Slashdot Mirror


Paypal Users In Argentina Can No Longer Make Domestic Transactions

another random user writes with this excerpt from the BBC: "The online payment service said that from 9 October: 'Argentina resident Paypal-users may only send and receive international payments.' Last year the Argentine government announced restrictions on the purchase of U.S. dollars. It has led to an increase in currency sales on the black market — but Paypal's exchange rates are better. Locals were setting up two accounts under different email addresses and transferring money between the two, exchanging local currency pesos for dollars in the process."

29 of 272 comments (clear)

  1. Re:A word to the wise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah. Look at all the people on Wall Street, who went to jail.

  2. Uhm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Transferring money from one of your own accounts to another, within the same country, is "money laundering and tax evasion" now?

    "Money laundering and tax evasion" clearly is the "terrorism and cybercriminality" of the financial world, it is.

    1. Re:Uhm. by mbkennel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Argentina is completely screwed up now. There is no logic other than figuring out strange ways for the government to steal. Oddly enough the president has a huge approval rating. It's an Economic Reality Distortion Field.

      It's pretty pathetic, because Argentina has tremendous natural resources compared to its population size and an educated population and few internal ethnic problems (they exterminated their natives in the 19th century). And to the north of them, without those advantages, Brazil is leaving them far behind despite having a robust social welfare state.

      Source: in-laws in Buenos Aires; reading Economist.

    2. Re:Uhm. by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Only if you're poor. If you're transferring funds that are only worth a day's wages, you're "money laundering and tax evading." If you're transferring sums that exceed the total lifetime earnings of an individual in the majority, you're a currency trader, and a respected businessman. Two scenarios gaming the system in exactly the same way. It's called arbitrage, if I'm not mistaken. Do it on small scales, you're a criminal. Do it at large scales, you're a pillar of the community.

  3. Re:Just wait by AK+Marc · · Score: 3, Informative

    Or 3 under Mitt.

  4. Re:A word to the wise by clarkkent09 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's the government of Argentina that is "gaming the system" by artificially increasing the price of dollars. Smart people are realizing that socialist policies are going to bring high inflation as they always do and wipe away people's life savings in the name of social justice .

    --
    Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
  5. Re:A word to the wise by srussia · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Game the system, pay the price...

    You were referring to the Argentine authorities, right? Price-fixing/rationing has always been a disaster. But it's not just Argentina, the most important price of all--the price of money (interest rates)--is still being fixed all around the world, with nary a peep from people, or indeed economists who should know better.

    If people knew what money is and saw what is passed off as "money" these days, there would be a revolution overnight.

    --
    Set your phasers on "funky"!
  6. The challenges of a global market by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Governments used to be able to easily control currency flows because banks were needed to move money and for most people it was not easy to move small amounts. Now, with PayPa, for example, it's a lot easier to move a few hundred dollars across borders. How long is it before Argentineans with friends and relatives abroad "buy" things - effectively converting pesos into dollars and then have that person bring back dollars or keep them safely out of reach of the authorities? The authorities will have to setup ways to monitor online "sales" and collect taxes at the time of sale or tax PayPal transactions at the time of money transfer. Or, force PayPal to not do currency conversions. In the end, they will either have to give up, massively devalue the Peso or make it a non-convertablke currency.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    1. Re:The challenges of a global market by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Or, force PayPal to not do currency conversions. In the end, they will either have to give up, massively devalue the Peso or make it a non-convertablke currency."

      Or -- far simpler -- just do as they did in the EU and make PayPal register as an actual bank.

  7. Beef by Kupfernigk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Too much of the Argentine economy consists of raising cheap beef for the US market. Most countries that are de facto producers for the US are screwed up. (And before you decide that is flamebait, go take a serious look at the CIA World Factbook.)

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:Beef by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Provided the land has not been bought up by US business, which I suspect is the case.

      http://www.propertywire.com/news/south-america/argentina-limits-foreign-buyers-201112195891.html

      Stop posting. You are constantly wrong, and the few times you've attempted to support yourself with a citation you've given links which flat out contradict you.

  8. Government fighting the market by udachny · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So people want to be able to buy something, government says: you can't. This always leads to black markets.

    Inflation (money printing) in Argentina is high, their prices are going up 24% per year, which is the consequence of high inflation. Instead of stopping the inflation (stopping the money printing), the government wants to stop people from saving their purchasing power, however they do it. Apparently to the people of Argentina USD seem to be more attractive then their own currency.

