Slashdot Mirror


Cash-Poor Sharp Mortgages Display Factories

Sharp is one of the small handful of companies that actually make the LCDs that go into products badged with many other companies' names. Now, itwbennett writes "The company was asked by one of its main banks to put its physical assets, including its Apple screen plant, up as collateral for about $2 billion in emergency loans, according to an IDG News Service report. Sharp expects to lose over $3 billion this fiscal year."

111 comments

  1. Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sharp makes amazing screens why are they in trouble? What did I miss?

    1. Re:Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's possible to make awesome products and have poor business plans. See Sun Microsystems.

    2. Re:Wha? by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sharp makes amazing screens why are they in trouble? What did I miss?

      Just because you make a fantistic bunch of hardware doesn't mean you can't have a load of bozos running around the board room with seltzer bottles in one hand and balloons in the other. Remember how bad Commodore was at marketing the Amiga? Ready ... FIRE! Aim ...

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Wha? by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

      Or Commodore.

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
    4. Re:Wha? by magarity · · Score: 1

      Sharp makes amazing screens why are they in trouble? What did I miss?

      From Sharp minds come Dull financial planning?

    5. Re:Wha? by 6031769 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or DEC. Or Silicon Graphics.

      Actually, it's starting to look like quality of products is always inversely proportional to quality of directors/management. If that isn't somebody's first law of economics, I'm claiming it.

      --
      Burns: We're building a casino!
      McAllister: Arrr. Give me 5 minutes.
    6. Re:Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's possible to make awesome products and have poor business plans. See Sun Microsystems.

      Arrgh. What you say is true, but inaccurate.

      SUN made great products, but their business plan was poor because there wasn't enough of a market for their awesome products to support a viable firm. (I hope that makes sense. My brain has been poluted by a MBA - the most worthless fucking thing I ever did with my time and money.)

      Build a better mousetrap and people will beat a path to your door. Not so.

      I have a cat that does the samething for less and I can pet it and it's cute and everything.

      SUN got it's ass kicked because PCs became just as powerful (or at least just as close) as their machines for much much less.

    7. Re:Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, I already said that about Mandriva... and citing Sun as example, too. And others talked before about DEC. IMHO, M$ confirms the inverse proportionality.

    8. Re:Wha? by Spy+Handler · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They got hit by a double whammy. Foreign exchange rates on one hand, and more nimble Korean competition on the other.

      Strong Yen eroded their profits, while at the same time Samsung and LG made huge aggressive bets by pouring billions into new LCD and LED making equipment and benefited from economy of scale. Basically the Koreans are doing to the Japanese companies what the Japanese themselves were doing to American companies back in the 70's.

      Samsung makes a healthy profit from TVs, while Sony and Sharp loses money on every TV they make.

    9. Re:Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's possible to make awesome products and have poor business plans. See Sun Microsystems.

      It's also possible to make products that are basically identical to almost every other vendor (except they cost 3x more), but you have not joined your friends in the land of overpriced failures only because your products are fashionable. See Apple.

    10. Re:Wha? by RatBastard · · Score: 1

      Remember Everex computers? Nice PCs. Horrible management.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    11. Re:Wha? by crazyjj · · Score: 1

      What did I miss?

      The fact that the LCD market is saturated right now. LCD's were hot for several years as everyone threw out their old tube TV's for shiny new HDTV's. But now those same people stubbornly insist on keeping those shiny HDTV's for years instead of upgrading every time some shiny new feature (like 3D) comes out.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    12. Re:Wha? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Apple is nowhere near that much of a price premium, at worst they're 30%, and often they are less.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    13. Re:Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where would slashdot be without the car analogy?

      See: Buick as owned by David Buick. Best engine of the time (so good almost all modern engines are STILL derivatives of his design), but nothing could save a company from being destroyed by that man as long as he existed within its walls.

    14. Re:Wha? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Because they had their fingers in too many pies instead of keeping to what they did great, which was screens? Time and time again we've seen good companies that made great products get run into the ground by shitty management, hell I'd say that's what happening to MSFT now with their "lost decade" and counting, and they had a fricking monopoly for the love of Pete and the sweaty monkey couldn't capitalize. In the case of Sharp they had everything from mobile phones to microwaves,photocopiers to PDAs. They just spread themselves too damned thin.

      Hopefully when they go under the assets will be bought by someone that actually wants to make great products, not like Hitachi and Samsung drive divisions being bought by Seagate and WD...yuck, just yuck.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    15. Re:Wha? by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

      Sun also died because they had an enormous sales force, vastly overpriced hardware, and option pricing that made Apple's ram and drive prices seem budget grade.

