Slashdot Mirror


Tesla Reveals Charging Station Sites In 3 US States

locallyunscene writes "Tesla has created the first solar charging stations for its Model S and plans to offer free charging. Is free fuel enough to for the electric car to finally gain traction? 'The technology at the heart of the Supercharger was developed internally and leverages the economies of scale of existing charging technology already used by the Model S, enabling Tesla to create the Supercharger device at minimal cost. The electricity used by the Supercharger comes from a solar carport system provided by SolarCity, which results in almost zero marginal energy cost after installation. Combining these two factors, Tesla is able to provide Model S owners free long distance travel indefinitely." The "free charging" part applies at least to Model S owners, and will be available first from a network of charging stations in California, Arizona, and Nevada, to be expanded nationwide over the next 2 to 4 years; Engadget features a video of the announcement.

58 of 332 comments (clear)

  1. Had to be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Obligatory "People who can afford a Tesla aren't bothered by the price of gas"

    1. Re:Had to be said by h4rr4r · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That is how everything works. The first airline passengers could have easily taken a week off work to travel from NYC to London.

      I am glad rich folks are buying teslas for vanity, hopefully that will fund a car I can afford. Then hopefully my purchase will help to create a car everyone can afford.

    2. Re:Had to be said by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      That was true of the Roadster, but the Model-S is much cheaper.

    3. Re:Had to be said by captainpanic · · Score: 4, Informative

      That was true of the Roadster, but the Model-S is much cheaper.

      Don't bother. Some people will just keep screaming that electric will never work. They will always find something else.

      Range already increased so much that you need to take a break before you're empty anyway. The time loss while charging went to an acceptable amount of time. Prices have steadily gone down. Battery life increased. And now charging stations are appearing everywhere... so the skeptics complain about money.

    4. Re:Had to be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You have it all wrong. We need to tax all that extra income and so it can be spent on subsidies for companies to build cheaper models that no one will want.

    5. Re:Had to be said by Thud457 · · Score: 2

      That is how everything works. The first airline passengers could have easily taken a week off work to travel from NYC to London.

      I am glad rich folks are buying teslas for vanity, hopefully that will fund a car I can afford. Then hopefully my purchase will help to create a car everyone can afford.

      Where were you last Pluterday ?

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    6. Re:Had to be said by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      I was thinking 10,000 would be a better target for a car. Maybe $1000 for something like a tata.

    7. Re:Had to be said by derrickh · · Score: 2

      I was about to comment that $70k isn't a bad price and is in line for what I plan on to replace my current car. Then I realized that maybe I'm one of the people the OP is referring to.

      D

    8. Re:Had to be said by cayenne8 · · Score: 2
      Bring back the roadster, in more of the price range of a corvette....and then I'll show an interest.

      I'm not interested in a 'family' car for that kind of money....I want a performance sports car that isn't 'fugly' like pretty much every other hybrid or electric car they've put forth so far...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    9. Re:Had to be said by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Model S is only about 1 second slower to 60 than a vette.

      The Model S is an attractive car, looks actually a lot like an Aston Martin to me.

      The old roadster was a slower Elise, the Model S is a big improvement.

    10. Re:Had to be said by h4rr4r · · Score: 5, Informative

      Define acceleration needs please.
      Is 0-60 in 5.6 not good enough? What would be?

      The Tesla S looks very nice. So it looks like range is the last remaning issue.

      The cost is comparable to other comparable luxury sedans.

      Hydrogen is absolute bullshit, it embrittles metal, it escapes through everything and the fuel cells that use it need platinum which means the fuel cell costs more than the car you want to buy. Hydrogen was the fossil fuel industry just blowing smoke up your ass. This is because hydrogen comes from steam reformation of natural gas. It is not produced in any "green" way industrially.

      The recharge time is not 30 minutes for 100 miles. It is 30 minutes for 80% of 300miles. This will only get better.

