Slashdot Mirror


Foxconn Workers On Strike Over iPhone 5 Production

itwbennett writes "That army of robotic assembly line workers we mentioned yesterday apparently can't get started soon enough. As many as 3,000-4,000 workers are on strike at Foxconn's Zhengzhou factory, upset at stricter quality control requirements with the iPhone 5 and having to work through a national holiday this week. 'According to workers, multiple iPhone 5 production lines from various factory buildings were in a state of paralysis for the entire day,' China Labor Watch said. Sina Weibo and Tencent Weibo are both blocking searches in Chinese for 'Foxconn strikes.'"

184 comments

  1. big surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    china unhappy.

    1. Re:big surprise by The+Snowman · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They'll be even more unhappy once they realize that robots can do their jobs even cheaper than they can. You know it's bad when even mainstream media is picking this up. A few months ago I was watching one of those Nightline/Dateline/Whateverline evening news shows that was talking specifically about Foxconn. At the end they showed the up-and-coming robot that does the work of the Chinese workers and in half the time of a human for half the cost. The reporter asked something along the lines of "what is going to happen when businesses realize they can assemble the gadgets in the U.S. and not pay to ship them across the ocean?"

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    2. Re:big surprise by Charliemopps · · Score: 4, Funny

      But in the US they have a high tax rate, and aren't allowed to just dump their waste in the local river... so that wont happen anyway.

    3. Re:big surprise by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Which American companies actually pay American Taxes? Not Google, Apple, Microsoft, General Electric, or any other large company that has the resources to hire good accountants. The cost of waste disposal for an assembly line probably isn't that much.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    4. Re:big surprise by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      We already ship our e-waste to China, why would that be any different.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    5. Re:big surprise by tomhath · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I suppose if you call billions of dollars paid in taxes as nothing, then yea, GE paid nothing. Pretty sure it's the same with the other companies, but you can research it yourself.

    6. Re:big surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That article doesn't really say quite what you're asserting that it does.

    7. Re:big surprise by Tough+Love · · Score: 4, Funny

      They'll be even more unhappy once they realize that robots can do their jobs even cheaper than they can.

      Don't be silly, they'll be building the robots.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    8. Re:big surprise by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      http://www.ctj.org/taxjusticedigest/archive/2012/02/press_release_general_electric.php

      General Electric's (GE) annual SEC 10-K filing for 2011 (filed February 24, 2012) reveals that the company paid at most two percent of its $80.2 billion in U.S. pretax profits in federal income taxes over the last 10 years.

      Following revelations in March 2011 that GE paid no federal income taxes in 2010 and in fact enjoyed $3.3 billion in net tax benefits, GE told AFP (3/29/2011), "GE did not pay US federal taxes last year because we did not owe any." But don't worry, GE told Dow Jones Newswires (3/28/2011), "our 2011 tax rate is slated to return to more normal levels with GE Capital's recovery."

      As it turns out, however, in 2011 GE's effective federal income tax rate was only 11.3 percent, less than a third the official 35 percent corporate tax rate.

      "I don't think most Americans would consider 11.3 percent, not to mention GE's long-term effective rate of 1.8 percent, to be 'normal,' " said Bob McIntyre, director of Citizens for Tax Justice. "But for GE, taxes are something to be avoided rather than paid."

      Pretty sure it's the same with the other companies, but you can research it yourself.

      GE is one of 280 profitable Fortune 500 companies profiled in "Corporate Taxpayers and Corporate Tax Dodgers, 2008-2010." The report shows GE is one of 30 major U.S. corporations that paid zero -- or less -- in federal income taxes in the last three years. The full report, a joint project of Citizens for Tax Justice and the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, is at http://ctj.org/corporatetaxdodgers/.

      The difference between the 47% of Americans who don't pay federal income taxes and GE, is that GE makes billions of dollars per year.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    9. Re:big surprise by arekin · · Score: 1

      The cost of waste disposal for an assembly line probably isn't that much.

      It may be cheaper to pay China to eat our production waste than to make our product and dump their own waste. Either way China wont miss their 7 toed children bathing in toxic waste.

      --
      Disagreeing with you does not make me a troll.
    10. Re:big surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmm might it be more cost effective to just export the waste? How far is the distance between the US mainland and international waters? I'm imagining there are problems with dumping this stuff in the ocean although if we are importing electronics what about exporting the waste instead? I think there are laws on this in Europe although I'm not so sure about the USA. I think you can get around these laws and they are only limiting exporting waste to Africa- not to China anyway.

    11. Re:big surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget payroll taxes, fuck this doublespeak. The implication is that they don't pay any taxes, this needs to be actively combated.

    12. Re:big surprise by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Pretty sure it's the same with the other companies, but you can research it yourself.

      No, just for the big ones. The small ones have to pay a lot more.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    13. Re:big surprise by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't forget payroll taxes, fuck this doublespeak. The implication is that they don't pay any taxes, this needs to be actively combated.

      FFS. Payroll taxes and State taxes do not go towards paying down the Federal Deficit.
      GE does not do its part in paying the tax that would prevent the bankruptcy of America.

      Your pedantry does nothing to advance a solution.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    14. Re:big surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the jobs were over in China, you idiot. No payroll taxes in America for jobs in China.

    15. Re:big surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent down.

      Whether its spending or deficit reduction, money is liquid and fungible. If payroll taxes weren't collected, that's a lot more deficit spending needed to to keep up with Social Security and Medicare. Same for state taxes: income, property (passed down to renters) and sales. The money for government services, which are numerous and omnipresent, has to come from some where. GP missed that the previous poster specified federal income tax, but it is certainly not pedantry to point out the even very poor people can't avoid a non-trivial tax burden.

    16. Re:big surprise by makomk · · Score: 1

      They don't pay any payroll taxes on assembly-line robots, since robots are neither on the payroll nor indeed human.

    17. Re:big surprise by gtall · · Score: 1

      If you had said the Federal Debt, then you'd be correct, but only because the Federal Deficit is the yearly amount we fail to collect in taxes for expenses incurred. What do you think the Federal Gov. does with your payroll taxes?

    18. Re:big surprise by gtall · · Score: 1

      The eWaste is mostly from manufacturing components. Moving assembly to the U.S. won't contribute much to eWaste.

    19. Re:big surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    20. Re:big surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, however some states like Texas do tax assets held on businesses. This means that there would be taxes levied on the robot workers to some extent. Adjustments would need to be made on tax rates as people would not be able to work and so social programs would have an uptick or two in usage.

    21. Re:big surprise by drsquare · · Score: 1

      The components, factories and infrastructure are still all in China. Even if you had the robots, it'd be cheaper to have them in China. It wouldn't eliminate shipping costs either, you'd still have to ship them from the US to the customers.

  2. Good for them! by s.petry · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Strike, it's the only power they have. Until they get shot for being on strike that is, or run over by a tank.. this is happening in China you know..

    And actually, China lets them strike because it hurts the US more than China. It's not like Apple is going to close the slave labor camps any time soon, even if they lose a few bucks.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:Good for them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Strike, it's the only power they have. Until they get shot for being on strike that is, or run over by a tank.. this is happening in China you know..

      No, I don't know, throwing a few links would be helpful. China has few human rights when compared to developed nations, but I doubt they'd shoot random people over nothing. "Encouraging" people to not cause trouble is much more efficient in the long term (e.g. you strike you become unemployable; I'm not saying they do this, but it would work better than shooting people). And sometimes the best you can do is do nothing at all, if you push people too hard too often they might strike back.

