Slashdot Mirror


HP Plans To Cut Product Lines; Company Turnaround In 2016

dcblogs writes "Hewlett-Packard CEO Meg Whitman told financial analysts today that it will take until 2016 to turn the company around. Surprisingly, Whitman put some of the blame for the company's woes on its IT systems, which she said have hurt its internal operations. To fix its IT problems, Whitman said the company is adopting Salesforce and HR system Workday. The company also plans to cut product lines. It said it makes 2,100 different laser printers alone; it wants to reduce that by half. 'In every business we're going to benefit from focusing on a smaller number of offerings that we can invest in and really make matter,' said Whitman."

184 comments

  1. zuh? by bananaquackmoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    0_o 2100 laser printers? WHY?

    1. Re:zuh? by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't get it either. A dozen models for each market segment should provide variety enough, methinks. So
      -a dozen models for the SOHO market
      -a dozen for the bigger ones that may serve as department printers (one per corridor and shared by everyone
      -a dozen for oversize formats, so the CAD guys can print out big schematics
      -a dozen really fast models for high volume printing...
      . ...now I'm at about 50 models and running out of ideas. Maybe I'm a bit of an ignoramus, but I doubt I've just missed 95% of the market :-o

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    2. Re:zuh? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Their firmware and driver teams need adequate room in which to explore the wide variety of vexing bugs that you can get away with shipping...

    3. Re:zuh? by P-niiice · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A lot of times, sellers willl request a custom model of a product - like a super-cheap model to draw people into a sale for example. These models usually vary slightly from an existing model (maybe it prints slightly slower or has a different paper tray). apparently HP has let these get out of hand.

    4. Re:zuh? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      So that when a part on one breaks, you absolutely cannot find that part used or for sale somewhere else. Also so that when you're trying to print from a new printer, you absolutely must connect to the internet first to search for the relevant driver, which will not be found anyway.

      It's part of the strategy that is obviously working out so well for HP and many other printer makers:

      Step one: Make printers pointlessly difficult to use in all ways, frustrating users
      Step two: The promised "paperless office" never happens
      Step three:???
      Step four: PROFIT!!!

    5. Re:zuh? by vlm · · Score: 4, Interesting

      10 middlemen retailers all with a policy "we will pricematch any competitors price for the identical model". Well, if walmart is the only retailer on the planet who sells model 13513.2362 then I guess they'll never have to pricematch, will they?

      Also add some B+W only models, some multifunction models...

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    6. Re:zuh? by haruchai · · Score: 1

      The big stores are still using that old trick? Used to be done for all the electronics back in the 80s.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    7. Re:zuh? by SuperMooCow · · Score: 4, Funny

      PC LOAD LETTER? What the fuck does that mean?

    8. Re:zuh? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      Yes. And they still haven't learned that it just pisses customers off.

    9. Re:zuh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps for the same reason that Space Invaders for the Atari 2600 came with "112 Video Games"?

      Options:
      duplex
      network
      extra trays
      multiple memory sizes
      color
      etc.

    10. Re:zuh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hell yes they are.

      I went shopping for a flat-panel TV a few years ago. I had my eye on the Samsung 7 series, 52-inch. They have a "fancy" power indicator light that Samsung was proud of for some idiotic reason. It "looks classy" to marketing shills, apparently. I really gave a fuck. (Your sarcasm detector should have just exploded.)

      So I shopped around online and at local retailers. MSRP on an LN52A7000 (close enough) was $3400. All the local shops wanted $3100, but Best Buy carried the LN52A7100, with the red power light, Circuit City (during their final days) carried the LN52A7120 with the blue power light, and everyone else seemed to have their own variant with different colored power lights.

      I bought the base model with the white power light from Newegg for $1800. That's what they get for trying to screw over an internet-connected buyer. I figure it was a small, silent middle finger to all of those dipshits. The reason Circuit City is gone and Best Buy is soon to follow is because of that shit, and I, the customer will not tolerate it. FOADIAF, B & M.

    11. Re:zuh? by MrWin2kMan · · Score: 1

      Well, she may either be misquoted or mispoke; Hp probably has 40-50 Laser Printers, but 50 'different models' or SKU's of each containing different powercords and localization for 50 different languages/locales.

      --
      Nothing to see here but us trolls...move along...
    12. Re:zuh? by L3370 · · Score: 1

      To create artificial scarcity on toner modules, and in turn keeping prices on consumables high.

    13. Re:zuh? by Sir_Sri · · Score: 2

      It's possible what she means is that each SKU is actually a different product internally. Like each regional HP 'buys' a particular internal HP printer and that each region can customize the base model designed at the main design centre. Especially if they aren't actually modifying much of anything this becomes a complete waste of money.

      It's also possible HP is losing money like crazy because they really do have 2100 different models of laser printer which are largely overlapping products competing with themselves and that's just wasting money. Because big companies really can be that stupid.

    14. Re:zuh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      0_o 2100 laser printers? WHY?

      gotta be a misprint.

    15. Re:zuh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's not a misquote or misspeak. A SKU is a SKU is a SKU. Each SKU has overhead (inventory, QA, marketing, support, etc).

    16. Re:zuh? by mspohr · · Score: 1

      I agree that many fewer models should be sufficient.
      I am still using my HP LaserJet 4L (in my SOHO) which just passed its 20th birthday.
      Refill cartridges for it are cheap now ($10) since they have been cloned.
      I don't print much anyway.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    17. Re:zuh? by slaker · · Score: 1

      Please mod up for truth, justice and the HP way.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    18. Re:zuh? by jimicus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Let us take a fictional model as an example. We'll call it the laser jet 200.

      We have:
      Laser jet 200: plain printer.
      Laser jet 200n: exactly the same as the 200 but with inbuilt networking. Only it's sold as a separate model, which means you need to find space in the warehouse for two almost identical pritnters.
      Laser jet 200dn: exactly the same as the 200n but comes with the optional duplex unit pre-fitted. Three almost identical printers in the warehouse.
      Laser jet 200dtn: as dn but with the optional extra paper tray in the box. Four almos identical printers in the warehouse. By now, inventory's a pig. What if you suddenly find nobody wants the dtn model but the dn model sells like hot cakes? You have a warehouse full of printers that nobody wants and the aggravating thing is each printer is 5 minutes work away from being turned into one everybody wants.
      Laser jet 200 MFP: printer is identical to the 200 but a scanner is bolted on top to make it a multi function unit.
      Laser jet 200 MFP(f): Now they've fitted a modem to give it fax capabilities.
      Laser jet 200 MFP(f) Special Edition: A 200 dtn with scanner unit and modem fitted at the factory.

      Repeat for a printer aimed at small workgroups, larger workgroups and big departments. Repeat again for colour printers aimed at groups of varying size.

    19. Re:zuh? by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      MY EMPIRE MY DUCATS!
      MY DUCATS MY PEOPLE!

      The more stuff you make, the more people either in house or outhouse (sic) you most likely control. The more people you control, the greater your internal empire. The greater your internal empire the greater your pay and the greater your chance of weathering the sandblasting reformer of DOOM.

      It has a sort of Dilbert defined logic which is logical if you're a mental patient who worships balloons.

      Were this New Person[tm] to want drastic change they'd "Pick an entrenched position and nuke it from orbit leaving the entire top of the management team devastated and looking for work." That would terrify other empire builders to 'tow the line' and/or 'suck up to the new boss'. Then NP[tm] nukes the suckups.

      By 2016 they should have shred 20 - 25 percent of entrenched management, the very top of the bloated hierarchy.

      Of course they need fired at the point they've 'manifestly streamlined the process' so they don't become the new and improved entrenched bureaucracy. ;)

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    20. Re:zuh? by hurfy · · Score: 1

      And like someone above said, multiply that by the number of powercords or languages available. There is going to be several different versions for the needed cord/voltage at least.

      Still there must be a way to simplify it all and i am sure customer won't mind ;)

      I could never figure out what new model to buy so i bought the same as we had :)
      Still using my Laserjet 5 in the office after 762,532 pages (2 rebuilds)..... (for the guy above my 4L is now used at home)
      Also still using my Color Laserjet 4550n or do i call it 4550dn now... luckily HP toner lasts forever (75% of the time, but paying 20% or less of list off ebay)

    21. Re:zuh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      HP's problems with printers is not the hardware, but the software. Never have I seen such poorly written and badly matched drivers for any product. I will not sell ANY all in one HP products to my worst enemy. And the low end lasers are almost as bad, with most not lasting through their warranty period.

      Once the king of the printer market, not anymore. Fire all the driver programers and make things work again.

    22. Re:zuh? by haruchai · · Score: 1

      I hear you - I have zero tolerance for those kinds of retailer shenanigans.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    23. Re:zuh? by compwizrd · · Score: 1

      And then they have the SKU for the paper tray, which is perpetually out of stock. HP seems to be having allocation issues lately, I've had trouble finding even the M551n and the like, and sometimes I have to wait weeks for toner carts for some of our other units.