    In USA inflation is also high, 11-15%, but prices are not going up as quickly as in Argentina, because other countries are still willing to absorb the new dollars and exchange their goods for them, so prices are going up in other countries, who respond with their own inflation, they print their own currencies in response to USA printing and they are willing so far to exchange their own productivity (products they manufacture and make) for US dollars. This pushes prices up for those productive nations and this still acts as a price buffer for USA.

    But look at this obvious response by government of Argentina: it's not that the government is plainly wrong in what it is doing, destroying the currency of the people.

    The government says: it is the people, who are wrong for wanting to save their own savings, their purchasing power. Let's take the purchasing power away from the people. What it means is that the government wants to keep its high levels of spending but cannot or will not raise taxes, so it wants to steal from people. Printing money is theft of productivity and it's most obvious to the people when their prices go up.

    Of-course very few people can understand the link between their prices going up and their government printing the currency, it's not a link that is necessarily very obvious directly to people, that's because people are not taught economics and the version of economics that they are taught is really not economics, it's propaganda that allows the government elite to keep people in check by denying them the real understanding of what is going on.

    What is happening in Argentina is nothing new. Many countries did the same thing - printed money, set exchange controls, price controls, all it ever does is it creates black markets and very quickly creates very wide separation onto the poor and rich, even among people that maybe didn't have that huge of a separation before the gov't actions.

    The newly printed money does not equal wealth. The amount of production stays the same (or it is decreased because people move their savings somewhere else and this means moving production somewhere else, so the country suffers decrease of productivity and increase of money supply), so the new money simply ends up bidding up prices for the existing assets and goods.

    This is why inflation (money printing) hurts the poor much more than the wealthy, because the poor live on various fixed incomes, they are getting less and less with every check, be it a salary or a dividend or a pension check, whatever.

    The wealthy end up bidding up prices for existing assets. Everything becomes a fight for a fixed or a decreasing pie, the pie is not growing. Only savings and production grows the pie, money printing destroys savings and productivity and re-allocates the pie from middle and poor to the top.

    That's why there is a higher and higher wealth disparity, it's not because the 1% is stealing something, it's because the government is stealing something, the government is stealing purchasing power, it's destroying the savings, productivity, it's destroying the currency.

    Of-course as people try to avoid their purchasing power from being destroyed by the government, the government sees this as something to be prevented, so it sets exchange controls, currency controls, wage and price controls. Minimum wage is just an attempt to hide levels of inflation, like many other things that gov't does it backfires and creates more unemployment and dependency and decreases productivity and standa

    1. Re:Government fighting the market by udachny · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, it will come eventually. I mean Greece wasn't a problem 2.5 years ago, right? What I mean is that nobody heard of Greece as being a problem 2.5 years ago. All of a sudden it became a problem.

      So did the problem happen in a few days? No, of-course not. Greece had the problem of government spending of money that it didn't have (borrowed money) for decades. Greece should never have entered the Euro zone, because Greece was fundamentally screwed up even when Euro zone was being established. Same with many other countries there.

      But Greece could keep borrowing with short term papers (ARMs) and it could keep spending money it could never repay. Eventually this became obvious and now there is a depression, which is again, a way for the market to rebalance the equation. A way to allow the scarce resources to be allocated more efficiently. Companies that are inefficient and governments that spend more than they can take in, spend borrowed or stolen money, they must fail so that the credit, the money can be saved and eventually the savings can be used to restart production.

      Instead the European union decides it's going to start printing more and more Euros, placing the burden on the people who still produce and pay taxes, be it in Germany or in Switzerland (now, that the Swiss committed economic suicide by hard linking their currency to the Euro). This will not solve the problem for Greece, it will only make the problem bigger for everybody else.

      Same thing for USA. Since 1971, when Nixon defaulted on the dollar, the economy has been going down. If you take all sorts of graphs, that compare wealth distribution, compare wages, salaries, purchasing power, manufacturing, government spending, whatever you want, you'll see an interesting thing that happened since about 1971 - there is an edge there, and all these charts show that since then the disparity started growing, the real earning power started going down, the debt started growing much more than before, inflation really took off, all the bad things that eventually do destroy the economy started around that moment.

      Of-course to lead to that moment, it took 1913, when the Federal reserve (and IRS) were established in the first place, which allowed for rapid expansion of government.

      People don't realize it, but growing government is not a good thing. Government shouldn't be growing all the time, it should do a few things and stay about the same in terms of size and power. A government that is growing all the time signals that the real economy is shrinking all the time and government that is growing is gov't that is getting more powerful, it signals that individual freedoms are shrinking.

      That's the combination that eventually destroys the economy, everything. The problem is the government, it's a very lucrative place to be, even if you are very mediocre or just plain stupid. I mean to grow a successful business you have to be productive, you have to work pretty hard, (maybe you have to be luckier than your average guy, but still, it takes a huge effort).