      And actually, China lets them strike because it hurts the US more than China. It's not like Apple is going to close the slave labor camps any time soon, even if they lose a few bucks.

      Foxconn workers striking is troublesome for Foxconn, and on a lesser degree for Apple and China. But Apple is an important customer, so I'd bet the one hurt the most, by far, is Foxconn, they might even have to give some discounts to Apple if the strike continues for too long.

      I just hope the strikers manage to get something, it's about time the Chinese people can have a share of China's amazing growth.

    2. Re:Good for them! by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2

      You do know that Apple recently opened up manufacturing in Brazil, right?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    3. Re:Good for them! by flimflammer · · Score: 1

      So when can we expect Apple to stop supporting Foxconn, then? Ever?

    4. Re:Good for them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      You do know that Apple recently opened up manufacturing in Brazil, right?

      Apple only opened the Brazil plants because Brazil wouldn't let them sell iPhones in Brazil unless they did. Don't act like they did it out of the good of their hearts. If that law didn't exist they'd shut down the Brazilian plant faster than you can say "Saint Steve Jobs" and move it back to China.

    5. Re:Good for them! by ZorinLynx · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >Apple only opened the Brazil plants because Brazil wouldn't let them sell iPhones in Brazil unless they did.

      Anyone else think that we (the US) should follow Brazil's example?

      I mean, there it is, a perfect example of regulation bringing manufacturing jobs back to a country. We could certainly use that right now.

    6. Re:Good for them! by s.petry · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How dare you speak common sense you protectionist!

      While I agree with your point, I have seen anyone that tries to implement common sense laws to protect the US economy labelled and belittled by people that make more profit sending things overseas for cheap labor. If you speak common sense about an economy, you are silenced by propaganda. It's not about the people of the US any longer, it's about the top getting more at all costs (and no, I'm not referring to the upper 10%, more like the upper .1%.

      I wrote an article about 20 years ago which was ignored, stating that the shipping of industrial jobs overseas would kill our economy. Hell, I was not alone by a long shot. Numerous economists, philanthropists, etc.. etc.. were already warning of it way before I was. The Ford model worked, and made us prosper. Middle class people spend their money, the upper 1% does not. This is how we get and hold our positions in the economy.

      Look at Detroit and Flint. Tons of cash was there for both the upper and middle classes. Every middle class household owned 2 cars, and a mortgage. Increases in pay meant that the middle class purchased snow mobiles, boats, motorcycles, wave runners, hunting gear, fishing gear, "Big Screen TV", etc.. The middle class money tends to be very liquid.

      The upper class in Detroit owned houses they rarely stayed in. They go on trips, they don't spend locally. They invest to get more money and property, they don't purchase locally and definitely nothing trivial like a snow mobile or wave runner. If they purchased a boat, it was an investment boat and again not generating money locally. That makes sense, it's how the wealthy remain wealthy and increase wealth.

      The lower class in Detroit were all in line to become middle class. They stood outside the auto plants applying all the time, took shop classes, got GEDs and went to school all in hopes of getting to the middle class.

      So when we sent all the middle class jobs overseas, the economy collapsed. At first, the wealthy still had money. But in short order, even they lost out. Property values dropped massively sticking everyone that owned property with huge debt and no capital. The lines stopped forming at the plants, and people started dropping like flies out of school. Now once prosperous areas in Detroit are like ghost towns.

      All of these things were called out in the 80s, before NAFTA was passed and the plants were moved first to Mexico then to China. Not by me, but by countless economists gave warnings and said "DON'T DO NAFTA!". Those guys were told that they were just being protectionist, if they were heard at all.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    7. Re:Good for them! by clarkkent09 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Chinese worker: $350/month.
      Chinese robot (if the article is correct): $175/month.
      Unionized US worker including benefits and taxes: $4000/month for doing a worse job slower.

      20,000,000 iPhone users in the US paying 4x price for their phone so that 2000 can get jobs: priceless

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    8. Re:Good for them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You may be too young to remember the events of Tiananmen Square of 23 years ago. I wasn't. And although I cannot find the picture now, the image of a headless body with bloody tank tread tracks leading away from where the head should have been is something that deeply affected my young self and I remember it quite vividly. (If you're posting from china and can still see this post, I suggest using a foreign proxy for your search about what I'm talking about.)

    9. Re:Good for them! by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 2

      If they purchased a boat, it was an investment boat

      Stop. You're killing me here.

    10. Re:Good for them! by Moofie · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    11. Re:Good for them! by khallow · · Score: 1

      Or we could recognize that Detroit would still be a burnt out shell even with protectionist laws in place.

    12. Re:Good for them! by flimflammer · · Score: 1

      Well, then, that answers my question.

    13. Re:Good for them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Tiananmen protests were against the government, the "Communist" rule (which today is mostly just a word rather than a philosophy), and lack of free speech.
      It was also, as you mention, 23 years ago.

      These protests are against working conditions at a private employer. The Chinese government are also a lot more interested in foreign investment these days, and the wanton murder of unarmed workers is not a good way to let the world know they should move their business there.

    14. Re:Good for them! by Tom · · Score: 1

      Anyone else think that we (the US) should follow Brazil's example?

      No, too simple, and everyone did it, it would be the end of world trade.

      But, there is a point in saying "you want our citizens money, then contribute something to our economy". So giving corporations a choice between various options would be a good way that solves both issues. Two immediately apparent ways are to either create jobs or pay an import tax. I'm sure there are others.

      Now an import tax sounds crazy at first because, after all, it will be the local buyers and not the corporation that pays it. But its purpose is not to get money from the corporation, but to create more of an equality to local manufacturers and soften the impact of the low labour-cost country.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    15. Re:Good for them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you work for a bowl of rice a day and somewhere to sleep? No?

      The kind of pay the Chinese workers receive wouldn't buy you a stick of gum in the 'States. There's no way of moving those jobs to the 'States unless the unit price of an iPhone rises to $60000....

    16. Re:Good for them! by sjames · · Score: 1

      You fail at logic. The labor cost is a tiny fraction of the iPhone's price, and only that part would go up.

    17. Re:Good for them! by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      I imagine many American businesses would give China their business on the basis that China shoots strikers. It's one way to keep strikes to a minimum.

    18. Re:Good for them! by ultranova · · Score: 1

      20,000,000 iPhone users in the US paying 4x price for their phone so that 2000 can get jobs: priceless

      Compared to having all manufacturing jobs shipped to China or fall to $350/month pay level with no benefits, yes: a status symbol costing more is pretty much zero cost to society. Go unions!

      Or did you mean to imply that it's okay to screw workers as long as you get toys for cheap?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    19. Re:Good for them! by Raenex · · Score: 1

      And although I cannot find the picture now, the image of a headless body with bloody tank tread tracks leading away from where the head should have been is something that deeply affected my young self and I remember it quite vividly.

      I've never seen this image, nor heard of it mentioned, and I found exactly 4 results when I searched Google for: Tiananmen Square headless body

      Memories are iffy things.

    20. Re:Good for them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the cost of labor on an iphone estimated to be only tens of dollars per phone.

      so basically, you're totally wrong.

    21. Re:Good for them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One important missing fact. Using overseas labor, lowers the cost of items for Americans. Even though we may not make as much over here, things are cheaper, so we likely have a similar standard of living even if salaries don't line up.

    22. Re:Good for them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at Detroit and Flint. Tons of cash was there for both the upper and middle classes. Every middle class household owned 2 cars, and a mortgage. Increases in pay meant that the middle class purchased snow mobiles, boats, motorcycles, wave runners, hunting gear, fishing gear, "Big Screen TV", etc..

