Slashdot Mirror


Victory For Apple In "Patent Trial of the Century," To the Tune of $1 Billion

pdabbadabba writes "The jury is in in the epic patent dispute between Apple and Samsung and Apple appears to be coming out on top. The court is still going through the 700+ items on the verdict form, but things seem to be going Apple's way so far. In the case of Apple's various UI patents, the jury is consistently ruling that Samsung not only violated Apple's patent, but did so willfully." Reader bob zee also points to the AP's story, as carried by Breitbart.com, and Charliemopps adds Reuters' take. Reader Samalie contributes a link to a live blog of the (at this writing) ongoing recitation of the verdict. Whether you like it or not, even this verdict won't be the last word.

16 of 1,184 comments (clear)

  1. Sweet! by wave9x · · Score: -1, Troll

    Apple deserved this win. Good for Apple, glad one of these Asian copycat companies is finally held accountable.

    1. Re:Sweet! by endinyal · · Score: -1, Troll

      I totally agree. This trial needed to happen. It sent a message that if you're going to compete, you better do it on your own merit and not copy someone else's hard work and try taking a ride from it. Samsung got what it deserved. If I were Apple, I'd be demanding that $1B+ check right now. Sure, appeal it if you want (I'm sure it will) but that just means extra interest payments on that amount!

  2. As it should be. by AdrianKemp · · Score: -1, Troll

    Regardless of your opinion of the patents themselves, Samsung did infringe on them and this decision is well deserved for those assclowns

  3. I feel like crying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Honestly. I've never felt this way about a tech legal suit. Apple is a fraud and I hope they burn in hell. If this holds up you can kiss free speech and innovation goodbye, because now shapes are patented.

    What makes me sad instead of angry is how fucking ignorant the jury seems to me. It's a mockery of what the legal system is supposed to be.

  4. Justice by kthreadd · · Score: -1, Troll

    This is a great day for all of us.

    1. Re:Justice by kthreadd · · Score: -1, Troll

      One of the reasons this trial ever happened was because consumers was mislead by Samsung into believing that they actually bought an Apple device instead of a Samsung. That's why consumers will benefit.

      Hopefully, this also means that companies will come together and realize that an iOS like OS is not the only way going forward. What will happen is that we will see tremendous achievements in mobile operating systems and interaction models. Copying iOS should not be the only way to "innovate".

  5. Re:Samsung should just leave the US market by kthreadd · · Score: -1, Troll

    Or take the hint and start innovating instead of just copying Apple.

  6. Re:Only 22 hours of deliberations by endinyal · · Score: -1, Troll

    unless the jurors found the evidence against Scamscum was so obvious, they didn't need to deliberate any more. Samsung got what it deserved. Seeing the fandroids kicking-and-screaming right now is such a fun thing to witness!!!

  7. Re:Only 22 hours of deliberations by whisper_jeff · · Score: -1, Troll

    Mad your side lost?

  8. Re:Don't use "stacked" by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: -1, Troll

    Well you could argue that Apple is so trendy that most idiots tend to worship the rotten apple so much that it might just lead them to be all biased.

  9. Well folks. Apple now has a monopoly by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1, Troll

    So basically you can look forward to an Apple only world from now on because they have the most money and people are too stupid to realize Apple did not invent the world.

    Fuck Apple.

  10. Re:No matter what the outcome actually is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Plenty of phones with rounded corners were found to BE infringing because of rounded corners.

    Can the fanboism.

  11. Re:Apple stifling innovation in lawsuit by Nerdfest · · Score: 1, Troll

    They didn't actually invent any of that. Every singe one of those was 'copied' from those who invented them.

  12. Re:Lazy Crap. by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: -1, Troll

    The losers is everybody who depends on innovation. Which is to say everybody, including Apple, though they they will see some short term financial benefits.

    That's facile. The opposite decision was reached in the Apple v Microsoft lawsuit back in the day and instead of a golden age of innovation we got a computing dark age. Microsoft didn't really understand the GUI (according to some they still don't) and it took them years after their copy job to come up with anything halfway decent. Likewise Samsung doesn't know the first thing about building a mobile computing platform, just enough to skin someone else's OS and copy some hardware once they see what works. Innovation is what was protected here today. If you want to argue the right to copy that's fine, but innovation it is not.

    --
    If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
  13. Re:No matter what the outcome actually is.... by BSDimwit · · Score: 0, Troll

    The entire point of the patent system is to grant an exclusive monopoly on an invention for a limited time to the inventor in exchange for divulging how it was done. Too bad if others can't compete due to this. If they can't compete because of this, that is further proof of the novelty of the invention and thus the inventing entity deserves the spoils all the more.

  14. Re:No matter what the outcome actually is.... by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: -1, Troll

    a daughter that he treated really poorly, surprisingly

    For a half Syrian it's not.

    --
    Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.