    11. Re:Had to be said by bobbied · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Range Anxiety" is still a real issue, even with the most advanced totally electric cars. It's very hard to get the same energy density of gasoline in to batteries. Electrics will just not go as far per "fill up" as their fossil fueled siblings. That does not seem to be changing anytime soon. So, you can add more batteries to the car, increasing its weight, cost and lowering it's efficiency to get more range, but who wants to drive around an SUV sized battery pack with one seat and a price tag that is measured in fractions of GDP?

      Charging stations are *not* showing up everywhere. In fact I've heard that there are places where they have been slowly disappearing because they are not being used. See: (http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/08/17/citing-a-lack-of-usage-costco-removes-e-v-chargers/). It's all been a bit more hype than actual progress.

      When electric cars make sense by the numbers, when they are overall cheaper than their fossil fueled counterparts, they will be built and bought by the millions and charging stations will show up everywhere. Until then, the totally electric car will be a fringe market limited to the rich and hobbyist. I expect that Tesla's will continue to be hugely expensive toys, and not much more than that, for a LONG time yet.

      How long? Until it makes sense in Europe and they start driving more electrics over there, forget it in the states. Just not going to be viable here. Now if you want to start talking about CNG fueled cars... We might have a viable option to help reduce gasoline use...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    12. Re:Had to be said by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What are these other easy ways this sort of thing could be funded?

      No one said rich people are doing anything good, merely that their money is being used to do good. If they are buying it just to support tesla, then I would think they are doing something good though.

      While extreme inequality sucks, I don't see any possible solution to that particular issue. No society has so far been able to solve it or even come close.

    13. Re:Had to be said by h4rr4r · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Most people in the states do not drive that far. My daily commute is under 10 miles. I own two cars, one of them could easily be electric.

      I am sure my life is not unique and many american families would be fine with one electric car and one gas fueled vehicle.

      CNG has other problems. CNG cars exist but the range also sucks. LNG fixes the range issue, but handling LNG is not something the average moron should really be doing.

    14. Re:Had to be said by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm repeating myself a bit, but.... it seems these opinions just don't die.

      It has to have acceleration,

      The Tesla S handily beats anything south of a Vette.

      at least 500 mile range on a charge

      Not a single performance sedan has that range. Heck, not even the Golf TDi has that range. Why that requirement?

      and not look like a piece of crap.

      The Teslas are all hot.

      Oh and it has to at least be in the price ball park of my gasoline powered car.

      Define ballpark. It's in the range of the luxus import sedans, which is what the Tesla is competing against. It is not in the range of a Kia Rio, which is what I suspect you're thinking of.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    15. Re:Had to be said by flyingsquid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The long charging time (1/2 an hour to get enough charge for 3 hours of driving) still seems like a problem. The press release argues that it's not a big loss of time, since you probably want to take a half-hour break every few hours to get some food, go to the bathroom, etc. That's probably true, but it ignores the problem that your car is sitting at the charger for half an hour, so no one else can use it. A single gasoline pump can refuel your car in maybe five minutes, so you can service cars at maybe six times the rate of an electric charger. So if you get there just and there's a line, you could find yourself waiting a long time before you even start to charge.

    16. Re:Had to be said by somersault · · Score: 4, Insightful

      By the time there are enough of these things around to have a line, they'll already have more charging stations. It would be a lot easier and safer to put a charging station at each spot in a parking lot than it would be to fit a gas pump to each one.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    17. Re:Had to be said by tnk1 · · Score: 2

      I don't own a Kia Rio. No offense to those who like them and all, but it's like driving through mud.

      As pricing goes, you can't have it all. The Model S can go 300 miles at 55 mph, but you need the 85 kWh battery for that, and that's 70 grand. Ballpark for what I am looking at is more like 35-45 grand. The 40 kWh capacity is only 160 miles and you still need a cool 50 grand for that.

      My range requirement is high, but the inconvenience of waiting 30 minutes to recharge even 80% of your car is an issue. Take a trip of any length and you're spending hours waiting on your car to charge. 500ish miles is a reasonable long day drive.

      Also, bear in mind that charging infrastructure for long trips is going to be hard to come by for awhile. You're probably going to charge before you start and when you arrive. Although, in theory, you can plug in anywhere, the reality is that you're looking at a lack of charging stations for the immediate future until it takes off. With a car, I might get 300 miles on a tank, but I can be at a gas station and gone in less than 10 minutes, sometimes less. More to the point, I can find a station just about anywhere short of the wilderness.