      Yeah, the UAW extorted that money out of the Big Three, in strike after strike; I was there in that era. Worked great when the economy was going good. When the American economy started going sour, well, you can just look what Detroit and Flint look like today.

      Protectionist laws wouldn't have changed much. Foreign competitors would still have been selling better product for a lesser price and the Big Three would have been just as hosed.

    23. Re:Good for them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strike, it's the only power they have. Until they get shot for being on strike that is, or run over by a tank.. this is happening in China you know..

      According to news which came out a day later, there was no protest at foxconn. Just a worker dispute. The news reporter better bring up a photograph of a protest as a proof.

    24. Re:Good for them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's a tiny fraction because they cheap chinese labor???

      Did you even think before you hit submit?

    25. Re:Good for them! by sjames · · Score: 1

      It's a tiny fraction period. Just how many man hours do you think it takes to assemble a phone? The majority of the parts are necessarily assembled by a pick and place machine and a wave or oven soldering line. If it's more than an hour, they're doing it wrong. That would come to about $25 out of a $600 phone if done in the U.S.

      The question then is did YOU even think before posting.

    26. Re:Good for them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you push people too hard too often they might strike back.

      the entire history of USSR proved it wrong. so do China history times longer than european one.

    27. Re:Good for them! by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      You do know that Apple recently opened up manufacturing in Brazil, right?

      Apple only opened the Brazil plants because Brazil wouldn't let them sell iPhones in Brazil unless they did. Don't act like they did it out of the good of their hearts. If that law didn't exist they'd shut down the Brazilian plant faster than you can say "Saint Steve Jobs" and move it back to China.

      =======
      I am let to believe that all Latin American countries are paralleling Brazil's rules. Chile, Argentina,Equador, etc. want 50% of the labor for a resell product to be done in their own country. Its time for the USA to do the same, and think then, about the jobs returning and the unemployment reduction. -- until robots take over

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  3. Why strike now? by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Couldnt they go on strike the day(s) of the holiday, just return the next day and start working?

    1. Re:Why strike now? by tqk · · Score: 5, Funny

      Couldnt they go on strike the day(s) of the holiday, just return the next day and start working?

      Nah. That'd mean double time and a half strike pay. It'd brick the union.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    2. Re:Why strike now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's not the holiday. It's the company's insistence that the products pass quality control. That's unheard of in Chinese manufacturing.

    3. Re:Why strike now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the holiday last whole week.

    4. Re:Why strike now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iPhone5 is harder to make.
      Workers get beaten for defects.

    5. Re:Why strike now? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Likely, the holiday was just the last straw.

    6. Re:Why strike now? by drsquare · · Score: 1

      It's traditional to go home and spend the holiday with their families. They can't do this in a day.

  4. Won't someone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Won't someone think of the hipsters?

  5. But.. but.. but.. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 0

    But.. but.. but... I thought by boycotting Apple I was helping the workers!!

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    1. Re:But.. but.. but.. by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

      But.. but.. but... I thought by boycotting Apple I was helping the workers!!

      Clearly you were [if its true]. That is kind of the point of the article.

    2. Re:But.. but.. but.. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2

      But.. but.. but... I thought by boycotting Apple I was helping the workers!!

      You know what, I totally misread the summary. It's my bad and I apologize. Please mod my post down.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    3. Re:But.. but.. but.. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      I had a reading comprehension fail there, it's my bad.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  6. Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But to be honest, I hope that both they get what they want AND the iPhone 5's quality goes up. The build quality seems to be pretty hit and miss at the moment. I'm actually thinking of buying a Samsung Galaxy 3, fragile behemoth that it is, just so I don't have to worry about getting a lemon iPhone 5.

    1. Re:Good for them. by tuppe666 · · Score: 1, Funny

      But to be honest, I hope that both they get what they want AND the iPhone 5's quality goes up. The build quality seems to be pretty hit and miss at the moment. I'm actually thinking of buying a Samsung Galaxy 3, fragile behemoth that it is, just so I don't have to worry about getting a lemon iPhone 5.

      I thought everyone was choosing the Galaxy III over the iPhone because of NFC, storage and screen size ;) No wonder Samsung is expecting to earn $7.3bn while Apple are reducing orders on chips and screens.

      I hope I have satisfied your off-topic troll comment trying to spin worker abuse as a good thing, with a lie.

    2. Re:Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OP here.More power to them, they've picked a good time to strike.

  7. Good to see people standing up, wherever they are. by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    Though I suppose there's some big syndicate behind them, which invariably is not a good thing.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  8. this bring them up to US mid 19th century by hguorbray · · Score: 5, Interesting

    when US and European Labor movements really started to assert themselves and address inequities and call the Robber Barons to task.

    China has their army and Police -US companies had Police and Pinkertons....the workers still prevailed in the end, although much has been lost recently...

    Hopefully it will not be bloody, but they deserve better than they are getting even if it means we might be paying slightly more for the next plastic POS we buy.

    I'm just sayin'

    1. Re:this bring them up to US mid 19th century by Marxdot · · Score: 1

      Hear, hear.

    2. Re:this bring them up to US mid 19th century by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Their 'robber barons'? You mean the companies that moved to China and started production there? Or do you mean the local companies that saved enough money and presented a viable business plan and started working?

      Or maybe you actually mean their government, which steals from every Chinese worker by devaluing Chinese money?

      Because if you talk about robber barons, you have to make sense, you have to talk about people who take something from those workers without giving them something back that they voluntarily agreed to, and that would be government running inflation and devaluing the renminbi and preventing those very Chinese workers from being able to use their own earnings to buy the very products that they are creating.

      --

      As to a strike - a private union is all fine as long as there are no laws that force the employer into being obligated to work with it. There has to be freedom of association and it must work both ways. No person has a 'right' to a job being provided by any other person.

    3. Re:this bring them up to US mid 19th century by clarkkent09 · · Score: 0

      You live in a fantasy world. Capitalism brought us the standard of living that we have and it is finally being allowed do the same in China and other places around the world that finally overthrew the collectivist scum who held back the enormous creative energy that only competition among free people can unleash. If unions truly wanted to help the workers they would be protesting in Washington, Beijing and other places where the corrupt ruling class is setting unfair rules to benefit themselves and their cronies and not calling for strikes against companies which are the source of wealth for all of us. Foxconn offers wages far in excess of average wages in China which is why people are queuing up to apply for a job there.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    4. Re:this bring them up to US mid 19th century by JBMcB · · Score: 1

      The Chinese are already unionized. There is one, national union, and membership is mandatory. All other unions are illegal.

      A workers utopia!

      --
      My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    5. Re:this bring them up to US mid 19th century by Wildclaw · · Score: 1

      ?

      Robber baron is just another way of calling those at the the top of the food chain in a right-libertarian society.

    6. Re:this bring them up to US mid 19th century by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      I know, it's a euphemism for the people who actually run the businesses, anybody who creates a product or a service that people end up buying because they like the product. This word is an acknowledgement of the fact that people do not understand why running a business as opposed to being an employee often provides somebody with a better life style. Those who call business owners robbers, are people who think something is stolen from them, because they think there is no other way a person running a business can make more money than any one specific worker that is hired by that person.

      ---

      It was fine 150 years ago, because capitalism was a fairly knew concept and few people understood it, but what is the excuse today?

    7. Re:this bring them up to US mid 19th century by rmstar · · Score: 2

      I know, it's a euphemism for the people who actually run the businesses, anybody who creates a product or a service that people end up buying because they like the product. This word is an acknowledgement of the fact that people do not understand why running a business as opposed to being an employee often provides somebody with a better life style.

