Slashdot Mirror


Free Font Helps People With Dyslexia

Thornburg writes "There is a free font available which has been designed to make it easier for people with dyslexia to read. DailyTech has a piece which pulls together a BBC interview and blog postings by the designer, Abelardo Gonzalez, who received a C&D letter from another font designer who charges $69 for his dyslexia related font."

14 of 151 comments (clear)

  1. Uhhh well, shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Never thought I had dyslexia, never imagined I had problems reading, but holy crap reading a page in anti-dyslexia fonts like this one http://www.pixelscript.net/gilldyslexic/ is like all the words leap off the page making sudden sense in an instant.

    *random expression of surprise at finding something new at age 44*

    1. Re:Uhhh well, shit. by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Interesting. I think that this font also makes it easier for me to read more quickly, but I wouldn't consider myself dyslexic as I've never felt as though I've had difficulties reading almost any font and read quite frequently. Maybe I'm just thinking that I can read that font more quickly, but for some reason it does seem easier to read. Perhaps it's something that's true for people in general. I'd be curious to see if there have been any studies to determine if this font also improves reading speed for people who haven't been diagnosed or probably wouldn't be diagnosed as dyslexic. All that aside, stuff like this is really awesome. Even though a lot of people like to say or think that the world is going to shit, it's also getting better in a lot of ways for a lot of people.

    2. Re:Uhhh well, shit. by DigMarx · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I tend to read by seeing an entire line at a time. The page you referenced sort of forced me to read left to right, parsing as I go. I'm not dyslexic either, but I can see how the font may help people by encouraging a "normal" cadence.

    3. Re:Uhhh well, shit. by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Funny

      The last time I saw a web page with a narrow enough column width that I could read a line at a time was... well, do you remember Netscape Mosaic?

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    4. Re:Uhhh well, shit. by ballpoint · · Score: 4, Informative

      Eulexics prefer simple and clean sans-serifs over the spectrum from serifs to ornamental. This font distracts by its irregular features (especially noticeable in g and p).

      The same applies on a larger scale where eulexics prefer undecorated text over the highlighted, underscored, colored and fontful, and a white sheet over magazine style.

      Apparently dyslexics need variety, while eulexics prefer uniformity. Interesting.

      --
      Flourescent (adj): smelling like ground wheat.
  2. Well, it doesn't work... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm pretty severely dyslexic, and I just plain cannot read his website in that font. The weird shading from top to bottom makes it look like it's been printed on a daisywheel with the platen out of alignment.

    It's so hard to read I had to turn off the stylesheet to make my way through the page.

    1. Re:Well, it doesn't work... by dreamchaser · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What a shame the guy never thought to test it on any dyslexics, instead of making up a load of random shit about how he thought his font would work. I mean, that must be what happened, since you're dyslexic and you've declared that it doesn't work. And all dyslexics must all be the same, since you didn't just say "it doesn't work for me."

      He more or less did say "it didn't work for me", so I fail to see why you'd treat him with sarcasm.

  3. Ignore Christian Boer, he's an ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Your typeface doesn't look the same as his typeface. You can't copyright typefaces, and they're all derivative.

    Typically what Adobe does is trademark the name, so there are many Palladins or Pallertrino's and the like, but only one Palatino (tm Adobe/Linotype).

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palatino

    What Mr Boer is trying to do, is to bully competitors in an effort to block competition. This is not unusual. The world is full of little shits like this. You have to learn to get a thicker skin against them and just ignore him.

  4. Re:US: fonts not protected / font files are by Improv · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Fonts are a lot more complicated than you think. You're not going to easily be able to convert a given imagefile into a font.

    --
    For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
  5. Re:Maybe it's just the vocabulary... by commlinx · · Score: 4, Funny

    Interesting, I often find the same reading things not succinct and broken into paragraphs.

  6. Control freakery stopping a good thing. by Stu101 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Because of the control freakery that Amazon "needs" you can't actually read a book in it. I think Amazon and Google should get the support on this font super quick.

    I am a big user of Amazon e-books and not having the ability to change the fonts kind of defeats a major selling point over old paper books. If Amazon started doing this I suspect they would be repaid several dozen times over with people who appreciate it.

    I think users should be allowed to choose their own font. So what if it looks totally crap. Its personal preference and it doesn't affect anyone else. Let the "Marketing" droids go swivel.

    BTW,I am a bit pissed because I never knew my reading was difficult until I used this font. It's kind of a realisation! And someone is trying to stop me being able to do things better.

    I also understand that Amazon etc are working on licencing it, but if we could change our own font, we wouldn't have the issue.

    --
    http://www.writeitfor.us - Writing IT for the IT generation.
  7. Re:Uhhh well a different view... by VVrath · · Score: 5, Informative

    Probably replying to a troll, but anyway:

    As a teacher, I can tell you that dyslexia is definitely not "an excuse". A pupil with dyslexia has been a member of my tutor group for the last four years. He struggles with reading, although use of a reading ruler is of tremendous help. His handwriting is difficult to decipher, and contains many mirrored letters (e.g. b/d, p/q, backwards s). However that difficulty aside he is one of the most intelligent and articulate 16-year-old's I have had the pleasure of teaching.

  8. Re:Uhhh well a different view... by flimflammer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've always wondered why people feel the need to post shit like this. It's as though suggesting you have anything to do with teaching forces a bunch of random pricks to analyze every character you write, desperately looking for any grammatical mistakes just so they can point out "herp derp hope you don't teach English!"

    We're not in class, and your response is old and tired.

  9. Re:Uhhh well a different view... by VVrath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am not an English teacher, although of course all teachers have a responsibility for incorporating literacy into their lessons. Strangely enough, I take far more care over my lessons than I do with Slashdot comments.

    Just in case you ever do consider teaching as a career, can I recommend that you look to improve your method of giving feedback? A snarky comment is humorous, but does not maximise the potential for learning. It would be much better to write something along the lines of:

    "That was a good post, and expressed your point clearly. However, you have missed a comma and used an apostrophe unnecessarily in your final sentence. Please re-write the sentence with the grammar corrected below."

    This sort of formative assessment rewards the learner (with praise) for their achievement as well as providing guidance on how to improve in the future.