Slashdot Mirror


Radioactive Tool Goes Missing In Texas

Hugh Pickens writes "Oil-field service companies lower radioactive units into wells to let workers identify places to break apart rock for a drilling process known as hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, which frees oil and natural gas. Now Bloomberg reports that Halliburton workers have discovered that a lock on the container used to transport one such device has gone missing, along with the unit, after employees drove a truck from a site near Peco to a well south of Odessa and while the loss of radioactive rods occurs from time to time, it has been years since a device with americium-241/beryllium, the material in Halliburton's device, was misplaced in Texas. NRC spokeswoman Maureen Conley says the material would have to be in someone's physical possession for several hours for it to be considered harmful as teams comb the route between the two wellsites searching for the seven-inch tube, which is clearly marked with the words 'DANGER RADIOACTIVE' as well as a radiation warning symbol, "Halliburton strongly cautions members of the public that if they locate this source, they should not touch or handle it, stay a minimum of 25 feet away," and contact local law enforcement or the company's emergency hotline if they find the cylinder, says the company which is also offering a reward for information about the tube's whereabouts."

32 of 163 comments (clear)

  1. "I'll offer you $50 for it" by grumling · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looking forward to seeing what the experts think it's worth on next week's Pawn Stars.

    --
    "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
  2. Not just hydrofrac... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Such tools are routinely use to estimate density in pretty much all oilfield well logging.

    1. Re:Not just hydrofrac... by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Around 1990 I was working at an oilfield testing company that had the grown kid of the original company owner at the helm. The guy was a moron and didn't care how the company functioned as long as the money kept coming in for him to go play the horses at a local racetrack.

      Anyway, the field guys lost a radioactive source and couldn't find it. They thought it bounced out of an unsecured lead canister along a road somewhere.

      They got their hand slapped for it but somewhere in the midwest there is a hot source laying by the road. Or was. Who knows if anyone ever found it.

      These kinds of things are inexcusable because anyone who happens to find one and pick it up has their life changed. Cancer and death awaits if anyone spends any length of time with one of those sources. If a company cannot follow a checklist for handling one of those sources, they should not be allowed to use them.

  3. Thoughts by Sparticus789 · · Score: 5, Funny

    If the finder does not contact law enforcement, then I feel this issue is best left up to natural selection. First to nominate for a Darwin award.

    --
    sudo make me a sandwich
    1. Re:Thoughts by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If the finder does not contact law enforcement, then I feel this issue is best left up to natural selection. First to nominate for a Darwin award.

      Depending on exactly how the source is encapulated, it may well not work out so neatly. If mechanically damaged, Americium-241 could come out to play and get all over the place, including friends, family, and general passers-by who hardly did anything to deserve an award...

      This thing isn't exactly an unalterable inventory item that just happens to do 1d6 radiation damage every hour it remains in a character's inventory.

    2. Re:Thoughts by Greyfox · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah! It's at least 2d20 area effect, unless you make the saving throw against radiation!

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    3. Re:Thoughts by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

      No one said natural selection was fair. Just ask all those dinosaurs whose only fault was adapting well to a time before the comet hit. Or all those other organisms we're driving to extinction now, who are well adapted to a world without humans.

      Anyway, the darwin awards were always a joke. It started well after Eldrege and Gould came out with punctuated equalibrium: the founders of the Darwin Awards were probably aware that natural selection doesn't work like that, with individual animals taking themselves out of the gene pool. Stupid is usually preferred evolutionarily speaking anyway. Bacteria are winning at evolution. It's not even close.

    4. Re:Thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Face facts...Halliburton probably sold the radioactive unit to the terrorists and a re now in the midst of a cover-up or a "blame some low-level field hand." I nominate Halliburton executives for the Death by Fire Ants Punishment - ahem I mean Award. I'll volunteer to pour honey all over the naked body of Dick Cheney and watch as the fire ants remove that scumbag from the the planet.

    5. Re:Thoughts by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      Radiation follows the usual inverse-square law. You can't render a large area dangerous with a point source, unless it's something crazy-radioactive like an unshielded nuclear reactor. If it were spread over a large area it could be more dangerous - even if the radiation itsself is of a very low level, radiation is scary, and could easily cause a panic.

    6. Re:Thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And what is stupid if not "simple."

      Stupidity and Simplicity are orthogonal. Complex solutions can be stupid. Simplicity can be brilliant.