      I admit, I'm not being easy on electrics. I want all the convenience of my gas car, but I want it to run on battery power. Right now, that means the electric has to outperform the gas car in some things. I don't care if I'm being fair or not, I have no interest in spending $45,000 for less of a vehicle. The good news is that I think that it can be done and I will have cash in hand when it is ready.

    18. Re:Had to be said by jo_ham · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We're working on the hydrogen production and storage issues.

      Plants crack water at room temperature and pressure all day every day (well, for half the day, every day) and we're getting closer to being able to replicate that catalytic cycle.

      The storage problem is also being worked on with new materials to increase the energy density of H2 systems and to address the leaking.

      Hydrogen is not dead yet, it just has issues to solve... much like battery electric (which we're also obviously working on).

    19. Re:Had to be said by ryzvonusef · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Reminds me of something that Jeremy Clarkson (of Top Gear fame) once said: If you want to look at the future, you should look at the luxury goods today. He gave examples of how "luxury" features such as power steering, ABS, injection fuel etc that were once the domain of expensive cars are now a part of every ordinary car.

      Same is the case with Tesla and the electric systems; they will start with luxury, and soon (5-10 years?) become part of the ordinary cars.

      --
      I am an ACCA student. Got a query on Accountancy/Finance? Maybe I can help!
    20. Re:Had to be said by KhabaLox · · Score: 2

      I just want to make sure the idea that rich people are helping us and its good to live in a world of extreme inequality

      I don't disagree with your politics, but let's face it, without the current quasi-capitalist system and resultant extreme inequality, Musk would (likely) not have had the money to start Tesla in the first place.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    21. Re:Had to be said by swillden · · Score: 2

      By "plants" the GP meant the green growing sort. That's why he/she said they only crack half the day.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    22. Re:Had to be said by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 2

      The Model S has 4 seats (way too many), and looks like a family truckster type sedan....sorry, not interested.

      It's actually got 5 seats, 7 if you count the child-size jump seats. I guess that makes it even worse for you, though.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    23. Re:Had to be said by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree they are, and I even like their methods. Sadly most americans disagree with that.

      We are pretty culturally opposed to that sort of thing. Americans prefer decisions made not based on the result but based on "moral" grounds. This is why we don't offer free needles to junkies for instance. It would save us millions in ER costs and the like, but people think it immoral to aid the junkie in getting high, never mind that he will do it either way.

    24. Re:Had to be said by Jeremi · · Score: 2

      Would it? What square footage of solar cells is required? How well do the cells perform in cloudy climes?

      It sounds like you're assuming that the electricity delivered at any given instant will be limited by the amount of sunlight hitting the solar panels at that instant. Clearly that can't be the case, otherwise it would be impossible to recharge your EV at night.

      What they'll almost certainly do instead is the standard net-metering setup: use the electrical grid to recharge the cars, and use the solar panels to sell electricity back to the utility company to offset the cost. That way it doesn't matter how the solar panels are performing at any given moment, it only matters how much power the electric company can supply them with at any given time.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    25. Re:Had to be said by adolf · · Score: 2

      The best part about driving a 4-door BMW is that I don't have any idea what it looks like on the outside as I'm driving around. Really, the only time I even realize that it has a back seat is when I've got passengers back there and they start screaming with terror on exit ramps...

      The 2-seater version is/was the same car (same engine, same brakes, same suspension, same seats, same gearbox, same instrumentation), minus interior space. As a driver, it's about the same. As an object to look at and admire? Meh: I prefer to admire cars from behind the wheel.

  2. I would drive to one of those three states by crazyjj · · Score: 2, Funny

    But there is no way I've got enough charge to get there.

    --
    What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    1. Re:I would drive to one of those three states by Baloroth · · Score: 2

      I was gonna say that :( If you have to drive farther than a charge will get you to get to the "free" recharge station, what's the point?

