Slashdot Mirror


The Deepest Picture of the Universe Ever Taken: the Hubble Extreme Deep Field

The Bad Astronomer writes "Astronomers have unveiled what may be the deepest image of the Universe ever created: the Hubble Extreme Deep Field, a 2 million second exposure that reveals galaxies over 13 billion light years away. The faintest galaxies in the images are at magnitude 31, or one-ten-billionth as bright as the faintest object your naked eye can detect. Some are seen as they were when they were only 500 million years old."

6 of 185 comments (clear)

  1. Hard to imagine the vastness by icebike · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ok, I officially feel small now.

    I'm not sure whether to be more impressed by:
      1) the scale of the universe itself
      2) the ability of some insignificant bags of protoplasm on an insignificant planet near a run of the mill star, in a less than impressive galaxy could find a way to actually see that far
      3) the fact that they held the camera that steady for 2 million seconds (23 days)
      4) That the camera moved 36 million miles during those 23 days and it didn't make any difference in the final image.

    But other than that, the image looks exactly like a gazillion other images from Hubble, so one has to take it on faith that it is what it says it is.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    1. Re:Hard to imagine the vastness by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ok, I officially feel small now.

      so..... can we have your liver, then?

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:Hard to imagine the vastness by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 5, Funny

      Space, is big. Really big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mindbogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space.

    3. Re:Hard to imagine the vastness by Matheus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I was pondering on this recently and was thinking the following:

      1) Light travels at that good ole' speed it does.

      2) Scientists continually marvel at the fact they are seeing the universe far away the way it was millions or billions of years ago.

      3) I never hear them comment on the fact what they are seeing has changed as much as our near universe in all of that time.

      SO... what's to say we're not looking at the beginnings of literally millions (+?) of civilizations that in a few million years would look to the Hubble like we do now from up close?

      Astronomers spend SO much of their time looking at light-speed forced history that I feel a certain slight is paid to what the present truly may be. The universe may be absolutely teaming with life that we won't be able to even see the beginnings of in ours or even our great-great-great-great-...........-great-great-grandchildren's lifetimes.

      Anyway... back to pondering...

  2. Re:Hey everybody, it's Phil Plait! by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Science doesn't promote itself. If there were any justice in the world, the Hubble team would be as celebrated as any sports team. This is certainly a much greater accomplishment than anything that happened at the Olympics. But that's not the world we live in. We need people like Phil Plait to publicly celebrate science. If there's a bit of self promotion in there too, so be it.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  3. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Shut up Plato, or we'll demote you to dwarf philosopher. Don't think we won't.