Slashdot Mirror


Harvard Creates Cyborg Tissues

MrSeb writes "Bioengineers at Harvard University have created the first examples of cyborg tissue: Neurons, heart cells, muscle, and blood vessels that are interwoven by nanowires and transistors. These cyborg tissues are half living cells, half electronics. As far as the cells are concerned, they're just normal cells that behave normally — but the electronic side actually acts as a sensor network, allowing a computer to interface directly with the cells. In the case of cyborg heart tissue, the researchers have already used the embedded nanowires to measure the contractions (heart rate) of the cells. So far, the researchers have only used the nanoelectric scaffolds to read data from the cells — but according to lead researcher Charles Lieber, the next step is to find a way of talking to the individual cells, to 'wire up tissue and communicate with it in the same way a biological system does.' Suffice it to say, if you can use a digital computer to read and write data to your body's cells, there are some awesome applications."

19 of 108 comments (clear)

  1. Paging Adam Jenson... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "I never asked for this."

  2. Why don't they... by multiben · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... just build cyborgs which don't need to blow their nose?

  3. DRM. by slackware+3.6 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Your heart possibly being owned by a corporation. Or your willy wang and the police busting down your door for unauthorised jerking methods.

    1. Re:DRM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your heart possibly being owned by a corporation. Or your willy wang and the police busting down your door for unauthorised jerking methods.

      That's exactly the kind of bullshit that would make any advanced alien species decide that we're not worth contacting. But it's standard bullshit. It's been going on for a long time.

      The full implications are worse than that. We are headed towards technological singularity. While I would like to believe this will usher in a new era of prosperity and achievement, consider the kind of sociopathic fevered egos who always wind up running things. Now imagine them even more "effective" (at doing what they have always done) than ever.

    2. Re:DRM. by arthurh3535 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Your heart possibly being owned by a corporation. Or your willy wang and the police busting down your door for unauthorised jerking methods.

      You mean http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Repo!_The_Genetic_Opera ?

      --
      No! It's a *SIG*. Keep the Special Interest Groups away! (Con joke!)
    3. Re:DRM. by Freaky+Spook · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm a bit more optimistic than this but should the singularity occur you might as well not worry about the details of what comes after as by definition it's unpredictable.

      I'm not at all, looking at just the USA and what companies like Monsanto, GSK and Kaiser Permanente have been able to get away with and also get legislated to protect their interests at the expense of everyone else, I'm not optimistic at all.

    4. Re:DRM. by BlueStrat · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm a bit more optimistic than this but should the singularity occur you might as well not worry about the details of what comes after as by definition it's unpredictable.

      I'm not at all, looking at just the USA and what companies like Monsanto, GSK and Kaiser Permanente have been able to get away with and also get legislated to protect their interests at the expense of everyone else, I'm not optimistic at all.

      If we accept that all human beings have weaknesses, fears, failings, and that no individual or finite group is impervious to corruption and/or compromise/influence/pressure, then logic says that the only realistic option to avoid most of the worst of corporate and other influence/corruption/compromise of the government is to make the central government as small and weak as practical, and keep as much of the local day-to-day governance as local and answerable to the people as possible.

      Decentralization, baby! Like the way the internet was intended to work, damage/corruption is routed around until repairs are effected.

      That way the Monsantos, GSKs, and Kaiser Permanentes of the world won't be able to buy influence over the entire nation in one spot from a relatively-small number of the very very powerful in the Federal government like a "supermarket of sleaze", but would have to influence/corrupt/bribe many, many city/county/state governments and officials/legislative bodies across the country and keep all those illegal acts from becoming widely known and drawing prosecution. A much more expensive, time-consuming, and risky proposition. It would thus help reduce the risks of corruption of the singularity from those sources and help tilt the scales a fraction more towards a more benign outcome.

      Look, we've all generally agreed and acknowledged that politicians are all ambitious, greedy, power-hungry sleazebags that can and will, given the chance, bring that painting of a boot crushing a human face forever to reality. And yes, that includes "your guy", too.

      Given that, wouldn't it be wise to keep the ones with the most power and ability to control you and your life within easy arm's-reach where you can nip their overreaches and encroachments on your wealth, security, free speech, and freedom in the bud? Keep in mind also that it's much harder for them to go astray if they've got to face the people they're governing across their own backyard fences, their kids go to the same school, etc etc.

      As a side-benefit, it would also tend to greatly reduce the power and influence of the two major national political parties and severely reduce the ability of a relatively few national party leaders to dictate to the rest. It's possible it could even allow the emergence of a third party or even more.