      If Sun had moved to a more reasonable plan, without armies of sales reps and such between you and the products that you want to buy, if they hadn't stuck with their laughable CDE, and such, they'd probably still be going today.

    16. Re:Wha? by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Last Sony TV we bought here had a Samsung screen.

    17. Re:Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you on this mostly, but I think Sun's demise was inevitable. There simply wasn't a need for what they had long term. As you said, PC's started to catch up, but just as importantly, Linux and FreeBSD basically came at them from the other side. The PC platform without free unix's left a huge place for Sun to compete: They were the cheapest and best commercial unix out there other than say AIX. But you can't beat free. As soon as Linux and FreeBSD got stable fast and popular it was all over. There was simply no advantage at all for Sun to even try to leverage.

      I can't believe they lasted as long as they did. They should have died as fast as SGI did when ATI, S3, Matrox and NVIDIA came to town.
      I think the only thing keeping them alive that they had to leverage throughout the early 2000's was motherboards with high amounts of addressable ram and 64bit addressing.

      Even when Opterons were coming on the market, almost all x86 motherboards only supported 4GB of addressable memory. Sun would offer 64GB or more.
      But then the way people were using computer changed again... 64GB split among 100, 50, even 20 users started to be kind of... restrictive. Would it just be cheaper to buy everyone their own box even though it was less addressable memory? And it was.

      I always loved sun. I still have a Tatung SPARC5 110MHz in my closet. It was my webserver for many years running openBSD. That little guy never died.

    18. Re:Wha? by jvillain · · Score: 1

      Every body built out their production for the HDTV migration. Now that it is over demand is down. 3D was supposed to be the great saviour but not so much. Turns out people want to match movies on 4" screens and you can get a lot of those out of a 120" sheet. There was also that little tsunami thing as well.

    19. Re:Wha? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's starting to look like quality of products is always inversely proportional to quality of directors/management.

      Actually, it's the way the Japanese run their business.
       
      If business is good, the Japanese model can go on forever, but when the market turns south, or when competition turns fierce, the Japanese business almost always jerks to a halt
       
      It happens to many Japanese businesses, not only Sharp.
       
      For example, Toyota
       
      It makes good car, but the way they made their car is akin to a "family business" where one make the spoke, the other the hub, the other the shaft, the other the belt, and someone in the family owns the bank, someone owns the metal stamper, and in that way, they got the car made
       
      It's fine when there's a market, and the market is booming
       
      But when there is a kink - like Toyota's faulty cars that made the news last year - that's where the whole thing bogged down, and often they can't stop the downward spiral
       
      In Sharp's case, they over-invested in LCD panel plants - and when Korea and Taiwan and China all shifted into high gear churning out LCD panels, Sharp suddenly see their cashflow dwindled
       
      This phenomena is not limited to Sharp. Panasonic (Matsushita) is also cash squeezed for it invested heavily in Plasma TV (yes, Plasma TV, you read it right) and when LCD overtook Plasma, Matsushita got into a big bind
       
      I am familiar with the Japanese business because I do have businesses there
       

      --
      Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  2. This is a win for Hollywood at least.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My Aquos TV (with its added yellow pixel) ruins movies by having sufficiently vibrant color to make the demarcation between green-screen and foreground characters completely obvious. Make-up too looks far less natural and more like Broadway stage makeup. The pressure for the movie industry to bring up their game will decrease significantly with these folk out of the picture.

    1. Re:This is a win for Hollywood at least.... by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      Did you take the time to calibrate your TV?

      Makes an INCREDIBLE difference in the picture quality.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    2. Re:This is a win for Hollywood at least.... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Make-up too looks far less natural and more like Broadway stage makeup.

      Go visit a studio, and you will find they damn near have to put Bondo on their faces to cover up the flaws. During the black and white days, they used green makeup so the actors wouldn't look so pale and would stand out better from the background. It looks far from 'natural'. I would say you just saw a more accurate picture of what they really look like.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    3. Re:This is a win for Hollywood at least.... by guidryp · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's not a feature, it is a glitch is Sharps Color processing.

      http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/news/sharp-lc46le821e-lc40le821e-20100628755.htm

      Unfortunately, we were soon to uncover a much more severe colour error which made our previous fears of oversaturated Yellows look truly trivial.

      The first sign that the Sharp LC46LE821E had colour problems that went beyond it’s expanded colour gamut became apparent with test patterns, and later with real-world content. The edges of saturated colours — especially reds — would appear thresholded, having a strange “tizzing” effect. In fact, this anomaly almost looked like a modern-day cousin of the dot crawl we all hated in old-fashioned Composite video systems.

