Slashdot Mirror


Lenovo Building Manufacturing Plant in North Carolina

An anonymous reader writes "One of the major themes of the ongoing presidential election in the United States has been the perceived need to bring product manufacturing back to the United States. A recent announcement from Lenovo is going to play to this point; the PC manufacturer said today that it's building a U.S. location in Whitsett, North Carolina. The new facility is small, with just over 100 people and is being built for a modest $2M, but Lenovo states that it's merely the beginning of a larger initiative." It makes sense: their U.S. HQ is a stone's throw away in RTP.

32 of 120 comments (clear)

  1. Not a new building... by alphax45 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just a new line inside an existing facility. Still good news :)

    --
    K Man
    1. Re:Not a new building... by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Funny

      Another Chinese mega-corp, exploiting cheap labour conditions in a distressed 3rd world economy.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    2. Re:Not a new building... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      Well, it is ironic...will the rich Chinese follow with massive outsourcing to the third-world US in all areas of industry? :-)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:Not a new building... by clarkkent09 · · Score: 2

      Given that the average monthly salary at Foxconn is $350 and the working conditions are miserable and that this is still considered a great job in China where there are waiting lists just to apply, there is still some way to go until US workers are competitive to their Chinese counterparts.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    4. Re:Not a new building... by jopsen · · Score: 2

      this is still considered a great job in China where there are waiting lists just to apply, there is still some way to go until US workers are competitive to their Chinese counterparts.

      [Citation Needed]
      And you should probably find a source from 2012.

    5. Re:Not a new building... by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Given that the average monthly salary at Foxconn is $350

      That is a meaningless number. When I was in Thailand in the USAF, it was a 3rd world country (since industrialized). The bungalow I rented cost $30 per month, woman included. I could feed four for a dollar in a nice restaraunt. I could take a bus anywhere in the coutry for five cents, a taxi for a buck. A tailored shirt was five bucks. When I was in Delaware I lived like a pauper, eating in the mess hall and living in a barracks and was always broke, same salary in Thailand and I lived like a king.

      I'm twice as rich as someone in Chicago earning the exact same amount as me, because prices there are twice what they are here, especially for essentials like food and rent and utilities.

      Without pricing info, the monthly salary is a meaningless figure. They most likely indeed do live terrible, poverty stricken lives, but otoh $350 may be a lot of money there and they could possibly be living better than me.

    6. Re:Not a new building... by Moses48 · · Score: 2

      With 128 million Chenese living on less than $365/year I think he's right. There is no data from 2012, 2011 is last complete year. (source: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ch.html)

    7. Re:Not a new building... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      What is the labor content of that laptop in dollars? It's pretty small. There was a report a while ago that paying the Foxconn workers standard US wages would add $17 per unit or so. This isn't some hand made product here, the cost is in many things, the labor is a fairly small fraction. Add in the costs of expedited shipping, and 'poof' away goes that differential. Add in growing wages in the coastal regions of China, some labor distress and 'poof' away goes more of it.

      There are metal fabrication houses in Silicon Valley who ship custom subcomponents to Chinese manufacturers because they compete, effectively, on price and quality. The world is becoming a much more complicated place than you would believe.

  2. Very good by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    Just don't put it near any military bases...

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:Very good by Panaflex · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oddly enough, the most likely reason they're putting in a plant in the USA is...... (wait for it).... to sell into DOD. You get an instant +5 karma by manufacturing in the USA for contract win purposes.

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
  3. Real Time Protocol by tqk · · Score: 4

    WTF does RTP mean, in context with this story?

    --
    "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    1. Re:Real Time Protocol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      It stands for Research Triangle Park

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Research_Triangle_Park [wikipedia.org]

    2. Re:Real Time Protocol by Qzukk · · Score: 2
      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    3. Re:Real Time Protocol by RobertLTux · · Score: 2

      as had been said Research Triangle Park (its an area with a bunch of different tech companies i think RedHat is one of them) if you live in NC you would know BUT SOMEBODY SHOULD HAVE EXPANDED THAT BIT for non-locals.

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  4. Re:Good news, to be sure, but on the other hand... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ..has our dollar really declined that much?

    It is not so much the decline of the dollar, as the automation of manufacturing. As factories become more automated, the "labor" component of the cost goes down, and at some point is exceed by the transportation and inventory costs of off-shoring. At that point it becomes cost effective to "re-shore" the factory.

    I have been inside factories in both China and the USA. Chinese factories bustle with people. American factories tend to be almost devoid of all lifeforms. Manufacturing is coming back to America, but manufacturing jobs are not.