      To become wealthy by working for government you have to be cunning, cheating, lying and as unprincipled as possibles - those are the qualities that get rewarded. And those people have the power in their hands. Of-course they'll abuse it for personal gain, what else is new? The problem is that they should never have had that power, they used to be constrained by the law that was set above the government - the Constitution, but they figured out how to get around the law. That's a pretty good explanation as to why so many people in government are lawyers.

      Lawyers. Not engineers. Not scientists. Not real business people. Not even just plain folks without anything special about them, who are not lawyers.

      I think the next crisis will force the people to review what kind of government they want, what is the function of government, what is the role?

      As far as I am concerned, the time of ultra-nationalist ideas must pass, the government shouldn

    2. Re:Government fighting the market by udachny · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You are the product of the propaganda machine that I am talking about. The real inflation in USA has not been reported since Nixon either, they have changed the way the inflation is counted enough times for it to mean absolutely nothing.

      Same with the GDP numbers, they are completely meaningless. It's a number, it means nothing. It's reversed engineered to fit the necessary levels of propaganda. 70% of it consumption, not production. Consumption of imported goods. 40% of economy is financial manipulations, banking, stock market, whatever. Again, that's not production. Maybe 5% of it is all the manufacturing and agriculture that still exists in USA. The rest of it is government spending, military, all sorts of government contracts.

      The real GDP in USA has been falling since 1971. There WAS a bump in 1981, that's when Paul Volcker took the interest rates to 21.5%, which was high enough for people to get back into dollars and government debt purchases. Since then it has been falling steadily again. The GDP is supposed to be deflated by the real inflation numbers, and the real inflation numbers are reverse engineered, manufactured by the government for your consumption.

      The real inflation numbers in USA vary between 11 and 15% year to year, and you can trace them by looking at a basket of commodity prices going up, precious metals, oil, even food, etc.

      Some people still track inflation the way it was calculated before Nixon's time.

    3. Re:Government fighting the market by Overzeetop · · Score: 4, Informative

      You do know that inflation is set by the CPI, which is (wait for it) a basket of commodity prices. The basket contents change periodically, but are relatively stable. If inflation were going up 11-15% per year, I would have seen my real purchasing power go down by half in the past 6 years, and yet it hasn't been anywhere close to that. Most of the stuff I buy is probably averaging 20% higher than it was 5-6 years ago which is (surprise!) about 3.5%. If you just look at gold and gasoline, you're going to get a mighty skewed picture of what "inflation" is.

      Now, if you want to talk about the purchasing power of the dollar against some foreign currencies - sure, the dollar has lost ground. I remember a dollar north of 200yen (in the 80s) and at parity with the British pound. Then again, looking over the mid term, the Euro was introduced at $1.25, fairly quickly dropped, then gained ground in the 2000s, peaking during the US financial crisis and when the congress was staring at default, and has settled back to $1.30.

      (BTW - I have an old friend who does work on the CPI and PPI, and I can tell you without a doubt that there is no collusion or conspiracy going on. You're welcome to argue what "inflation" means, but I promise they are not cooking the books)

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    4. Re:Government fighting the market by jbolden · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Will you stop with this Austrian nonsense.

      1) Inflation is the measure of price increases not the increase in base currency. If the Fed were to create tons of MZM but no increase in minted dollar we would have massive inflation. Conversely if the Fed/Treasury/Mint printed 10x as many dollar but didn't change MZM there wouldn't be any inflation.

      2) Inflation generally does at least in the short term increase productivity. The lag between printing of money and raising of prices creates artificial wealth which creates artificial demand. If the economy is demand constrained, which is often the case when governments start engaging in inflationary policies, production increases.

      3) "This is why inflation (money printing) hurts the poor much more than the wealthy, because the poor live on various fixed incomes, they are getting less and less with every check, be it a salary or a dividend or a pension check, whatever." In most countries at this point the fixed income is inflation adjusted. The real issue is quite a lot of the bottom 99% are net debtors while the top 1% tend to be creditors. Policies designed to shift wealth from creditors to debtors benefit the bottom not the top.

      4) During the period of time prior to the 1930s where we had a lightly regulated financial system we had frequent panics. Once we had a highly regulated financial system we had few if any. As we moved back to a lightly regulated financial system we had several major panics. I'd say the correlation is not that government causes the problem.

      5) If busts were just restructuring of debt we wouldn't see panics depress activity in areas of the economy with little or no debt. They would be more localized than they are. The fact that panics seem to depress activity across almost all sectors means that they just depress demand and this sets off a chain reaction.

  9. In your inbox soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear Sir
    I am a successful Argentinian businessman who is in urgent need of your assistance. I have the sum of $10,000,000 equivalent in US Dollars which I need to transfer to an associate of mine in this country. Due to restrictive government policy, we require a 3rd party intermediary located outside the country. If you are willing to provide your services for this task, we will compensate you the sum of $5,000 USD. Please contact me as soon as possible, urgency is high in our minds to accomplish this transaction.
    Our email address is: 9racdge82@mailvault.com

    Sincerely,
    Your Future Associates

  10. I'm in Buenos Aires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And you have half of your facts right.

    Brazil has very much indeed left us behind. No doubt about that. But they have problems of their own too.

    The behavior of the government here can be described as "random" at best, creating policies which have no clear benefit to anyone or purpose other than "someone, somewhere is stealing a lot of money with this... but I don't quite know how". It is very infuriating. They come out with blatant lies all the time, which has made the approval rating drop to what I imagine are single digits now. I say imagine since you can't trust any news outlets. I'd say something about that, but you americans have fox news, so we're relatively tame on that score. At least for now.

    It's also sad that what used to be the "good" politicians are the ones now in office, corrupted beyond recognition. They got in basically by not being part of the US-slavish mafia that had been ruling for the last 20 years. But now they made up a mafia of their own, so that's not even a selling point anymore. It's nice that they don't just bow and take it in the ass 24/7 and lay the bill on us, but who cares if they still fuck us over even worse than before in many ways.

    The opposing party is pretty much an open mafia, so there is really no other choice. If there were elections today, I couldn't vote honestly for anyone, unless votes were casted with bullets. I would vote for pretty much everybody then. Many times over.

    1. Re:I'm in Buenos Aires by Alioth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And of course all the Argentine government do if they feel their ratings are slipping is distract the population by bringing up the Falklands again. Then accusing Britain of being "provocative" when Britain increases the defence of the Falklands from all the belligerent talk from the Argentine government.

      Whether this works or not to distract the Argentine population or rally them around the current government, I don't know (an article I saw on the Spanish TV news analysis programme, Informe Semanal, seems to suggest it no longer works)

    2. Re:I'm in Buenos Aires by lbschenkel · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The current situation in Argentina reminds me of Brazil before Plano Real when inflation was around 60% per month and people where running for the dollar. Some years before that the government froze 80% of the bank assets of the whole population, which was a total disaster.

      In retrospect, it is amazing that Plano Real actually worked. I'm still amazed when I think about it: I was born in 1980 and in my lifetime I've seen Brazil adopt 6 different currencies! New governments would announce over the weekend that the currency have been renamed and three zeros have been cut (1000 = 1); until new banknotes were available the banks were stamping the old ones with the new name and value. Prices and contracts were frozen; it was a mess...

      Even today many people still go to the supermarket and buy groceries for the whole month, out of habit. In the old times of hyper-inflation, you had to rush to the supermarket and buy everything you could because if you went in the morning and later went again in the same day but during the afternoon instead, prices would have changed already. When I was a young kid, and before we had barcode scanners and a ticket with the price was fixed in every piece of merchandise, supermarkets had full-time employees that spend their whole day attaching the new prices. I remember that I ran more than once to grab something in the end of a long corridor while the employee was setting the new prices at the other end, so I could pay the old price before he had the opportunity to change it.

      If Brazil managed to fix that mess I bet Argentina can, too. It might take a while, though: it took us more than two decades.

    3. Re:I'm in Buenos Aires by PPalmgren · · Score: 3, Informative

      As a result, companies like mine are averse to doing business there as well. We do have a location down there, but we wrk in a high expense fixed asset industry. There's a predominant fear that they might de-privatize our industry and force us out, leaving us holding the bag on a multi-hundred million dollar investment. As such, we have to charge according to the risk. Its like a vicious cycle, we charge because of the volatility, they react to those prices and be more volatile.

  11. Re:Never works, does it by bmo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Furthermore

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_Price_Administration

    President Franklin D. Roosevelt revived the Advisory Commission to World War I Council on National Defense on May 29, 1940, to include Price Stabilization and Consumer Protection Divisions. Both divisions merged to become the Office of Price Administration and Civilian Supply (OPACS) within the Office for Emergency Management by Executive Order 8734, April 11, 1941. Civil supply functions were transferred to the Office of Production Management.

    It became an independent agency under the Emergency Price Control Act, January 30, 1942. The OPA had the power to place ceilings on all prices except agricultural commodities, and to ration scarce supplies of other items, including tires, automobiles, shoes, nylon, sugar, gasoline, fuel oil, coffee, meats and processed foods. At the peak, almost 90% of retail food prices were frozen. It could also authorize subsidies for production of some of those commodities.

