy.

  7. Re:False choice by MightyMartian · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Only an American would call Obama a Marxist. The United States is made of up 300 million political ignoramuses. Have you even read Marx?

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  8. Re:Preference cascade by Rockoon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "redefinition of marriage" - I think you mean equal rights for all.

    Equal rights for all?

    How about all single people get the same artificial advantages as married people, eh? No?

    You don't know what equal rights actually means. First you set up an unfair situation where some people get special treatment. Then you go on about how some other people dont get the same treatment.

    Meanwhile why not just let all people have the same treatment? No? Yeah.. thought so.. empty words from you.

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  9. Re:False choice by TapeCutter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    do you have an actual argument

    Yes, Obama is financially conservative and socially liberal and rarely strays far from the center. The reason you think he's a socialist is because you are way out on the right wing, the left wing is over your horizon and it's difficult for you to even see the center.

    I am not an American, I was born in the former USSR. Unfortunately for me I actually had to read Marx and Lenin too

    We've crossed paths before, I believe you are sincere and passionate but it comes across as ignorance and arrogance, unfortunately you routinely believe the most outlandish propaganda and then repeat it as truth. You grew up in a land and time where intense state propaganda was the norm and motivated the behavior of the adults around you. Pravda and Fox are two faces of the same evil, I hope that one day you can get past resenting the adults from your childhood and realize that you've been fighting dragons for so long that you have become one.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  10. Re:Americans elect "Not Sure" most times by riverat1 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It used to be that Republicans and Democrats were willing to compromise to help get things done. Ronald Reagan and Tip O'Neil would sit down together over a drink and hash out a compromise. On the day that Obama was inaugurated a number of national Republican leaders got together and decided to say no to anything Obama tried to accomplish regardless of whether it was a reasonable idea or not. To me that borders on being treasonous.