      So you are saying that a business owner by definition never does wrong or acts immorally? I mean, you are saying that calling a business owner a robber is always wrong. How about knowingly let workers handle poisonous substances for years, and then firing them when they get sick? Is that capitalist genious?

      Insisting that everybody has to live his life as a businessowner is totalitatian.

      It was fine 150 years ago, because capitalism was a fairly knew concept and few people understood it, but what is the excuse today?

      People understand it quite well. By insisting that it is perfect, you show your ignorance and lack of understanding.

      I have a question on your dash mania. I've seen that in other people of your same persuation so I wonder: is that a bug in the randroid BIOS?

    8. Re:this bring them up to US mid 19th century by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      So you are saying that a business owner by definition never does wrong or acts immorally?

      - by definition you just built a strawman argument, where did you see anything of the kind in my comment? You just put words into my mouth, let's see if you are going to argue against this very notion that you just ascribed to me.

      I mean, you are saying that calling a business owner a robber is always wrong.

      - yes, it is always wrong to call a business owner a robber unless he is a robber, which means he stole something.

      But do you call all employees robbers because some employees steal something (not always from work, sometimes from work, sometimes from stores and other businesses, sometimes from other people). It is always wrong to call a group of people something that they are not by definition.

      You want to call somebody a robber? That's fine. Jon Corzine is a robber, he stole money from clients of MF Global while he was the CEO of the company.

      He should be sued by the customers of MF Global, MF Global was sued, he should be held personally liable given all the information that came out. Instead the courts ruled in his favour, because he is a political figure. So Jon Corzine is a robber. Does it make somebody else a robber? No. You are assigning guilt by association, but this ways we are all robbers, because people steal, so everybody who is a person is a thief, is that your underlying point?

      How about knowingly let workers handle poisonous substances for years, and then firing them when they get sick?

      - that's fine, that's what courts are for. In fact the reason why many got away with things like that was the government protection, just like Jon Corzine was protected. The point is that the gov't creates the moral hazard, it starts at the very moment the gov't allows for a special privilege of 'limited liability' to be assigned to an organisation, so then the people who may in fact be directly responsible for bad behaviour get away with it because of government protection.

      That's Jon Corzine and whoever else that did similar things.

      Insisting that everybody has to live his life as a businessowner is totalitatian.

      - another strawman argument, building one more contraption and assigning it to me, while I never said that anybody must be forced into anything. In fact ALL my arguments come on the side of voluntarism and against use of force by government to achieve any results that have nothing to do with the reason why a Republic was established in the first place (to protect individual liberties).

      People understand it quite well. By insisting that it is perfect, you show your ignorance and lack of understanding.

      - perfect? No, it's not perfect, it allows for various mistakes to happen, it's exactly like evolution.

      Is evolution perfect? Is Darwinism lacking understanding and is it evolution theory ignorant?

      I have a question on your dash mania. I've seen that in other people of your same persuation so I wonder: is that a bug in the randroid BIOS?

      - an ad-hominem, the last refuge of the incompetent and the irrelevant.

    9. Re:this bring them up to US mid 19th century by HarrySquatter · · Score: 1

      Brilliant libertard parody.

    10. Re:this bring them up to US mid 19th century by rmstar · · Score: 1

      - by definition you just built a strawman argument, where did you see anything of the kind in my comment? You just put words into my mouth, let's see if you are going to argue against this very notion that you just ascribed to me.

      Well, you wrote that anyone who called businessowners 'robbers' had not understood capitalism, which I found an interesting claim indeed.

      Foxconn and the others are abusing their position to impose inhuman working conditions on their employees. That type of behavior fits very well what was originally meant by 'robber baron'.

      - an ad-hominem, the last refuge of the incompetent and the irrelevant.

      I am still wondering about the dash. Where does that come from?

  9. I hope you fucking hipsters are proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next time you trend-slaves want to buy a cell phone, try choosing one that won't ruin everyone's holiday.

    1. Re:I hope you fucking hipsters are proud by m0nkyman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Gladly. Please point me to a cell phone that is made 100% in the first world and I will immediately buy it.

      --
      ~ a low user id is no indication I have a clue what I'm talking about.
    2. Re:I hope you fucking hipsters are proud by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      How do we know which phones those are? We only talk about Apple!

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    3. Re:I hope you fucking hipsters are proud by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      Ya'll realize the iPhones, Galaxys, HTCs, etc. are probably not only made in the same country, but in the same building, right?

      Sadly there's very little choice in the matter if you want a cel phone.

    4. Re:I hope you fucking hipsters are proud by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Not really. At least some S2s were made in Korea, for example. Nokias used to be made in Finland (not anymore, unfortunately).

    5. Re:I hope you fucking hipsters are proud by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

      Ya'll realize the iPhones, Galaxys, HTCs, etc. are probably not only made in the same country, but in the same building, right?

      Sadly there's very little choice in the matter if you want a cel phone.

      ...are you sure. I am pretty positive that Samsung manufacture their CPU's in America [supports workers rights]. HTC is a Taiwanese manufacture so most of their phones are made there, both use Google OS which famously left china for ethical reasons...and tried to bring Manufacturing back to America with the Nexus Q. That is ignoring the abuses in this instance question are about iPhones not other Phones...but the short response is the ethical consumer simply does not buy Apple products, realistic alternatives are trivial to find.

    6. Re:I hope you fucking hipsters are proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically China was Second World

      Finland was also Third World

    7. Re:I hope you fucking hipsters are proud by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

      Gladly. Please point me to a cell phone that is made 100% in the first world and I will immediately buy it.

      ...Sony is Japanese and have there own manufacturing plants. That is not forgetting that Samsung manufacture their chips in America, Google is trying to bring manufacturing to America in the form of the Nexus Q.

      It is not really that hard to find companies with manufacturing facilities where workers rights are protected, or companies trying to do the right thing...but then your not interested in that your interested in defending Apple, rather than support more ethical companies. The world would be a better place with more ethical consumers.

    8. Re:I hope you fucking hipsters are proud by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      ... which famously left China for ethical reasons?...
      They left because they could not gain enough marketshare over established local brands.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    9. Re:I hope you fucking hipsters are proud by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that Foxconn is a Taiwanese company. That said, they're engaging in the same cutthroat business practices that most Chinese companies would. The distinction is that they make some of the world's most desirable consumer electronics and they're Taiwanese. So the Chinese government is less likely to clamp down and the likelihood of the western media hearing about it is slim. Not that the Chinese government isn't eager to get this strike under control, because it doesn't bode well for them in the long run. Many HTC phones are indeed manufactured in Taiwan where conditions are a lot better. But if you happen to have one made in China, chances are things aren't all that different than at a Foxconn factory.

      The mechanization of the manufacturing process is a strong likelihood, especially for higher end products. Whether it reminds in China or moves elsewhere, it's not good for China. I suspect the weakening Chinese economy is a big factor in the strike. I wouldn't be surprised if there's pressure from the top to over deliver in order to keep foreign interests happy.

    10. Re:I hope you fucking hipsters are proud by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      It is not really that hard to find companies with manufacturing facilities where workers rights are protected

      I wish that were as true as you may be trying to imply. Workers' rights are rapidly going the way of the dodo bird, especially in the USA. Meanwhile countries who actually respect their workers are facing economic instability due to our runaway unchecked capitalism and the fact that some arrogant bastards on wall street damn near broke the world. This leads to even higher unemployment in countries where workers rights were respected, as their (now former) employers go to places where 18 hour work days for near zero pay are considered acceptable practices.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    11. Re:I hope you fucking hipsters are proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. Apple does everything out of self-interest. They could give a rats ass about the worker. I wouldn't exactly call Sony a good example though.