  5. How Funny by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Interesting

    American companies can not build here, but Chinese can. Just amazing how bad American leadership has become.

    At this point, if the west really wants to acknowledge China's gov cold war and take it on, then we should start sending as many MBA's to China as humanly possible. Of course, the Chinese will probably realize it and simply put a bullet in each one of them and then charge the USA for it, while subsidizing and dumping the rest of the ammo on America's market.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:How Funny by Nidi62 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Of course, the Chinese will probably realize it and simply put a bullet in each one of them and then charge the USA for it, while subsidizing and dumping the rest of the ammo on America's market.

      Hey, fewer MBAs and cheaper ammo. Sounds like a win win to me.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:How Funny by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh, there is little doubt of that. However, it is STILL more than what large American companies have done. Hell, you have ppl like Carly Fiorina, Meg Whitman, Immelt, Rometty, Palmisano, Dell, Gates, Jobs, etc arguing that the best way to help American companies is that they be allowed to bring back tax free the money that W/neo-cons tax breaks gave them. Of course, we did this once already, and NONE of it was used to create new jobs here in the USA. So it is twisted that it is even being suggested.

      Yeah, I have little faith in Chinese companies, since 99% of them are controlled by the Chinese gov, OR are loyal to their nation (and I do not blame them for that). BUT, America's large business leaders are the worse scum on this planet.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  6. Re:The South Will Rise Again...? by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

    Im pretty sure the Research Triangle has more to do with the fact that it is formed by the triangle of Duke, UNC-Chapel Hill, and NC St, which are strong tech/science/research schools. Plus there's the fact that the Triangle has been around since the 50s. This is what makes it attractive to businesses, especially reasearch and tech companies.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  7. Re:Maybe the quality will improve? by walshy007 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm typing this from a thinkpad x201, and have failed to see any issues. Design wise very little has changed on it since the owership changed.

    Some people could consider it stagnation, but I consider it "don't fix what isn't broken"

    It still has all the features nobody else is willing to do in a single package, like a quality nub, reading light, waterproof keyboard, etc.

    The connectivity options are impressive, not only the usual wifi/ethernet/cellular but it even still comes with an in-built 56k modem.. on an i5 :)

  8. I don't expect so. by Let's+All+Be+Chinese · · Score: 2

    This is a small plant, so really only suited for assembling from parts, not creating new parts. Think batches of desktops assembled to spec, in the tens or hundreds, not thousands. If laptops, probably limited to swapping out keyboards for a different layout, change the hard drive, add more memory, or perhaps other warranty replacements.

    Beyond that, the strong points of thinkpads were quality build and eclectic design focused on getting things done, like non-glare high-resolution high-quality 4:3 screens. That's not something fixed by swapping out a few parts in a laptop.

    Alright, a different keyboard is easily swapped in, provided you have better quality ones in sensible layouts--like the lack of windows keys that was a feature for the longest time, leaving ctrl and alt nicely accessible without looking. But if you have better keyboards available, or other higher quality parts, why not stick'em in right away?

    So, in a word, no, this isn't likely to magically improve the thinkpad range. For that to happen, lenovo has to realise that just the brand name isn't enough; you have to differentiate yourself. Instead, they've moved to become more like the rest, not less. Thus lessening the brand name in the process.

    But they also have a line of desktops. I expect this plant is about order configuration management close to delivery, probably mostly for small bulk orders, likely desktops and perhaps some laptops too.

  9. Re:Good news, to be sure, but on the other hand... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

    Transportation is probably a factor, as well. For things like warranty work or build-to-order configs, the customer doesn't want to wait for the boat from China or pay for the plane from China.

    Companies that sell nothing but prebuilds don't care as much; but if you do customization it isn't uncommon to have a 'slapping FRUs into boxes' plant somewhere in the US or northern Mexico that is supplied with more labor intensive parts from elsewhere.

  10. Re:Lenovo is owned by the Chinese government by lexlthr · · Score: 2

    The worst crowd who could possibly own a company. I'd say this is just a token gesture to lull us into a false sense of security that outsourcing to China has any long term benefits

    From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenovo Responding to claims that Lenovo is a state owned enterprise CEO Yang Yuanqing said: "Our company is a 100% market oriented company. Some people have said we are a state owned enterprise. It's 100% not true. In 1984 the Chinese Academy of Sciences only invested $25,000 in our company. The purpose of the Chinese Academy of Sciences to invest in this company was that they wanted to commercialize their research results. The Chinese Academy of Sciences is a pure research entity in China, owned by the government. From this point, you could say we're different from state-owned enterprises. Secondly, after this investment, this company is run totally by the founders and management team. The government has never been involved in our daily operation, in important decisions, strategic direction, nomination of the CEO and top executives and financial management. Everything is done by our management team

  11. Re:The South Will Scooter Again! by DriveDog · · Score: 2

    Well, Rock Creek (nearby town is Whitsett), where Lenovo is locating, has another tenant of note: Red Oak Brewery. Probably within scootering distance, too. A small family-owned Italian restaurant near there sells pizza by the slice. Only the slices come from pizzas over 3' in diameter.

