Slashdot Mirror


$1 Billion Mission To Reach the Earth's Mantle

black6host writes "Humans have reached the moon and are planning to return samples from Mars, but when it comes to exploring the land deep beneath our feet, we have only scratched the surface of our planet. This may be about to change with a $1 billion mission to drill 6 km (3.7 miles) beneath the seafloor to reach the Earth's mantle — a 3000 km-thick layer of slowly deforming rock between the crust and the core which makes up the majority of our planet — and bring back the first ever fresh samples."

267 comments

  1. Paging Lawrence Fishburn by DaKong · · Score: 5, Funny

    Please remember to wear your heat suit when venturing outside the vessel.

    --
    If not us, who? If not now, when?
    1. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by firex726 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh god that movie was so bad. IDK why people rag on Armageddon so much but we never hear anything about The Core.

    2. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because as bad as it was, it wasn't as bad as Armageddon.
      Also not Lawrence Fishburn it was Mr Lindo.
        (Delroy Lindo ... Dr. Ed 'Braz' Brazzleton)

      Cheers

    3. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by MiniMike · · Score: 5, Funny

      Because it's too easy? It's like picking on a disabled kid- it would be easy, but it's just wrong to do.

      Because it's too cheesy? Some movies approach the cheesiness boundary carefully, but don't get too close. This one seemed to leap over that line early in the movie, and just kept running for the fence.

      But mostly:
      Because one would have to admit having seen The Core?

    4. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by beamdriver · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Because The Core is a fun, silly movie meant to be enjoyed with your brain in the off position.

      I particularly liked the part when they got stuck in a giant geode. The only way it could have been better would have been if there were dinosaurs in the geode.

    5. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Not a good move. The Morlocks aren't going to like this at all...

      --
      No sig today...
    6. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I loved it. Daft and hammy though it was.

      Favourite quote "Physics 101, hot iron spinning creates a magnetic field".

    7. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

      Any movie with Hillary Swank in it is at least 3.5 stars.

    8. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by FreonTrip · · Score: 5, Informative

      That wasn't Lawrence Fishburne, that was Delroy Lindo. And yes, The Core is one of the most hideously inaccurate, ostensibly scientific films ever made. What galls is that the film itself isn't awful in terms of character development or plotting - it's just oriented around a series of terribly wrong fundamental assumptions, and then ties itself into progressively more ridiculous knots to support them.

      On the other hand, it is riotously funny to watch with a room full of tipsy geologists.

    9. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by SilentStaid · · Score: 4, Funny

      On the other hand, it is riotously funny to watch with a room full of tipsy geologists.

      The problem with that is they won't shut up about how much the floor is tilting or the world is spinning... and drinking just makes it worse.

      /ducks

    10. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by luigi517 · · Score: 3, Funny

      who rags on armegeddon?! I love that movie. "This is how we fix in mother russia!"

    11. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by dywolf · · Score: 1

      Exactly what part of the movie was meant to be scientifically accurate?
      It was a summer popcorn movie, not a documentary.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    12. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American parts, Russian parts all made in Taiwan!

    13. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because one would have to admit having seen The Core?

      If anyone asks, you only rented it because you saw the "Hippy-Drill" episode of Southpark.

    14. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by Alsee · · Score: 4, Funny

      How about just one dinosaur was trapped in the geode, and for the last 65 million years evolution has been turning it into an even more ferocious and deadly killing machine.

      P.S. Before anyone corrects me on evolution, I am mocking the general level of scientific accuracy of the movie.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    15. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly what part of the movie was meant to be scientifically accurate?
      It was a summer popcorn movie, not a documentary.

      They tried to explain it in terms which they attempted to make sound scientific. It wasn't intentionally bad, that's the thing- it was Action, not Comedy, but the movie is only good if viewed as a comedy. As for being a summer popcorn movie- yes it was. A really shitty one.

    16. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by LordGibson · · Score: 1

      I like where you're going with this. I'd like to produce your movie.

    17. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by rwise2112 · · Score: 1

      Because The Core is a fun, silly movie meant to be enjoyed with your brain in the off position.

      I particularly liked the part when they got stuck in a giant geode. The only way it could have been better would have been if there were dinosaurs in the geode.

      Oh no! You've given away the plot of the upcoming sequel!

      --

      "For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert"
    18. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by Lord+Lode · · Score: 1

      I've never seen The Core, but saw its trailer just now. What I wonder is this:

      They say they can't make the core start spinning again because it's so big and requires so much force. That makes sense to me. What doesn't make sense to me, is that they did manage to stop it, which would cost the exact same energy. Why was stopping easy and starting not? Really stupid...

    19. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amateurs. Anybody knows Crack in the World is the definitive move on this subject.

    20. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by Metabolife · · Score: 1

      You can't forget the part about the secret alien research facility which has been guiding the evolution process... that is.. until the neo-rex bit the hand that fed it.

    21. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Exactly what part of the movie was meant to be scientifically accurate?"

      The Earth has a metallic core.

      That's about it.

    22. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by krakelohm · · Score: 1

      I agree, lets http://www.kickstarter.com/ that bitch!

      --
      You are all a bunch of idots.
    23. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by cb88 · · Score: 0

      Well those sorts of things are hard for many reasons such as the battery being dead, still in gear.. out of fuel etc...

    24. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      [www.imdb.com?title/tt012591/quotes] Not the most quotable movie of all time (that award goes to Tombstone), but there were a few gems.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    25. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by shadowrat · · Score: 3

      This is probably a stupid thing to be discussing, but think about a bicycle. It takes a certain amount of energy input from you to get the thing going. Yet, it takes obviously less energy from you to make it stop. Magic of friction.

    26. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      Learning! link here

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    27. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Vampires.

    28. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by TFAFalcon · · Score: 2

      Replace the dinosaur with underground cannibalistic piranhas and it was already made.

    29. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      It's not the ridiculous science, really it's not. I can forgive "put the reactor fuel next to the bomb to make it go bigger boom!". I can forgive "the material magically makes electricity from heat, enough to keep the entire ship cool even!". I can even forgive "here's a huge geode hundreds of miles under the crust".

      What can't I forgive?

      The ship 'flies' straight down, the back of the ship is straight up from the front. Yet whenever they move from one section to the other, they walk through. They should have to climb a ladder dammit! I know it's a pointless nitpick that has no bearing on anything, but it's like they didn't even try! They even show the ship from the outside many, many times and always show it vertical. Switch the the interior and there's the crew wandering from one compartment to the next. It just bugs me. It's like they didn't even try.

    30. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because so many fewer people watched it?

    31. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

      Because one would have to admit having seen The Core?

      I'll only admit to having seen the SNL skit about it. Ride 'em Cowboy!

    32. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by squiggly12 · · Score: 1
    33. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by dbraden · · Score: 1

      Why was stopping easy and starting not? Really stupid...

      That's easy! To start it moving, you have to overcome starting (static) friction, requiring more force.