      It also coincidentally assures some variety in the style, flavor, and feel of governance from place to place across the nation and thus there is a better chance one can find a place to live with governance that accommodates one's religious, cultural, and political beliefs to a sufficient degree.

      This, I believe, would also greatly increase the chances for a more-positive outcome from the singularity by assuring a variety of views, cultures, and beliefs, thus avoiding a monoculture of tyranny.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    5. Re:DRM. by CommieLib · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, no, you don't understand - THIS TIME we'll get it right. The people involved are so good and so pure, they'll make the right choices, and resist the pull of corruption. You just don't understand how smart these new people are - the New York Times talks about them everyday. These are the best and brightest, the very smartest of society - isn't it better for them to make the choices for us?

      You don't understand - human beings are corruptible and evil, and so we need to make government powerful so that it can be better. What will the government be composed of? Well, human beings, of course. Er, well, these human beings are less corruptible, I think. And look at these wonderful corporations who are supporting our rise to power - they must surely be led by disinterested saints committed to social justice.

      You see, we're not committed to ideology - we're pure pragmatists, we only care about what works. Well, yes, I suppose that ideology does define what goals are worth working towards and which ones aren't, and I definitely have preferences in that area...well, yes, I suppose that I have premises that I operate from in choosing methods that constitute ideology...but ideology is bad! I mean, YOUR ideology is bad! Mine is progress. Towards what? Well...the future! Forward! By what methods, and to what ends? Eh, those are details we'll figure out later...what matters now is that we get unlimited power to reshape society according to our beautiful vision.

      What? I don't care about the history and track record of these ideas! I'm not hide-bound and shackled by tradition like you! The performance of these methods in the past has nothing to do with what's going to happen when we get power! </sarcasm>

      . Individual liberty may be imperfect, but ultimately it's the only deal worth considering.

      --
      If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
  4. Grown. by MnemonicMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The issue for all of us who already exist today is that the tissue grows around the mesh. Certainly in the future new organisms can be grown and integrated at the same time to become cybernetic life forms. However, for all of us who are already grown getting a mesh inside of our tissues presents a whole other engineering problem.

    1. Re:Grown. by dark_requiem · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not really, use your own stem cells to grow the tissue, grow a new heart/arm/etc., and transplant it. Transplant tech has advanced enormously in recent years.

  5. Not the use you expected... by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Funny

    Suffice it to say, if you can use a digital computer to read and write data to your body's cells, there are some awesome applications."

    Yes. The RIAA can now ask for someone to be disassembled to search for pirated software, and the government in order to check for terrorist cellular data. Reassembly of course, will be your problem, not theirs.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  6. Bacteria will kick your arse by harlequinn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Cool.

    I wonder what the infection rate along the interfaces is?

  7. Combine with the Patch Clamp? by bughunter · · Score: 2

    the next step is to find a way of talking to the individual cells, to 'wire up tissue and communicate with it in the same way a biological system does.'

    I wonder if these nanowires can be combined the patch clamp to solve this problem?

    --
    I can see the fnords!
  8. Re:Cyborg Jones for President! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It took us almost 200 years just to let all humans vote, and we're still debating civil rights for all of them. How much worse will we be to those who are demonstrably not entirely human? Run for President? First they'll need the right to drive.

  9. Awesome! by Lotana · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ignoring all the ./'s typical cynicism: This is quite an exciting development.

    If the artificial components can be kept functioning without affecting the living tissue, we will be able to help people with virtually any physical disability! A few weeks ago there was a stoly how brain signals were decoded when it came to sight, so combine that with this breakthrough we can even have people controlling the devices with their mind!

    Biotech is making great strides in progress. This is a very exciting time to be alive.

  10. Re:Does this mean... by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Perhaps Jon Daly was correct, someday there might be a vagina that doubles as a Wifi hotspot.

    The only thing going in my vajayjay that runs on batteries comes with a happy at the end. I'm sure most women feel similar. Second, do you really want your dick in a microwave? What do you think rubbing your man-sausage on a transmitter pumping out several watts is going to your little swimmers?

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  11. Cu, Copper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    It has antimicrobial properties. In essence this could help fend off disease just by being there.

    It is rather interesting and is worth the time to check it out.

  12. Re:Star Trek: First Contact, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    No. Riker, with the power of Q, offered to transform Data into a human but Data refused. In another episode, Data becomes Q's only friend when the latter is stripped of his powers. When Q got his powers back, he offered a gift to Data, which Data assumed meant turning him into a human but instead Q made Data laugh.

  13. Re:Required... by mcgrew · · Score: 2

    I've already been assimilated, you insensitive clod!