    7. Re:Thoughts by marcosdumay · · Score: 2

      I'd say that neither is true. Bacteria aren't neither the simplest nor the most stupid (define as you like) thing to ever live on Earth.

      What is or is not advantajeous to an organism isn't so simple to rule. If you look at Earth's history, several times a increase in complexity allowed a small set of organisms to competely outcompete every other organism on the planet (we have at least 3 such botlenecks on our past). Also, several times complexity doomed a species.

    8. Re:Thoughts by ChumpusRex2003 · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's a neutron emitter. Alpha-particles will interact with Beryllium nuclei to emit neutrons. By encapsulating a mixture of Americium 241 and Beryllium, the alpha radiation (and gamma radiation) can be contained, but the neutrons allowed out, where they can be used for chemical analysis (in this case for analysing the composition of the rocks around the well bore).

      Quite apart from the fact that the source is dangerous in its own right, emitting neutrons which are an ionising radiation, they are a particular nuisance, because they can leave "radioactivity behind" by activating the nuclei of nearby materials (metals are particularly troublesome).

  4. From time to time? by djdanlib · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wait. Who's saying that "the loss of radioactive rods occurs from time to time" in such a nonchalant way, like they're trying to convince the readers that it's no big deal? It's a big deal. You don't just lose stuff like that.. they're transported in large, heavy packages!

    1. Re:From time to time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is no big deal. *waves the jedi mind trick*

      Seriously though, Halliburton's disasters must be measured on a different scale. Hell, they were involved in the Deepwater Horizon and got away with it. Do you think that a few rods of nuclear material worries them? The worst case is that they get a new government contract for building a nuclear bunker against terrorism.

  5. Better link by vlm · · Score: 5, Interesting

    while the loss of radioactive rods occurs from time to time

    This is a better link

    http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/event-status/event/

    Its pretty interesting reading. I think I heard about it from RISKS digest maybe a decade ago. About a half dozen reports are filed every day. At least one will be interesting, or at least WTF worthy. The story about the weld radiographer getting the source stuck while he was up a ladder so he took the source out and wore it like a necklace as he went down the ladder a couple days ago is WTF worthy.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  6. I've worked with these before I think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't think the description of purpose is actually accurate. Pretty sure they're talking about a Radioactive Densometer used to measure fluid density, which is used at the surface and attached to pipes pumping fluid, and isn't lowered into a well or whatever. It's basically a section of pipe with a very small radioactive source on one side, and a detector across from it. The measured decay rate tells you the fluid density accurately (the denser the fluid, the more radiation is blocked). They're actually fairly harmless in terms of radiation levels, although it's still important to recover lost ones.

  7. Nuclear density gauges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The nuclear density gauges are relatively common in civil engineering.Yeah, they go missing from time to time.

    How they usually go missing--some joker steals a worker's truck on a job site. The idiot doesn't realize he has taken a van with a restricted device in the back. Then a world of hurt descends on the person when they are finally caught.

    The person who was in charge of the gauge finds they are in trouble for leaving the vehicle unsecured.

  8. Oh boy! by bmo · · Score: 5, Informative

    This reminds me of the Goiania accident, a horrifying incident where someone stole the radiation source to a radiotherapy machine.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goi%C3%A2nia_accident

    A choice bit:

    On September 24, Ivo, Devair's brother, scraped dust out of the source, taking it to his house a short distance away. There he spread some of it on the cement floor. His six-year-old daughter, Leide das Neves Ferreira, later ate a sandwich while sitting on the floor. She was also fascinated by the blue glow of the powder, and applying it to her body, showed it off to her mother. Dust from the powder fell on the sandwich she was consuming; she eventually absorbed 1.0 GBq, total dose 6.0 Gy

    It glows, let's use it for makeup.

    --
    BMO

    1. Re:Oh boy! by lobiusmoop · · Score: 3, Informative

      Reminded me more of Davd Hahn - thought he was maybe up to his old tricks again and looking for a large amount of Americium (not from fire alarms this time though).

      --
      "I bless every day that I continue to live, for every day is pure profit."
    2. Re:Oh boy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Category 3 means this is maybe 1/1000 to 1/100,000 as strong as the source in Goiania, and it's a single metal rod, not a large container of powder. Very different scenario. Industrial radiography sources are ubiquitous and are lost/damaged on a regular basis with minimal consequences.