  12. Government contracts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    My wife replaced her government issued laptop recently. She was free to get whatever laptop she wanted, as long as it was not made in China. So she ended up with a Dell assembled in Ireland with parts manufactured in China. I assume the NC facility will be mainly a federal government procurement facility to comply with the "not from China" policy.

  13. Nice to see - hope it's a trend! by ErichTheRed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even if it's just for PR points, some domestic manufacturing employment is a good thing. The reason why isn't nice, it's not politically correct, but it's the facts:

    Not everyone is intelligent enough for knowledge work.

    In my opinion, if we continue the way we're going, we're going to spiral into a society with three classes -- business owners, knowledge workers and a huge swath of working poor. If everyone has to complete at least a masters' degree to secure a place in one of the top two classes, that completely ignores the other 75% of the IQ distribution.

    Think about the way society was organized in the 50s through the 70s:
    - Only the highly intelligent and/or well off went to college. They typically inherited a business, got a technical, science, engineering or other kind of knowledge job, or became academics. Each one of these outcomes guaranteed a stable job for life because that's what business ownership, academia or large corporate employment did back then. This is still the preferred path, minus the guarantees of course.
    - For the high end of the medium-intelligence scale, there were plenty of paper-shuffling jobs in corporate environments. Remember that before computers, automation and email, large corporations had to employ thousands of file clerks, secretaries and layers of management that just routed paper reports around. Because US companies were doing so well, and things couldn't be outsourced and automated, a huge upper middle class thrived.
    - For the low end of the medium-intelligence scale, there were millions of factory jobs. They were all simple, stand on a line for 8 hours and perform a single task or set of tasks. Because of unionization and a lack of global competition, even those jobs were stable and paid reasonable living wages. This was the bulk of the middle class, and I grew up in a Rust Belt city in the early 80s so I got to watch it all unravel live.
    - The screwups, dropouts or just plain dumb people wound up doing menial labor. But even at that end of the scale, there was less downward pressure on those wages, so they were able to scrape by for the most part.

    The problem is, in 2012, you can locate a factory anywhere, employ thousands of people for a fraction of the price that 100 would cost you, and pump out products just as quickly as before. All the secretaries and paper routers lost their jobs in the late 80s/early 90s automation and downsizing waves. So now, where do all those people who used to have solid incomes go? They either end up permanently unemployed, or go work menial jobs for just above minimum wage, no security and no benefits. So you have a huge class of working poor, working at Wal-Mart, as a home health care aide, or something else.

    It's a really tough problem that might have a very bad ending in the next 40 years or so -- we need to find something for everyone to do and someone to employ them. Conservatives love to tout entrepreneurship as our savior, but do they really think a factory guy whose job was bolting the same two parts together for the last 20 years is going to be a successful business owner? Thinking like that will mean you have a class of bankrupt working poor instead of just working poor as all their little ventures fail.

    So yes, I hope manufacturing comes back. And I hope it can be something that someone can build an entire career on, not just a string of $10/hr temp jobs.

    1. Re:Nice to see - hope it's a trend! by HeckRuler · · Score: 2
      Yeah, this is one of those problems that people have seen coming. Just to tweak your comments though:
      While there may be a bell curve to intelligence, education CAN affect where that average lies. Now, there are natural geniuses out in desert that would have been math majors had they had any schooling, and given a chance they can pick up new things later on. And there are those who, despite a massive amount of effort from everyone involved, never quite grasp calculus. But on a society level, education makes more knowledge workers.

      And intelligence means almost jack shit when it comes to owning. You seem to be making a few assumptions connecting owning a business, MBAs, and intelligence. Is "social intelligence" or your ability to shmooze really on the same scale?

      in 2012, you can locate a factory anywhere

      All the secretaries and paper routers lost their jobs in the late 80s/early 90s automation

      And these are good things. This is progress. Imagine a world where we make robots do all the work. This could be a paradise. It's probably going to be a bumpy ride getting there. Exactly like there was some contention over where the extra money goes when the factory owners bought industrial tools in the industrial revolution, there will be a question over who gets what when we automate all the work away. But don't let that distract you. Progress is a good thing. It literally makes the products more affordable for everyone. It used to be that when you bought a car, some fraction of that cash had to go to pay for the boss's secretary. No more secretary means that car is that much more affordable. And, hopefully competiton or some other system means the customer reaps some of that efficiency.

      [Manufacturing returns] And I hope it can be something that someone can build an entire career on

      I just don't see that happening in the long run.
      And that still leaves us with the original problem doesn't it?

      Personally, I likewise see a division of work in the future. I think/hope it's going to break down like this:

      Smart people. STEM jobs. Geeks. Like you said, the intelligent crowd. Everyone needs to be at least a little smart to be functional in society, like the ability to read, but it'll be the focus of these people.

      Social people. Like, where they talk to each other and stuff. Polititians, managers, figureheads, correspondants, and yeah even walmart greeters. Anyone that interacts mainly with other peole. Everyone needs to be at least a little social to be functional in society, like the ability to converse with others, but it'll be the focus of these people.

      Artsy people. The creative types. Yeah, that's right, I want my utopia to have murals'n'shit instead of featureless concrete. Unless you're into that. Does everyone need to be a little arsty? I dunno. I think someone with a zero value would be a psychology case study though.

      Those are the big three ways people make their living. A lot of jobs will be a mix of more than one talent. Hopefully that'll span the majority of society. I don't think there's any upper limit to the amount of effort any of those three could absorb. Sure, the world only needs X amount of sprockets a year. But research? Art? PolitiuuuuhhI'll get back to you on that last one. But there are alternatives:

      Menial labor. Sure, eventually robots could take everything, but for a really REALLY long time there's going to be random pidly stuff that anyone could do. Picking up garbage. Washing dogs. Being that person who screems "theif" if you steal shit, but ostensibly is there to "ring you up". There will be some jobs for people who can't do anything else.

      The safety net. Hey man, we're approaching a post-scarcity society. Food and shelter can be had for dirt cheap if you're willing to live in that style. And as a

    2. Re:Nice to see - hope it's a trend! by Formalin · · Score: 2

      Artsy people. The creative types. Yeah, that's right, I want my utopia to have murals'n'shit instead of featureless concrete. Unless you're into that.

      Speak for yourself. Brutalism is an art. An awesome one.

      I for one look forward to a brutalist dystopia. At least then the buildings will match the general mental state of the populous.

  14. Re:Maybe the quality will improve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    From what I have heard there is a consensus that Thinkpads used to be much better back in the days. Before they got branded/involved with Lenovo.
      Maybe they are going to be better built now?

    If you ask me this is bullshit.

    My last "IBM" thinkpad (T41) died from the infamous ATI BGA packing defect after only two years of use.

    Before this CFL tube on my "IBM" thinkpad ??? blew after about the same time.

    Current "lenovo" T400 with LED backlight and switchable graphics has been with me for more than 4 years now including origional 4-cell (small) battery still providing >1.5hr. This machine is used every day with no problem of any kind.

    Case is solid, keyboard is great and internal magnesium frame in "lenovo" T400 is more substantial than "IBM" T41.

    While Lenovo also makes cheap crap you can still get real thinkpads if your willing to pay the slight premium or pick up an older model and save $$$.

    As always YMMV, antidotical evidence cuts both ways and is best ignored outright. The assertion there is a consensus that lenovo is worse than IBM is bullshit in my not so polite opinion.

  15. Fascinating by garyoa1 · · Score: 2

    I love it. IBM sells Lenovo to china. China decides to come back to the states and build here and people scream. Yet most of the screamers drive a toyota or nissan or volkswagen and have no qualms about supporting these foreign companies. Because... they have factories in the US? Or do they really believe they're US companies?

    --
    Wuddooeyeno? IITYWYBMAD? Like nuts? eclecticallyincorrect.com
  16. Re:They probably just want the tax incentive by TimHunter · · Score: 2

    The difference, of course, being that Lenovo isn't getting any tax incentives.

    Lenovo sought no incentives and received none

    http://www.newsobserver.com/2012/10/03/2387334/lenovo-to-manufacture-computers.html

  17. Re:Good news, to be sure, but on the other hand... by Formalin · · Score: 2

    It's mindboggling where that point is though.

    Whenever I see things like a $30 bench with heavy cast iron ends - made in china. How does it not cost that much just to ship the thing...

    Why are Chinese iron frying pans cheaper than ours? Not a whole lot of labour involved really, but an awful lot of weight for shipping.

    Then there's other things - I notice a lot of canned corn, for example, is made in Thailand. Canned fruit from South Africa, and more and more Chinese fruit and veg.

    How the fuck is it possible to be cheaper than corn grown and packed in Iowa..? Totally mindboggling.