      The point is these stations will eventually be everywhere. But you can't really start at the end, you have to start at the beginning. Which is just three states, in this case.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
  3. Huge increase in total travel time by Orga · · Score: 4, Insightful

    3 hours of driving at 60 mph on the highway (which is dangerous IMO) and 30 minute fillup. More likely 70-75 mph, 2 hours of driving + finding a station? and then 30 minutes of fillup. 25% more travel time on a long trip. I don't know who has that kind of time on the road. Timing over lunch a great idea... what about at 3pm, not so convenient then is it. I think they have a lot of work to do

    1. Re:Huge increase in total travel time by Orga · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was referring to 60 mph on a major highway, a lot of states are 70mph speed limit which means travelers are typically doing 75-80. People doing 60 and beyond slow lane slow, you're going to draw attention and it won't be the friendly hey it's an e-vehicle kind.

    2. Re:Huge increase in total travel time by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not a lot of grass under the Nevada Desert.

      Perfect is the enemy of Good.
      Even killing a little grass is a hell of a lot better than burning gasoline.

    3. Re:Huge increase in total travel time by Orga · · Score: 2

      I don't know where you live that your highway speed limit is only 60, but I'm sorry for you. In the rest of the country it's 65-70 (now even 80 in some places). People are typically driving at 75-80 on my morning and evening commute.

    4. Re:Huge increase in total travel time by Orga · · Score: 2

      Fuel cost is only one of many things calculated in the cost of travel. Wear and tear, maintenance on a vehicle. Perhaps a 2 day trip is then stretched to 3 and you're staying another night on the road. On the road food is also typically more expensive, along with your personal time, which perhaps you enjoy driving great, but still, fuel is not the only consideration in the cost of a trip.

    5. Re:Huge increase in total travel time by Orga · · Score: 2

      Just a couple weeks ago I had a chuckle when I learned that the first cars ever made were fully electric.

    6. Re:Huge increase in total travel time by arkane1234 · · Score: 2

      wait.. 50,000 for a midgrade and 100,000 for the roadster makes you a rich son of a bitch?

      You realllllly need to evaluate what rich is, my friend.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    7. Re:Huge increase in total travel time by arkane1234 · · Score: 2

      I've traveled from Maryland to California in the lower states, and most states are 65.
      Texas is different. (in many ways)

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    8. Re:Huge increase in total travel time by __aaeihw9960 · · Score: 2
      I'm not OP, but 50,000 for a car is outlandish for most people. 100,000 is more than many spend on a home where I live. The median price for a home here is ~45,000.

      So, yes, those prices make you a rich son of a bitch.

    9. Re:Huge increase in total travel time by tilante · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For day-to-day usage, the idea is to have enough range to get you through the day. Then, once you're home, you plug the car in and let it charge while you're doing other things -- because unlike refueling with gas, where someone needs to be there in case there's a malfunction and fuel spills, you can let an electric vehicle charge unattended.

      Thus, you're not spending 180 minutes a week charging the car. The car is charging for that much time, but *you* spend about a minute per day total in plugging it in at night, then unplugging it in the morning, for a total of about 6 minutes a week of *your* time spent doing it.

      I'll agree that it's still a significant disadvantage on long trips, but for day-to-day use, it's actually more convenient than refueling a gas car, because you don't have to make a stop at a gas station -- you do it somewhere that you're going anyway.

    10. Re:Huge increase in total travel time by Cimexus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And where I live the median price for a home is ~$600,000 USD (which only buys you a very average 3-bedroom suburban home). $50k USD would be fairly typical for a 'medium-end' family sedan or large SUV here. So despite the fact that I'm most definitely not rich myself, the price of the Tesla doesn't seem too outrageous (though still a bit out of my price range ... another few models/revisions though and we'll see).

      Point is, Tesla doesn't have to come up with a good price point for every geography and every segment of the market - they just need to make it low enough so that a decent number of people in SOME markets will buy it. That should bring the prices down for future models and allow EVs to appeal to a greater number of people in the future.

