Slashdot Mirror
Rick Falkvinge On Child Porn and Freedom Of the Press
bazorg writes "Rick Falkvinge of the Swedish Pirate Party blogs on the subject of freedom of the press and foresees how users of Google glasses could be charged for possession and distribution of illegal porn. 'Child pornography is a toxic subject, but a very important one that cannot and should not be ignored. This is an attempt to bring the topic to a serious discussion, and explain why possession of child pornography need to be re-legalized in the next ten years.'"
Also on a philosophical level, rape is just the deposition of a little bit of matter. It's just atoms.
Philosophy is borked and can be used to support ANY point of view.
Oh, please. Give me a break. Virtually all child pornography involves exploitation of a child. How can anyone say that this should be legalized?
Hey mods, this isn't flamebait. Crazy, perhaps, but not flamebait.
Please try to avoid using that mod so much.
Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
I say eff them, throw them in a hole. or cut off the nuts. there is no "reforming" a pedo. this isn't about criminalizing "bits" it's about criminalizing possession. which has a rich legitimate legal history. possess drugs? go to jail, do not pass go. posess stolen merchandise? (as opposed to the act of stealing). jail. posess an unlisenced gun, or one used in a crime? jail, unless the tea tards get their way about the second amendment. this is the kind of society we live in, and the kind of society i want, despite the ranting of some freetard in norway. maybe norway wants to legalize pedos so they'll all leave US and move there.
Viewing child pornography doesn't make the viewer a pedophile. Neither does thinking about it or having "age-play" fantasies. A pedophile is someone who molests a child and I agree if someone is willing to cross that line they cannot be reformed anymore than you can expect a rapist to develop a conscience.
Doesn't harm the child??? just how the fuck did the child get in the photograph in the first place. The children in the photograph are being sexually abused,raped. So possession of CP is just as bad if not worse.
Jack of all trades,master of none
Fact is: If you "please" a child, and the child was not hurt, but enjoyed it - then you have not per see hurt the child. However - the child is in a learning stage of life, and because we see this as immoral and it's against our religious beliefs or otherwise, the child will come to know this when the child grows up, and therefor the risk is there that the child will at a later stage in life - feel abused and dirty, and thus have it's life "mentally" destroyed and disturbed.
So you are trying to justify child molestation.
please go wash yourself with gasoline then have a smoke. fucking pedophile.
Snowden and Manning are heroes.