      Near the beginning of Chapter 6 on the UK Blu-ray Disc release of “The Hurt Locker”, there is a shot of a off-cyan sky which is covered in a pleasing amount of film grain (this material originates on 16mm film). On the Sharp LC46LE821E, even without using its Colour Management controls (that is, using the company’s recommended “Movie” mode settings), the sky showed visible darker blocks dancing around in it. And in the next shot, what once appeared as one smooth sky was divided into two distinct bands. This is very surprising indeed, because Sharp has publically stated that one of the benefits of their Quattron technology is to provide smoother gradations.

      Remembering that there were strange artefacts in areas of highly saturated colour, we pulled out the Blu-ray Disc of “Serenity” and skipped to Chapter 6, which features a vividly coloured, impressively lit neon city scene. Here, the Sharp LC46LE821E made a complete mess of the coloured transitions, and created obvious borders around tones which, on any other TV, would appear smooth and natural. The Sharp LC46LE821E created harsh borders around the actors, and in fact, the effect is akin to a poorly-done “green screen” effect with a fuzzy edge. The effect is best illustrated with pictures:

    4. Re:This is a win for Hollywood at least.... by Phasma+Felis · · Score: 1

      "Movies looked great on my old TV, but terrible on my new TV. This can only be Hollywood's fault!"

      That's an...interesting perspective. Kudos to Aquos' marketing team, though.

    5. Re:This is a win for Hollywood at least.... by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 1

      I said it ever since they announced their quad pixel technology that it would simply create more problems than it fixed and/or was a marketing gimmick. The colors are either being properly represented by the panel, or they are not. Adding a fourth color pixel to the panel will not make things better unless the panel without that pixel can not display the correct color gamut in the first place. The additional image processing required to take signals that are written in a RGB format and convert them to RGBY format before displaying will add needless time-consuming steps which will add delay to the process (which may not be an issue in some use cases, but for things like video games, that added delay is a real problem).

      --
      We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  3. Anyone else have trouble parsing the title by LehiNephi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the title of this post isn't reason enough to reform the English language, I don't know what is. At first I though it had something to do with homeowners refinancing.

    Cash-Poor (adj) Sharp (adj/noun) Mortgages (verb/noun) Display (verb/adj/noun) Factories (noun)

    --
    Help find a cure for cancer. Join the [H]orde
    1. Re:Anyone else have trouble parsing the title by Hatta · · Score: 5, Funny

      I know all those words, but that sentence makes no sense.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:Anyone else have trouble parsing the title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, I got it. Sharp, the company, is cash-poor, and as a result mortgaged its display factories, including their shiny new IGZO display factory.

    3. Re:Anyone else have trouble parsing the title by ThorGod · · Score: 2

      Yes! The title crossed my eyes. The wording is uncomfortable and unfortunate.

      --
      PS: I don't reply to ACs.
    4. Re:Anyone else have trouble parsing the title by sandytaru · · Score: 1

      It makes perfect sense if you've ever played a game of Monopoly.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    5. Re:Anyone else have trouble parsing the title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This title is a good argument against capitalizing every word. Proper nouns would be evident.

    6. Re:Anyone else have trouble parsing the title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just that the ./ editors delight in crafting unreadable headlines. If you stick around you'll notice it popping up every now and then.

    7. Re:Anyone else have trouble parsing the title by temcat · · Score: 1

      Yep. I initially parsed it like Cash-Poor (adj) Sharp (adj) Mortgages (plural noun) Display (verb) Factories (plural noun) and was thoroughly confused. English is not my mother tongue though.

    8. Re:Anyone else have trouble parsing the title by Fishbulb · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yep. Verbing weirds language.

    9. Re:Anyone else have trouble parsing the title by LordLimecat · · Score: 3, Informative

      The problem isnt the English language (which certainly does have problems), its the journalism tendency to leave out "irrelevant" glue words when crafting a headline.

      Problem is, those words are required in english for a reason. The grammattically proper headline would be "A cash-poor Sharp mortgages their display factories", which is much less ambiguous.

    10. Re:Anyone else have trouble parsing the title by geekoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You would have a point if the title was proper English sentence.

      It's an argument for better Grammer* classes.

      "Cash-Poor Sharp Mortgages Display Factories"
      It's just a bad sentence all around.

      "Sharp mortgages display factories for bank loan." Adding Cash poor is redundant.

      Of course when ever a company uses a common word for a name, it can make for weird sentences; however that isn't an English problem.

      So it should be:
      "Sharp Electronics Corporation mortgages display factories for bank loan."

      I'm not even very good with grammar** and I can see that.

      *haha

      **English is both my first and second langues. I had reconstructive surgery and need to learn how to speak again after I was 5.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:Anyone else have trouble parsing the title by fuzznutz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well it is mine, and that's exactly how I initially parsed it. It doesn't help that titles are all capitalized obscuring the clue that the proper noun "Sharp" is not an adjective in this instance.

