Why Klout's Social Influence Scores Are Nonsense
jfruh writes "Klout is a new social media service that attempts to quantify how much 'influence' you have, based on your social media profile. Their metrics are bizarre — privacy blogger Dan Tynan has been rated as highly influential on the topic of cigars, despite having only smoked one, decades ago. Nevertheless, Klout scores have real-world consequences, with people deemed influential getting discounts on concert tickets or free access to airport VIP lounges (in hopes that they'll tweet about it, presumably)."
and will likely never will. From the last /. on this if people are hiring you based on your "klout" you should probably be looking elsewhere for a better managed place to work.
If you are looking for free shit all the time then I guess a higher "Klout" score might actually be worth something to you...
Beware the Lollipop of Mediocrity, Lick it once and you suck forever.
I bet my Klout score is near zero; my clout is not.
No twitter, facebook, etc. accounts, and use pseudonyms in most places. But I do have a LinkedIn account under my real name.
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
.. Is to judge one's ability to brown nose and game pointless metrics.
So yes, they're able to pick ideal middle management candidates.
XKCD says it all!
http://xkcd.com/1057/
and after it disappears as many dot-coms do, you won't have to hear about it again either.
If I had a person stick their Klout score on their resume I'd beat them with a wiffle bat.
Related: http://www.klouchebag.com/
This "news" is kind of backwards. It would be news if it turned out that it *does* make any sort of sense.
May Peace Prevail On Earth
No, I'd say their real strength is their ability to score how many spammers follow you on Twitter. If you frequently tweet keywords that attract spambot followers, you'll have a very high Klout score.
There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
But I don't really care what your Klout score is. THAC0 is what really matters.
How is Klout useful for me?
Social warfare is getting to be bad enough. We don't need to further relegate people into different classes. Do we really want some sort of Hindu caste system? Klout needs to be Klobbered.
Proverbs 21:19
Not impressed. Gonna go sign up now.
title says it all.
Any service that requires me to log in thru another source I will NOT use. It's bad enough i have a facebook account, but to actually use it, hell no. I hide from my relatives for a reason.
Be seeing you...
Maybe?
OK I'll check it out.
tappity tappity ENTER
KLOUT "Sign in" with Twitter (don't have) or Facebook (don't have) ....and I'm over it.
I'm also bothered by misspelling Kommon words for effekt.
I don't need some fancy new social media site to tell me that most of what I say on the Internet is delusional rants and unsupported claims.
Asians do well on IQ tests because of Asian Privilege. Didn't you get the memo?
Right. Klout is essentially a promotion for Twitter/Facebook as a single sign-in system.
C'mon, Klout is fun! Exactly because its metrics are so bizarre, it's really fun to check out yours and your friends' score, and compare it with some well known people. At my workplace we do it like every couple of days, and its like watching Monty Python. You can't keep a straight face when for example a guy sitting in the next cubicle suddenly turns out to be - according to Klout - more influential then the company CEO.
A post from Cpt. Obvious. I guess you will be hard pressed to find people on Slashdot who actually think the Klout score really says something about another person.
The purpose of the Klout score is, that some day people somehow will pay Klout for increasing their Klout score ;-).
Their metrics are bizarre — privacy blogger Dan Tynan has been rated as highly influential on the topic of cigars, despite having only smoked one, decades ago.
The metrics make perfect sense when you understand the reason: the purpose of Klout is to promote Klout.
Not sure if this is a joke or not - klout is one service where single-sign on actually makes sense!
the Chinese is all about the test and not much on undering staining what the test covers.
Their metrics are bizarre ...
... if they were using /. UID numbers and ./ Karma and the /. friend/foe network and all that, I bet the results would be far more informative.
I think /. should allow klout linking... I think it would really further my career to be known as highly influential WRT goatse, TRS-80s, and being grouchy.
"Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
I assume we're all familiar with @horse_ebooks, seeing as it's been reported on in innumerable places including the New York Times; if not, just know that it's a spam bot on Twitter which, to appear to be human, tweets randomly-selected phrases, occasionally to comedic effect.
Anyway, a while back, this spambot's score on Klout overtook that of Twitter founder Jack Dorsey's. In fact, it's overtaken a number of "social media gurus" who proceeded to rant and rave about this injustice.
Google it up, it's pretty hilarious.
Klout scores have real-world consequences, with people deemed influential getting discounts on concert tickets or free access to airport VIP lounges
Wow, that's some really horrible real-world consequences... Can we move along...
This article smells like Product Placement/Advertisement wrapped in the guise of a news story. Come on moderators...
And we all know, it's those damn pigments that are at fault here. Right? Is that your point?
http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/26/using-a-social-media-rating-to-help-people-not-judge-them/
http://parislemon.com/post/29563509395/under-the-influence-of-klout
http://uncrunched.com/2012/08/16/why-i-changed-my-mind-on-klout-and-invested/
Yes? Then ignore and move on.
It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
Warren Buffett and Bill Gates have lower Klout scores than Justin Bieber. Until this summer, so did President Obama. And as far as I could tell, Steve Jobs never had Klout at all. And this is a metric that I'm supposed to take seriously? I think not.
Imagine all the people...
Klout is like Digg (or was that Reddit) for Wordpress which is like Blogger (or was that tumblr) for newz.
Did anyone else read this and think it was just some sort of inside joke or coy insult to insinuate Tynan blows a lot of smoke up things?
I never signed up for klout, but one time I facebook-statused about an app and a friend that I thought was going to buy it did not. My amazon reviews are usually rated less helpful that
So, now I'm starting to wonder...do I have negative klout? Maybe people pay us for negative reviews and give us free samples of their competitors products?
Bang on. So, since this is /. you're naturally trashed for it.
You don't study for IQ tests. Either you have the intelligence to do well on them or you don't.
... because pigmentation is the only difference between the races?
Whoosh, baby, whoosh!
Are you for real?? This is a serious question? Even IF what you suggest is true, there's still no data on what the specific differences *are*. Your personal haphazard observations are statistically insignificant. We have a long way to go before we can even define what a human is to begin with, let alone what the variants truly are. Stop being stupid, you'll live happier.