    Facts are inconvenient for some.

    --
    BMO

  12. Re:A word to the wise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You mean Madoff? Or would you like to talk about the mortgage meltdown stuff? Well the mortgage meltdown stuff gets interesting, because if you really want to get into that, the first thing that needs to happen is you go back to where the government forced banks into lending to people who shouldn't have gotten the loans in the first place. And when the banks said "we shouldn't have to..." the government said: "you will loan, or we'll pull your FDIC backing and launch trade and trust investigations against you."

    Nothing quite like the government at work right? Might also want to look into which party was heavily involved in all of that too. But let's just say that, when changes were put forward to get it fixed back in 2002, and 2003 the "opposite party in charge" cockblocked the entire thing. Oh...if you didn't figure it out yet, it was the democrats.

  13. Re:A word to the wise by pla · · Score: 5, Informative

    realize politics isn't a fucking sporting event between two teams

    Except, it kinda does work that way.

    Most people just have the teams wrong - Not red vs blue, not plebes vs silver-spoons, but rather "all of us" vs "anyone who runs for public office".

    Oddly, despite having the bigger team, we usually lose.

  14. Re:A word to the wise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And how many of those people who lost their jobs were the ones that actually caused the problems? I don't recall seeing the CEOs of any of the banks hurting after their incompetence and hubris led to the crisis.

  15. Re:A word to the wise by Xest · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't even recall any of the bankers themselves losing their jobs really. It was all the support staff that suffered like IT, admin, and customer facing branch staff. In this respect, and as the investment banks and customer facing banks are often different sub-companies, I'm not even sure people from investment arms of banks really paid a price at all for the most part.

    Also, a year later, they were all getting hefty bonuses again to boot.

  16. Re:A word to the wise by Xest · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "It's the government of Argentina that is "gaming the system" by artificially increasing the price of dollars. Smart people are realizing that socialist policies are going to bring high inflation as they always do and wipe away people's life savings in the name of social justice ."

    Like all systems, just as over the top free market capitalism led to the banking collapse, over the top socialism can indebt a country beyond it's means too (Greece).

    But what isn't true is that socialist policies in general always inherently bring high inflation. Countries like Canada, Germany, the UK, most the Scandinavian nations and so forth are good examples.

    Using one failing country to push your own political ideology is stupid, especially so when there are many other countries succesfully using elements of that ideology you so sternly oppose and claim is doomed to failure.

  17. Re:A word to the wise by jonadab · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually, this kind of "gaming" of the system (called "arbitrage" in economics circles (although this is kind of a special case of arbitrage, because currencies are not traditionally viewed in exactly the same way as other goods and services)) is essentially unpreventable. Requiring an international transaction just makes it a two-step process instead of a one-step process (and perhaps also assures that in most cases there will be more than one person involved), but it doesn't change anything that matters. If they shut down Paypal altogether (in Argentina, or using their currency), other mechanisms will surface. As long as the Argentine peso is worth one amount inside Argentina and a different amount in the rest of the world, people will be buying it in the cheaper place and selling it in the place where it's worth more. The people who do this turn a profit, and either the prices in the two places are brought closer together or, if someone is artificially keeping them apart, doing so costs money, which goes into the pockets of whoever is doing the arbitrage.

    Fundamentally, forcing an unnatural exchange rate on a fiat currency is not sustainable. I thought maybe the Argentine government had learned their lesson about dorking around with fundamental economic forces after their little hyperinflation fiasco in the second half of the twentieth century, but perhaps they needed to be reminded. You can't fight fundamental economic forces. Well, you can try, but the fight will not go well for you. It's like trying to fight the laws of physics, only your fate arrives slowly and painfully instead of swiftly.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  18. Re:A word to the wise by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What you mean to say is, the United States of America has been printing money and using it to make purchases from other nations, and those other nations hoard those US dollars and trade them amongst themselves rather than redeeming them for American made goods, so America basically gets a free ride on the back of everyone else and has since the 70s.

    It's like if I wrote a cheque and used it to pay for groceries, and the grocer didn't cash it, but paid their power bill with it, and the power company didn't cash it, but paid their employees with it, etc, etc.

    But it's going to come to an end soon... China is selling oil for Yuan, and Russia has made an agreement with them to supply them with as much oil and gas as they want.

    http://www.examiner.com/article/dollar-no-longer-primary-oil-currency-as-china-begins-to-sell-oil-using-yuan

    So, the era of the USA is at an end, along with the ridiculous culture they've created.

    --
    -1 Uncomfortable Truth