    12. Re:Anyone else have trouble parsing the title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Subject: Cash-Poor (adj) Sharp (proper noun)
      Verb: Mortgages (verb)
      Direct Object: Display (noun adjunct) Factories (noun)

      Slashdot headlines have some sort of imposed length limit. That's why Slashdot headlines are always so hard to understand - the editors try to remove as many words as they can.

    13. Re:Anyone else have trouble parsing the title by steelfood · · Score: 2

      Sharp is an adjective (Sharp Corporation is a noun).

      Sharp being the adjective means mortgages is a noun. That automatically makes display the verb (a sentence has to have a verb).

      In effect, these cash-poor, sharp mortgages are displaying factories.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    14. Re:Anyone else have trouble parsing the title by miltonw · · Score: 1

      I so like this interpretation!

    15. Re:Anyone else have trouble parsing the title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linguists actually have a (rather poetic) technical term for this situation: "crash blossom". (The name is taken from the following nearly-inscrutable headline: "Violinist linked to JAL crash blossoms" )

      Here's an NY Times article about it : http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/31/magazine/31FOB-onlanguage-t.html?scp=1&sq=headline&st=cse
      and a website dedicated to collecting them : http://www.crashblossoms.com/

    16. Re:Anyone else have trouble parsing the title by Tanktalus · · Score: 1

      It got you to click, didn't it? Mission accomplished.

    17. Re:Anyone else have trouble parsing the title by Renevith · · Score: 1

      Came for crash blossom post. Leaving satisfied. Mod parent up.

    18. Re:Anyone else have trouble parsing the title by istartedi · · Score: 1

      FWIW, you could add "its" between "Mortgages" and "Display" and the headline would also be more clear.

      The problem is that "cash poor sharp mortgages" reads as a potential non-phrase that has the ability to "display factories".

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    19. Re:Anyone else have trouble parsing the title by Mick+Ohrberg · · Score: 1

      FWIW, you could add "its" between "Mortgages" and "Display" and the headline would also be more clear.

      It would just become "it's", just like the confusion between their, they're, there. Par for the course.

      --

      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.

    20. Re:Anyone else have trouble parsing the title by jrumney · · Score: 1

      "A cash-poor Sharp mortgages their display factories"

      Would be less grammatically correct than the current title. Sharp is the name of the company, you don't have "A Sharp", cash-poor or not.

    21. Re:Anyone else have trouble parsing the title by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Doing a bit of research, it appears my usage was (or at least could be) correct. Google "indefinite article with proper noun". It appears that when you have an adjective before a proper noun, you can use the indefinite article "A" or "an". Examples:
      Mr Dursley hummed as he picked out his most boring tie for work and Mrs Dursley gossiped away happily as she wrestled a screaming Dudley into his highchair. (Appears to be from harry potter, but was pulled from a forum example)
      Alfie then shut the gate and ambled off to the house, shaking his head in perplexity, to complain to a sympathetic Dora in the kitchen.

      In this case, since "Sharp" is modified by the adjective "cash-poor", the indefinite article is allowable. But as I said, headlines tend to drop all articles, which makes "cash-poor Sharp mortgages" rather ambiguous.
      Further reference (though there are zillions)
      http://forum.wordreference.com/showthread.php?t=2204216

    22. Re:Anyone else have trouble parsing the title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I imagined a bunch of "Display Factories", displaying these new sort of "Sharp Mortgages" for cash-poor customers.

      I guessed they might be virtual Display Factories, or could be interactive audio visual Display Factories, like mortgage brokers would use.

    23. Re:Anyone else have trouble parsing the title by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Or better syntax highlighting. If nouns, verbs, adjectives and adverbs were all different colours, the sentence would be a lot easier to read...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    24. Re:Anyone else have trouble parsing the title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for the apostrophe. If people were properly educated, they would understand the difference between "its" and "it's".

  4. Manure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Manure

    Yeah, I went there.

  5. wtf? by shadowrat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Indigenous Rainbow Spatulas Dungeon Ponies.

    1. Re:wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *blink* Kinky!

    2. Re:wtf? by serbanp · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the title took a while to sink in, but your example is rather poor, as none of the words can be a verb.

    3. Re:wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      I will spatula you for your insolence!

    4. Re:wtf? by game+kid · · Score: 1

      What do you mean you can't Dungeon a Pony?

      Damn...now that I think about that, I want a Dungeon Pony. It sounds like they'd look the same as regular ponies, except that they'd have pitch-black hair, wear collars that menace with spikes of the bones of trolls they trampled to death (and jackets made of the skin of their own dead cousins), and just walk around with a serious face like the hardboiled badasses they are.

