Slashdot Mirror


Romney-Ryan Release Space Policy Paper

RocketAcademy writes "The Romney-Ryan campaign has released a white paper on space policy, which observers find to be long on criticisms of the Obama Administration but short on specific recommendations. The policy promises 'a robust role for commercial space,' but it's clearly a supporting role: 'NASA will set the goals and lead the way in human space exploration.' When it comes to space, both parties put government ahead of private enterprise. Some see a parallel with the policies which are driving space companies out of California. Newt Gingrich, one of the few politicians who thinks seriously about space, says the policy is a step in the right direction but not enough."

8 of 378 comments (clear)

  1. The real question... by damn_registrars · · Score: 5, Funny
    ... will the Romney spacecraft have windows that open?

    When you have a fire in an aircraft, there's no place to go, exactly, there's no - and you can't find any oxygen from outside the aircraft to get in the aircraft, because the windows don't open. I don't know why they don't do that. It's a real problem. So it's very dangerous.

    Clearly, Romney is an expert on these things, so I hope they take his input seriously in the design phase. We wouldn't want future astronauts dying from not being able to open their windows.

    (yes, I know I'll be moderated down for this. but I've got karma to burn - even if I can't get oxygen at 30,000 feet to burn it with)

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  2. Re:Romney-Ryan no Insurance your doctor is ER and by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Bottom line is, if you can't afford insurance, you have no business getting free health care financed by the rest of us. Find a free clinic.

    And who pays for this "free" clinic?

    Magic. Magic pays for everything. It's the new fiscal accounting model.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  3. Re:I hear that... by SoCalChris · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is what AC is referencing. 7th paragraph down.

    http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-romney-beverly-hills-fundraiser-20120922,0,2317962.story

    “I appreciate the fact that she is on the ground, safe and sound. And I don’t think she knows just how worried some of us were,” Romney said. “When you have a fire in an aircraft, there’s no place to go, exactly, there’s no — and you can’t find any oxygen from outside the aircraft to get in the aircraft, because the windows don’t open. I don’t know why they don’t do that. It’s a real problem. So it’s very dangerous. And she was choking and rubbing her eyes. Fortunately, there was enough oxygen for the pilot and copilot to make a safe landing in Denver. But she’s safe and sound.”

    Sadly, this isn't an Onion article.

  4. Romney just showed he is still a hypocrite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    January 27, 2012 Republican debate:

    “I spent 25 years in business. If I had a business executive come to me and say they wanted to spend a few hundred billion dollars to put a colony on the moon, I’d say, ‘You’re fired!’” -Mitt Romney

    Calling for anything other than a minimal to nonexistent manned space program is hypocrisy for Mitt Romney.

  5. Re:Romney-Ryan no Insurance your doctor is ER and by iluvcapra · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do you really think that parents that take their kids to the ER for a fever and/or ear infection are going to suddenly stop taking their kids to the ER and go to their regular doctor?

    Well yeah, they'll have insurance. These people aren't hopeless morons, and they love their children and what whats best for them. Indigent homeless are trickier, but you see a lot of working homeless families lining up around the block to get their non-emergent medical needs addressed. Under a

    In some states that can be Robamacare and in others it can be insurance and tort reform. Tort reform would save the system more money then any of the current proposals.

    You forgot to call the President "hopey changey," or make a reference to the "democrat party." Minus two points.

    Tort reform is a bit of a red herring. Orrin Hatch's Tort Reform proposals in '09 would have saved about $54 billion, which isn't chump change, but it would only reduce total national health spending by 0.5%. So we could claim that money on the table, but the limitations in Hatch's proposal specifically were extremely low, to the extent that they reduced pain and suffering awards to a slap on the wrist and would probably cause incidents of malpractice to increase.

    State-by-state solutions are doomed in the US because of regulatory arbitrage. Employers and tax units in states with expensive programs can simply move their paper addresses to states with lower tax liability. Insurance companies can shop around for states that offer them the most favorable regulation (the ones with the least customer protections), and employers can play states off each other to obtain favorable tax treatment. States simply can't design their own programs when the employers within it can simply evade the costs of the system by filing paperwork, while enjoying all the benefits of the system by dumping their employees into the state public program. A state-by-state healthcare system in the US would end up looking a lot like the consumer credit card system in the US, which is to say, we'd all have whatever rights the North Dakota and Delaware legislature had agreed to, because they were the highest bidder for the health insurance company's business.

    "States' Rights" has been keeping 60's-style state capitalism alive for decades, by giving employers a huge stick with which they can extract free services from a state government, guised under the threat of "killing jobs." An employer simply threatens to move unless they can stay tax-free, dumping the costs of roads, schools, police, and health care on everyone else.

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
  6. Re:But he said space was stupid before.... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The only ones that haven't flip-flopped are Gary Johnson and Ron Paul.

    That's correct. They skipped the "flip" part and just flopped.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  7. Re:Romney-Ryan no Insurance your doctor is ER and by GrimShady · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Bottom line is, if you can't afford insurance, you have no business getting free health care financed by the rest of us. Find a free clinic.

    And who pays for this "free" clinic?

    WTF does this have to do with TFA about Romney and space? This is why I dont like reading /. anymore

  8. Re:What NASA needs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah. $2.2 billion after you cut out the part Germany paid for. That's to send a giant robotic laboratory 350 million miles and land it on another planet.

    We spend that much on one submarine. We have 71 of those. Last figure I saw for the f-22 program alone was $65 billion. That's just one plane we have zero use for and has spent a fair percentage of its operation life grounded. And still we spend between 1 and $1.4 trillion, per year, on defense related stuff.

    That's (conservatively) more than one Curiosity rover launching, and one landing on another planet, every single day, all year long. Oh, and cash left over to launch a new space telescope maybe every other month? Plus the manpower to run it all. Now do that every year. Rough math, I admit.

    So yes, $2.2 billion is roughly "$14 and a pack of chewing gum", with regard to the US Budget.