    34. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are making an assumption that the ship is "flying" straight down. In fact I believe the premise was that the ship was going in perpendicular to the axis meaning it would be traveling horizontally from the equator. The reason the ship looks to be flying straight down is the camera angle used to film the ship as it traversed through thousands of tons of solid rock...My question then would be who was outside the ship filming it IF it was the only ship traveling to the core.....

    35. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      The ship 'flies' straight down, the back of the ship is straight up from the front. Yet whenever they move from one section to the other, they walk through. They should have to climb a ladder dammit! I know it's a pointless nitpick that has no bearing on anything, but it's like they didn't even try! They even show the ship from the outside many, many times and always show it vertical. Switch the the interior and there's the crew wandering from one compartment to the next. It just bugs me. It's like they didn't even try.

      Re-watch the part where they design the ship. The interior sections are on gimbals and pivot to remain "level" - within a specific range. True, the script doesn't always seem live within that constraint, but it's been considered. More interesting is the film doesn't consider the lack/lessening of gravity as they travel toward the core. As I understand it, they should be almost weightless near the core.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    36. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Because The Core didn't have Liv Tyler looking like a walking Barbie doll while her and Affleck gave the most contrived unbelievable "romance" since Anakin and Padame?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    37. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      The core is pretty big and pretty dense, they should doubtless be reduced in weight, but not weightless since they never go deep into the core. As to the cars being on gimbals that's fine, they can walk around each car just fine inside one compartment, doesn't change the fact that the other compartments should be above and below them, not forward and back.

    38. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by FreonTrip · · Score: 1

      See, my personal tipping point was the "microwaves" coming through the Earth's magnetic field and burning through the Golden Gate Bridge.

    39. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by dpilot · · Score: 1

      No, the best part was when they said the drill's hull was made of "unobtanium" and said it with a straight face. That's only a good part when the rest of the movie is definitely bad. The jury's still out on Avatar, where they made the same straight-faced reference.

      The second best part was stepping through the frames when the birds are hitting the building, and finding the fish hitting, too.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    40. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Thanks and agreed. Still, I thought the movie was a fun two hours spent...

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    41. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1

      IMDB rates it 5.3, but then not many movies get rated below 3.5.

    42. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The drill should be made of adamantium, to claw its way down.

    43. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure the writers of The Core were in on the joke. Wasn't one of their magic technologies explained by saying it uses "unobtanium"?

    44. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by ByteSlicer · · Score: 2

      I particularly liked the part when they got stuck in a giant geode.

      That was actually the more plausible part of the movie.

    45. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love Hillarys wank

    46. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by Dave+Emami · · Score: 1

      I love Hillarys wank

      Her husband Bill apparently wasn't satisfied with that.

      --

      "The Greens lynched a hacker in Chicago. Last month, but I think the body's still hanging from the old Water Tower."
    47. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by Man+Eating+Duck · · Score: 1

      This is probably a stupid thing to be discussing, but think about a bicycle. It takes a certain amount of energy input from you to get the thing going. Yet, it takes obviously less energy from you to make it stop. Magic of friction.

      I hope you didn't think that through...

      --
      Are you a grammar Nazi? I'm trying to improve my English; please correct my errors! :)
    48. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yes, The Core is one of the most hideously inaccurate, ostensibly scientific films ever made.

      Yes, I thought it was the most scientifically inaccurate movie ever created. And then, 2012 happened.

    49. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      And yes, The Core [imdb.com] is one of the most hideously inaccurate, ostensibly scientific films ever made.

      If you watch something like The Core for scientific accuracy, you're the one with the problem.. And to be consistent, you'd have to write off any film, book or TV series containing time /FTL travel, anti-gravity weapons, cold fusion, matter transference or any number of other things which are impossible according to current scientific knowledge.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    50. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Why was stopping easy and starting not? Really stupid...

      Duh. Compare getting a car going by push-starting it, and stopping it by driving into the side of a skip.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    51. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      My question then would be who was outside the ship filming it IF it was the only ship traveling to the core.....

      You are aware that this is a work of fiction and not a documentary or live TV report, right?

      Your comment is similar to criticising the movie Titanic on the basis that the cameraman filming the iceberg should have gone and warned the captain.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    52. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      Doh!

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    53. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      I woulda prefered they make it look like freefall/ gravity free myself..

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    54. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that's not true. You must not be a brake pad.

    55. Re:Paging Lawrence Fishburn by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      oh, you mean like one of those "Found Footage" things?

      Blair Witch, or Cloverfield?

      Blair Witch was shite, btw. Cloverfield was bearable. Just.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  2. Sounds fun. by Sparticus789 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if by samples, they mean the live dinosaurs that inhabit hollow earth.

    --
    sudo make me a sandwich
    1. Re:Sounds fun. by NatasRevol · · Score: 0

      That can't be true.

      Dinosaurs never actually existed!

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    2. Re:Sounds fun. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be silly, the subterranean dinosaurs are just a crazy diversion to hide the Crab People down there.

    3. Re:Sounds fun. by Alsee · · Score: 1

      We have to stop this project!
      They'll let the MORLOCKS out!

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    4. Re:Sounds fun. by Sparticus789 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You see, they did exist. Since the universe is only 6,000 years old, what happened is that God blinked us into existence. Realizing, in his omnipotent knowledge, that humanity would some day understand the laws of the universe which he created, He decided to create 13+ billion years of history to fool us with. So the dinosaurs did exist, just long enough for God to kill them and bury their bones, so that we would have fossils and oil. Because God decided it would be easier to create everything in 6 days instead of kicking back on his supernatural couch, sipping a beer, and watch the universe grow on it's own.

      Or, if you prefer, God could be at a gas station next to a dusty road in the middle of the desert. Where nothing is said because it has all been said.

      --
      sudo make me a sandwich
    5. Re:Sounds fun. by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Wait, God drinks?

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    6. Re:Sounds fun. by Sparticus789 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the Catholic Church was the largest brewer in Europe for 1,000 years. Therefore, God drinks.

      --
      sudo make me a sandwich
    7. Re:Sounds fun. by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Ahhh, mead, is there nothing you can't make better? Well, except the Dark Ages?

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    8. Re:Sounds fun. by jd2112 · · Score: 2

      "Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." - Ben Franklin

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    9. Re:Sounds fun. by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

      Actually, the "samples" refer to the food products handed out by retirees at the Sam's club down there.

    10. Re:Sounds fun. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2

      We have to stop this project! They'll let the MORLOCKS out!

      The Morlocks are already out. Didn't you see the Republican National Convention?
      Run and hide little Eloi. Run and hide.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    11. Re:Sounds fun. by fatphil · · Score: 1

      Now do a millisecond of research, and find out what the real quote was, so that you don't ignorantly parrot an incorrect one again.

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    12. Re:Sounds fun. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Luke 7:33-34: For John the Baptist came neither eating bread nor drinking wine; and ye say, He hath a devil. The Son of man is come eating and drinking; and ye say, Behold a gluttonous man, and a winebibber, a friend of publicans and sinners!

      Yes, God drinks. Emanual == God With Us. Why do you think he invented alcohol? I mean, except keeping the Irish from conquering the world?

    13. Re:Sounds fun. by EdIII · · Score: 1

      He said the same thing about weed. It's just not as well published :)

    14. Re:Sounds fun. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, if you prefer, God could be at a gas station next to a dusty road in the middle of the desert. Where nothing is said because it has all been said.

      Well there is always that pinball machine.

    15. Re:Sounds fun. by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      You ever taste the blood of Christ? It tastes like cheap wine, he must have been trashed all the time.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    16. Re:Sounds fun. by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Once the place is flooded with seawater, they won't be live dinosaurs anymore.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    17. Re:Sounds fun. by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      Now do a millisecond of research, and find out what the real quote was, so that you don't ignorantly parrot an incorrect one again.

      How about this then?

      "When the Internet is invented, it will be totally cool if people misquote me on it." -- Ben Franklin (or was that Abraham Lincoln?)

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    18. Re:Sounds fun. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Wait, God drinks?

      It's one explanation for His mistakes, like not even being able to prove He exists to those without blind, irrational faith.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    19. Re:Sounds fun. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Now do a millisecond of research, and find out what the real quote was, so that you don't ignorantly parrot an incorrect one again.

      All I can find with a quick search is that it a quotation mistakenly attributed to him, but no-one appears to know who did say it. It's nonsense anyway. If God had wanted mankind to be happy, I'm fairly sure He could have avoided things like killer childhood diseases, teeth that rot and fall out, gout, cancer, heart attacks, and indeed death itself.

      It would be particularly crappy planning to rely on a temporary palliative to ensure our happiness.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    20. Re:Sounds fun. by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      You're thinking of Jody Thompson. And that annoying woman from Caprica.

    21. Re:Sounds fun. by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      No, he's the Bartender.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    22. Re:Sounds fun. by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      I have a theory on that... it's called the Dark Ages because the sum of Human knowledge and scientific progress was kept on computer. We'd gone through our first silicon age. Then one day, a massive EMP wiped everything, setting us back a thousand years. Everything was forgotten except that for some unknown reason, eight hundred years had passed.

      That could almost be a book...

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    23. Re:Sounds fun. by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      "We hear of the conversion of water into wine at the marriage in Cana, as of a miracle. But this conversion is, through the goodness of God, made every day before our eyes. Behold the rain which descends from heaven upon our vineyards, and which incorporates itself with the grapes to be changed into wine; a constant proof that God loves us, and loves to see us happy!"
        - Benjamin Franklin's original quote, translated from a letter to Abbe Morellet

      "Beer is living proof God loves us and wants us to be happy."
        - Homer Simpson, sometime around 1996

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  3. Why do we have to dig our own hole? by UnresolvedExternal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Forgive my ignorance here but don't we already have this? What's wrong with using a volcano?

    1. Re:Why do we have to dig our own hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because if we are going to spend $1 billion than we want to make it as fresh as possible. None of this already used holes to the Earth's mantle.

    2. Re:Why do we have to dig our own hole? by vlm · · Score: 2

      Forgive my ignorance here but don't we already have this?

      Your confusion is that Kola was a lot deeper but was only about 1/3 of the way thru the crust, this is drilling thru a very thin area of the crust.

      Traditional drilling methods don't work so they gave up on Kola.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    3. Re:Why do we have to dig our own hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They tend to, y'know, EXPLODE.

      At least when underwater, if something goes tits up, there is the entire ocean to put it out.

    4. Re:Why do we have to dig our own hole? by ZeroSumHappiness · · Score: 1

      Worked great for Deepwater Horizon.

    5. Re:Why do we have to dig our own hole? by tnk1 · · Score: 2

      They have this tendency to go off when you would prefer they didn't. More to the point, we only probably want to deal with magma when we reach the bottom end of the shaft, with a volcano, it's magma and pockets of superheated and pressurized gasses all the way down.

      Presumably, you'd want a hole that you could set up safety protocols which prevent blowouts like in an oil well, except in this case it would be pressurized gasses and even magma. For that, you probably want a clean borehole through bedrock.

    6. Re:Why do we have to dig our own hole? by dywolf · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because a volcano isnt a straight shot. Know how water flows through rock via the cracks and fissures? Same thing with a volcano, just molten rock instead of water as the fluid.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    7. Re:Why do we have to dig our own hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      no, it's turtles all the way down...

    8. Re:Why do we have to dig our own hole? by Garridan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, tsunamis never killed anybody...

    9. Re:Why do we have to dig our own hole? by rwise2112 · · Score: 2

      Forgive my ignorance here but don't we already have this?

      Your confusion is that Kola was a lot deeper but was only about 1/3 of the way thru the crust, this is drilling thru a very thin area of the crust.

      Traditional drilling methods don't work so they gave up on Kola.

      Yeah. Ocean crust is a lot thinner than continental crust. And if I remember correctly, Kola is in a mountainous area where the continental crust is thicker.

      --

      "For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert"
    10. Re:Why do we have to dig our own hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      And here I thought it would drain the whole ocean.

    11. Re:Why do we have to dig our own hole? by wiedzmin · · Score: 2

      You guys crack me up.

      --
      Bow before me, for I am root.
    12. Re:Why do we have to dig our own hole? by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      Forgive my ignorance here but don't we already have this? What's wrong with using a volcano?

      I'm asking the same question but then someone will not earn a billion dollars if we use a volcano. However, I didn't RTFA nor am I a geologist. I think an interesting drilling is to one of those "cones" way down there to get fresh diamonds. Some years ago I read an article that diamonds formed very deep and are size of watermelons, and after zillion years or so they make their way to the surface but have been broken up into small pieces. Imagine a diamond of watermelon size and probably very heavy.

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
    13. Re:Why do we have to dig our own hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the guessing game? If your point is that the molten rock gets contaminated on its way to the surface by the rocks it touches, then say so.

    14. Re:Why do we have to dig our own hole? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Some years ago I read an article that diamonds formed very deep and are size of watermelons, and after zillion years or so they make their way to the surface but have been broken up into small pieces. Imagine a diamond of watermelon size and probably very heavy.

      As I believe industrial diamnonds are not particularly expensive, all this would do is knock the bottom out of the jewellery business, hardly important news unless you're a necklace diamond cutter or something.

      It would be amusing to take your watermelon sized diamond to the Tower of London and mock the pathetically small stones in the Crown Jewels, I suppose.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    15. Re:Why do we have to dig our own hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The answer is quite simple: volcanoes are not holes to the earth's mantle, as you and GP erroneously seem to believe.

    16. Re:Why do we have to dig our own hole? by valentinas · · Score: 1

      Actually diamond density is only ~3,500 kg/m3, so no, it wouldn't be very heavy. ~35kg, more or less: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=(big+watermelon+serving+volume)+*+diamond+density

  4. Gros Morne by Kinthelt · · Score: 1

    The unfresh samples at Gros Morne not good enough?

    --

    "Evil will always triumph over good, because good is dumb." - Dark Helmet (Spaceballs)

    1. Re:Gros Morne by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I read the same thing on WikiPedia. Why go to the mantle when the mantle came to you already? (There's a Soviet Russia joke in there somewhere.)

  5. We must stop them! by nysus · · Score: 5, Funny

    I know how this ends...with a giant sucking sound as the world's oceans drain into the earth's core. Then, as steam builds inside the planet, the earth turns into a giant exploding kernel of popcorn.

    --

    ---Technology will liberate us if it doesn't enslave us first.

    1. Re:We must stop them! by alabandit · · Score: 2

      I know how this ends...with a giant sucking sound as the world's oceans drain into the earth's core. Then, as steam builds inside the planet, the earth turns into a giant exploding kernel of popcorn.

      Congratulations to NASA on finding away to alleviate their funding problems! Time to buy property on the mars is now!

      --
      "You are still innocent until proven guilty. What's changed is what they do to innocent people." by notnAP (846325)
    2. Re:We must stop them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This could possibly be the funniest thing I'll read all day.

    3. Re:We must stop them! by onyxruby · · Score: 1

      Like all things, it will go better with bacon. And since we'll be creating instant fried bacon worldwide when this happens everything will be better. Nothing to worry about...

    4. Re:We must stop them! by Zordak · · Score: 2

      No, you've got it all wrong. It ends with the earth being wholly consumed by lava. See this excellent documentary

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    5. Re:We must stop them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This ought to be the next "What If" on xkcd!

    6. Re:We must stop them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, what happens is they pop the giant helium balloon that holds the earth up

    7. Re:We must stop them! by lordofthechia · · Score: 4, Funny

      I know how this ends...with a giant sucking sound as the world's oceans drain into the earth's core. Then,

      The whole world gets covered in a thick layer of steam. For weeks it becomes hard to breath and see. After the steam subsides people start to wipe their fogged up windows to reveal every TV screen, every computer screen, every phone and tablet with the same message:

      STEAM: NOW AVAILABLE ON ALL PLATFORMS

      --
      Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
    8. Re:We must stop them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      <speculation type="wild"/>
      Ever consider if this is what happened to life on Mars? Martian life evolves, gets curious about their own planet's interior and start digging. The result?

      Shutdown of their planet's magnetosphere
      Venting a majority of their atmosphere into space
      Olympus frikkin Mons
      Enough material is ejected from the mantle to cause the crust to collapse down on it, creating the Valles Marineris

      Needless to say, the martians then pack up all of their stuff, erase any evidence of them ever being there (it's too embarassing) and move to Venus. Where they promptly melt.

    9. Re:We must stop them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh jeez, I really laughed at that one.

    10. Re:We must stop them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A publicity stunt, Valve style. Without valves.

    11. Re:We must stop them! by arkane1234 · · Score: 2

      and without style.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    12. Re:We must stop them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call bullshit, I think the steam would simply escape back out of the drilled hole... That or you just drill a hole on the other side of the world at the top of a mountain to let the steam out.

    13. Re:We must stop them! by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Only Americans fry bacon. For the rest of us, it is a nice juicy meat for grilling, not an excuse to eat salty, fatty charcoal.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  6. Triple check your assumptions by Cyphase · · Score: 1

    Just don't overestimate the DESTINI-- I mean density of the core-- I mean mantle.

    --
    by Cyphase ( 907627 )
  7. One more hollow earth reference by kaka.mala.vachva · · Score: 1

    But this one is a live (and good) comic strip: http://www.reptilisrex.com/

  8. What Could Possibly Go Wrong? by synaptik · · Score: 1

    This might be a good way to terraform... might this create a volcanic island?

    --
    HSJ$$*&#^!#+++ATH0
    NO CARRIER
    1. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no

    2. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope

    3. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes! 8D

  9. You can try their training simulator at home. by L1mewater · · Score: 1

    They've been training for this for years. The original project was supposed to take place back in 1999. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wurm:_Journey_to_the_Center_of_the_Earth

    1. Re:You can try their training simulator at home. by Migraineman · · Score: 1

      "The first efforts to reach the Earth's mantle actually began back in the late 1950s, though plans for the journey were first drawn up in 1864 by the little-known French researcher Jules Gabriel Verne. The first documented attempt was made by the intrepid team of James Mason, Pat Boone, and Arlene Dahl. The most recent (and failed) attempt was made by Brendan Fraser and Anita Briem in 2008."

    2. Re:You can try their training simulator at home. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The most recent (and failed) attempt was made by Brendan Fraser and Anita Briem in 2008.

      That movie was, like, fail to the power of infinity. With a flag on top.

  10. No but seriously by Idimmu+Xul · · Score: 2

    can i vote against this?

    --
    The problem with slashdot is that most of its users were bullied and stuffed into lockers as kids!
    1. Re:No but seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      I think you are confusing the US with a country that cares what its citizens think.

    2. Re:No but seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, pick any of the fine fundamentalist religious parties available in a country near you.
      They hate science, in the same way children hate it when you tell them there is no easter bunny.
      For instance, if you happen to live in the United States, I believe you have a perfect opportunity approaching.
      And it probably doesn't even matter who you vote for.

    3. Re:No but seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're confusing democracy with a system that cares what individual idiots think.

  11. Balloon by JavaBear · · Score: 3, Funny

    Lets hope the Earth crust is not a balloon...

    1. Re:Balloon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's not

    2. Re:Balloon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, it sort of is.

    3. Re:Balloon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, not even remotely close. "jokes" based on pretending you're an idiot aren't funny. fucking nerds.

    4. Re:Balloon by dywolf · · Score: 1

      Be funny as hell...all the pressure of the crust causes a jet of mantle material to gush skyward.....
      As long as I dont live anywhere near it anyway. Then it wouldnt be so funny.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    5. Re:Balloon by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      You can have tiny holes in a balloon without the balloon popping. You can tell they're there if you put it under water and watch the bubbles form.

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    6. Re:Balloon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      actually, they sort of are.

    7. Re:Balloon by JazzLad · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is why we're doing it under the ocean.

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    8. Re:Balloon by chakan2 · · Score: 0

      Does that mean the earth will float away into space when the crust fills up with all that steam?

    9. Re:Balloon by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

      Try that with a balloon inflated to maximum pressure with the hottest gas you can use. The reason it works with a balloon is because the internal pressure in the ballon is not much greater than the external pressure (measured in single or double digit pounds), and because the surface of the balloon has a very high elasticity. Last I check, the Earth's mantle is considerable more brittle and the pressure inside the crust is incontrovertibly greater than outside the crust, by several orders of magnitude (enough to propel, dust, heavy metals and maybe even rocks bigger than cars miles into the air at extreme velocities). Two very fatal (to the brave men and women willingly offering themselves up for sacrifice to the volcano goddess Pele) flaws in your analogy.

    10. Re:Balloon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      POP...phphpphpphpphpphpssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss

    11. Re:Balloon by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      no, not even remotely close. "jokes" based on pretending you're an idiot aren't funny. fucking nerds.

      No, it's pointless comments from someone who really is an idiot that aren't funny. Except that they are, sort of, like a skateboarding dog falling into a lake.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    12. Re:Balloon by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      Party trick: tell someone you're gonna stick a rubber balloon with a needle and it not burst. Make it a beer game.

      Take some cellotape and stick it on the balloon. Make sure to get the air bubbles out, get a good seal on that bad boy. Then stick your needle straight through the middle of the tape and through the wall of the balloon. As long as the needle's in there, the balloon shouldn't pop and it should stay inflated. Remove the needle and the balloon should just slowly deflate. You're up a beer.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  12. Oblig video by kerrbear · · Score: 3, Funny

    Used to watch this on Saturday morning with "Superhost" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHtZ6Ixeqvs

  13. Three words for you... by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 2

    RELEASE THE MORLOCKS!

    --

    You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    1. Re:Three words for you... by mcgrew · · Score: 1
  14. Re:Insert Joke Here by MRe_nl · · Score: 1
    --
    "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
  15. Billiion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's that I see?

    1. Re:Billiion? by NighthawkFoo · · Score: 1

      You just need to read it in a Dr. Evil voice.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
      - Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    2. Re:Billiion? by lxs · · Score: 1

      You need to spend one billiion dollars if you want to find the gobliiins.

    3. Re:Billiion? by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      I just assumed it was a billion with an imaginary middle.

    4. Re:Billiion? by smitty97 · · Score: 1

      or Carl Sagan

      --
      mod me funny
  16. BAD, BAD IDEA by Type44Q · · Score: 3, Funny

    Everyone knows you're supposed to enter through the poles...

  17. Yay! More dust, awesome! by Spectrumanalyzer · · Score: 1

    Now that was money well spent.

    Dust!

    We just dont have enough dust here on our planet!
    Anyone who has visited my home, can tell that Im addicted to dust.

  18. Re:We tried this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't you just call is Preparation Ass Cream

  19. lolCNN by electrosoccertux · · Score: 0

    In my experience CNN typically writes stories with fancy headlines to generate clicks.
    This story fails the BS sniff test.

    1. Re:lolCNN by gewalker · · Score: 1

      Clicky ads generation is a given, but the program is real.

  20. Alternately... by Type44Q · · Score: 2
    From TFA:

    To get to the mantle scientists will be relying on a purpose-built Japanese deep-sea drilling vessel called Chikyu

    Chikyu, meet Cthulhu. :p

    1. Re:Alternately... by jackbird · · Score: 1

      There's some terrible labored "Chiks dig U" joke to be made there as well, but why bother?

    2. Re:Alternately... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      here's some terrible labored "Chiks dig U" joke to be made there as well

      Um, because there's no absolutely no fucking connection whatsoever to the topic at hand, i.e. drilling in the ocean deeps?!

      Ding! Do I win a prize? :)

    3. Re:Alternately... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      here's some terrible labored "Chiks dig U" joke to be made there as well

      Um, because there's no absolutely no fucking connection whatsoever to the topic at hand, i.e. drilling in the ocean deeps?!

      Ding! Do I win a prize? :)

      This is the internet. The problem is not the lack of connection to the topic at hand, it's the fact that it is not an accepted running joke, sorry meme, yet.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    4. Re:Alternately... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI:

      chi : earth
      kyu : globe
      Chikyu : the Earth

  21. ONE BILLIION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A number so great that it has an extra I

  22. Michael Bay by Vermonter · · Score: 0

    Would we get more enjoyment if we gave the money to Michael Bay to remake "The Core"?

  23. By all that is holey by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

    Please tell me my taxes aren't involved...

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  24. Oh fuck. by game+kid · · Score: 1

    I tell you, if any untold horrors come out of there, I shall just point at the hole in the adamantine, say "ain't my fault", and whistle as I walk away and get quickly minced into an unrecognizable mess.

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  25. Obligatory movie quotes by zill · · Score: 4, Informative

    The humans delved too greedily and too deep. You know what they awoke in the darkness of Khazad-dum... shadow and flame.

  26. Hope they dont forget the black guy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anytime you do something like this you always take your token black guy with you so when something goes wrong he can be the one to die trying to fix it so the other people that actually matter to the mission can live.

  27. $1 Billiion Dollar? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

    Man, Dr. Evil needs to get himself a copyeditor.

  28. Diamond juice by Lev13than · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Down there," said Golg, "I could show you real gold, real silver, real diamonds."

    "Bosh!" said Jill rudely. "As if we didn't know that we're below the deepest mines even here."

    "Yes," said Golg. "I have heard of those little scratches in the crust that you Topdwellers call mines. But
    that's where you get dead gold, dead silver, dead gems. Down in Bism we have them alive and growing.
    There I'll pick you bunches of rubies that you can eat and squeeze you a cup full of diamond-juice. You
    won't care much about fingering the cold, dead treasures of your shallow mines after you have tasted the
    live ones of Bism."

    "My father went to the world's end," said Rilian thoughtfully. "It would be a marvellous thing if his son
    went to the bottom of the world."

    --
    When you have nothing left to burn you must set yourself on fire
    1. Re:Diamond juice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Narnia, nice.

    2. Re:Diamond juice by aicrules · · Score: 1

      that part just creeped me out. not sure why but the idea of eating gems like grapes bothered me...

  29. Did this already by stewsters · · Score: 2

    I did this once in dwarf fortress... Protip, it creates a lot of FUN.

    1. Re:Did this already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess there was a lot of red coloured ASCII.

      Fuck that game, seriously.

    2. Re:Did this already by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      No, you go deep enough in DF and you get to battle to denizens of hell.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    3. Re:Did this already by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      Why do dwarves always dig too deep? Won't they ever learn?

  30. I guess you;ve been watching... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Crack in the world"

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0059065/

    1. Re:I guess you;ve been watching... by MichaelJ · · Score: 1

      I was shocked I had to scroll down this far before seeing a reference to Crack in the World. Too many young'uns on Slashdot. The Core is a terrific movie when compared with Crack in the World. You want bad science? How about blasting a new moon out of the earth, eh?

      --

      Michael J.
      Root, God, what is difference?
    2. Re:I guess you;ve been watching... by scifiai · · Score: 1

      I'm old enough to remember Crack in the World. Crazy old school sci-fi.

      --
      www.scifiai.com
    3. Re:I guess you;ve been watching... by CptNerd · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the people "escaping" but within a few miles of the chunk of Earth "blasting away" and surviving with only mussed hair and dirty clothes...

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    4. Re:I guess you;ve been watching... by wallsg · · Score: 1

      I was shocked, too. It was the first think that I thought of.

      Thank God It's Only a Motion Picture!

  31. Now != 800K years from now by tepples · · Score: 1

    What exactly would be the problem with contacting Morlocks in the year 002012? The only reason they had settled for farming and eating Eloi by 802701 was because the Morlocks had already hunted most other wildlife to extinction.

  32. No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    good will come from this....

  33. You're all wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no escape from the fortress of the Moles!

  34. But will they go by Flipstylee · · Score: 1

    20,000 leagues under the sea?

  35. Deprived scientists... by Type44Q · · Score: 1
    Apparently these guys never had the chance when they were kids to see what happens when you let the air out of a balloon...

