Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Taming a Wild, One-Man Codebase?

New submitter tavi.g writes "Working for an ISP, along with my main job (networking) I get to create some useful code (Bash and Python) that's running on various internal machines. Among them: glue scripts, Cisco interaction / automatization tools, backup tools, alerting tools, IP-to-Serial OOB stuff, even a couple of web applications (LAMPython and CherryPy). Code has piled up — maybe over 20,000 lines — and I need a way to reliably work on it and deploy it. So far I used headers at the beginning of the scripts, but now I'm migrating the code over to Bazaar with TracBzr, because it seems best for my situation. My question for the Slashdot community is: in the case of single developer (for now), multiple machines, and a small-ish user base, what would be your suggestions for code versioning and deployment, considering that there are no real test environments and most code just goes into production ? This is relevant because lacking a test environment, I got used to immediate feedback from the scripts, since they were in production, and now a versioning system would mean going through proper deployment/rollback in order to get real feedback."

3 of 151 comments (clear)

  1. Code versioning and deployment? by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't understand how code versioning has to be coupled with deployment? You have no test environment, as you said... so just make releases and deploy them manually. Since you are going straight to production, you had better be there in person to roll it back if you screwed up. Right? So, SVN should be all you need...

    --
    "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
  2. Re:A few things by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you can't get the hardware. Try to Virtualize a Test Envionment with like VM Ware or Virtual Box.
    At least you have something to play in before it you put it out on the open.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  3. Revision Control and Deployment by MrSenile · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Before it gets out of hand, I'd look to set up four things.

    1. Set up a proper split environment. Even if you don't have the hardware for it, set it up in such a way that when the hardware becomes available, you can move it appropriately. That being, a standard dev -> qa -> stress -> prod infrastructure.
    2. Set up a good revision control. I've started to really enjoy using GIT for this, as there's other software like gitolite that can give you fine-grained access control to your repositories. However, feel free to use subversion or any other well contained revision control platform.
    3. Set up a good method for deployment. My suggestion? Try puppet. It's free, and it's powerful, and if you get it configured, adding new systems to it is exceedingly easy to do.
    4. Packaging for your deployment. If you are installing a bunch of software (scripts, job control, etc) package it and give it a revision, then it's easy to upgrade systems with the 'new package', or revert it to the 'previous package' instead of having to manually copy around files or (re)editing them.

    Hope that helps.