Slashdot Mirror


Terabit Ethernet Is Dead, For Now

Nerval's Lobster writes "Sorry, everybody: terabit Ethernet looks like it will have to wait a while longer. The IEEE 802.3 Industry Connections Higher Speed Ethernet Consensus group met this week in Geneva, Switzerland, with attendees concluding—almost to a man—that 400 Gbits/s should be the next step in the evolution of Ethernet. A straw poll at its conclusion found that 61 of the 62 attendees that voted supported 400 Gbits/s as the basis for the near term 'call for interest,' or CFI. The bandwidth call to arms was sounded by a July report by the IEEE, which concluded that, if current trends continue, networks will need to support capacity requirements of 1 terabit per second in 2015 and 10 terabits per second by 2020. In 2015 there will be nearly 15 billion fixed and mobile-networked devices and machine-to-machine connections."

2 of 140 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Damn the summary by rufty_tufty · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We need terabit Ethernet NOW, not in a decade.

    You know my 5 year old nephew keeps confusing need and want too.
    How much are you prepared to pay for this desire? If it will cost say 4 times greater per bit to implement Terabit with current technology do you still want it?

    --
    "The weirdest thing about a mind, is that every answer that you find, is the basis of a brand new cliche" -
  2. Isn't it about time we stopped calling it Ethernet by Viol8 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hardly any 10 base T systems bother with the CDMA/CD system that original ethernet had , in fact its more like a serial protocol rather than a broadcast "in the ether" one now. WHy not just give it a new name?