      The problem is there aren't that many choices to begin with.

      Doing something right in one place (like freedom, free software, GNU/Linux) and being unable to do it in another (move production to countries with decent working conditions) shouldn't count against a company.

      The problem is when a company isn't doing what they reasonably could.

      Sony, Microsoft, Adobe, Apple, and others are doing wrong. They always do wrong. They just don't have any *good* in them whatsoever. They don't have people at the top doing whats right. There are no incentives for them to do whats right. It's just not happening. The corporate charters aren't for whats right. They are for what brings in the most money.

      The companies which are doing whats right to the degree that they can are privately funded or non-profit (ThinkPenguin or Mozilla for instance).

      But even the organizations whom you might think are doing what is right aren't. Raspberry Pi for instance. They are using chipsets dependent on non-free software. Maybe this could be excused if they were working on freeing it. As far as I know they aren't though. It's sad.

    12. Re:I hope you fucking hipsters are proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From NCIS: What is the difference between an ethical man and a moral man.
      An ethical man knows it is wrong to cheat on his wive.
      A moral man doesn't cheat on his wive.

    13. Re:I hope you fucking hipsters are proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My LG Nitro HD says made in South Korea

    14. Re:I hope you fucking hipsters are proud by toriver · · Score: 1

      Hipsters by definition used iPhones before it was cool. Now that everyone have one they probably have focused on not yet popular Windows Phone 8 handsets,

    15. Re:I hope you fucking hipsters are proud by toriver · · Score: 1

      Unless you belong to a small handful of countries, Taiwan is a part of China. Officially.

  10. turns out by nimbius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the ipod's promise to revolutionize the way we live, only applies to its consumers.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:turns out by Guru80 · · Score: 1

      Oh it's revolutionizing alright, even in the form of a revolution across Chinese factories as they finally are embolden enough to fight for their rights. HOWEVER, those 2-3,000 will be fired and the 1 million lined up for their jobs will be fighting mortal kombat style for the spoils of open jobs.

    2. Re:turns out by router · · Score: 1

      This is awesome! Fake post to slashdot, fake website for kitchen faucets...is this the intarwebs everyone else gets?

      I don't have my abuse numbers anymore, can someone rid the net of this scum please?

      andy

    3. Re:turns out by khallow · · Score: 1

      turns out the ipod's promise to revolutionize the way we live, only applies to its consumers.

      And water is wet. I wonder why it is so mystifying that a "promise", vaguely defined as it is, made to a group of consumers, happens to apply only to that group of consumers? The previous post completely fails to understand what a promise is (even if we ignore whether such a promise actually were made). If I promise to help a friend clean their attic, I didn't just issue a blanket promise to help everyone clean their attics. It matters who the promise is made to.

    4. Re:turns out by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is that articles have been popping up about the Chinese elite worried that there might be a communist revolution. Go figure...

  11. surprising really by v1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't see how a country with such a large workforce can have any traction in a strike? Foxconn is a huge employer over there. Their working conditions are what most westerners would describe as "sweatshops", but then so are 95% of the rest of the manufacturing plants over there, so despite being unusual for "us", it's not at all uncommon for "them".

    I wonder how long it takes for Foxconn to find another 4,000 workers willing to do the job for the pay? I simply can't believe that any of those employees weren't fully aware of what was and could be asked of them. They just want more pay for what's probably more work, and certainly longer work weeks. But if there are three people lined up behind you waiting to do that job for that pay the moment you turn your back, a strike doesn't seem like a good idea.

    Strikes and unions just don't make sense for unskilled labor. And just because it's electronics doesn't make it skilled - if you're doing something that could be replaced with a robotic arm, it's not "skilled", skilled refers to mental skills, not physical.

    I wish I had more insight into this "chinese holiday" thing though. I get the impression they take it a lot more seriously than we're giving them credit for. I see a lot of the chinese stores going on holiday all at once, it's obviously a widespread thing, maybe that five day vacation is their unwind time for the rest of the year in the sweatshop? In that case I think I can start to understand where it becomes a big deal. Kinda stupid of Apple to expect them to launch a new production line at that time, they had to see that one coming. I would expect them to have had a conversation with foxconn, "can you DO this?" And foxconn either adding a premium to the cost during that time, or sniveling and saying they'll make it happen, to keep their biggest customer. Oh to be a fly on the wall...

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:surprising really by amorsen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There aren't that many workers lining up in China any more. Well there is in the interior, but that is not where the factories are (yet). Mass migration from the interior to the coast is no longer very practical.

      When you have moved a thousand km away from home and get to see your family a few times a year, you really don't want to lose a day of holiday. You're already likely to spend a day travelling at each end of the holiday.

      Anyway, the days of doing low-wage manufacturing in China are almost over. Luckily.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    2. Re:surprising really by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Strikes and unions just don't make sense for unskilled labor. And just because it's electronics doesn't make it skilled - if you're doing something that could be replaced with a robotic arm, it's not "skilled", skilled refers to mental skills, not physical.

      Actually, unions make far more sense for unskilled laborers. As an engineer, I don't need a union to bargain for my wages. My bargaining power lies in the fact that my skills are in short supply. Companies must pay me competitive market wages because it would take them years to train someone to replace me. Contrast that with an unskilled laborer. They have no bargaining power by themselves because, by definition, they can easily be replaced by anybody else the company hires. Only by joining with all the other unskilled workers do they gain any sort of bargaining power. A single unskilled worker threatening to quit has no real effect on a factory, but the entire group of laborers can effectively shut down the factory in the short-term.

      Unions can be pretty fucked up in practice, but in theory they represent the only way unskilled laborers can gain any sort of bargaining power.

    3. Re:surprising really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Strikes and unions just don't make sense for unskilled labor. And just because it's electronics doesn't make it skilled - if you're doing something that could be replaced with a robotic arm, it's not "skilled", skilled refers to mental skills, not physical.

      The factory cities are mostly staffed by people who by and large ARE the educated work force of China. Most of the miniature assembly work is semi technical and does require training. Also you are very sadly mistaken about how important the labour movement was to the low paid work force that made North America great! Sounds like you have been drinking far too much Republican coolaid and your sensibilities are really out of whack with what is really going on.

      As long as we are led to believe that our so called "intellectual property" is more valuable than real work, the whole consumer driven economy of the so called "skilled West" is going to crash. The Mennonites have it right and knew long ago that we are headed for a disaster with a social system based solely upon unrestrained consumerism and greed. Justified by a perverse Darwinian survival of the richest economic philosophy. That is exactly why some still refuse electricity and cars, including some of my close relatives. We are dooming ourselves as a society with our stupidity and greed, the only bright lights happen when the rich start to give back some of the ridiculous amounts they have hoarded in a gesture of penance before they die. I am not saying the answer is communism like the Chinese, what I am saying is that great employers realise the true value of their employees all the way down to the ones sweeping the floor.

      When good employers are being forced by a companies like Walmart to pay less wages or off shore to survive it only goes to prove that our economic system is broken and will only crash down on our heads as very soon we will not be able to pay off our debts and our income to debt ratio will become unsustainable.

    4. Re:surprising really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how long it takes for Foxconn to find another 4,000 workers willing to do the job for the pay?