    Seriously, though: what's the possibility that they could turn a deep ocean trench into Earth's very own Mount Olympus? :p

    1. Re:Deprived scientists... by Drinking+Bleach · · Score: 1

      zero

  36. They're going deeper than that by maroberts · · Score: 1

    On a Journey to the Centre of the Earth pick a door, any door.

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  37. Are they looking for Halloran the Mad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm, the easiest way into Undermountain is in the well of the Yawning Portal, but if you don't have the gold piece to spare you can go through the basement.

  38. Re:You mean Halaster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean Halaster?

    And there is always Skullport.

  39. Have they thought this out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next thing someone will want to stick a bomb in it to break through that final diamond barrier...
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crack_in_the_World (Great almost the end of the world movie)

  40. With all that money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should use part of the 1 billiion to buy a spell checker. Either that, or with all that money they bought an extra vowel!

  41. *pinky* by jspenguin1 · · Score: 2

    I believe it's spelled: one BIIIIIIIILLION dollars...

  42. Billiion, really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really Slashdot, now we don't even spell check titles anymore? Billiion, with three "i"'s? Really?

    Fuck it, I'm out. There are plenty of other websites out there that report things faster than Slashdot, spell check (and sometimes even grammar check) their post titles, and are a lot more balanced than Slashdot (try telling people you want to start a company with closed source code - even it will be cross platform and use Qt). Best of luck, but I'm unsubscribing.

    1. Re:Billiion, really? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Best of luck, but I'm unsubscribing.

      So you pay for a subscription but don't have a UID and post as AC? Really?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  43. Ruh roh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Couldn't this possibly cause a volcano type blow out?

  44. we have only scratched the surface by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    Yeah, and it's showing a hell of a rash for it.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  45. Re: Tipsy Geologists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what is that rumbling noise and why is everyone going uh oh?

  46. Doctor Who by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I realize Inferno was aired decades ago, but have we forgotten?

  47. They won't get very far by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 2

    Don't they remember the Inhumanoids; the evil that lies within?

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  48. Pressure=rock creep : hole filled while drilling by advid.net · · Score: 2

    The pressure below is so high that the creep of rock may fill back the hole as it is drilled.

    Do they plan to reinforce the hole wall ?
    With which material ? Even if they find one, this will make the project a lot more complicated...

  49. Was Lake Peigneur just a small proof of concept? by Kaptain+Kruton · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I know it isn't going to happen like this, but I cannot help but think of the flooded salt mine on Lake Peigneur. Some drillers miscalculated their location and drilled down, through a lake bed, into a nearby salt mine shaft. The lake was drained and temporarily reversed the flow of nearby rivers. Look it up on youtube... its kind of interesting to hear how a relatively small 14 inch drill bit can cause a disaster large enough to sink multiple barges and reverse rivers.

  50. Project MOHOLE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was attempted before but ran out of funding before it got far:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Mohole

  51. Ever heard of Volcanos by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

    We get free samples all the time, it is called volcanic eruptions.

    All drilling to the mantle will do is create a new volcano.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  52. Why can't we wait for the mantle to come to us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I.e. a volcanic irruption....

  53. better probe plan: go all the way down by rubycodez · · Score: 2

    Geophysicist David Stevenson of Cal Tech proposes we make a probe that rides a molten mass of iron, 10,000 cubic meters of it poured into a fissue 0.1 meter wide x 300 long x 300 meter deep, all the way to the center of the earth.

    http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CB8QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcampanian.iodp.org%2FMantleFrontier%2F12_Ojovan%2520-%2520Self_Sinking_Capsules_-_Ojovan.pdf&ei=egNrUMiMKuOeywH48YFw&usg=AFQjCNF3htj3aVkXi4Ln7xttNgFiL4TW5A&sig2=-xgVnfbwNGwtVNN6w7s_ZQ

    1. Re:better probe plan: go all the way down by vlm · · Score: 1

      I like the idea but right off the top of my head 100 MCi C-60 is something like the entire national stockpile. Not impossible, but it would be quite the achievement.

      I am almost motivated enough to calculate the Cerenkov radiation light flux of that ball before its dropped... is it of the order of magnitude that it would be invisible, or would it make the air around it glow like a searchlight, etc.

      To say they have a pretty serious refrigeration problem before "launch" would be an understatement.

      Also just as a warning, tungsten doesn't melt until 4000 degrees ... in an inert atmosphere. In air you can ignite it and make tungsten oxide at a MUCH lower temperature than melting. They may wanna run the plan past a couple metallurgists, etc. I had / have a small roll of it and it really is useless as a nichrome replacement.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:better probe plan: go all the way down by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      it's about the "installed base" in U.S. gamma irradiation facilities (for sterilizing single use medical equipment). c-60 production could be stepped up for this experiment, by putting cobalt rods in CANDU reactors, for instance. very worthwhile for a trip to inner space.

    3. Re:better probe plan: go all the way down by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Could you please post the real link next time rather than Google's clickjacking?

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
  54. MMmmmmmm by Dripdry · · Score: 1

    We can finally reach the gooey jelly filling!
    Any bets on what flavor it'll be?

    --
    -
    1. Re:MMmmmmmm by sexconker · · Score: 2

      We can finally reach the gooey jelly filling!
      Any bets on what flavor it'll be?

      I ated the orange jelly. It tastes like burning.

    2. Re:MMmmmmmm by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      Two-thousand point advantage to Sexconker for the obscure Ralph Wiggum quote! :)

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
  55. Re:We tried this before by Lucky75 · · Score: 1

    That was a base on the moon, not getting to the earth's core. But I love those movies.

    --
    DNA -- National Dyslexic Association
  56. Delroy Lindo by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0005148/

    That was Delroy Lindo apparently. Can't really give you a hard time, I briefly thought it was Morgan Freeman which is clearly ridiclous. Morgan Freeman has been on my mind since that YouTube video I saw awhile ago, so maybe that's it.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eV8l_Qb8Fc

  57. great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are they going to do when mantle juice starts gushing out of the hole & they can't stop it? We're all done for!

  58. Weren't the perils of dedrilling into the Earth... by rnturn · · Score: 1

    ... well documented in"Crack in the World"?

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  59. The difference between science and religion by Nutria · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Scientists come up with evidence-based ideas and then try to test them.

    Religion makes absolute proclamations and damns people who disagree.

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  60. Re:Was Lake Peigneur just a small proof of concept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    its kind of interesting to hear how a relatively small 14 inch drill bit can cause a disaster large enough to sink multiple barges and reverse rivers.

    It can't.

    What can, is an extensive salt mine placed under a lake.

  61. End of the world... lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has bad idea written all over it. Supervolcano anyone? Just not smart

  62. Total Recall [2012] by phonewebcam · · Score: 1

    Never would I have thought science could be kicked out of the park regarding journeys beneath our feet further than The Core until ... I saw the "elevator" in TR 2012.

  63. Billiion by randizzle3000 · · Score: 1

    So expensive, they had to create a new number!

    Also funny because this story was double-posted to correct redundant dollars ($1 Billiion dollar... to $1 Billiion) yet they still forgot to correct the redundant "i".

  64. Crack in the Earth by mknewman · · Score: 0

    They did this a long time before The Core. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0059065/ with really disastrous results.

