Slashdot Mirror
Majority of Mobile Malware Now Reliant On Toll Fraud
CowboyRobot writes "Spyware is no longer the primary concern with unwanted software on mobile devices. According to mobile security firm Lookout, most mobile malware performs 'toll fraud' — billing victims using premium SMS services. The problem is very geographically-dependent, worst in areas with weak SMS regulation, particularly China, Ukraine, and Russia, where users are 10,000 times more likely to have malware on their phones than users in Japan, for example. Other risks include mobile ads surreptitiously uploading personal data, as well as apps that download other malware without users knowing. The full report is available."
But... But... You cant have regulations, you have to let the Free Market....
Thank god i live in a socialist hellhole where when this crap started to spring up it got massively stomped on by regulating the crap out of it.
stuck at "It's Easy To Steal Identities (Of Corporations)"
try lifting the lid and blowing on it, then jiggle the cable... and if that doesn't work, give it a few good knocks on the side
Seriously, why do we even need a system which lets people charge arbitrary ammounts via SMS? It's insecure, ripe for abuse and open to fraud. I don't think I have ever seen it used for a beneficial purpose, except perhaps for charity donations which could just as easily be done via another system.
So, why not just shut the thing down? Or, heck just limit it to registered charities; it's not like anyone else uses it but those who prey on the weak (rip off custom ringtone companies, horoscope peddlers and malware)
I'm working as a programmer since nearly 20 years and I just love technology. I use Linux as a desktop since the early days of Slackware, back when it took quite a leap of faith.
My cellphone? An iPhone... With a prepaid SIM card!
That way I'm sure that: a) I'll spend way less than any "plan" (master plan one could say ; ) any operator could come up with and b) no malware / premium SMS service / crazy app/site eating my 3G bandwith can never "eat" more than the data limit available on my prepaid card.
It would be reasonable to expect a means by which the consumer could opt out of premium SMS services (all of them) similar to having call blocks for long distance, 900 calls, etc. on your home phone. Even better, the default would off, and you would have to UNBLOCK the ability by contacting your telco. Alas, this would never be provided voluntarily by a telco without regulation...
you would think this is a reasonable request. My wife had a twenty dollar charge on a tmobile account, and they said that she had used "premium" network services. She had to pay that time, and went through every formal protest that she could just to record that it wasnt her and we would not pay twice. All of the texting plans outside of pure data ( g-chat, g-voice, email , etc) had already been disabled. 2 months later it happened again.We had to fight tooth and nail to get them to remove the charge, and then they ended up forgetting the promise to undo the charge and said it was our responsibility to have the charges removed by the vendor... completely ignoring the fact that as no service was purchased, there was no vendor to speak with. They also tried to say that anyone with the phone's email address could place charges to the number , and the tmobile would just pass through the charges. We knew this was obvious bullshit, and got the guy to bac down on that one. Hours later they finally realised that this is their issue, and that they were about to lose customers, so they gave the cash back " within 90 days".
It has some uses (see other replies), and it's OK if you have strong regulation of the service providers.
Example here, which was news here last week:
A malware attack targeted at 18 countries that cost unsuspecting users £15 every time they tried to open a ‘free’ app has been cut off by PhonepayPlus, the UK’s premium rate telephone services regulator. Sanctions imposed by the regulator’s Tribunal will see all money returned to UK consumers on top of a £50,000 fine imposed on the provider of the premium rate shortcodes that enabled the apps to fraudulently charge smartphone users.
none of this £27,850 of UK consumers’ money reached the fraudsters.
(The apps were "free" versions of popular apps, downloaded from alternative app stores -- not the Google one -- or websites.)