      The unemployment rate in the city that this strike is happening in was 3% in 2010, so it would probably take them quite a while to find, hire, and train the staff to do this and seems like it would be pretty disruptive to their operation there. And really, if the current batch of workers are getting pissed off at their working conditions, do you really think the next 4,000 are going to think it's fine and dandy? No, they'll get pissed off and probably make the same threats later on.

    5. Re:surprising really by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 2

      "I wish I had more insight into this "chinese holiday" thing though. I get the impression they take it a lot more seriously than we're giving them credit for. I see a lot of the chinese stores going on holiday all at once, it's obviously a widespread thing, maybe that five day vacation is their unwind time for the rest of the year in the sweatshop?"

      Try this BBC video, "China's 'left behind' children growing up without parents" (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19787240).

      From the accompanying text: "For many people in China, the mid-autumn festival and National Day holiday, falling within days of each other this year, means a week off work and a chance to spend time with friends and family."

      I'm not sure if this is the same holiday the workers are striking over. But this could be a hint that Chinese workers do take their holidays seriously. If you're underpaid and you know you're underpaid, a day or two with your loved ones would be Mastercard priceless. After all, they're one of the reasons you left the farm.

    6. Re:surprising really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The holiday that they didn't get is the Asian version of Thanksgiving. Major celebration with all the fanfare of Thanksgiving here in the US. Piles of food, drink, and families getting together.

    7. Re:surprising really by EnsilZah · · Score: 1

      I imagine that even if it's 'unskilled labor' you still can't take a random person off the street and have them start doing the job on the same day, at the same speed as a veteran worker.
      If you give me a hoe and ask me to dig a ditch I could do it but I'd probably take ten times longer than someone who's been doing it for a living for the last five years.

      So how long does it take to post an opening, hire enough people, get them up to speed on how the work is done?
      If it takes ten days, would that lose you more money than just giving the current proficient workers a day or two off?
      What's to ensure that the new workers won't go on strike later?

    8. Re:surprising really by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      A single unskilled worker threatening to quit has no real effect on a factory, but the entire group of laborers can effectively shut down the factory in the short-term.

      And because they are unskilled in an economy where people are looking for work you can let them all go and head out to the job market to replace them.

      You have to remember lock-outs are just as viable as strikes in industrial dispute. A short term loss is easily absorbed if you manage to suppress the rising cost of your workforce. It's amazing how quickly people back down when they don't bring a paycheck home at the end of the day.

      Where I work this was done. The workforce threatened to strike every day and rarely actually striked completely disrupting our production planning. End result is every day they threatened to strike they were locked out. After a few days of no pay the union caved.

      Don't assume because someone is an organised group they are all powerful.

    9. Re:surprising really by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      And because they are unskilled in an economy where people are looking for work you can let them all go and head out to the job market to replace them.

      New people still need to be shown how to do the job, even for unskilled roles. And will take a few days to get up to speed. Not a problem when you're replacing one at a time. But if they all go at once, there's no experienced ones to train the new ones. And where you're taking a workforce of thousands, even if management know how to do all the jobs, it's going to take them a long time to get a new workforce trained and up to speed.

      It's amazing how quickly people back down when they don't bring a paycheck home at the end of the day.

      The UK miner's strike lasted a year.

    10. Re:surprising really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't assume because someone is an organized group they are all powerful.

      Don't assume they're powerless either. Both unions and companies are simply groups of people getting together to increase their total market power at the expense of some of their individual freedoms. Both have similar advantages and disadvantages. In this case a relatively small group of people in a relatively large market means that they have to be largely prices takers, not price makers.

    11. Re:surprising really by jdogalt · · Score: 1

      But if there are three people lined up behind you waiting to do that job for that pay the moment you turn your back, a strike doesn't seem like a good idea.

      The angle that I don't think you are factoring in is the unique public image prominence of Foxconn and the iPhone5 specificly. That changes the equation as to what might be a good idea. If China sees free speech 20 years down the road, these folks might get themselves some book deals or otherwise cash in somehow. Or they'll get themselves and their loved ones in trouble. My hat is off to their courage.

    12. Re:surprising really by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      I think it is mostly in the US that holiday time is mainly a trip to the mall to cash in on some deep discounts. In Poland, holidays were taken seriously, with all stores closing, people getting together, having events, etc, and I imagine that might be the case in China. And don't forget that these people move far away from home to look for work. Maybe they go back to visit.

    13. Re:surprising really by Fierlo · · Score: 1
      Yeah, companies never try to screw with "skilled labour". They would never dare lock out engineers (P.Eng. or the U.S. version of everyone is an engineer), or mechanics or technicians.

      You, my good friend, are a complete twat, with very little appreciation for the position that most workers ("skilled" or "unskilled") operate in regardless of the general state of an economy.

    14. Re:surprising really by Fierlo · · Score: 1
      I just wanted to add one more thing...

      Most of the job descriptions in Silicon Valley that have 'engineer' in their title wouldn't be considered engineering outside of that small area of the world.

      You can write buggy programs/games and drivers/firmaware and it doesn't make you an engineer. In fact, it makes you almost the exact opposite: A hack.

    15. Re:surprising really by IgnitusBoyone · · Score: 1

      Did not the UK miners union/guild choose to go back to work with out a new contract effectively loosing the strike and costing its members an entire years salary?

      --
      Momento Mori
    16. Re:surprising really by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      New people still need to be shown how to do the job, even for unskilled roles. And will take a few days to get up to speed. Not a problem when you're replacing one at a time. But if they all go at once, there's no experienced ones to train the new ones. And where you're taking a workforce of thousands, even if management know how to do all the jobs, it's going to take them a long time to get a new workforce trained and up to speed.

      The company managed to start so they have a lot of foundation in place. The hardest thing about starting a company is not training the employees it's building the contracts with suppliers and customers. Assuming you can sort your mess out before they jump ship any productivity issues that last a few weeks will end up being a rounding error on the bottom line. End result, very short term pain, minor loss in wages, a MAJOR message to the workforce.

      I can't remember which company it was but there was an operator of about 5 foundries in the USA. When their workforce unionised only one of the 5 foundries actually had the vast majority unionise, the remainder only a small percentage of employees. When the union participation started to rise upon hearing of the great pay and conditions of this one unionised foundry the company shut that foundry down citing it was no longer viable to operate. That dealt a fatal blow to the union.

      Best of all is union attitude towards non-union workers. I remember doing manual unskilled labour at a biscuit factory in my city. I was getting paid a fortune. $30/hour off the street at a time where my peers who had been working for years at their various entry level jobs (basic store clerks etc) were earning half that. The union had a strike wanting more pay, I didn't leave work, I wanted to keep working, and I sure as heck didn't deserve an extra cent, heck I wouldn't have flinched if I had gotten a pay cut that year. The names I got called by these entitled fuckwits were incredible. Seriously you want a job where you get paid to sleep while your company goes down the toilet, join a unionised workplace.

      The UK miner's strike lasted a year.

      Allow me to quote from the wikipedia page:
      "The end of the strike was felt as a terrible blow to loyal NUM members, though many understood that the extreme poverty being suffered after a year without wages was difficult to bear. Indeed, in many areas, striking miners made a distinction between those who had returned to work after only a couple of months strike, and those who felt forced to return to work for the sake of their children, many months later."
      No the formal action lasted a year, many workers returned much earlier than that, all workers eventually returned without a new contractual agreement meeting their demands, and some workers even died during the strike.

      Not sure if you were trying to prove your point or mine.

    17. Re:surprising really by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      This is why we have employment laws that ban that kind of thing and force the two parties to negotiate a settlement. This isn't the 19th or even 20th century.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    18. Re:surprising really by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Not sure if you were trying to prove your point or mine.

      I'm not trying to fight any pro or anti-union argument. I was just responding to a couple of inaccuracies in your anti-union argument.

      You said "It's amazing how quickly people back down when they don't bring a paycheck home at the end of the day." and thats wrong. Some strikes are long, protracted affairs. There are no general private industry lessons to be learned from the outcome of the UK miner's strike, because it was a nationalised industry, with a government that wanted to crush all unions. A whole different kettle of fish. It's just there to show that strikers don't necessarily go back quickly when they have no wages.

      The company managed to start so they have a lot of foundation in place. The hardest thing about starting a company is not training the employees it's building the contracts with suppliers and customers. Assuming you can sort your mess out before they jump ship any productivity issues that last a few weeks will end up being a rounding error on the bottom line.

      The company will have grown it's human resources over years, and any particular production line over months. Closing down of production lines will not just be lost productivity over the period of the strike but for a long time afterwards, and will usually result in contracts being broken and lost customers. That is rarely a rounding error on the bottom line.

      A strike is a battle. Both sides have strengths and weaknesses. Either side might win or lose. And the most usual result is a compromise.

    19. Re:surprising really by dsmithhfx · · Score: 0

      "I don't need a union to bargain for my wages. My bargaining power lies in the fact that my skills are in short supply" Let's say, hypothetically, that the main employers in your industry made a secret deal to cap salaries? Oh wait, Apple did that.

    20. Re:surprising really by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      It usually only works if there is a threat of violence. If you try to replace 4000 angry workers that is going to cause a big mess, which is what happened back when unions were being formed.

      These days unions don't strike, because as much as they grip there isn't really that much at stake. Back in the heyday they'd have taken shots at the national guard.

    21. Re:surprising really by twistedcubic · · Score: 1

      "...skilled refers to mental skills, not physical."
      What happens if we replaced the whole Lakers roster with Harvard's math department?

    22. Re:surprising really by sjames · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm sure they could have 4000 newbies fumbling around in the factory in no time, and nobody to teach them any of the practical things they need to know to get the phones to pass whatever passes for quality control in no time. Getting the factory back to something resembling it's production goal is quite another matter.

      You see, it may be CALLED unskilled labor, but that just means it can't be taught in a classroom, it doesn't mean there isn't a learning curve.

    23. Re:surprising really by cusco · · Score: 1

      I wish I had more insight into this "chinese holiday" thing though.

      We stumbled on a movie on Netflix called 'The Last Train Home' that gives an excellent view from the eyes of the Chinese workers as they make their annual visit home. It's called 'the largest human migration on the planet', tens of millions of factory workers return to the villages where they were born to visit their parents (and often their children).

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  12. It's not a strike. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a "We love this work and low wages" parade. These people love these jobs and would do anything for them. They don't mind the low pay because it's actually high. Now, economists say that the wage there is equivalent to getting about $5/hr in America. However, from what I understand Romney and Co saying, is that $5/hr plus foodstamps and welfare puts a person in a better position than any American millionaire. Truly, the poor are blessed.

    So, I must conclude this is a voluntary day off to have a parade in support of wonderful working conditions that every young Chinese person dreams about.

    I get that right Apple fanboys?

    1. Re:It's not a strike. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got *some* of it right, and some of it wrong. If you subtract out the living expenses (food, shelter, clothes, etc.) the left-over wages from these jobs is closer to what someone earning $10-15/hour would have left in the US. More if they take advantage of the company dorms & cafeteria. Additionally, the folks who work on the Apple product lines actually make about 15-25% more than the workers doing similar tasks on other lines. These jobs don't pay *great*, but the wage is comparable to factory jobs in the US, when you take into account the various cost of living factors.

      It's kind of amazing that *this* is getting multi-day news coverage (because it's associated with Apple), but the story about the XBox 360 workers strike (also Foxconn), where the workers went up to the roof of the building and threatened mass suicide to get improved work conditions barely got a mention. (And what mention it *did* get was certain to include more references to Apple than Microsoft.)

  13. Like Wearing Fur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you walk around with an iPhone 5, you might as well be wearing a fox fur coat - the kind with the paws and head done up taxidermy-style, draped over the shoulders.

    1. Re:Like Wearing Fur by Aardpig · · Score: 2

      The butthurt is strong in this one, O Master!

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    2. Re:Like Wearing Fur by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Hm...throwing fake blood on hipster iPhone 5 users...

    3. Re:Like Wearing Fur by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Why is your master training you to sense butthurt?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    4. Re:Like Wearing Fur by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately all the people that used to do that to fur wearers are the biggest Apple users now.

    5. Re:Like Wearing Fur by istartedi · · Score: 1

      And this, ladies and gents, is why I won't touch AAPL stock with a 3.048 meter pole. Fads can turn on a dime. It's absolutely unpredictable. They thrive on "cool", and if that picks up and goes, begging for it to come back just makes you look even less cool.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  14. Re:This is as good a forum as any.. by tuppe666 · · Score: 2

    I've seen a lot of people with iPhones and Samsung Galaxy S3s. Whenever I see a Galaxy S3, I think, how in the fuck can you actually USE that thing? So my question is, do you have first hand experience with the S3, and is it just too ridiculously big?

    I'd rather have an Android but will gladly go to the iPhone if it means getting a rocking phone that actually fits in my pocket and doesn't make me look like a dork.

    I believe that Android phones come in a variety of shapes and sizes. You may not believe it is true that there is not one true phone. Android phones come with keyboards; projectors; even larger sizes [and smaller ones]; at every price point; game pads; waterpoofing; 2 sim slots. Personally I quite like the HTC S for a good android phone with a smaller screen. ...but then this is another off topic post to try and detract from worker abuse at Apples manufactures.

  15. Re:This is as good a forum as any.. by tqk · · Score: 1

    I'd rather have an Android but will gladly go to the iPhone if it means getting a rocking phone that actually fits in my pocket and doesn't make me look like a dork.

    Too late.

    --
    "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
  16. Nerve Staple 'Em by Aardpig · · Score: 1

    I've said it before, and now I'm saying it again. Nerve stapling all around, or failing that, off to the punishment sphere with the lot!

    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
  17. 1st Anniversary of Steve Jobs' Death by theodp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Neat coincidence, no?

    1. Re:1st Anniversary of Steve Jobs' Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, we should celebrate that he's dead.

    2. Re:1st Anniversary of Steve Jobs' Death by jmac_the_man · · Score: 2

      What holiday do you think they're celebrating?

  18. Just wait... by Dahamma · · Score: 1

    ...for the Chinese government to come in and do some hard core strike breaking any day now. Workers of the world flee in terror!

    Ah, the irony of "The People's Party". Seriously, now, why do we even bother calling China a Communist country any more, it should just officially be changed to a "Totalitarian Bureaucratic Oligarchy".

  19. maybe they're holding it wrong by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Stricter quality control requirements with the iPhone 5?! So the purple flare really does come standard? And Foxconn doesn't make the maps app but if they did, it might be more accurate, lol. I don't have numbers on iphone failure rates but if the 4s was worse than previous versions as reliability, I could see them cracking the whip (probably literally) on version 5 production. I know that from 2007 to 2009 the macbook quality dropped from 2nd place to 6th so it does seem likely. If you're curious, an ASUS, MSI, Toshiba, Sony, and Samsung are all now more reliable than a macbook, and at most 1/2 the price.