      My Ruthless Pony: Friendship is a Bad Mother Fucker.

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    5. Re:wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pony as the verb: "An indigenous dungeon full of rainbow spatulas finds the cash to settle a loan."

      Dungeon as the verb: "A bunch of indigenous rainbow spatulas corralled some ponies into a dungeon."

      Spatula as the verb: "Some ponies were spanked with a spatula by an indigenous rainbow in a dungeon."

    6. Re:wtf? by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

      Indigenous Rainbow Spatulas Dungeon Ponies.

      Wow, that does sound serious; I better RTFA.

    7. Re:wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pony up!

    8. Re:wtf? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      I find it amusing that your line immediately caused a coherent image to form in my mind* while I took half a minute to parse the story's headline (and initially did it the wrong way).

      * I think that the combination of Rainbow Dash, spatulas and BDSM is weird but hey, so is the thought of mortgages displaying factories...

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    9. Re:wtf? by P-niiice · · Score: 1

      Effective McDonald's Shakes Industry Leaders

    10. Re:wtf? by bosef1 · · Score: 1

      I have proposed we use the infinitive verb "to spatulate" to describe the thing that is done with a spatula. For example, "After adding eggs to the flour, you will need to spatulate". Or, "I've been spatulating all day, and wow my arm is tired."

    11. Re:wtf? by The+Dancing+Panda · · Score: 1

      Turn. The word you're looking for is Turn. Turn Over if you want to be more specific.

    12. Re:wtf? by bosef1 · · Score: 1

      Duuuddee... your taakkinngg all the fuunnn out of it.

  6. is that _accurate_ colour, or just "vibrant"? by Chirs · · Score: 1

    I would actually rather not have an unnaturally vibrant screen. I want a screen that shows me exactly what the director intended the picture to look like.

    1. Re:is that _accurate_ colour, or just "vibrant"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume you also have properly designed speakers with double 18 inch woofers in a correctly built and well damped 400 pound wood enclosure, sitting in an acoustically neutral room. Right? Right??

    2. Re:is that _accurate_ colour, or just "vibrant"? by swb · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many directors actually do any more than give some vague description of the look (bright, dark, grey, etc) they want and then the army of people including production designers, cinematographers, colorists, and so on do a little something which isn't even evident until maybe after a working print of whatever scene is being shot is struck if its shot on film.

      I'll bet a lot of director color schemes these days get applied via post-processing anymore.

  7. Sharp screens are mediocre IMO. by guidryp · · Score: 3, Informative

    When I was checking out TVs, I quickly marked Sharp off my list. IMO their panels have the worse viewing angle washout of any of the panel types and no real compensating high point (Yellow pixels are more gimmick than benefit).

    I see lots of talk from Sharp, but I have never seen a Sharp screen I want to buy, so no great loss IMO.

    1. Re:Sharp screens are mediocre IMO. by The+Dancing+Panda · · Score: 0

      This is pretty stupid, because they probably make the actual screen in the TV you actually bought.

    2. Re:Sharp screens are mediocre IMO. by guidryp · · Score: 1

      No. Sharp actually makes the screens in relatively few TVs. My TV has a AU Optronics panel.

    3. Re:Sharp screens are mediocre IMO. by guidryp · · Score: 2

      Which was probably just a re-badged sharp panel..

      Well at least you hide behind an anonymous login when making clueless posts, about topics where you are entirely ignorant.

      Saying an AU Optronics panel is just a re-badged sharp panel, makes about as much sense as saying an Intel CPU is probably just re-badged AMD CPU.

    4. Re:Sharp screens are mediocre IMO. by wmbetts · · Score: 1

      I have a Sharp in my front room and I have to disagree with you on the viewing angles. I have no issues with side viewing.

      --
      "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me". - stolen from Dan C alt.os.linux.slackware
    5. Re:Sharp screens are mediocre IMO. by Tanktalus · · Score: 2

      [...] an Intel CPU is probably just re-badged AMD CPU.

      It is? Damn, I got ripped off, then! Why didn't anyone tell me this before I plunked down an extra $100 to get my i7 instead of an AMD CPU when they were the same thing all along?

      (Taking things out of context will continue for the duration of U.S. Silly Season.)

    6. Re:Sharp screens are mediocre IMO. by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      (Taking things out of context will continue for the duration of U.S. Silly Season.)