    1. Re:Crack in the Earth by scifiai · · Score: 1

      All hail Dana Andrews!

      --
      www.scifiai.com
  65. Wait wha? by kiriath · · Score: 1

    So... we had a devil of a time spending tons of money to patch a teensie oil leak under water... and now we want to potentially make more things leak worse intentionally?

    Have we lost our minds completely... ?

    I mean, I've lost mine but I didn't realize that everyone else had as well.

  66. Re:Pressure=rock creep : hole filled while drillin by vlm · · Score: 2

    The real problem is the mud. So to more or less balance pressure at the bottom of the hole, you need the drilling mud to be so heavy that I really donno how to make it. Hmm a lubricating coolant with the density of aluminum that can be pumped around at sea level on the surface like water... Oh and it has to be stable around 600 degrees F (which is why they gave up on Kola). So anything other than asphalt (including teflon) will be vapor.... its just a mess.

    Another fun limitation is if the bottom pressure is 10000 psi (made up) the pressure half way up is 5000 psi now can your cemented in holes survive that?

    You know those engineering puzzles like from statics/dynamics class "how tall of a cylindrical flagpole can you make out of concrete / steel / CF until it buckles" well my cousins in the Louisiana petrochem industry have puzzlers like "imagine an infinite budget and you wanna dig 10 miles straight down, now write an essay explaining all the technical limitations".

    Someday the tech might change to something like a vertical tunnel boring machine. Maybe thats what they're going to try. That would certainly be very interesting.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  67. Re:We tried this before by MarkRose · · Score: 1
    --
    Be relentless!
  68. And once this is done here's what comes next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this is done it will set a new precident to follow or topple. As we live in a opportunistic capitalism run world it wont take ong for major coporations to follow suit and start drilling deeper for oil, rare minerals etc. If anything is found of value or anything that can have a value put on it you can bet mega corporations will be racing to drill. In the meantime no one will be paying enough attention or care as to the reprecussions of this action. In the meantime the deep drlling releases more heat from the earth's core and into the atmosphere thereby accelerating glacial melting and making the planet eventually inhabitable. Granted it wont happen overnight but it will happen. The first two justifications for the deeper drilling will be oil and thermal energy then others will follow suit. This will accelerate global warming and the greenhouse effect.

    Meanwhile food shortages, global instablization, and the proliferation of plagues, diseases and disorders will follow as we will create more sub tropical and desert environments where lethal animals, insects and the like can flourish such as snakes, aligators, mosquitos and more. We will eventually burn ourselves to extinction as the heat will begin to affect our reproduction as well. You can think I am being dramatic I just see the writing on the wall mankind has a penchant for acting without thinking and this is a prime example. Just like Fracking running lose with no regulations courtesy of lobbysts from Halliburton.

  69. didn't they already get virgin magma samples? by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I think it was from the crater of Mt. Nyiragongo, DRC, they even made a documentary about it on Nat. Geo. Region-limited Youtube link. I've seen this show, it's awesome, makes me wish I had a projector and a rocket heater to get the full experience without actually leaving my comfy chair.

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  70. Re:Was Lake Peigneur just a small proof of concept by Riddler+Sensei · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of what seems to routinely happen to me in Minecraft...

  71. Re:Was Lake Peigneur just a small proof of concept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thanks for the reading, very informative!

  72. What about the underworld denizens ? by kjshark · · Score: 1

    As soon as they have access to the surface. they're going to want green cards. Instead of the "wet foot dry foot" policy Americans have for the the cuban refugees, it could be "deep foot surface foot". Becha the Mormons are going to want to send missionaries toot sweet !

    --
    The difference between truth and fiction is that fiction has to be plausible.
  73. Atomic Drilling? by Penurious+Penguin · · Score: 1

    Wonder if they'll be using anything similar to this: http://www.google.com/patents?id=PdAuAAAAEBAJ&printsec=abstract&zoom=4#v=onepage&q&f=false

    Apparently, it's a subterranean atomic drill. Quite interesting, and quite old. If it -- or similar technology -- ever was employed, I suspect it has evolved since.

    --
    Forward! -- Emperor Norton, 2012
  74. One Word: by Sinjinx · · Score: 1

    Balrog

  75. to what end? For what purpose?

  76. Isaac Asimov by chthon · · Score: 2

    Recipe for a Planet

    See also 'Project Mohole'

  77. Re:Was Lake Peigneur just a small proof of concept by kermidge · · Score: 1

    Ditto, thanks Kaptain.

    I'm surprised to see (unless I missed it) no reference to earlier attempts, Project Moho for example.

  78. How do we know if we've never done it? by OriginalSpaceMan · · Score: 1

    If we've never drilled 3.7 miles below the ocean floor to the mantle, then how do we know that it exists at all? Am I the dumb one here or is it everyone else?

    --

    You talk better than you fool!
    1. Re:How do we know if we've never done it? by djh2400 · · Score: 1

      Earthquakes.

      Earthquakes create different types of waves, and different types of waves behave differently through different types of objects. Pressure waves travel through solids and liquids, though at different speeds, depending on density. Shear waves do not travel through liquid, but they do travel through solid. Using complex geometry, mathematical models, knowledge of substances, and recording many points recording waves produced by earthquakes, we can map what the earth looks like below ground.

  79. Ostensibly Ecumenical by neurosine · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I'm sure they're going to find investors who really want to 'Inspire and advance human knowledge.' That's what companies these days are all about.

  80. The earth is really big by cvtan · · Score: 1

    This is a little like trying to figure out what the inside of an elephant is like by taking core samples the size of a hypodermic needle.
    What will they find deep within the earth? There are only two choices: dinosaurs or zombies!

    --
    Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
  81. scares me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This does not sound like a good idea to me. The mantle is hot, under a lot of pressure, and wants to escape upwards. Hence we get mountains and volcanoes. The land mass and water above the mantle provide an opposing force that keeps the mantle contained. We seem to have a nice balance here. I just can't see poking a hole in here and risk modifying this balance. Perhaps it is perfectly safe, but have these scientist really thought everything through and could they be wrong.

  82. Congratulations! by dpilot · · Score: 1

    I believe that this is the lowest S/N ratio that I have ever seen on a Slashdot story, particularly a science story.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  83. waste of money in old days by peter303 · · Score: 1

    It was 99% certain that mantle rocks had been brought to surface in ophiolites (obducted seafloor) and kimberlites (explosive vents). you should study these first at a vastly cheaper cost.
    50 years later we have much more cost-effective drilling and want to close that 1% uncertainty gap.

    Mars rocks are like this too. There about 50 meteor samples that 99% certain to come from Mars because the mineralogy and gas inclusions exactly match what Mars probes measured. But at some point we will want to and be able to retrieve actual samples to close the final uncertainty gap. The cheapest retrieval mission is estimated at about $5B, comprised of three partial missions. And far too expensive for NASA in the current budget climate.

  84. Tossing money down a hole by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

    now has a whole new meaning..

  85. And I thought ... by WillRobinson · · Score: 1

    A boat was a hole in water you pore your money into. This will be way more efficient....