    3. Re:Oh boy! by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Informative

      TFA(to the best of my layman's understanding) suggests that this one is a stainless steel pipe with an Americum source behind a beryllium window.

      If some dumbass cuts it open, or decides to look down the tube for an extended period, things will get bad; but as long as it is mechanically undisturbed it won't be a huge deal.

      The Goiania incident was particularly nasty because the source was opened and Caesium chloride(started out as a dust, also readily water-soluble, for extra pollution potential...) went all over the place. Had nobody opened the source, exposure would have been trivial. Incidents like that are(part of) the reason why the graphic designers behind the nuclear trefoil attempted to come up with something that was overtly threatening looking, even to somebody who might not speak English or even be literate in their local language.

  9. , stay a minimum of 25 feet away.. by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From the picture I would say that if you get close enough to read the "Danger Radioactive" you've already got problems.

  10. Radioactive tool? It can only be... by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...Homer Simpson!

    I actually want to mod myself down for that one.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  11. Have they checked by Colourspace · · Score: 2

    Down the back of Homer Simpsons rad suit yet?

  12. I saw the name of the company by SlippyToad · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Halliburton: Endangering American Lives, With Taxpayer Dollars!

    God, if there were ever a corporation that needed to be dissolved in a vat of acid and the remains scattered to the far corners of the earth, Halliburton is it. They are the epitome of casual, incompetent, expensive evil.

    --
    One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / the next it's rolling over me / I can get back on / I can get back on
  13. Re:Should only be a problem if ingested by jbeaupre · · Score: 3, Funny

    But in California they force fed smoke detectors to lab rats. And they died.

    Moral of the story: don't feed smoke detectors to rats if you value your life.

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  14. Re:If I remember correctly by Alioth · · Score: 2

    A seven inch rod of the stuff plus beryllium - which turns it into a neutron source - making it pretty damned dangerous (much more dangerous than a mere alpha emitter).

  15. Re:More Thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is a slim chance that the device was left behind at the last well-head where it was used. That would explain both the radioactive source and the container padlock being missing. More distressing is the prospect that an outsider with ill intent wandered into the area of the well-head while the crew was on lunch break/siesta, broke into the container and stole it. That person should definitely be awarded a Darwin Award. That doesn't necessarily explain the missing padlock, as it is just something of little worth to carry off. But the most distressing prospect is that this was theft by an insider who knew the value of the device, and wished to conceal the fact that the padlock was not broken.

    Regardless of whether the device was lost or stolen, the company that owned this radioactive source should be heavily fined, as well as suspended from any further ability to own/possess/use such devices. I would go so far as to propose criminal liability charges brought against this company. Err, wait. This was Halliburton. Never mind. Move along. Nothing to see here.

    Would anyone care to bet against the prospect that the TSA will use this event to perform full body cavity searches everywhere they have now been deployed, far beyond the security lines at airports? I wouldn't.

  16. Re:I've worked with these before I think? NO by DCFusor · · Score: 2, Informative

    Something consisting of Am and Be is going to be a neutron source, and be used to make the minerals exposed to it radioactive via neutron capture. Not long ago, nearly all neutron sources for this were "Active" in that they shot a beam of mixed DT against a target holding more D and T, on batteries. They're hot as hell, and like I said - make things around them radioactive. If you have this, and a gamma spectrometer down the same hole, by the resulting gamma spectrum, you can tell what's there. Am has only about a 6 mo half life, so if it's not found, it's getting weaker fast. I've made my ow such sources with the Am source from a staticmaster brush and some Be to convert the alpha hits to emitted neutrons. I use my source to test neutron detectors for my fusion device. I have to replace the Am fairly frequently to keep the source emitting enough neutrons for this - my homebrew source is very small and not a big risk to anybody - you can barely detect it against the neutrons made in cosmic ray showers. But I could be wrong too - there's not enough info to say.

    --
    Why guess when you can know? Measure!
  17. Wait, isn't this desirable? by Phase+Shifter · · Score: 2
    It's an election year.

    Aren't potentially dangerous tools supposed to be getting lost?

  18. 100 comments, and no Joe Biden gags by smittyoneeach · · Score: 2

    Poor old Uncle Choo-Choo. No love on /. for that radioactive tool.

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  19. A radioactive tool, you say? by SoupIsGood+Food · · Score: 2

    The radioactive tool's gone missing in Texas? Did they check his dad's compound in Kennebunkport?