Slashdot Mirror
Two Teams Win the BotPrize
An anonymous reader writes "For the past five years, the 2K BotPrize has challenged artificial intelligence researchers and programmers to create a computer-game-playing bot that plays like a person. It's one thing to make bots that play computer games very well — computers are faster and more accurate than a person can ever be — but it's a different thing to make bots that are fun to play against. In a breakthrough result, after years of striving and improvement from 14 different international teams from nine countries, two teams have crossed the humanness barrier! The teams share $7000 in prize money and a trip to games company 2K's Canberra studio. The winners are the UT^2 team from the University of Texas at Austin, and Mihai Polceanu, a doctoral student from Romania, currently studying Artificial Intelligence at ENIB CERV — Centre de Réalité Virtuelle, Brest, France. The UT^2 team is Professor Risto Miikulainen, and doctoral students Jacob Schrum and Igor Karpov. The bots created by the two teams both achieved a humanness rating of 52%, easily exceeding the average humanness rating of the human players, at 40%. It is especially fitting that the prize has been won in the 2012 Alan Turing Centenary Year. The famous Turing test — where a computer has to have a conversation with a human, and pretends to be another human — was the inspiration for the BotPrize competition. Where to now for human-like bots? Next year we hope to propose a new and exciting challenge for game playing bot creators to push their technologies to the next level of human-like performance."
Can't have been too hard to make a bot that spews random obscenities and anti-gay/misogonistic comments, while randomly firing bullets into team members and tea-bagging you when you die.
That gets you up to what, 75%?
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
IGOR! I need a new brain for the robot!
There are two fascinating things about the parent post.
One of them is that I have just realized how to pass a Turing test -- just have your program pretend to be a frothing nutcase. Technically, that counts as human, but apparently it relieves you of the normal human requirement that your utterances be appropriate to the context, which is really the hardest part of passing the Turing test.
The other is that someone apparently modded it up.
While it may lack in variety, I often prefer to spend what little time I do have to play games in skirmish offline or against bots. I find that better than dealing with most of the bullshit online. Yeah I know your counterargument, if I spent more time finding good players or servers it isn't really a problem. I just don't want to. Bots don't go berserk or disconnect or lack (albeit often predictable once you've played a game enough) skills, or any of the other usual multiplayer complaints.
Whoa! Who woulda thunk that playing computer games makes people less humann?
I wonder if part of how they did this used human game play to train a neural network. A quick google of the idea makes it seem like that is plausible and has been done in at least one study, but I don't know if it is a widely used AI technique or not.
I would respond but your post failed to pass the Turing test, the Rorschach test, the Sniff test and frankly even your STD test scores are looking a bit sketchy.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Well if these teams have no black people, I guess we can conclude that only white people have no game and therefore need bots.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
I often prefer to spend what little time I do have to play games in skirmish offline or against bots. I find that better than dealing with most of the bullshit online.
I used to play Unreal Tournament a lot. I liked to play online, there was a lot of bullshit but in the end I just felt like playing against bots was too fake.
I don't know why that is, because I love many single player games where essentially I'm playing a whole game against bots and carefully tuned algorithms meant to fool me into thinking I "beat" something that could have had me easily had the "Mercy" setting been turned down to 0. But I just never could get into playing any game that was normally played against (or with) other people using bots.
Perhaps making the multiplayer bots more "human" will bring in the elusive element that made me dislike FPS bots.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
If a bot can be "more human" than actual humans, what's next?
Robot Love!
One of them is that I have just realized how to pass a Turing test -- just have your program pretend to be a frothing nutcase.
I've heard that the program most often mistaken for a human was frequently rude and nasty to its correspondents.
William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
One of them is that I have just realized how to pass a Turing test -- just have your program pretend to be a frothing nutcase.
I've heard that the program most often mistaken for a human was frequently rude and nasty to its correspondents.
Actually, that was me. Sorry about the mistake, stupid. :D
morcego
...or the judges are very bad at distinguishing human from bot. One interesting thing to note is that lower skill default bots were rated quite highly on the "humanness" rating (higher than the average for humans), which might suggest the judges thought human players are worse than bots. The default bots "humanness" average was only slightly below the average for the actual human players (~37% vs ~41%), which suggests the methodology is a little questionable. If you can't distinguish the default, "non-humanized" bots from actual humans, how would you expect to distinguish bots that have been intended to be "humanized"?
"None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
I find it interesting that the ordering of judges on the "Most human humans" list is the exact opposite of those on the "Best human judges" list. So the more robotic a judge appeared to others, the better they were able to recognize the true bots in the games. A great example of "it takes one to know one".
-deane
Ut2004 is a chaotic game. Very bot friendly especially since you never see a player's perspective (judging was done in game using a tag gun). I'd be more impressed if a bot could recreate the muscle memory twitch and intelligence of a counterstrike player via the first person perspective.
Dear winners, Please dont judge Australia by what you see in Canberra. Its a soul sucking dreadful place. And its also full of our federal politicians. Please escape and go somewhere good - there are lots of great places in Australia. Canberra is not one of them.
As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a reference to Godwin's Law approaches 1
Some of the old classic arcades had this option. I was a passable midline Mortal Kombat II-III player before I retired from most video games. A couple of fun local shops had the setting on medium. On a good day you could beat the game with a couple of bucks. Then on road trips some of the other shop owners were greedy and cranked the difficulty setting, and that became NO FUN AT ALL. I don't recall the specifics, but a couple of the characters just got way too fast with the Throw maneuvers, Goro and Motaro got out of control, and another couple characters were zinging turbo combos that were actually kinda impressively-depressive, but only worth a buck in amazement before you just walked away.
My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
The one defining characteristic of human players in most multiplayer games is that 70% or so are completely clueless about tactics, strategy and teamwork. Add some insulting behavior to that, and you have the perfect emulation of a human player...
Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
You can download the source for the UT^2 bot entry (written in Java using the Pogamut framework) from http://nn.cs.utexas.edu/?ut2 . The bot has a modular behavior architecture and uses evolved neural network controllers for some of its behaviors and a playback of human game traces (available as a separate download) for others.