      I'm glad that silly season only happens every other year, and to a lesser degree on the years not divisible by 4.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    7. Re:Sharp screens are mediocre IMO. by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      If you care mostly about viewing angle (vs, IDK, sitting in front of the TV you want to watch), then this may be useful. But there are many axis of quality, and when I went shopping for TVs for the first time after 18 years about 2 years ago, the Quattron had by far the best color quality, look, and subjective fulid motion of LCDs. It was almost as good in store displays as many plasmas, without the price premium (at the time, in my local stores).

      I was and remain quite impressed with the video quality and upscaling from modest video sources.

      That said, once you're over 120hz refresh rate with 2d, I'm not sure there still is an appreciable difference for me or people I know with any current flatscreen TV. They're all about the same now, though I still would take a close look at a Sharp vs a Samsung vs a Sony ... I.e. the sort of "name" brands vs Vizio and Dynex I see on sale all the time at Sams Club or Best Buy.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
  8. sacrifice long term for the sake of the short term by ThorGod · · Score: 1

    So in the future they'll have interest payments to meet in addition to their other factor costs for creating displays.

    In the short term, they can continue to meet whatever short-term debt obligations they have. (Bonus question: What are likely to be their short term debt obligations?)

    In the long term...who knows? Their future ability to pay appears less secure.

    --
    PS: I don't reply to ACs.
  9. Oh noes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Now they won't be able to build houses/hotels or collect rent!

  10. Question... by PortHaven · · Score: 4, Funny

    What are "Sharp Mortgages", and what caused them to be cash-poor. Is this part of the toxic asset relief program. Apparently, they're displaying their factories. So mayb these were commercial loans for industry used to build factories...

    Hmm....

    Anglish!

    1. Re:Question... by Misagon · · Score: 1

      They are sharp enough to be able to know how to use money, but they are apparently not sharp enough to spend it wisely.

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
  11. Price Wars by alexander_686 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The LCD screen market has been brutal for the past couple of years. Plants have high fixed capital costs. i.e. building plants are expensive. The market has surplus capacity. i.e. everybody thought people would be buying their screens. In this situation, if the plant is running you might as well run it at full throttle – it is almost as cheap to build 100 rather than 80. This leaves a company with 2 choices.

    First, you can shut down the factory and leave all of the capital ideal. Even worse, with the technology cycle so fast, when you restart the plant it is going to be obsolete.

    Second, you can engage in a long drawn out price war. Unfortunately Sharp is facing Samsung who has the same problem – overcapacity – but have deep better diversified pockets to survive the price war. The second option is better – you bleed slower.

    If you want an analogy, take a look at the airlines. The price wars have been so brutal that, IIRC, the total return on equity invested in airlines (as a whole) is about 0% for the past 50 years.

    1. Re:Price Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "First, you can shut down the factory and leave all of the capital ideal"

      Do you mean "idle"? LOL.

  12. I'm sooooooo confused by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Cash-Poor Sharp Mortgages Display Factories

    I've heard of a lot of mortgage companies, but not "Sharp Mortgages."

    And what do they need factories for, and why are they displaying them?

    Oh, I get it, they need cash and hope the buzz will attract investors.

    Oh, and it's "Displays" not "Display." Unless I'm reading it wrong and there are a bunch of starving but very bright mortgages out there which are showing off their factories, in which case I apologize.

    Hmm, this could be the next correct horse battery staple. I hope this isn't Mr. Okuda's password.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:I'm sooooooo confused by psmears · · Score: 1

      Oh, and it's "Displays" not "Display."

      Really? I'm not sure that's an improvement...

    2. Re:I'm sooooooo confused by neminem · · Score: 0

      No, there are multiple Sharp Mortgages, and they're all competing to display the best factories.

      Actually, I had an even worse time of it, as I started off by reading -Sharp- as the primary verb, as in "to cheat", so I was like... cash-poor people sharp their mortgages... what?

    3. Re:I'm sooooooo confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Noun-verb agreement.

      "Sharp Mortgages," the name of a company, singular noun.

      "Displays" needs the s at the end.

      It would've helped if the word "they" was replaced by "it" in reference to "Sharp Mortgages" in the post you replied to.

    4. Re:I'm sooooooo confused by psmears · · Score: 1

      Noun-verb agreement.

      "Sharp Mortgages," the name of a company, singular noun.

      "Displays" needs the s at the end.

      Singular nouns that refer to groups of people often take plural verb agreement in English (admittedly this is more common in British than US English, but it does happen in both). Compare "My family is big" with "My family are big"...

      It would've helped if the word "they" was replaced by "it" in reference to "Sharp Mortgages" in the post you replied to.

      Yep, exactly - the "they" clearly indicates the company is being thought of as a group in this example.

      Of course, the whole thing just goes to show how poorly written the original title was in the first place :-)

  13. I almost expect Apple to buy Sharp. by Picass0 · · Score: 1

    With the rumors of an Apple TV odds are Sharp is already a fabrication partner on that project. Apple could buy the plant and transition other product assembly away from Foxconn. I'm sure Japan would love to see the jobs come over from China.

  14. They should have gone to Apple instead... by jd2112 · · Score: 2

    If Sharp goes under the may have to go to Samsung for displays. I'm sure they would do it but there will be an extra $1B charge tacked in somewhere...

    --
    Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    1. Re:They should have gone to Apple instead... by tlhIngan · · Score: 0

      If Sharp goes under the may have to go to Samsung for displays. I'm sure they would do it but there will be an extra $1B charge tacked in somewhere...

      Samsung only makes AMOLED displays (they got rid of their LCD division). There are plenty of others who make LCDs - LG and Hitachi are the bigger ones, but there are various smaller ones as well.

      Though, I'm surprised Apple didn't take it as an opportunity to invest in Sharp, perhaps doing it as a joint venture. Apple's been investing heavily in display technology, they could use it as a chance to own the display supply chain to do strategic R&D (i.e., higher res displays).

      It's something Apple prides itself on (having some of the nicer displays in its products), so I'm surprised they wouldn't spend some of that huge warchest to acquire cutting edge display technology and manufacturing.

  15. Not too much sympathy here by zlexiss · · Score: 2

    This just a few months after settling for $200 million in an LCD price fixing suit. Guess they were counting on keeping those artificially high prices going to break even.

  16. What Apple screen plant? by guidryp · · Score: 1

    Isn't it just a rumor that Sharp will be making iPhone screens. AFAIK, there are no sharp screens in any shipping Apple product.

    Desktops use LG IPS screens. iPhone 4s uses LG IPS screens. iPad 1/2 use LG IPS screens. iPad 3 uses Samsung PLS(their version of IPS) screens.

    Sharp??

  17. Meaningless by DaveGod · · Score: 1

    How is this news? A company obtaining finance and giving their bank good security is normal practice in business. If anything is weird here it is that Sharp does not already have these assets securing loans. The tone gives me the impression this is meant to be bad news for Sharp, but there is no clue why in the summary.

    Reading TFA, it seems the story here is that Sharp is in deep financial trouble, but the good news is that they have been able to refinance, thus answering Moody's recent concerns. The particular importance of Sharp is that they are seen as symbolic of current weakness in the Japanese electronics industry, they are one of the few manufacturers of LCD screens, and the lack of finance had cast doubt on their ability to make screens for Apple's upcoming new iPhone and iPad products.

    1. Re:Meaningless by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      The tone gives me the impression this is meant to be bad news for Sharp, but there is no clue why in the summary.

      Phew. So (per the summary) having to mortgage your factories to raise $2 billion in emergency funds when you're looking at a $3 billion+ loss isn't bad news.

  18. Re:sacrifice long term for the sake of the short t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the long term...who knows?

    Buyouts by Chinese companies. Japan is no longer an indispensable part of the electronics supply chain and can not command prices sufficient to fund the very high corporate tax rates its government imposes or the high compensation its workers expect.

    You should expect to see more Japanese companies floundering. Some marquee names like Sharp will try to remain independent through debt and public offerings. Others will seek out partners and buyers. In any case the plant and capital will evacuate to lower cost parts of Asia, Eastern Europe and even Africa as the decline accelerates.

  19. Same problem as USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sharp's plant is in Japan and they can't compete with Chinese LCDs.

  20. I wonder how that bodes for AAPL by tibit · · Score: 1

    I wonder, though, if AAPL shares might be affected by it. I need to check if Apple seems to have second-sources for their display tech. The Sharp plant suddenly looks like a lost case in the long run.

    --
    A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  21. No, it's free market punishing bad businesses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what happens when free market is working.

    Sharp bet on large LCDs. Turns out market didn't want them as much as Sharp thought. Market went the other direction - smaller screens on iPads and smart devices

    Sharp made a bad decision. Sharp didn't make what the market wants.

    Seeing the bad decision they made, banks are reluctant to loan them more money without Sharp offering something as a security - their factories.

    Don't let libertarians fool you thinking capitalism is all sunshine and rainbows and banks rush to your feet the moment you say you're a "business". If you believe that, then perhaps you would like to loan ME some money? I'm er... starting a business selling bridges.

  22. the market. by swschrad · · Score: 1

    the market is saturated. major players like Philips have basically handed over their factories to get out from under the pressure years ago. we're left with Sharp, Samsung, Mitsubishi (Panasonic,) and several Red Army Factions.

    just like there used to be a dozen CRT plants in the US alone, dwindled to channel master and Sony, and they're all closed. Clinton is closed in China. there may not be a working CRT plant left any more, anywhere.

    and as the complexity and demand for higher grade screens rises, it's a double squeeze... everything you have is obsolete and pennies per diagonal inch, but everything you need to make yesterday is already on the verge of oversupply because the competition's plants are already announced and half-done.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:the market. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the least two, one in india and one in italy

  23. Sharp's main issues by MasaMuneCyrus · · Score: 4, Informative

    For those that don't know, Sharp recently built their tenth-generation glass substrate and LCD factory in Sakai, Japan. This is, bar-none, the most advanced, efficient, and green LCD manufacturing facility in the world. To further lower costs, their main suppliers moved their factories just next door to the Sakai plant.

    When Sharp first made this plant, it seemed like Japan would come to dominate the LCD industry, again. Sharp had deals with all the major LCD players to manufacture parts for them to use in their own brands. Notably, SONY was a huge investor in the Sakai facility. The Sakai plant was going to produce the best LCD TV components, and SONY has a long history of using top-of-the-line components in their products.

    Sharp has fallen on hard times because of two primary issues:
    1. The economy, stupid
    2. The inexplicable and dramatic rise of the yen

    When Sharp first made the facility, it made it big, and it expected big demand. BOOM! global economic meltdown. That seriously hurt Sharp, but at least they still had their deals with other companies to buy their industry-best components. Well, a consequence of the meltdown, quantitative easing, uncertainty, etc, is that the Japanese yen has skyrocketed in value.

    I studied abroad in Japan from 2007-2008. At that time, I got about 121 yen per USD. Now the rate is half that. That means Made in Japan is 50% more expensive in the US (and most everywhere else) than it was, before. This is what is killing Sharp. This is what is killing all Japanese manufacturers. Modern Japan developed as an export economy, and with the yen as strong as it is, it is struggling to export. Many of their industries are diversified; for example, Honda has the ability to manufacture the same Honda Civic in Japan or the US, then ship it to whichever country it wants to sell it in depending on the exchange rates. Sharp has put all its eggs in the Made in Japan basket (not a bad decision at the time; I would certainly prefer a Made in Japan TV for a small premium, and I know others would, too), and now that basket is way too expensive to compete.

    Unless the yen weakens, Sharp will fail. If they fail, somebody is going to take over the Sakai factory, because it is just too new, too advanced, and too efficient to let disappear.

    1. Re:Sharp's main issues by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Samsung is spinning off their LCD division to concentrate on OLED. It is a really bad time to invest in low margin LCD factories.

    2. Re:Sharp's main issues by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Sharp pretends to put all its eggs in the "made in Japan" basket, by highlighting their factories in Japan on the webpage, but if you dig deep enough, you'll find the page where they list all their global factories (Poland, Mexico, China, Thailand, Malaysia, Philippines) just like any other major Japanese electronics company.

    3. Re:Sharp's main issues by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      The strong yen is *somewhat* explainable, but not to the level it is currently at. Japan, although it has a very large debt to GDP ratio(something like 2.2, the highest in the developed world), does have a very high rate of personal savings and thus a lot of people considered it "safe" and sold "riskier" dollars and euro to buy yen, causing it to rise slightly and thanks to algo traders and crazy margin buyers that rise got out of control.... The fundamentals do not support the yen at this level

      The yen will snap back, pretty violently, in the other direction, just as the Euro did back in 2008(went from $1.60 to $1.15 in a matter of a few months), at this point its simply a question of time. The euro snapped back when Bear Stearns failed, causing liquidity to dry up and forcing a lot of people to sell their Euro positions to get the cash to cover a lot of their puts, causing the euro to fall, which in turn caused a lot of margin calls which in turn caused more people to sell the Euro etc. The exact same thing will happen with the yen, but I couldn't tell you when. Right now the Fed and ECB are pumping in liquidity like mad, so most of the really heavily leveraged yen traders can absorb any short term swings(such as JCB interventions), but that probably wont last forever. If you want to make lots of money, short the yen, just be careful on the timing :P

  24. Re:sacrifice long term for the sake of the short t by Immerman · · Score: 1

    More importantly - the company will continue to be able to pay the CEO and Board their expected bonuses while it gradually bleeds to death and hopes that the LCD market will pick up again.

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  25. Short list of troubled Japanese companies by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 0

    Nissan - now owned by Renault from France

    Olympus - now still embroiled in bitter internal strife

    Sharp - cash squeeze and facing bankruptcy

    Elpida - bankrupted and bought by Micron

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  26. Easy by wiedzmin · · Score: 1

    They should sue Samsung. They make rectangular LCDs as well.

    --
    Bow before me, for I am root.