    11. Re:Huge increase in total travel time by drkoemans · · Score: 2

      I grew up in a place where median home price was in that range and for some reason, everyone in town seemed to have a fully loaded/lifted truck, a 5th wheel, dirt bikes, classic car, you name it. These were blue collar working class folk. A fully loaded pickup with mods is a good $50,000 easy these days and I see plenty of people in rural/suburban areas ponying up that kinda cash. I'm not sure how a luxury car (and 60k is barely that) is any different than a pickup. They both suck up gas at the same rate, have about the same horsepower but just appeal to different crowds. Cost of housing in an area is no way to measure this stuff.

    12. Re:Huge increase in total travel time by hab136 · · Score: 2

      The stations will actually make a little bit of money - they're basically solar power-generation stations that sell electricity to the grid, and also happen to have charging stations.

      When the sun is down, they use grid power. It's much cheaper to sell to the grid during the day and buy it back at night, than it is to set up an electric storage system (battery/flywheel/pumped storage/etc).

      The waiting in line strawman is also silly - they're not going to have one spot for one car. Like gas stations, each station will have a few spots. If it gets to the point where the charging station is always packed, well, that's great! Build another one, and also celebrate, because there's tons of electric cars on the road.

      Anyways, this network is to kickstart the electric filling station network. If you're just going from home to work and back, you can charge overnight at home and during the day at work (my work has charging stations in the parking lot). These stations are for long trips, not the daily grind.

  4. Who is going to pay for the roads by fermion · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Like local and state sales taxes paying for services, state and federal fuel taxes are not going to be able to pay for roads and the deficit in the same way as we move to more efficient vehicles. Now with electric cars there is no fuel tax. The states have loved to live on these hidden taxes, in clothes, in fuel, on the phone bill, but really we are going to have to start more open taxes and explain what they pay for and how they are applied. If every dollar a middle class American makes is going to be taxed three times, one on payroll, once on income, once when it is spent, that makes less sense than just taxing it to begin with. Of course that will result in the wealthy paying taxes. For instance, most of us pay payroll taxes on everything we make, but someone making 200K does not. Now if you can afford a Tesla, you don't pay for the roads you use.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:Who is going to pay for the roads by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      The free ride will only apply during the early adopter phase. And it's needed to encourage this shift in technology. Once it becomes mainstream, for sure it'll be taxed, in one way or another.

    2. Re:Who is going to pay for the roads by WillAdams · · Score: 2

      The problem is, it'll probably be taxed by mandating a GPS unit in all electric vehicles --- but there are no privacy implication for that, right?

      A better solution would be to place the tax on tires (which are already the subject of especial taxes and disposal fees), say based on the mass squared of the tire --- this would penalize the heavier vehicles which actually damage roads and encourage people to take better care of their tires and keep their vehicles in alignment.

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
  5. meh by MonoSynth · · Score: 5, Funny

    No wireless. Lame.

    1. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      more space than a nomad, though....

  6. The other important announcements by dnaumov · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the SEC filling:

    As our main focus is on quality, we have methodically increased our Model S production at a rate slower than we had earlier anticipated.

    We now anticipate that we will deliver between 200 and 225 Model S vehicles to customers in the third quarter and between 2,500 and 3,000 Model S vehicles in the fourth quarter.

    We anticipate, however, that manufacturing and supplier issues will continue to arise and need to be addressed in a timely manner.

    In the third quarter of 2012, we anticipate that our gross margin will be negatively affected primarily by the limited number of Model S vehicles we intend to deliver

    We also expect selling, general and administrative expenses for the third quarter to increase modestly over the prior quarter as we continue to increase our vehicle selling and servicing capabilities.

    We have now fully drawn down our $465 million DOE Loan Facility.

  7. Meanwhile, Toyota by Kupfernigk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    (Who know a thing or two) are abandoning pure electric cars because they can't make the engineering sums add up with present battery technology. They have even produced a hybrid (Yaris hybrid) that undercuts the cheapest electric cars without subsidy. Now that Mercedes is bringing out hybrids and are producing their first fuel-cell cars, meaning we have gasoline, diesel and fuel cell hybrids, it looks like Tesla and the other all-electric experiments are a dead end.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:Meanwhile, Toyota by Locutus · · Score: 2

      or it couldn't be the Toyota dealerships are fighting the electric car as is likely the US automaker dealerships are. And Toyota has a hybrid lineup which is soon to be 14 different models and retains the nice features the dealerships like, ie constant maintenance. They also have plugin hybrids which cross the pure EV and hybrid lines without having to try to change the publics mind about how viable EVs are.