    Do I start flaying my arms now? Danger Danger ..

    Just brilliant ....

  86. Color me stupid, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...how do we know how thick the crust is, if we've never been through it? How do we know anything as such even exists? I love seeing the cut-section model of our planet, showing the crust, mantel and core. But how did anyone ever come to know that the Earth is comprised of such?

  87. Mohole and Kola by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    This has been done before, donkeys years ago: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kola_Superdeep_Borehole

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    1. Re:Mohole and Kola by cababunga · · Score: 1

      It was also twice deeper.

  88. Noooo!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are they thinking?!? The Earth will deflate and fly away like a balloon if they do this! We might end up in the Gamma Quadrant when this is all said and done.

  89. Re:Pressure=rock creep : hole filled while drillin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who says they have to keep the shaft open? If they don't mind doing twice the work, they could turn around and drill back out. Of course, that presents other issues like what to do if a drill breaks.

  90. Holy shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy shit, if you punch a hole in that thing I will not be responsible!

  91. Riiiighht by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

    Right becasue we know we can build safety protocols to drill a hole, under miles of ocean, into what is assuredly a very highly pressurized molten ocean of mostly iron.

    Why don't they just call it what it is, or rather will be? A man-made plinian or phreatomagmatic (if it develops even the tiniest leak of water into the rig) volcanic vent.

    I for one welcome our first man-made volcano, although I am perplexed why none of Earth's submarine volcanoes can be utilized to examine the core.

    But, I look forward to this 3.7 mile deep drilled hole. What could possibly go wrong drilling miles under the ocean looking for liquids trapped in/under the Earth's crust?
    Maybe Hyundai Heavy Industries knows of a rig we can use?

  92. Firewalker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's all fun and games until we kick off the next plague.

  93. Beware the giant chickens by dsgrntlxmply · · Score: 1

    I recall watching some incredibly awful movie on TV in the 1960s, where there were unexpected results from deep drilling project: giant chickens emerged from the bowels of the Earth and terrorized the population.

  94. There's a hole in the bottom of the sea. by bdabautcb · · Score: 1

    I just hope they plan to bring a log with a bump with a frog on it in order to plug up the hole they make, otherwise when they leave... Whoosh!

    --
    Koalas. They're telepathic. Plus, they control the weather. -Margaret
  95. Mohole anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has been done before en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Mohole

  96. According to Roland Emmerich... by Maltheus · · Score: 1

    ...the Earth's mantle will be coming to us in two months.

  97. Kola Superdeep Borehole was 7+ miles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russians have already been twice as far as this
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kola_Superdeep_Borehole

  98. Free Xenu! *one per customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The project to liberate the great space lord will soon begin! Xenu will be free and reestablish his galactic empire! Embrace your inner thetans!

  99. Re:Pressure=rock creep : hole filled while drillin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who cares?
    They'll just have to plan on drilling on their way out, same as they did on their way in.

    A more interesting situation might be that they must always keep moving/drilling, lest they be crushed by staying in one spot too long. The drill is only in one direction, how does the ship keep from getting crushed laterally?

  100. This has been tried before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kola_Superdeep_Borehole

  101. Son Of Project Mohole 1958-1966 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the Archives of Failed Science reality rears its gnarled and very ugly head: Project Mohole.

    I'll just post a full breath from the web:

    http://www.nas.edu/history/mohole/

    Project Mohole was an attempt to retrieve a sample of material from the earth's mantle by drilling a hole through the earth's crust to the Mohorovicic Discontinuity, or Moho. The project was suggested in March 1957 by Walter Munk, NAS member (1956) and member of the National Science Foundation (NSF) Earth Science Panel.
    Project Mohole represented, as one historian has described it, the earth sciences' answer to the space program. If successful, this highly ambitious exploration of the intraterrestrial frontier would provide invaluable information on the earth's age, makeup, and internal processes. In addition, evidence drawn from the Moho could be brought to bear on the question of continental drift, which at the time was still controversial.

    The Mohorovicic Discontinuity marks the boundary between the earth's crust and mantle. (The Moho was named for Andrija Mohorovicic, a Croatian geologist who first proposed the existence of such a discontinuity. ) The plan was to drill to the Moho through the seafloor, at those points where the earth's crust is thinnest. Attempting such an effort on land would have been impractical, since the drilling equipment would not have withstood the depths and temperatures involved. Ocean drilling offered a further advantage in that undersea samples, undistorted by atmospheric and surface actions, would provide better evidence of long term geological activity than would samples drawn from land.

    The American Miscellaneous Society (AMSOC), an informal group of scientists of which Munk was a member, endorsed Munk's idea. The group was formed in 1952 when Office of Naval Research geophysicists Gordon Lill and Carl Alexis found themselves handling research proposals that fit into no existing scientific categories. Out of that "precarious miscellany" AMSOC emerged, as a forum for scientific speculation. When funds for Project Mohole had been obtained from NSF, AMSOC in 1958 took charge of the effort as an official study unit of the National Research Council's Division of Earth Sciences.

    Project Mohole was to include three phases, the first consisting of an experimental drilling program, the second consisting of an intermediate vessel program, and the third consisting of the final drilling to the Mohorovicic Discontinuity. After ocean-going trials off La Jolla, California, Phase I began in earnest with a set of drillings off Guadalupe, Mexico, in March and April 1961. Five holes, one of which extended 601feet beneath the seafloor, were drilled under 11,700 feet of water. Cores obtained from the holes showed that the first layer of crust extended 557 feet and consisted of sediment Miocene in age. The second layer of crust was sampled for the first time, and this was found to consist of basalt. After the unprecedented success of Phase I, it was decided to shift operational control to NSF while maintaining the AMSOC Committee as project adviser. This relationship proved to be unsatisfactory, and after a series of negotiations and redefined agreements with NSF, the AMSOC Committee in 1964 dissolved itself. Following the AMSOC Committee's dissolution, two new National Academies committees continued to advise the NSF Mohole activity until Congress, objecting to increasing costs, discontinued the project toward the end of 1966, before Phase II could be implemented.

    Although Project Mohole failed in its intended purpose, it did show that deep ocean drilling was a viable means of obtaining geological samples. Since Mohole's demise a number of related programs have been undertaken, the most recent one being the NSF's Ocean Drilling Program.

  102. Why dont you do something usefull with that money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take the other side of the big oil bets and knock the price back down to a reasonable 20 dollars per barrel.

    That will do more for humanity than a hole in the ground.

  103. This is slashdot, here's your car analogy by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    I can take the balance weights off your car wheel with a paperclip and the loss of balance just might make the wheel wobble enough to fall off.

    It's easier to stop something moving when other forces exist to assist you, then it is to get it started all on it's own.

    do you know soldiers don't march synchronized when crossing a bridge?
    a small platoon on foot can take down a bridge....

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  104. Already read about what happens... by haapi · · Score: 1

    Paging Roger Zelazny...

    --
    Well, apparently, you only have to fool the majority of people for a little while.
  105. so, is this called by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    deep fracking?

  106. Japanese way ahead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard the Japanese made a good attempt at this at Fukushima.