    24. Re:zuh? by marcosdumay · · Score: 2

      Whatever they inventory problems are, if I get to their site to choose a model, and there are 2000 models to choose from, I'm going to their competition. If I choose a model, but can't buy it because of geographical restrictions, and this repeats a few times, I'm going to the competition. If I see a model at a store, but I can't find that model anywhere else to compare, I won't trust it, and I'm going to the competition. If I can't find a review about the model I've choosen... Well, you got the idea.

      WTF were they thinking?

    25. Re:zuh? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Load a full, letter sized paper cartridge as the current one is empty.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    26. Re:zuh? by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you sound intelligent. That is not the target market for companies like Circuit City and Best Buy. You walk around there, maybe, and walk out without doing more than using their powder room.

      The 450 people I worked amongst for several years go to those places to purchase something immediately, and bring it home.

      No matter how many close, there will always be a market for the "buy it and take it home today" crowd. Not until Amazon goes beyond their replacement for PO boxes and has it at your doorstep in an hour or two. That's why Netflix is beating the shit out of cable, and why RedBox is beating the shit out of Blockbuster, if you discount the part where Blockbuster is copying Redbox 100% plus.

      I, the generalized customer, want what I see now. I, the individual, shop around and am willing to wait. But I am not the majority. Or even a significant portion of the minority. I guess it's just me and you, and the people we speak with. And a subset of that, because people are not readily convinced that they are the minority as far as intelligence goes.

      It is your duty to let people know when they are below average intelligence, and help them if it is at all possible. Your donation of time will benefit us all. In the form of retailers who do not treat us as retards.

      And by retards, I mean those who are retarded, also known as people who are behind the curve. Not as an insult. The same as "tardy" means late, and "retarded" means developmentally behind one's peers.

    27. Re:zuh? by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      Some technical solutions to de-multiply the number of models:
        -Multi-language interface, language can be set by the user. Maybe the printer driver can read the country settings from the PC it is installed on and make that the default. Should work for 99% of the SOHO customers, and larger companies tend to have IT departments that handle such stuff.
        -Power supply with wide range input voltage, 100-240V. Common in ATX power supplies BTW.

      Of course each of that will cost some extra money, as you have to put a bit more memory into the printer or pay a bit more for the power supply. But it's either that or deal with an unreasonable number of models. HP, your choice...

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    28. Re:zuh? by jimicus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      WTF were they thinking?

      This sort of mess doesn't happen as a result of careful planning. It happens as a result of shortsighted knee-jerk management decisions. Those management decisions probably work out OK in a strong economy, particularly if you are able to predict how many of each model you'll sell.

      The problem arises when you face a downturn. You've got an entire chain from building through to distribution devised around this idea of shipping 2,000 different printers (with, let's say 50 basic printers and 40 variants on each one). Which means your driver team is put together based on that assumption, your factories are tooled up based on that assumption, your warehouse processes are based around that assumption and your management team is built around that assumption.

      It'd make far more sense to have maybe 10 or 15 basic printers and a whole lot of optional extras - which is precisely what everyone else in the industry does. But in order to get your processes down to that level, you need to drastically cut staff, warehouse space, re-engineer your factories (or pay your contract manufacturers to do so) - and in so doing, an awful lot of middle managers who have been merrily building up their own little empire will push back. They won't do so obviously - well, some might but they can be dealt with very easily - they'll do so insidiously. Terrified for their own job, they'll do everything in their power to avoid making any change that might ultimately mean their team (and hence their empire) is no longer needed.

      You really need someone at the top who has the strength to push through this sort of mess and sort it all out - you can't trust the entire business to work with you to achieve it because in so many people's case, it goes against their best interests. Even then it's famously difficult to get right - there is a damn good reason why people who've succeeded in turning around massive companies are greatly respected, and it's nothing to do with their enormous salary.

    29. Re:zuh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's also localization to be aware of. There are a couple spoken languages out in the world as well as a variety of power systems. So even after each feature variant is made (M601, M601N, M601DN, etc), you then need a second factor for each country/region.

    30. Re:zuh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      KA-WOOSHHHHHHHH!!!

    31. Re:zuh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It means it's time to take your printer for a little drive, and play baseball with it?

    32. Re:zuh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      0_o 2100 laser printers? WHY?

      I think you just summed up Meg Whitman's expression in the board room meeting when she found out.

    33. Re:zuh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes they do, this is why i do not buy ANYTHING electronic from walmart

    34. Re:zuh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that people will read that as "Personal Computer Load Letter". Better have a longer, scrolling line of text than an abbreviated message with a confusing acronym at the beginning.

    35. Re:zuh? by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      It means that HP and a lot of others assume that English == US Letter, Anything else == A4 That's got to be one of the most seriously fucked up defaults in Postscript.

    36. Re:zuh? by SuperMooCow · · Score: 1

      I've had OS X assume I used A4 because I set my language to French Canadian.

    37. Re:zuh? by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

      That's why Netflix is beating the shit out of cable

      Only until the ISP's implement universal tiered monthly usage caps (see the story here on /.; it was posted within the last couple of days). The stodgy incumbents can't have their gravy train interrupted, now can they? :-(

      --
      'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
  2. They're also swapping out employee computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For Apple Mac's. Instead of lookalike computers, they'll actually be using Apple products. This alone should make them twice as productive.

  3. Better for her to preside over downfall of HP... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...than the entire state of California.

  4. HP doesn't need a long-term vision by MrEricSir · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They need a short term one, specifically one that doesn't involve switching CEOs every year.

    If you don't have stability at the top, you have zero ability to execute a long term goal.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:HP doesn't need a long-term vision by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      They need to stop depending on short term visions, and expectations of them.

      Although it sounds like eliminating 90% of their printer models would be an excellent place to start, and it shouldn't take four years to do that.

    2. Re:HP doesn't need a long-term vision by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      In the spirit of charity, I'd be happy to offer them the services of a magic 8-ball with an MBA from an online degree mill.

      It won't offer appreciably worse leadership, and it is happy to work for only 50k/year.

      Just give me a call, HP, you know this one is a win-win!

    3. Re:HP doesn't need a long-term vision by SpzToid · · Score: 1

      Meg just announced the turn-around will take until "2016", so Meg plans to stick around for a few years, and if nothing else, this will be good for Meg and her purse.

      She said so, and you will just have to take her at her word (or SELL). I think the next few years will be good for Meg. But can she fix HP? Given so much (announced) job security, I'm fairly certain I could fix HP in that timeframe too. Or at least I'd get paid trying.

      At least if she ruins HP, I can choose not to buy HP. Had she 'won' California, well that's something else and I'm more pleased she lost that election, despite her hundreds of millions spent trying to buy the right to govern it. HP might be more in Meg's league of management skills however; but I have my doubts.

      --
      You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
    4. Re:HP doesn't need a long-term vision by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      I'll take the magical 8-ball. You can keep the MBA.

    5. Re:HP doesn't need a long-term vision by cplusplus · · Score: 1

      Meg just announced the turn-around will take until "2016", so Meg plans to stick around for a few years, and if nothing else, this will be good for Meg and her purse.

      She's a billionaire, and is the 913th richest person on the planet. I don't think she's in it for money. It's probably more of a hobby. Maybe that's a good thing?

      --
      "False hope is why we'll never run out of natural resources!" - Lewis Black
    6. Re:HP doesn't need a long-term vision by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      It can both be a good thing and a very bad thing. A companies long term goal is success and profitability, quite often that requires someone motivated to make the hard decisions and those decisions can make a lot of enemies and create a lot of hate which someone that doesn't have their own future riding on it can often be more likely to avoid or simply walk away when the going gets tough. I hope she is someone that simply likes a challenge regardless of pain or HP could be in for many more years of stumbling in the dark.

    7. Re:HP doesn't need a long-term vision by raehl · · Score: 1

      She's a billionaire, and is the 913th richest person on the planet [forbes.com]. I don't think she's in it for money. It's probably more of a hobby. Maybe that's a good thing?

      That's still 912 places short of #1. She's just trying to level-up like the rest of us.

  5. I no longer work there, luckily by P-niiice · · Score: 1

    God, I'm glad I got India'd out of a job in '04.

    1. Re:I no longer work there, luckily by chinakow · · Score: 1

      You mean Canada'd? right? That is where they told me my job went.

    2. Re:I no longer work there, luckily by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Indification?

    3. Re:I no longer work there, luckily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Were you fire'd for apostrophe misuse?

    4. Re:I no longer work there, luckily by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Your example is a misuse. His is not. Replacing a dropped letter with an apastrophe is normal usage (frowned upon in some circles but still valid).

  6. About time by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1

    HP printer firmware seems to get flakier every year. 2100 model variants? Do you really need more than 20?

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:About time by couchslug · · Score: 0

      HP printer drivers are so immense your PC will actually WEIGH MORE after downloading them.

      HP can't die soon enough for me.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:About time by mattb47 · · Score: 2

      Amen!!!

      Brother, Samsung, Canon, Epson, etc. drivers usually install in a quarter (sometimes a tenth!) of the time. And usually take up a quarter to a tenth of the drive space.

      Especially on the all-in-one models.

      And functionality just isn't that different or better with the HP models. Just immensely more annoying to install.

      HP's printer software is a disaster.

    3. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 for brother printers. Hell even when they're networked, just install as a local printer using a new tcp/ip port and typically the driver is self installed in seconds. HP always takes way longer.. even longer than Dell printers

    4. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canon all-in-one printer scanners always suck driver-wise, whereas my Epson is doing its job and scanning when I need it to scan, even over its IP/ethernet interface. The last HP printer I owned was an ancient, reliable HP deskjet inkjet. It never broke down. I just stopped using it. Though I also started buying cheaper Chinese replacement ink cartridges. Multiply that by everyone, and that can't be good business for HP.

    5. Re:About time by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Yup. I just bought a Konica Minota 1650EN. For Windows the drivers were auto-installed. For Linux I downloaded a few kb PPD file.

      The irony is that the same PPD file would probably have enabled printing on the thing on a VAX, or on Windows 3.1, or on Wordperfect v5 for DOS.

      Why is it that the universal printer driver was figured out 30 years ago, and we're still inventing bloatware that fills a DVD to do the same thing?

    6. Re:About time by dbIII · · Score: 1

      With a xerox on win7 I fucked about for ages with drivers for various sub-models in an attempt to get colour and printing from the tray that actually had paper in it. In the end I just did on win7 what I did in linux to get it to work - told it the thing was generic postscipt that could print on both sides. It's worked perfectly since.
      I think that's often the solution instead of the crap HP drivers too, unless it's also a really crappy HP that doesn't understand either postscipt of HP's own PCL (a lot of them don't).

  7. Still too many by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1,050 printers is still way too many.

    They should just have 3, A laser, a color laser and an inkjet.

    they make their dough on toner and ink anyhoo!

    1. Re:Still too many by Sez+Zero · · Score: 2

      They should just have 3, A laser, a color laser and an inkjet.

      they make their dough on toner and ink anyhoo!

      They've got 2100 laser printers. Imagine how many models including the ink jets!

    2. Re:Still too many by NemosomeN · · Score: 1

      Three is way too few. They need Corporate high volume, corporate medium volume, and corporate low volume. (High and medium being multi-function copy machines, low being a beefy printer). These should all be laser. Then they have various graphic-design oriented printers, from high volume to low volume, with variations in paper sizes. Lets say high, medium, and low volume, with "low volume" overlapping with high end consumer. Drafting/plotting printers for blueprints and such. Then maybe 7 consumer printers. That's 13 right there, disregarding color/monochrome, and injet, bubblejet, and whatever the hell else exists (I rarely print at home, so I only know what we have at work). (My math doesn't add up because of the overlap I noted). So far fewer, but definitely more than 3.

      --
      I hate grammar Nazi's.
    3. Re:Still too many by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Yes. Because I want a refridgerator sized printer that easily churns out 50000 pages a month in my home office. And the university down the street wants a laptop sized printer that can only take 20 peices of paper in the feeder at a time.

  8. Re:Better for her to preside over downfall of HP.. by superdave80 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it will be much better with Jerry Brown presiding over it instead...

  9. Oh, that's encouraging... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wasn't their bold plan for not sucking supposed to be offering 'enterprise' IT consulting? And now they admit that their own organization couldn't change its own asses toner cartridge with both hands and a map?

    1. Re:Oh, that's encouraging... by Sez+Zero · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My thoughts exactly. The headline should have read "IT Company Has Bad IT; But Don't Worry, CEO Says It Will All Be Fine In A Few Years"

    2. Re:Oh, that's encouraging... by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

      No, that was like two hours ago. Their new CEO scrapped that plan and has a completely different one.

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    3. Re:Oh, that's encouraging... by SuperMooCow · · Score: 1

      We're sorry. Those responsible for sacking the people who have just been sacked have been sacked.

    4. Re:Oh, that's encouraging... by squidflakes · · Score: 2

      Whitman's claim is so much bullshit. Its her standard claim for any situation and she's throwing around Salesforce and Workday as if they will actually solve issues. What she really means is that she's outsourcing a bunch of internal support people in addition to the external support.

      Workday is mostly a SaaS product, as is Salesforce.

      So, expect more HP layoffs, and not much more.

    5. Re:Oh, that's encouraging... by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      We're sorry. Those responsible for sacking the people who have just been sacked have been sacked.

      HP Compaq. Continuing in a long proud tradition of downsizing its way to greatness.

    6. Re:Oh, that's encouraging... by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      Yep. Salesforce and workday won't save your organization from misery. Unless you know that your tools are actually hindering your operation, switching tools is not going to save you. And that's coming from someone who works at Salesforce....

      Personally, I see this as bad news from the top. Whitman is advertising some minor operational details as if they will save the company. And, as someone else said, a terrible indictment of HP's IT consulting business. I fully expect Whitman selling off the printer business, refocusing on PCs, and slowly grinding HP into the ground, while taking credit for every million-dollar savings that was achieved by cutting its workforce to the bone.

      Too bad, because I still have good friends at HP. I don't think that bodes well for them.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    7. Re:Oh, that's encouraging... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah sounded like she was blaming a bad IT dept. which is probably true, but one of many management problems. HP's general management is SNAFUBAR, especially post Carly Firiona & her MBA ass clown parade rendered the whole HP organization dysfunctional, just going out of their way to sink that ship.

    8. Re:Oh, that's encouraging... by squidflakes · · Score: 1

      In my cynical moments, and in a comment lower down, I suggested that the move to Salesforce and Workday was prompted because of the donations given to Whitman by the CEOs of both organizations. Of course, that could be stretching it, but it just seems like such an odd announcement for her to make. I could easily see Salesforce being the ones excited to advertise that size of company switching their CRM, but HP?

      I just hope that these miracle savings will go in to restructuring in a good way, and not in to more corporate jets and executive bonuses.

    9. Re:Oh, that's encouraging... by erikscott · · Score: 1

      HP has blamed some quarterly misses on SAP in the past, and you hear stories about how HP is distorting the market for SAP consultants... maybe they finally admitted it was never going to work? That's the kind of "operational detail" that is big enough to be materially significant in the SEC sense of the term.

    10. Re:Oh, that's encouraging... by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      Why does anybody think that Meg Whitman has any skill whatsoever?

      Despite having one of the best funded campaigns in history, she managed to lose California race for governor. Despite inheriting the reigns of eBay after a fantastically lucky growth streak, she managed to lose Billions of dollars on a badly botched "purchase" of Skype while managing to distract said company from its core competence: selling stuff. (she managed to buy Skype without buying any source code rights.... WTF?)

      I have zero confidence in Meg Whitman as anything more than a charismatic charlatan with a lucky break. If I had money to spare, I'd short HP stock.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    11. Re:Oh, that's encouraging... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      options are for insiders.

    12. Re:Oh, that's encouraging... by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

      Take it from someone that has been implementing ERP systems for years. Salesforce and Workday are fine products but they are not a magic pill. No software is going to save companies from making stupid decisions. I've said this before but HP is the worst run company in Silicon Valley. HP's problem is not a lack of ERP software it's a lack of leadership. Sure, you can get some savings by way of operational efficiencies but then what? Printers are about the only thing that makes money for HP and Whitman comes out and condemns that division. Nice. And it's internal IT systems are to blame (at least partly) for their current woes? Well there's a real ringing endorsement for HP's consulting services, don't ya think?

      So this is the grand plan, Meg? Really? Right after the announcement I see some guy on CNBC saying he expects HP's stock to drop to $7 a share before it's all said and done. Meg Whitman...captain of the Titanic.

  10. Re:Better for her to preside over downfall of HP.. by geoffrobinson · · Score: 2

    for her at least. HP has better prospects than California.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
  11. Computers are Dead by fm6 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Pretty much everybody who needs a PC already has one, and will go as long as 10 years between replacements. Servers are still big business, but nowadays data centers want to buy cheap white boxes, since any reliability issues are handled by cloud software. So name brand computers are dead.

    When I worked for Sun's hardware division, I believed that the company could turn itself around by firing all the sales idiots who thought x86 systems were a passing fad. (Which earned my emity because I worked on some fancy x86 systems that were easily the best on the market.) Now that I've been out working on cloud systems for 3 years, it's become obvious that the brand of computer an app is running on matters as little as the specific processor. Commodification of everything is the new normal.

    1. Re:Computers are Dead by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      In plenty of countries white boxes dominate the home and SOHO market share but over 90%.
      I've yet to see a single person who uses branded desktop computers, and I've worked as home tech-support, cibercafes, and plenty of other places.

    2. Re:Computers are Dead by lightknight · · Score: 2

      Nonsense, the variant of processor can matter, but software must be written to take advantage of it, and what more, to provide a true advantage. Compiling something with the Intel compiler, where x87 code is used for AMD processors, isn't a true advantage of Intel processors -> those AMD processors support those SSE instructions, and a quick recompile / change of the flags destroys your temporary advantage.

      What makes many other types of processor quick ass over the x86 variants? Typically fun things like double-digits of registers or special instructions that can do in one cycle what x86 do in ten. But you can't rest on your laurels. You can't ship a new chip with a slight speed boost, while others are trouncing your platform, and cross your fingers that companies are too heavily invested in Sparc to transition to a different chip. Your sales guys cut better deals, with happier customers, when the stuff they're selling isn't crap. Cut back on R&D or tech too much, and you turn into another oem who is competing on price alone (a dangerous place to be). When people look to your company, they need to know that the tech is as safe as houses, the deal they're getting isn't bullsh*t, and that the support contracts won't be outsourced to someone who hasn't personally built one of the servers they're supporting.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    3. Re:Computers are Dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes many other types of processor quick ass over the x86 variants?

      Um, nothing? X86 processors are the fastest in the world, with the possible exception of IBM Power7.

    4. Re:Computers are Dead by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Like the Sun sales guys, you're focusing on all the technical issues and ignoring economics. Commmodity systems are cheap. Economies of scale make them cheap to buy, and the fact that they run standard software on standard OS's makes them cheap to own. In a cloud environment, you just dion't care that they're less powerful — you just buy more of them.

      Once got into an argument with a Sun sales guy over an x86 system I was using for an internal wiki. He called me lazy because I ran Linux on it instead of Solaris. I explained how the I needed certain standard Perl libraries that were widely used on Linux but which were utterly broken on Solaris. I offered to go back to Solaris if he'd help with the resources I would need to get those libraries working. Never heard back from him.

      I'll say it again, commodification is everything.

    5. Re:Computers are Dead by fm6 · · Score: 2

      I neglected to read TFA. If I had done so, I would have noticed something that made my point for me: Whitman is tossing internal applications and replacing them with cloud applications. Which certainloy run on white box systems. So why should I buy an HP brand server if HP itself doesn't use them?

    6. Re:Computers are Dead by PTBarnum · · Score: 1

      I work for a company that builds all of its servers from scratch, but I have a name brand PC under my desk. I don't know the reason, but I speculate it has to do with scale. Setting up to manufacture desktop computers in house isn't worth it because there aren't enough of them to matter.

    7. Re:Computers are Dead by tom229 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have no idea how this has been voted up. The statements in this post are pure fantasy. First off, on what planet to people keep their PCs for 10 years? It's more like 3... at the most; for both home and business. And on the business side you're much better off sticking with a vendor like HP both for their warranties and the ease of deploying their OEM images over the network.

      Secondly, white boxes are all fine and dandy for large data centers but you're leaving out a pretty big section of the pie there. "The cloud" isn't the blanket solution for everything yet. Virtually all small and medium sized offices run internal windows domains, most still find reasons to need exchange, have internal MDM software, and alot of industries still require older server/client software. Im also seeing more of a desire to have high availability systems which is creating demand for SAN storage.

      Computers aren't dead, "the cloud" (aka. web services) is nothing new, and tablets don't replace anything.

      --
      If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
    8. Re:Computers are Dead by slew · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Nonsense, the variant of processor can matter, but software must be written to take advantage of it...

      The amount of software that is written to take specific advantage of a processor architecture is going down in this era of the cloud. Unless the thing you are doing is so trivial that it doesn't matter, or vast that you can fill your own datacenter with it 24-7, odds are today your software will (eventually) want to run on a cloud platform (e.g, like Amazon AWS/EC2). In a cloud environment, you don't own the computer, you rent a virtual computer. The cheapest rentals will likely be the most commoditized platforms. Specialized software which need specific variants of processors is not only is less cost effective to develop, but also to execute.

      FWIW, As for the other arguments, x86 is mostly dead in the cloud world. Everyone is x86-64-AVX That means in addition to the 16 standard integer registers there are 16 256-bit SIMD registers in the IAS which are quite competitive with Sparc (0+7g+8i+8o register window). Besides, today processors have many more physical registers and do top-of-stack caching so ISA registers don'tt mean as much as it used to mean (e.g, the sandy bridge i7 architecture has 160 integer registers available for renaming).

      Also, all those arguments about magic instructions are mostly not relavent anymore. Everyone pretty much has the similar stuff. For example, the latest rabbit out of the Sparc bag have been a dedicated security co-processor (given that many of their servers are web-host front-ends, maybe a co-processor that does AES/DES/RSA is a reasonable thing), although not clear that it's net any better than say an i7 with x86-AES-NI acceleration instructions + a highly optmized AVX RSA implementation unless all that's all your server is doing is RSA (usually there's some other code running).

    9. Re:Computers are Dead by NemosomeN · · Score: 1

      Everywhere I have worked has name brand computers. It's just generally not worth building from scratch, and most companies who don't do tech as their core business want to treat computer issues as NMFP. Even my home PC is an HP, though I will admit I regretted the purchase. "Name brand" computers are cheap. Nearly top of the line can be had, on sale, for just a few hundred dollars.

      --
      I hate grammar Nazi's.
    10. Re:Computers are Dead by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Pretty much everybody who needs a PC already has one, and will go as long as 10 years between replacements.

      Not if that PC is an HP... :p

    11. Re:Computers are Dead by fm6 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Maybe I got voted up because people can see for themselves that all this is happening. Maybe the people you know buy new computers every few years and maintain their own in-office networks — but that's not the trend, not by a long shot. There's resistance to moving away from these things, but the fact remains that they cost a shitload to maintain. And what do businesses worry about these days? Cost. Then they worry some more about cost. And then if they have some spare time they worry about cost.

      When you say that the cloud is nothing new, you're assuming that "cloud" is just marketspeak for "servers". Wrong. It's about SaaS and other technologies that make access to applications a kind of commodity. Saying "this is nothing new" is like somebody in 1981 saying "PCs are nothing new, we've had computers for more than 30 years." What's new here is not the basic technology, but the economics and infrastructure that makes that technology more available.

      Which is why HP (as mentioned in the article) is trying to save money by shifting to cloud-based CRM and HR instead of continuing to run their own servers. Ironic, really.

      BTW, you mention the need to run an Exchange server? Every office I ever worked in that had its own Exchange server had major problems because the damn thing is hard to administer. If I had been there as an IT guy, I would have insisted that they go to an Exchange provider and let them worry about that shit. Cloud, cloud, cloud.

    12. Re:Computers are Dead by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      First off, on what planet to people keep their PCs for 10 years? It's more like 3... at the most; for both home and business.

      Not sure what industry you're working in but I'd have to say the fantasy is yours in this case, Most businesses these days keep their systems as long as possible, six year old computers are common. For most use cases it makes no sense to upgrade every 3 years. Most computers are simply more powerful then the average user needs, by far. Proper maintenance, like keeping the computer free of dust, and a maintained UPS lets most computers last for many years. After mainboards when to solid caps their failure rate has been significantly reduced in desktops. Laptops are the most likely to be replaced due to heat and impact related deaths.

    13. Re:Computers are Dead by tom229 · · Score: 1

      Oil & Gas. Most are replaced due to old software. 3 years is about the norm as they are both out of warranty at that point and usually won't have the most current version of windows. Sure some can go longer than 3 years but I can't recall a single case of a PC being 10 years old. If that was true I'd still be supporting windows 2000.

      --
      If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
    14. Re:Computers are Dead by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      First off, on what planet to people keep their PCs for 10 years? It's more like 3... at the most; for both home and business.

      Well, I've always been a computer geek. From 1982 until 2007, I updated for a faster computer every two years on average.

      Right now I'm typing this on that same 5-1/2 year old system, and I don't see any need to upgrade it for the foreseeable future. It's still fast enough for most anything I do, and the latest systems aren't drastically faster (especially on any particular single-threaded task I'm most likely to be waiting on).

    15. Re:Computers are Dead by tom229 · · Score: 2

      "Cloud" is just market speak for hosted service. Hosting services can make a lot of sense in various situations, but not in all. And, IMHO, if you can afford it, it's always better for a company to take ownership. Should a company spend hundreds of thousands of dollars developing its own robust CRM? Probably not, but that doesn't mean computers are dead, or there's significantly less need for branded server hardware. There's many needs for software outside of applications like customer management. Active directory, group policy, mail, intranets, file sharing, print services; and doing all of this securely.

      I feel, primarily, that some people are getting way too carried away with all this cloud shit. There's a lot of 'what if' situations with the cloud that are completely ignored to favour short term savings.
      For example, what if the company hosting my data: loses it, sells it, goes out of business, catches on fire, gives it over to the government (patriot act), or has its security compromised? What if they don't maintain their network and it gets slow, or there's several outages? What if they raise their prices suddenly or they make it difficult for me to get my data out? Etc, etc, etc.

      I feel people that are selling 'the cloud' as some magic trend that is going to be the death of the way IT is traditionally done are simply getting ahead of themselves. Hosted services are merely a supplement for internal IT systems, where it makes sense; just as they always have been.

      As for insisting on hosted exchange, there's many many reasons why you wouldnt want to do this in any particular case. If your company provides cell phones and wants to enforce enhanced security policies with MDM software, you want to tie mail accounts with AD, you run sharepoint, you cant have mail accessible on non company owned machines, or you just want to control your own data.

      There's also situations where hosted exchange, or maybe google apps, does makes sense especially when if you do want to run it yourself... ya... you do need a sysadmin that knows how to administer it.

      --
      If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
    16. Re:Computers are Dead by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      In fact, around here most people buy white box desktops. But when a company wants to buy some computers, the lowest bidders are always branded.

      Scale makes all the difference.

    17. Re:Computers are Dead by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      No, you'd still be supporting windows XP.....

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    18. Re:Computers are Dead by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Dude, if you're going to argue with someone, argue with them. Don't just contradict.

    19. Re:Computers are Dead by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1


      "Cloud" is just market speak for hosted service.

      Well, no it's not. It also means using white-box commodity servers to serve a large software application. The savings from using commodity servers is put back into the software development to make it more robust to handle the less reliable commodity servers.

      If you're large enough, you develop the software yourself; if you're even larger, you design the commodity hardware yourself, which allows you to drive out cost while increasing performance in the things you get a return on. Neither of which either Dell or HP can add any value to, so there's just no reason to use them.

      Google is the 5th largest server manufacturer in the world by itself. Add in the other big cloud players: Microsoft, Amazon, Facebook and a significant portion of server purchases are going to commodity hardware, whereas 10 years ago it was OEM. And it's not going to get any better. The fact is, building your own white box makes sense for more and more installations, because it's really not that hard. If you need more than about 10K cores, you can probably find it cost effective to start doing it now, and if you are any kind of software company, you already have much of the software development resources in house.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    20. Re:Computers are Dead by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I'm in oil and gas (and coal) and still have a pile of desktops over three years old. Stick a decent video card and two or three big screens on just about anything and the users are very happy, especially if the real work is done in the server room and the PCs are mostly there to be X terminals and write simple reports. Ten years is a bit much though so there's only legacy stuff that's used very rarely on things that old, and that stuff would be ditched and virtualised if it wasn't for evil parallel port dongles for copy protection.

    21. Re:Computers are Dead by DerekLyons · · Score: 2

      Maybe I got voted up because people can see for themselves that all this is happening.

      More likely you got modded up for the pointless anecdote about how you hates salesdroids, were working on (what you thought was) the "hottest" machine, and how you knew more than/stuck it "the man". Because the rest of your post is, as the grandparent says, pure fantasy.
       

      And what do businesses worry about these days? Cost. Then they worry some more about cost. And then if they have some spare time they worry about cost.

      A business that worries about nothing but cost is a business that either already dead (but doesn't know it yet), or is so far gone they might as well be. Cost is only one part of the business equation.
       

      When you say that the cloud is nothing new, you're assuming that "cloud" is just marketspeak for "servers". Wrong. It's about SaaS and other technologies that make access to applications a kind of commodity.

      And what is SaaS? It's pulling software/data from a remote server. It's not a technology. And it's not anything new.
       
      Your three years of working on cloud systems has given you tunnel vision.

    22. Re:Computers are Dead by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      You missed the first part of my comment "In plenty of countries". I know for a fact that USA isn't one of them, but plenty of other are.
      Of course, large businesses and corporations have brand-named computes everywhere.

      Personally, I'd never buy a brand-name computer because the setups are too limited. By buying a white-box computer, I can customize it as I please.

    23. Re:Computers are Dead by strikethree · · Score: 1

      First off, on what planet to people keep their PCs for 10 years? It's more like 3... at the most; for both home and business.

      Hm. I will need to disagree with you. The computer I am sitting on right now was bought 3.5 years ago and I have absolutely NO interest in upgrading. Specs: dual quad-core E5620 xeons @ 2.4ghz. 24 gigs of ram. GTX 460 video card. 3 terabyte RAID array. etc etc.

      The computer my son uses was bought in the summer of 2007. It has a dual core Athlon chip. Unsure of the freq it runs at. seems like it is 2.6 ghz. It has 6 gigs of ram, an 8800GTX, two 10k rpm 35 gig drives in RAID 0 for the boot/OS and a 750 gig storage drive.

      I am unsure either of those computers will last 10 years but short of video games, both are still obscene overkill for most current computing needs despite being "ancient" and outdated.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    24. Re:Computers are Dead by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      I agree that the Sun/Oracle x4NNN systems are the best on the market, via having a serial console that not only is conveniently provided as an RJ45, but that actually works out of the box. This is priceless when one isn't in the same room as a server.

    25. Re:Computers are Dead by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Alas the X4**** are no more. They all used AMD processors, and Oracle has decided to stick with Intel.

    26. Re:Computers are Dead by fm6 · · Score: 1

      My anecdote had a point. 'The point happens to disagree with your prejudices, but it's there.

      I've already rebutted your "The cloud is just..." arguments, but you're simply ignoring them, and coming back with the same arguments.Not a productive line of discussion. I'll just point out that this "marketspeak" fantasy you dismiss so glibly is keeping me and a lot of other people employed. So, go back to your buggy whips — I'll let the marketplace speak for itself.

    27. Re:Computers are Dead by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Hence me writing X4*** not X4?00. Eg. the X4270m3 (which they suddenly started calling something else) uses Intel, the X4100/X4200/X4600 {,m2} systems were AMD. It makes sense for them to stick with one or the other. HP still has a number of AMD variants, maybe they have customers who care.

    28. Re:Computers are Dead by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Right, I misremembered the naming system. When I was there, all the 4-RU systems were AMD, and I misremembered the first digit as representing the physical size of the system. It's actually the second digit.

    29. Re:Computers are Dead by NemosomeN · · Score: 1

      I didn't miss it, there's just no way to make the leap from "many countries" to "except for the US." And where do I say I'm in the US?

      --
      I hate grammar Nazi's.
  12. Sounds like a decent move by phorm · · Score: 1

    Honestly, most people are just confused by all the stuff that's out there anyways.
    Over 2000 printers? For consumer stuff, offer
    * inkjet
    * laser
    * color laser
    Maybe an MFC offering for some of the above

    For extra stuff, just have addons that can easily be plugged into the printer. You don't need to manufacture two printers to allow ethernet, just make one include a module

    Add something similar for corporate printers, along with the ability to add trays/duplexers/etc as normal...

    Yes, there might still be quite a few different models, but I fail to see why they'd have 2100

    1. Re:Sounds like a decent move by SuperMooCow · · Score: 1

      I would only make two models of printers: laser black and white and laser color. Inkjet is dead. You don't see companies offering dot matrix printers anymore, inkjet is on its way out.

      Second, I would standardize on a single model of toner cartridge, meaning HP would only need four types of toners in stores: cyan, magenta, yellow and black.

      And the modular idea is the way to go. A module for scanning, one for faxing, one for wireless, one for ethernet, etc. People will then be able to buy and install the modules they want. That way the printer they want is cheaper and then later if they want to upgrade they simply buy and install a module.

    2. Re:Sounds like a decent move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      inkjet is on its way out.

      You obviously don't sell ink.

    3. Re:Sounds like a decent move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " would standardize on a single model of toner cartridge, meaning HP would only need four types of toners in stores: cyan, magenta, yellow and black."

      If it was big, some people don't want to pay $100 a big cartridge they would replace every 5 years (because they don't print that much), and if it was small, some people would not want to pay $25 for a cartridge they have to replace each week (because they print a lot). So you need choices.

    4. Re:Sounds like a decent move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would make too much sense. And sense doesn't translate well to profits for an established business with a large customer base bent on replacing the existing products in their customer's hands with new products that do exactly the same thing.

      On the other hand a small startup could do this so long as they could get people to trust that they would be around long enough to support their products (regardless of whether or not they actually would be).

    5. Re:Sounds like a decent move by suutar · · Score: 1

      I think you're underestimating the number of featuresets that the market will demand. At work, we really do kind of need the 5 trays of variously sized paper and the collator unit. At home I can use a 50-sheet tray that's built in to the printer, and I don't want to pay for the extra hardware that it would need to interface with the collator and extra trays, because at home it will never get to use it.

      And while I like my little color laser at home for a lot of things, my inkjet does a much better job of printing on my DVD blanks, and I think it does a better job with my vacation photos too.

    6. Re:Sounds like a decent move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modular is the way to go, indeed.

      I propose making those separate functions (printing, imaging, telephony/transmission) completely separated into "modules" called devices. Then we can make those devices network-capable (wired only!) and use as many or as few of each of them as we want. And if wireless networking is desired, a separate (and standard!) wireless network bridge device can be used.

      Y'know, like putting together a real fucking network.

      All-in-one sells to lazy people, stupid people, and anyone drinking Apple-flavored kool-aid.

      Is it really too much to ask to get a small, ethernet-connected device that can send a fax from a network? Really? No printer or scanner attached, just a postscript engine and a faxmodem. Why is this difficult?

      The same question applies to the concept of a network-connected scanner. Every time I plug my phone into my computer it pops up a fucking window asking me where I want to put the pictures it imports. Why can't I do that from a networked scanner? Scan to the scanner's internal flash memory, then raise an SNMP alert so anyone with the included monitoring software gets the alert. Optionally, you could include some job-originator data to make sure that only the person who started the scan got the alert.

      INGDRS. (It's Not God Damned Rocket Science)

    7. Re:Sounds like a decent move by SuperMooCow · · Score: 1

      That can still be a single model of cartridge, one full, one half-full, one quarter-full. The manufacturing cost of a 100g plastic part is nearly the same as a 50g plastic part. It's the mold itself and the processing that's costly. That would also cut on the packaging costs. Just put three checkboxes on the label and check the appropriate one when packaging.

    8. Re:Sounds like a decent move by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      The comment about different amounts of toner in the cartridge is probably correct in terms of how it would work out, but alternatively you could redesign the printers so that the toner cartridge projects partway out of the printer's case, with the height of the thing varying depending on how much toner it held.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    9. Re:Sounds like a decent move by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      I used to use an inkjet for vacation photos until I realized it was cheaper and higher quality to outsource them to the dye sublimation printers at the local drug store.

      Then high resolution tablets came out, so I think I'll probably be migrating to no photo printing in the future.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  13. I Will Get This To You In 2016 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Now that's some clever job security!

  14. Saleforce? Hah by realmolo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When a company starts thinking that Salesforce (or any CRM, or any single piece of software) is going to save them, that means they are DOOMED.

    The fact that HP doesn't know this says a lot about how clueless they really are about IT, software, *and* business needs in general.

    1. Re:Saleforce? Hah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, it means their CEO is a former consultant. If their CEO was a former plumber, they likely all would be getting new toilets.

    2. Re:Saleforce? Hah by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      maybe they should hire a plumber as CEO, plumbers know how to work with shit and HP makes shit

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    3. Re:Saleforce? Hah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you check their history, HP was a major Siebel user, and the commission system for worldwide sales teams was tightly bound up here. Apart from taking some years getting out from under an Oracle application , changing to a new CRM IS a strategic move, as it touches everything you do.

  15. 2,100 different laser printers by NikeHerc · · Score: 5, Funny

    640 printers is enough for anybody.

    --
    Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
  16. Re:Better for her to preside over downfall of HP.. by vlm · · Score: 2

    "California CEO Meg Whitman told financial analysts today that it will take until 2016 to turn the state around. Surprisingly, Whitman put some of the blame for the state's woes on its IT systems, which she said have hurt its internal operations. To fix its IT problems, Whitman said the state offices are adopting Salesforce and HR system Workday. The state also plans to cut benefits and entitlements. It said it has 2,100 different forms alone; it wants to reduce that by half. 'In every state we're going to benefit from focusing on a smaller number of entitlements that we can invest in and really make matter,' said Whitman."

    I donno if its going to be all that different.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  17. Randy Mott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A few years back, I remember reading glowing stories on HP's former CIO in InformationWeek. Mott was leading a multi-year project to slash the number of in-house applications, the number of data centers, and IT employees, and to migrate to the corporate data warehouses to use HP's new technology NeoView.

    Mott didn't survive the rapid turnover in HP CEO's office. He is now the CIO at GM.

    1. Re:Randy Mott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work at HP. I know people who were there during Randy Mott's reign. According to them he was a joker with no clue who caused a mass exodus of technical people because of hos policies, including the plan to migrate all of the data centers to Houston (which just happens to be his home town). Strangely, a lot of guys who didn't live in Houston didn't want to move there. Who'd have thought?

      Now he's at GM I believe he's introducing similar policies, with similar results. gg Randy.

    2. Re:Randy Mott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except everything he did made all HP IT go to shit. It became impossible to get anything done, or get any assistance with anything with that POS running the show. When the only number you are measuring things on is lowest cost the easiest way to reach that number is to spend absolutely nothing on anything...
      --
      Current HP employee

  18. printers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do they really still make printers?
    It must be 8 years ago since we abandoned HP printers, and we never have been happier...
    What a shitload of flaky mechanisms, flaky drivers, bulky software and trouble did we avoid.

  19. 2016?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's an eon in 'internet time', by then the tartars will have flowed again across the steppes!

    1. Re:2016?! by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

      Gives her something to do until the next California Governor election comes up. By then she will have tired of the 'HP' experiment and leave it to someone else to pick up the pieces.

  20. Some have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But the ones that learned this are retired. Those who now fill their shoes have to learn it all over again.

    Knowledge is funny, that way.

  21. No surprise that IT systems are at fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The company I work for loves HP and we buy tons of stuff from them. They're our official vendor for servers, storage systems, etc. Dealing with them is a huge headache. They take forever to return quotes, then ordering takes forever. I recently tried to buy some fiber cables for our SAN and it took three days to get us a quote, even though we gave them the HP part numbers and the quantity. Their excuse? "It took us a while to look up and apply your corporate discount." You'd think they'd have that programmed in their computer and it'd be calculated by the time the screen refreshed. They are a computer company after all. I told a colleague that if we had ordered the cables from NewEgg (or any other tech web store) we'd already have the cables before HP even gave us the quote. It was two weeks before we finally got our fiber cables.

    You'd think a huge computer and software company would be more efficient at this, but HP is borderline incompetent. I think the only reason they are still in business is due to sheer inertia.

  22. fewer = better? by h8sg8s · · Score: 1

    Apple makes 12 HW products by my count. I think Meg may be onto something here.

    --
    Organization? You must be joking..
    1. Re:fewer = better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Apple makes ZERO hardware products by my count. The Chinese make all of Apple's branded products, Apple makes nothing themselves except software.

    2. Re:fewer = better? by guttentag · · Score: 3, Informative

      One of the first things Steve Jobs did upon his return to Apple in the 90s was kill off all the random, overlapping, redundant, confusing product lines... Which each cost money to develop, produce, support and market. He drew a cross on the whiteboard and wrote "pro laptop" in one corner, "consumer laptop" in another, pro desktop and consumer desktop in the others. And that was their strategy. The point was to FOCUS a company that had lost its way, and HP certainly looks like a company that has lost its way.

    3. Re:fewer = better? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Yes because the Chinese factories that Apple uses can never be the same as the ones HP uses. Do your homework.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  23. HP in permanent decline by twasserman · · Score: 5, Insightful
    For the past 10 years or so, going back to Her Worship (Fiorina), HP has been cutting staff. Total layoffs through Hurd, Apotheker, and Meg are now up to 100K. HP has decimated its R&D capabilities, to the extent that they are essentially incapable of creating innovative products, which partly explains their 2100 printers. Too many of the people who are left are lifers who know how to keep their jobs. Anyone who is capable of finding a job elsewhere has done so.

    If you are looking for a job, HP is a company without an interesting mobile strategy and a cloud strategy focused predominantly on IT services - not very attractive for entrepreneurial types, who have many other excellent opportunities.

    Finally, the 100K HP departees are not likely to purchase HP products or to recommend them in their new settings. That's a very large pool of people who are going to advocate for competing products.

    So the turnaround projected for 2016 is unlikely to happen, but it's a pretty fair bet than Meg Whitman won't be around HP when that day arrives.

    1. Re:HP in permanent decline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait.. HP "has" a mobile strategy.. Stop the Presses!

    2. Re:HP in permanent decline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worse than having 100k pissed off ex-HP workers is having products so bad they defame themselves. I live in an HP town. I did some work at a local real estate company occasionally, and one day when I came in, I was surprised to see they had replaced every one of their computers with HP PCs. They wanted to support a local company, you see. Cut to three months later, and all the HP PCs were gone because such a massive percentage of the computers failed outright, and the ones that didn't fail were so much slower than the ones they had replaced (even though they were newer models with newer processors) the company had no choice but to give up on HP entirely. HP ate the entire cost, since the computers were all under warranty and a contract that let the company send them back.

    3. Re:HP in permanent decline by TBB303 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      An ex HP contractor here. I had a good 3.5 years at HP, and even though I got a lot of crap here on Slashdot last time I commented on HP related news regarding how ugly the way they terminated my contract in the end was, I haven't been suggesting everybody I know to avoid HP products like plague; x86 ProLiants are still pretty good hardware, I've always preferred HP displays both at work and at home, and as long as you avoid their consumer models, you'll get yourself a pretty good laptop from them. Those products I can definitely recommend still. However, the company was working against itself already during the time I spent there. Managers were mainly concerned in staying out of the way as long as their performance indicators seemed fine, and while us higher level Unix support folks were seemingly given free hands in solving the customers' problems, that freedom was an illusion, as I learned a couple of years after leaving and hearing all the stuff said about my working methods (example: using SSH tunneling via an SSH proxy dedicated for this purpose by the company) by people incompetent to make such judgements. And that's where I see HP's biggest problem - during the years of growth, so much incompetence has found its way in in that the company has been forced to lay off A LOT of people. Unfortunately for HP, the same incompetence has prevented the company from telling the difference between competent and incompetent workforce. Layoffs are a simple numbers game for them. I feel pride for the way I improved the support process during my stay and how I was part of a highly skilled team, each member with his own strengths that made the team greater than the sum of its parts; I still remember my teammates with warmth. But HP had already grown too big to be efficient by the time I worked there, and this resulted in an organisation that doesn't know where it should and wants to go; and excluding Whitman (of whom I have no experience), the recent CEO's and high level politics definitely haven't made me optimistic about the future of HP.

    4. Re:HP in permanent decline by Nimey · · Score: 0

      Paragraphs, motherfucker, do you speak it?!

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
  24. Just two models? by DragonWriter · · Score: 2

    I would only make two models of printers: laser black and white and laser color.

    So, are you going to just make compact desktop models, just high-end high-volume model, or just pick one-point in between? Are you just just going to make directly-connected models, or wired network models, or wifi models?

    Or, along with color vs. black and white, are there multiple axes of variation you need to cover that are going to require more than one model of printer in each the "black and white" and "color" categories?

  25. Doomed by squidflakes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Its been said, but I'll reiterate.

    Salesforce is not an IT tool, it is a Customer Management tool. The whole point of using Salesforce is to make your sales and customer service people more efficient so you can do more with what you have or do the same with fewer people.

    Workday is the same thing, only it replaces any internal HR databases with its own SaaS solution in order to allow your HR people to manage more people, or in order to manage the same number of people with fewer HR people.

    At the end of the day, both of these projects are about outsourcing internal functions, possibly to save money, possibly because Dave Duffield and Marc Benioff the CEOs of Workday and Salesforce respectively were big contributors to Meg's failed gubernatorial campaign.

    I'm cynical, especially when it comes to the continued flushing of HP down the toilet.

  26. Having just gone through a Salesforce effort... by LaRoach · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...all I can say is sell your HP stock! They're doomed.

    1. Re:Having just gone through a Salesforce effort... by js33 · · Score: 2

      ...all I can say is sell your HP stock! They're doomed.

      ... for what it's worth anymore. I paid $29.59 a share and today it closed at $14.91 :-(

      They were once a company I admired for their quality printers and calculators, but ever since that ill-fated acquisition of Compaq, it's just been downhill. What a misdirected, aimless company. Make something half-way decent and reliable like you used to, not 2100 different models of laser printers, and all those crappy laptops and desktop computers that never were your core competency to begin with.

      Not going to turn the company around until 2016! Ha, ha, ha! That's several more CEOs into the future, if the company lasts that long.

  27. Kodak ... HP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder what the similarity ...

  28. Buy in Canon gear, and rebadge... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..fire your own workers, just like Xerox will be doing with their remaining engineers next year when the HCL "partnership" hits the iceberg and they have no A3 multifunction devices to sell of their own and no money left.

    It'll be much cheaper. No R,D&E costs at all, just Sales, Marketing and Accounts.

  29. The all new HP Mac by MrEricSir · · Score: 2

    Why would HP need to buy Apple products? HP already makes their own MacBook Pro (which is appropriately named "Envy") as well as their own iMac. They don't need to visit the Apple Store when they can make their own.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
  30. Probably localized models by sirwired · · Score: 1

    As another poster has pointed out, those probably include localized models. Different display languages and power cords can make for a lot of different "models." Really, she should have called them "SKUs", not "models" to differentiate between actual different designs and minor changes to what gets tossed in the box.

  31. Becoming a "brand" not a company... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep.

      HP will soon no longer be neither designing, nor manufacturing any of their own products. Already the lion's share of their manufacturing is farmed out to Foxconn and other outfits in China. Pretty soon "Hewlett Packard Development Company" will become just Hewlett Packard, Inc." as product development also will be farmed out to China and the name will be used as a product "brand" only... just like Magnavox, Westinghouse, Zenith, Emerson, Polaroid, Philips, RCA, Sylvania, Bell & Howell, and a host of others.

    And not too far behind HP's footsteps is the once great name of Motorola too.

  32. Hey, maybe Whitman won't suck for HP by jbeach · · Score: 1

    As long as she doesn't go anywhere near public office ever in her entire life, or any company that I or a friend are working for, or any institution that will have a significant impact on my life, I'm willing to give her the benefit of the doubt.

    --
    The Invisible Hand of the Free Market is what punches workers in the nuts.
  33. So Long HP Home Division by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the home consumer, HP once meant high quality laser printers and top notch calculators. Then Carly Firiona came, merged HP with Compaq, and proceeded shit on everything and everyone. Its been downhill ever since. And btw, the real HP calculator division died over a decade ago, all that remains are crappy ass Taiwanese junk. TI & Casio are far better values today. Palm/Handspring floundered with Treo & Web OS, acquired & killed by HP. Now always-internet-connected smartphones , mainly Apple iPhone & Android, are drowning/killing all other competing smart devices. Innovation-wise this sucks big time.

    1. Re:So Long HP Home Division by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And btw, the real HP calculator division died over a decade ago, all that remains are crappy ass Taiwanese junk. TI & Casio are far better values today.

      The HP calculator division has been whittled down to a handful of people. Calculators as such are a dying breed outside of elementary and high school, and TI has that market pretty much cornered (in the U.S., at least.) The calculator division is a footnote to a footnote in HP's balance sheet, although I'm sure that they are sufficiently profitable to avoid the axe, as they have so far. It's not easy to make products that will set the world on fire under those circumstances.

  34. i would like HP to cut its product offerings to 0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And bring back carly, just to fire that stupid bitch all over again.

  35. Except Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple thinks only 1 should be needed.
    AND you will like it.

    1. Re:Except Apple by Nimey · · Score: 1

      But it's got these sexy rounded corners and the casing is aluminum billet.

      Granted you can't ever replace the toner when it runs out, but this makes it a whole inch smaller and a couple pounds lighter!

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
  36. or not shipping... Re:zuh? by Fubari · · Score: 2

    Their firmware and driver teams need adequate room in which to explore the wide variety of vexing bugs that you can get away with shipping...

    Or drivers they're not shipping; I am the unhappy owner an orphaned HP color laser printer (CLJ 1500). While Brother figured out how to support 64 bit Vista & Win 7, HP decided to "focus on things that matter." It is going to be a while before I look at buying HP hardware again. (Yeah, yeah, I'm sure HP is all bummed out about that.) But who knows, maybe they'll impress me with their visionary innovation some day.

    1. Re:or not shipping... Re:zuh? by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

      As I can summarize an "Ask Slashdot" I submitted a few years ago, "caveat emptor". End I can translate that as "you should have looked up the specific specifications(sic) before considering purchasing whatever it is you purchased, retroactively. And given that he specifications were not available, nor clear in any way, it is entirely your fault."

      On behalf of HP, I can honestly say, go fuck yourself with an "adult" prosthesis and/or artificial appendage of your choice which would cause you very little pain in the wallet, and at the same time the greatest amount of pain in the arse.

    2. Re:or not shipping... Re:zuh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell is wrong with you?

    3. Re:or not shipping... Re:zuh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just looked this model up. You really picked a shitty one. This is why I only buy free software friendly printers. Paying a little extra for even a shitty (quality) printer is better than knowing (you could have predicted it with this model) it's going to be “discontinued” in a few months and become unsupported because the manufacturer won't support it. A company which provides sources/specifications ensures it at least can be properly supported down the road.

      >>> only company I'll buy from cause they sell freedom friendly hardware (GNU/Linux)

      http://www.thinkpenguin.com/

  37. I have an idea... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    HP should outsource all their IT to HP India. It worked so well for the rest of us.

    It'd be interesting to see how long it'd take them to go out of business.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  38. Re:Better for her to preside over downfall of HP.. by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

    Believe me, after Arnold ran the state even further into the ground, we need someone with experience at the reins. Wanna-be politicians like Whitman and Arnold just don't cut it when there's extremely difficult times ahead.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
  39. HP should... by unixisc · · Score: 2

    Add another variable for them localizing their printers around the world, due to varying environmental conditions. Like printers in humid, tropical countries would be very different from the ones in the US, which is why you don't see the same models in both places. It's not the same as touchpads.

    However, I think they should spin off their non-PC computer business into a pure maintenance company, that would deal w/ customers w/ their legacy products, like ones from Compaq, Tandem, DEC and HP's own PA-RISC and Itanic lines. Let this company develop successors to all these lines of products - the PA-RISC, the Alpha, continue on Itanium III, MIPS and make successors to the old product lines like Himalayas, Alphaservers, HP-9000s, Integrity servers & so on. Delight their customers (who are still w/ them) and live off maintenance contracts. And maybe even build a business around FBSD and OBSD.

    As for HP itself, be just a PC & peripheral company like Dell. Since they are going w/ Windows Phones & Tablets, base them on Clover Trail or Hondo (same advice goes for Microsoft's own rumored phone) - don't go w/ Android: that market is already lost to Samsung, Sony, Google/Mot and HTC.

  40. Re:Better for her to preside over downfall of HP.. by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

    I saw Red Sonja, and expected as much. One should watch Conan, Terminator, and Red Sonja before voting for a candidate. He may have a heart of gold, but he was a fierce warrior who seemed to have a somewhat tenuous hold on the concept of governance.

    Ronald Regan, on the other hand, was a handsome and well-dressed non-barbarian. So clearly he was a better choice as governor. Clearly.

  41. Re:Better for her to preside over downfall of HP.. by dbIII · · Score: 1

    I'm sure it will since he's had plenty of practice in presiding over the downfall of California. I'm not even in the USA and I've heard of his fuckups last time.

  42. You don't get to outsource the worry by dbIII · · Score: 1

    I would have insisted that they go to an Exchange provider and let them worry about that shit

    Then you still have the worry but there's fuck all you can do about it apart from wait. An organisation near me with 20k users hosted by MS were just small fry that had to wait more than a week to get their email. The problem was a DNS typo at the MS Exchange server farm fixed in seconds, but it took a bit over a week for the ticket to make it through the queue. Over that time the IT people in the organisation did little other than answer phones and tell angry people that they just had to wait.

    1. Re:You don't get to outsource the worry by fm6 · · Score: 1

      What's you're point? That you can avoid incopetence by never outsourcing anything? The way you avoid incompetence is by not dealing with incompotent people.

    2. Re:You don't get to outsource the worry by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I suppose that means my point is you don't know who is competant and who is not, and even if they are if they care enough about their customers to have an email outage of less than a week.
      There's probably nobody more competant than Microsoft at running MS Exchange servers but that doesn't help if they are happy to let your twenty thousand users go for a week with email access because that's a small customer by their reasoning.

    3. Re:You don't get to outsource the worry by fm6 · · Score: 1

      So maybe you should switch to a provider who thinks that a customer who's paying them six figures every month is a customer worth keeping.

    4. Re:You don't get to outsource the worry by dbIII · · Score: 1

      So how do they find that provider when the salesfolk will always pretend that they will get such a service?
      Anyway, it's just what I see as a pretty obvious example of outsourcing to a large respected provider being a mistake in hindsight (although since I was only involved in trying to work out why I could not send email to these people I know nothing about the benefits - only the truly epic failure of no email for over a week). You don't get to wash your hands and say "that's not my problem" when people are screaming about lost revenue, and I don't intend to let an outsourcing company put me in that position for something as important as email. Users will grudgingly accept loss of electricity, telephones or internet connection, but if there's no backhoe ripping through the line they will ring up and scream if they are not getting their email. Even if there is a backhoe ripping through the line they will complain if they can't email a 50MB attachment to some guy down the hall, which is the other situation where hosted email sucks even if you do have a fast link.

    5. Re:You don't get to outsource the worry by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Subtle hint that the salespeople lied? Taking a week to fix a simple config issue.

      You mention not being able to email large attachments? Internal email servers tend to run short of space, because of the usual cost dweeb issues. Thus every internal server I ever used filters out anything over 1 MB. If you find the right external provider, you can specify what does and does not get filtered. Though you really should have an SFTP server or a file sharing account or something.

    6. Re:You don't get to outsource the worry by dbIII · · Score: 1

      You are making my argument for me about the stupidity of a one size fits all policy enforced from outside. It's easier to get bigger disks and move to a larger tape backup than it is to socially engineer your employers and tell them they shouldn't be sending emails larger than 1MB on a gigabit speed internal network. I just cannot see limiting email sizes to 1MB as a sane approach in 2012 - it's BOFH territory considering what little resources you need to let the users send much larger attachments, even when there are already plenty of other methods to share files in place. Their convenience can be supported with very little time and resources, and until mail clients have an attachment stripping and linking system that requires no thought on the part of the user we'll be stuck with attachments instead of emails where the user just points to where the file is available.
      Anyway, with the example I gave above they stuck with MS since it was nearly a year before the contract came up again and the salesfolk convinced the management of that place that other providers would be even worse. From looking around and hearing of all kinds of fuckups they are definitely correct in some cases (eg. zero backups, just an online live copy that was also lost when the production data was lost), and you have no way of knowing who is good or not until they fuck up, and even then they may retain a good reputation (eg. how many times have Dropbox screwed up security so badly that it's been in the mainstream newspapers?).

      My job is gone, and rightly so, if computer problems prevent large numbers of people from doing work and thus revenue not coming in for a long period of time whether the fault is inhouse or at a hosting provider. Blaming the hosting provider would do little other than give me someone to be angry at as the door hits me in the arse on the way out to unemployment for choosing the wrong hosting provider.

    7. Re:You don't get to outsource the worry by fm6 · · Score: 1

      You are making my argument for me about the stupidity of a one size fits all policy enforced from outside.

      You're right, that's stupid. And I don't even begin to see how I was advocating it.

    8. Re:You don't get to outsource the worry by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. Anyway my entire point is that you can't just magic away responsibility by outsourcing something.

    9. Re:You don't get to outsource the worry by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the responsibility for your IT is yours. But being responsible for something isn't the same as doing it yourself. If your expertise is limited, being responsible means not doing it yourself, but instead delegating to somebody with more expertise than you. One solution is to hire an expert. Another is to outsource.

      Now, you can hire an "expert" or sign an outsourcing provider and still get screwed. That doesn't mean that you should have done everything yourself — you can't. It means you made a bad choice. It's something we all do. And that's something else you can't magic away.

    10. Re:You don't get to outsource the worry by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The last time I hired a MS Exchange "expert" to handle an upgrade I wasn't confident about (being a *nix person that had barely touched the platform), he turned three mail servers into open relays. Then there was the SOE installation "expert" who fucked about with his scripts that would not run for weeks until I came in and saw in less than 30 seconds that he had long filenames in something that would only take the seven+three format.
      You still need somebody inhouse or that can be trusted that knows enough to be able to say if the contractors are delivering or not on the obvious stuff.
      Enough grumbling, I've put my point out there and it looks like you were never suggesting the cloud as a magic fix anyway. With my current situation and local bandwidth issues imposed by a communications monopoly just about everything "cloud" would be a step backwards for where I work - it's obviously not the same for others.

  43. Education in permanent decline? by dbIII · · Score: 2

    There are sentences in Moby Dick longer than the paragraph above.

  44. Problems are with IT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait, I thought Randy Mott was getting high praise for what an amazing job he did for HP's IT.

    I guess not then.....

    It's a good thing Meg has a lot of experience working with extremely large companies in the services and hardware business. She doesn't? How did she get the job then?

    - (anonymous former hp employee coward)

  45. Mod parent up. by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    Me too. Unless you play games, CS people have been fine for 6 years. Typical office related computers probably for 10 years if you don't get forced into the software upgrade cycle.

  46. Re:Better for her to preside over downfall of HP.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree, I think she's got a better shot at turning HP around. California is a well known lost cause.

  47. Well, it is a different approach than in the past. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is refreshing to see a HP CEO actually address the issues HP has instead of hiding them. The CEOs of the last 10 years or so have just been covering things up and pretending all is good. It has been SOP since Carly that if a quarter is going to come in below expectations; you lay off all the contractors for up to a month and freeze spending for a while to make the numbers come out better. Of course this means competent contractors leave for more stable work and all of the project’s schedules slip and then go over budget trying to catch up again. We had a good quarter though!

    I don’t know if she can do it, but publicly facing the problems instead of hiding them seems like a good first step.