      While it may still be true that huge battery packs which get you 200+ miles on a charge and are very expensive, those super luxury EVs are not for everyone. But there are lots of people who could use an EV for their daily driving needs if they just opened their minds about how/what they really _needed_ and reasonably priced EVs were on the market.

      BTW, back when GW Bush hoodwinked everyone into believing hydrogen cars would be everywhere while only million dollar prototypes remained available for years, then CA governator Schwarzenegger pledged millions to put in hydrogen fueling stations throughout CA. But EV charging stations are hugely less expensive yet, the cars are somewhat obtainable and real yet we have nothing. So I say great for Tesla for putting their money where their mouth is and showing how this can work.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  8. Witty... by Kupfernigk · · Score: 2

    No mod points, but that was a good one.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  9. Re:how many kids can fit in there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I forgot, almost everyone with a vehicle is in the breeding phase of their life. Back to the drawing board.

  10. Gene Pitney song by rossdee · · Score: 4, Funny

    He was only 24 hours from Tesla

  11. Love this Idea by DaKong · · Score: 2

    I was in the new Tesla dealership in the Roosevelt Field Mall in Long Island on Sunday. The Model S is a good sized sedan. I did see 5 grown adults sitting in it. The car itself looks great, like a Bentley, I thought. I learned of the constellation of supercharging stations there, which put in a nail in the coffin of range-anxiety ninnies.

    But letting you recharge for free? That's genius. A swift kick in the nuts to both the oil and traditional auto industries. More power to Tesla! God how I'd love to see the fossil fuel people utterly collapse in a year in the face of such disruptive vision.

    --
    If not us, who? If not now, when?
  12. Abandoning? by SilverJets · · Score: 3, Informative

    By abandon do you mean rolling out an all electric RAV4?

    Sure, they're dropping one line of car, their little eQ minicar. But that doesn't mean they are dropping electric all together. They've just realized that the technology isn't there quite there yet. And they are planning on having 21 hybrid versions of their vehicles by 2015.

    In other words they moved too fast on the all electric cars for some markets and are backing off for now until the technology catches up with the ideas.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/24/us-toyota-electric-idUSBRE88N0CT20120924

  13. Hippy greens are not making what the world wants by Medievalist · · Score: 3, Funny

    I want all that stuff, and also a pony.

    No pony? Your products are crap!

  14. Re:how many kids can fit in there? by CastrTroy · · Score: 2

    Actually, the Tesla model S seats 5 Adults + 2 children in rear facing seats. When you consider this, the Tesla looks very attractive. You'll be hard pressed to find a 7 seater car that gets respectable gas mileage. Also, 7 seater vehicles are often more expensive meaning that it makes the tesla even more competitive and appealing to certain market segments.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  15. Constant Fill Up? by inhuman_4 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One thing I don't understand, and perhaps someone on here can enlighten me, is why people always assume you will fill up only when the tank is empty? It seems to me that one of the big advantages of electric is that you don't need a speciallized fueling station. You should be able to fuel up all over the place (although perhaps not quickly) provided there were enough charging stations. For example charging while:
    At home.
    Parked at work.
    Out to dinner.
    Overnight at a hotel.
    At a movie.
    Shopping at a mall.

    The tank doesn't have to be empty, and the charging doesn't have to be to fill. But consistantly charging a little bit here and there should be one of the main ways to extend range. I realize that infastructure like charging stations need to be installed and the electrical grid must be able to handle it all. But other than that, what am I missing?

  16. Free electricity? by cellocgw · · Score: 3, Interesting

    OK, I'm going to buy one of these cars, charge it up for free at the nearest station, drive home, and dump the battery into my house inverter.
    I'll get all the electricity for everything I own, for FREE!!!!!! Maybe I'll even dump some back into the grid and make money off whatever Con Ed is calling itself these days.

    --
    https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw