Slashdot Mirror
NYC Taxi Commission Nixes Cab-Hailing Apps
An anonymous reader writes "Uber is a company that creates apps to connect taxi and limo drivers with potential passengers. They've been rapidly expanding their service to cities across the country, but they're now getting pushback from New York City. This week the NYC Taxi and Limousine Commission issued a public notice saying, 'A driver must not use any electronic communication device (PDF), including a cell phone or smartphone running a hail or payment app, while operating a taxicab.' The commission says its current contractual obligations forbid the use of such technology."
They can use it while they're parked waiting for a fare, but not while driving. Makes sense for safety.
is the radio considered an electronic communication device? it is one-way communication for sure, but "communication" nonetheless.
Why is there a commission to decide whether I can drive you from A to B for a fee and whether you can call or text me on the phone to arrange it and to whom I have to pay a very substantial annual fee for the privilege of doing so? The answer: its a legalized racket, just like all business licensing.
Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
So if you can't use electronics, how do you dispatch them? Do they return to the depot after every pickup to receive little strips of paper? (-_-)
Another case of capitalism gone full retard -- "We forbid you to use anything that could make your job more efficient and convenient for your customers!"
#fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
Because the asshole that cuts you off within millimeters to make their fare happy is now worrying about how many fares they will miss if they aren't driving and fucking around on their cell phone
"When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
This is why people have trouble trusting the government, their only interest is to sell Medallions for their own profit.
"A good friend will bail you out of jail. A true friend will be sitting next to you saying, 'damn....that was fun!'"
I live in San Francisco and Uber is the reason I don't have a car anymore, and never want to have a car ever again. Yes, it's expensive. And yes, it might be "throwing money down the toilet" compared to owning a car, but I don't care. The convenience is well worth it. No payments, no insurance, no gas, no parking, no maintenance, no traffic stress. Took a trip to LA, used Uber there too. One click and a nice clean car shows up in 10 minutes or less.
Basically a cabbie in new york, according to regulations, HAS to stop for anybody that hails them.
So bascially, this app makes cabbies into a pusedo limo service. They by pass people on the street hailing them, and go pick up the appointment.
but what is boils down to is, once again, government regulations stopping free enterprise. They need to drop this silly non-sense about limo service vs taxi service.
If you don't understand why taxis are legally required to pick up anyone hailing them,
then I guess this doesn't make sense and you can shoehorn this into the traditional
"government regulations are stifling free enterprise" world view.
There's a reason that the police and Taxi & Limosine Commision conducts sting operations to make sure that drivers are following the law.
The main ones being: you can't charge handicapped passengers more, you can't kick someone out for wanting to go to a hospital,
you can't discriminate based on race, and you can't refuse service based on destination.
More often than not, regulations are there because "free enterprise" misbehaved,
not because the big bad government is out to stop free enterprises from making money.
[Fuck Beta]
o0t!
More often than not, regulations are there because "free enterprise" misbehaved,
not because the big bad government is out to stop free enterprises from making money.
More often than not, these well-meaning regulations are twisted to serve special interests once the regulations have outlived their useful purpose. Then the misbehaving party *becomes* the government. The difference is, with free enterprise, you can opt out of a corrupt or discriminatory business or even create your own competing one. There is no such option when government gets involved, which is why you should *always* be wary of government assuming such powers, no matter how trivial.
In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
Yeah, 'cause the absolute first thing I do when a capital intensive business pisses me off is to start my own competing business. You should see my empire now. I've got my own cell phone company, taxi and limo company, electric power utility, food distribution service, and of course health care system. Oh, wait, I can't just start those things up on my own, so my choices are to have a society with rules or just take whatever corporations and business owners think I deserve. Guess which one serves my interests better?
Libertarian types can be such dumbasses sometimes,
More often than not, these well-meaning regulations are twisted to serve special interests once the regulations have outlived their useful purpose.
Are you claiming that the regulations requiring taxis to pick up all passengers has outlived its useful purpose?
I cannot deny that regulations can end up serving special interests instead of the general public.
My rebuttal is that we should have better regulation, not no regulation.
In this particular case, the regulations governing taxis generally serve the public and the regulations should remain that way.
The difference is, with free enterprise, you can opt out of a corrupt or discriminatory business or even create your own competing one.
The balance of power is not equal between someone who wants a service and someone who provides a service.
This is why we have regulations.
Without regulations, there are monopolies and oligopies, not competition and free markets.
This is what history shows us and ideology frequently strives to ignore or deny.
[Fuck Beta]
o0t!
... A driver must not use any electronic communication device ...
I am not from New York, but I had been to New York (and NYC) many times, and have lost count of the times I took NYC cabs
I remember that in the NY cabs that I were in, even during pre-cellphone era, there was already an "electronic communication device" - a CB-radio
And the cabbies were using it to communicate with their HQ and to others, even while they were zig-zagging in and out of the city traffic!!
It's totally ridiculous to place a ban on the use of "electronic communication device" while they were already using "electronic communication devices" !
Unless of course, the CB radio they were using were not electronics - maybe they are still using vacuum tubes in their CeeBees
Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !