Slashdot Mirror


Starting Next Year, Brazil Wants To Track All Cars Electronically

New submitter juliohm writes "As of January, Brazil intends to put into action a new system that will track vehicles of all kinds via radio frequency chips. It will take a few years to accomplish, but authorities will eventually require all vehicles to have an electronic chip installed, which will match every car to its rightful owner. The chip will send the car's identification to antennas on highways and streets, soon to be spread all over the country. Eventually, it will be illegal to own a car without one. Besides real time monitoring of traffic conditions, authorities will be able to integrate all kinds of services, such as traffic tickets, licensing and annual taxes, automatic toll charge, and much more. Benefits also include more security, since the system will make it harder for thieves to run far away with stolen vehicles, much less leave the country with one."

19 of 178 comments (clear)

  1. The big brother society by ickleberry · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Marches on steady. Unstoppable and with an insatiable appetite for new technology

    1. Re:The big brother society by wierd_w · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And we, the technicians, geeks, engineers, and software architects of the world, greedily line up to offer suggestions on how best to feed that pernicious appetite out of either being forced into it simply to have food to eat, or for fame and fortune.

      The result is the same. We make the very chains they enslave us with, and happily forge ever more diabolical pleasures to satisfy big brother.

      Who made DRM? It wasn't a media executive. It was somebody in a cubicle. Think about that.

    2. Re:The big brother society by PRMan · · Score: 4, Informative

      I once told my boss that I would quit if he made me work on a spam engine. He finally gave the product to some of my co-workers, who gladly did it... :-(

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    3. Re:The big brother society by wierd_w · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I would rather see us do what doctors in ancient greece did.

      Make an oath not to willfully cause harm, and internally enforce it. Call it whatever, but we need some form of morality in our profession, and willfully creating code we KNOW to be malicious is clearly immoral, regardless of what moral compas you choose to employ.

      Simple things, like "I will not create mass mailers for commercial uses", "I will not create personally identifiable tracking systems of any sort.", "I will not create nor enforce systems to hinder political speech of any kind.", "I will not willfully penetrate another computer system without permission, and will not create tools to do so either.", "I will not willingly install backdoors for spying, monitoring, or sabotage, for any agency, in any software or systems I create.", etc.

      It doesn't need to be religious, like 'i will only make open code' or anything. Just things we can unilaterally agree are clear misuses of technology. Kinda like doctors refusing to create bioweapons. That kind of thing.

    4. Re:The big brother society by Obfuscant · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There was no sane reason why NASA needed that information. They were just collecting it because they could. Because someone said, "well, we've got just about everything on these boys...

      I can think of one very good reason. To have a control sample to test against when they get back, to see what effects the low gravity/increased radiation had on them. Who knows, there might be gravity related issues with reproductive processes just like there are for bone and muscles.

      Or for later use, in case there was a radiation accident that would render them incapable of having children.

    5. Re:The big brother society by xenobyte · · Score: 3, Funny

      I once told my boss that I would quit if he made me work on a spam engine. He finally gave the product to some of my co-workers, who gladly did it... :-(

      What kind of respectable company would want any kind of spam engine?!

      Sounds like a loser with shotty morals...

      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
    6. Re:The big brother society by wierd_w · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As for purpose, that is more external. For that, we need a history lesson.

      Hippocrates was not an ordinary physician. He was the lead physician at a well respected hospital/temple of apollo. He was greatly displeased that other doctors in other cities engaged in nefarious antics, and belived strongly that medicine should only be used to heal, and medical knowledge should never be used to cause injury or harm. He couldn't force the doctors in other cities to comply with that moral vision, and didn't really attempt to explicitly.

      Instead, he made all of his students swear to an oath that is basicaly the granddaddy of viral licensing. It prohibited his students from delivering medical knowledge to any physician that wasn't an oath sworn one, in their tradition.

      The external factor was that the citizenry held more trust in hippocratic doctors than doctors of other schools, because of the added and strongly enforced ethos of that school of medicinal practice. As such, over time, the hippocratic school simply stole all the customers and students.

      Ok, history lesson over.

      I am suggesting that a community be created with the express intent that technological knowledge should never be used to willfully harm people, with similar implicit and explicit restrictions as the hippocratic oath. We should protect information with very strong asymetric keys, and exchange information only with other members. Membership should be free, but be serious business. The idea is to foster trust with industry and the citizenry at large, by being a very highly sanitized specialist forum to discuss vulnerabilities and solutions to those vulnerabilities in a sanitized environment. Failure to comply with the restrictions of the community results in having your keypair banned for life, and having your real identity added to a (searchable) wall of shame. All exchanges in the community are always encrypted, and stored in the encrypted form. Community members authorize other members to read their posts by distributing public keys. Each message is to contain a cryptographically identifiable hash, such that decrypted messages can have a unique and positive identification of which public key did the decryption. Each member retains his/her private key. To an outsider viewing the forums, they will see only huge blocks of RSA style crypto streams in nested succession. A CA should fascilitate the assignment and revocation of keys.

      This would allow community collaboration and exchanges on wild exploit discoveries in a more protected environment, and enable more controlled release of information with industries impacted, with the intent of proving and sustaining professional trust, making the community a preferential setting for such dicussion.

      The idea is to passively win out over disreputable technology workers by concentrating information, and internally vetting members. Membership must always be free and easy to obtain. It should be difficult to RETAIN, except through strict adherence to the rules. Membership thus gives access to a potentially huge archive of very specific information, and a potentially valuable asset in security consultency.

      It wouldn't hold any legal protection or authority. It would simply be a stongly enforced "club", with a strong code of conduct.

      The reason for multiple keypair generation is to frustrate attempts at collecting and brute forcing the data, and just accepting the added complexity tradeoff.

  2. Soon to be hacked by concealment · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I clone your MAC address, I decrypt your Wi-Fi, and I own your basic electronics already.

    Apply these relative basic skills and what do you have? A high-tech integrated system which can actually be used to conceal the identity of a vehicle behind a false identity, and charge up all sorts of services to the legitimate owner besides.

    1. Re:Soon to be hacked by Tom · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You overestimate yourself and underestimate your enemies.

      Sure you can hack some home WiFi. Your enemy is one guy, statistically speaking most likely someone with just enough computer know-how to reinstall windows.

      Going up against a national system is a different game. Not just a different league, a different game. If they don't make the MPAA-stupidity-mistake (invent your own crypto and don't let anyone outside test it for weaknesses) or the typical software-company-mistake (do thinks cheap and fast so you have a great time-to-market, facepalm the day before release and say "oh btw, has anyone thought about security?"), or some other obvious ones, this can be very, very solid.

      Crack NSA's SELinux to get a feel for what you're up against. Sure it's possible. All you need is either a serious mistake in the policy configuration, or a ring-0 exploit.

      Yes, everything can be hacked. Don't expect to be the one doing it, though. If they do this properly, then a hundred other people have thought of your approach before, during the design, development and testing phases. Maybe they've put in an easter egg for you to find, to reward the effort.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    2. Re:Soon to be hacked by epyT-R · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Fine. Get that service if you want. That doesn't mean it should be shoved down our throats by the state under the guise of safety. Would you want a policeman in your house 24/7 to 'monitor' your 'well being'? No? Why not?

  3. Thank you, Big Brother! by Bill+Dimm · · Score: 3, Funny

    authorities will be able to integrate all kinds of services, such as traffic tickets

    Remember the bad old days, when police inconvenienced you with long stops while they wrote you a ticket just when you most urgently needed to get somewhere? Well, those days are gone! Now, a pile of tickets will arrive in your mail each day without you ever being held up by those pesky police. We hope you appreciate the convenience we've brought you while you're speeding off to your destination.

    Sincerely,
        Big Brother

  4. wont stop thierves; crooks by wierd_w · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The "must be tagged" law will not prevent theft, and will not prevent other criminal activities.

    It does not prevent the criminals from disabling a tag, altering a tag, or replacing the tag.

    What the tracking system ultimately tracks are the tags. Not the vehicles.

    As such, removing the tags, and then transporting the vehicle under a different but "valid" tag would make an effective means of breaking this system.

    The real benefit to law enforcement/government is *NOT* combating criminals, it is tracking law abidding citizens.

    I would expect catch-22s like "we show your vehicle at the scene" in one case and "you can't prove that isn't a fake transponder being used to put you on the other side of the country" in another, with the difference being the desire of the prosecutor.

    (Eg, "iron-clad, irrefutable!" When used to show guilt, and "suspect, clearly a technological fabrication!" When used to assert innocense.)

    If anything, this masure will spawn a new form of criminal activity, buying, selling, and provisioning counterfiet/shady transponders.

  5. Re:On the bright side... by Githaron · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It would fail outside the major cities at least. The cops over there can't even keep people from hacking into the water and power system. I went to one place where there was a literal "wrong side of the tracks". On one side, everyone paid for their utilities. On the other side, water was spraying out of pipes duck taped into each other in all directions and extension cords were running under the tracks. I am curious, are you Brazilian? You spelled Brazil with an "s" instead of a "z" like Brazilians.

  6. We already have this here in the US. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The big brother society ... Marches on steady. Unstoppable and with an insatiable appetite for new technology

    It also deploys very quietly these days. It's already up and running before people notice it's there.

    We already HAVE four federally mandated car trackers on all passenger cars (along with most other vehicles) since 2007.

    It's called a "Tire Pressure Monitoring System". It works by having (typically) a lithium-cell powered device in the valve stem on each wheel that transmits the tire pressure information along with a unique serial number (so your dashboard computer doesn't get confused by nearby cars). These can also be read by loops in the road.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:We already have this here in the US. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      They're also not registered to the car.

  7. Re:"Services" by Tom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Traffic tickets are not a "service". A service implies that you actually get something useful in return.

    You assume that the service always has to be towards the subject. It doesn't. The police performs a service when it arrests a burglar, but the service isn't towards the burglar, it is towards the house owner. Traffic tickets are a service to the other participants of traffic, because by punishing undesireable behaviour they limit it.

    Yeah, we can talk all night about how reality sometimes differs and how speeding traps are often put not at the spots where speeding is dangerous but where they'll catch the most people, etc. etc. - that's implementation details.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  8. How Brazil works by submain · · Score: 4, Informative

    Brasil is a communal society; we could care less for individual rights. Heck, if the entire country goes out on the streets naked every February, there is no need for individualism.

    That being said, it's really hard to enforce a law in Brasil, mostly because it is a matter of national pride to find a way around the rules. They can put as many transponders as they want, but if all the population gets are tickets, then even the dealerships will have an "unofficial" - official - system to remove the tags.

    The same thing happened with DVD players way back. Companies tried to force consumers to only get players for region 7. Except that, when you bought a DVD player, the salesman himself would write a code in a piece of paper that you could use to unlock all the regions.

    Of course, if the system is used properly, then people won't bother. They could care less if some random guy knows if they are going to churches or brothels.

  9. Brazilian Explain by superflit · · Score: 3, Informative

    OK,

    It is VERY FUNNY how foreigners or first world people think about that.
    The REAL reason is:

    TAXES, FEES and revenues.

    The Brazilian gov. only cares about revenues and taxes to keep it's dysfunctional dept. and employees.
    Brazil was one of the first countries to have its IRS system on internet, paying taxes on INTERNET.

    In one of my country roads, there is a camera that read the tags and check if the license is ok.
    If not it sends a alert to the next police station with details.
    The police see: White car, tag xx xxx
    He stop and tow the car.

    But if you go at night that does not work.
    So the brazilian govt is going deeper.

    In sao Paolo you have SOME days you can use your car, if you use on 'not allowed' days and you get caught you get a fine.
    So this is the reason for the tags.

    'hmmmmm..you moved your car 1 mile in your not allowed day, please pay'

    Now I will wait for my fellows brazilians say that 'it is not like that.' and how our govt 'really ' cares about us..