    1. Re:maybe they're holding it wrong by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      If you're curious, an ASUS, MSI, Toshiba, Sony, and Samsung are all now more reliable than a macbook, and at most 1/2 the price.

      Citation?

    2. Re:maybe they're holding it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, there are certainly ASUS, MSI, Toshiba, and Samsung laptops which are half the price of a MacBook. (Not so certain about Sony.) There may also be laptops carrying those brands which are as reliable as a MacBook, maybe even more. Unfortunately, there's no intersection between those two categories. Especially not if you want something of similar capabilities.

  20. Reality check by Tough+Love · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Consumer disk storage is 6 cents a gig. Still a factor of 16 less than flash. As long as that ratio holds there will be no overnight takeover of the storage market by flash. Instead it's a creeping progression largely driven by the mobile market, outside of which the vast majority of mass storage being sold is still rotating disks. Sure a few geeks like me have begun to swap out their noisy, slow hard disks for ssd, but that's a few geeks. The PC market, the cloud, and enterprise storage, which together completely dwarf the mobile segment in terms of capacity, will continue to prefer cheap over fast and quiet for some time to come.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    1. Re:Reality check by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Wrong story?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:Reality check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did this even get so much upvotes...

  21. Oops by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    There goes AAPL's quarter.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  22. Quality control issues by juicegg · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's more relevant information about the reasons for the strike: http://www.businessinsider.com/foxconn-workers-go-on-strike-2012-10 The important bit is that workers are striking not because they are against stricter quality, but because tighter quality checks meant they must work harder to produce iPhone components presumably at the same rate as earlier models. And they were told to do this without additional training.Victory for workers would mean Foxconn hiring more workers and less exhausting working pace for all workers there.

    1. Re:Quality control issues by PeanutButterBreath · · Score: 2

      The important bit is that workers are striking not because they are against stricter quality, but because tighter quality checks meant they must work harder to produce iPhone components presumably at the same rate as earlier models.

      And what better way to increase quality than to squeeze more productivity out of workers?

  23. Re:Good for themI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No

  24. Ethical alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I spend most of my time in China and Taiwan, whence the following data point, and the reason for my posting anonymously.

    Workers on the Apple product assembly lines make the same repetitive motions 2,800 times per day (Macbooks) up to over 3,400 times per day for the tablets and phones. 10 minute breaks every two hours. 10 hour work days. 6 day work weeks. (But, the iphone5 is so successful, the day off is cancelled.) High-school kids in parts of china have been dragooned into serving as operators, with the threat that they MUST do these or not graduate. They get paid $US340 per month, and that's not a lot of money, even in the Chinese hinterlands.

    I have two HTC phones, both on the basis of the fact that they were made in Taiwan. I simply will not own products where I know, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that the supply chain is unethical in its treatment of workers.

  25. Re:This is as good a forum as any.. by Dr.+Hellno · · Score: 1

    I'd rather have an Android but will gladly go to the iPhone if it means getting a rocking phone that actually fits in my pocket

    Maybe it's time to trade your oshkosh b'gosh for grown-up pants? You're a big kid now.

  26. But Apple says they're happy! by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    Apple wouldn't obscure the truth would they?

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    1. Re:But Apple says they're happy! by LodCrappo · · Score: 1

      Apple doesn't obscure truth, they simply create new truth as needed. 1984 wasn't like "1984", but that was only because Apple hadn't perfected the technology yet.

      --
      -Lod
    2. Re:But Apple says they're happy! by dsmithhfx · · Score: 0

      You will be hearing from Apple's lawyers shortly regarding your violation of their copyright on the use of "1984".

    3. Re:But Apple says they're happy! by toriver · · Score: 1

      Care to come up with a citation for your subject line?

    4. Re:But Apple says they're happy! by fluffernutter · · Score: 1
      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  27. Some solutions to the jobs problem by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1
    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  28. Why are we still using people as labor? by hessian · · Score: 1

    Machines do a better job of repetitive tasks, and humans should be (if you believe all the promises made about technology a century ago) healthier, working less, and spending more time in pursuit of self-fulfillment.

    It's time to liberate ourselves. Put the robots in the factories, and put the humans back on the couch (with crisps, remote control, maybe a bluetooth keyboard and game controller).

    1. Re:Why are we still using people as labor? by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      Because the robots can't do everything ... and how do you motivate people to do the work which does have to be done? (Personally I think we should be cutting work weeks.)

    2. Re:Why are we still using people as labor? by JDG1980 · · Score: 1

      But that only works if you have a powerful redistributionist state. Otherwise, virtually all the productivity gains from automation are hoarded by the capitalist and managerial classes.

  29. Foxcunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple, and by extension, Foxconn is a cunt. Anyone who buys their products is a cunt. Don't be a cunt.

    1. Re:Foxcunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not? If you treat them right, cunts are warm and welcoming. But I wouldn't expect a misogynistic ass-hat such as yourself to know what that's like.

  30. Robots deserve a fair wage! by McDrewbie · · Score: 1

    Robots should be compensated at a fair wage. For several reasons: 1. So that humans can still get jobs (albeit crappy ones) 2. So when the Robots become sentient, they can't hold being made unpaid slaves as a grievance against the human race. 3. So plutocrats just can't fire/low ball every human worker.

  31. It can't be bargained with... by MrSteveSD · · Score: 1

    It can't be reasoned with. It doesn't feel pity or remorse or fear and it absolutely will not stop, ever, until you are unemployed.

  32. Quality by microbee · · Score: 1

    So, the US consumers (us) complain about scratches caused by rubbing keys on the iPhone 5, which probably caused the whole "stricter quality control" thing, and then turn around and complain about the stricter quality control thing?

    No wonder customers are always right.

    1. Re:Quality by JDG1980 · · Score: 1

      So, the US consumers (us) complain about scratches caused by rubbing keys on the iPhone 5, which probably caused the whole "stricter quality control" thing, and then turn around and complain about the stricter quality control thing?

      Maybe part of the problem is that Foxconn's idea of 'quality control' is demanding workers work longer hours under worse conditions.

  33. Coming soon... by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

    Foxconn: Sub-Saharan Africa!

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  34. Re:This is as good a forum as any.. by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's time to trade your oshkosh b'gosh for grown-up pants? You're a big kid now.

    As opposed to 93-pocket cargo pants, which make people really look mature.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  35. Re:This is as good a forum as any.. by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

    Too much choice is actually bad. But hey. You're on a roll. Not going to stop you.

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  36. hyperbole and FUD as usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure there are legitimate grist for CLW to chomp on but this just sounds like their usual bullshit.

    upset at stricter quality control requirements with the iPhone 5

    How are assembly line workers going to influence quality significantly after the fact of design freeze and production commencement?
    Are they inserting the board upside down into the case?

    This latest incident followed tighter rules to prevent tiny indentations on the phones and scratches to the phones' frames and back covers. The new iPhone 5 is said to be more susceptible to such markings.

    Are you fuckin kidding me ITWORLD?
    So the assembly line workers are now responsible for hardening plastic and steel alloying?

  37. Brazil is causing small companies trouble though!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This might seem like a good idea at first although it ensures small companies don't enter the market. Brazilians can buy Apple- they can't buy ThinkPenguin laptops or a Raspberry Pi . It's screwed up that Brazil has ensured a monopoly / duopoly of the largest or largest players.

    What they should do is only enforce this law on large companies or importers. That way there is no issue with small companies getting products to the Brazilian market. The way it is people in Brazil are being done a disservice.

  38. Does the robot have t to be "Chinese" ? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

    Chinese robot (if the article is correct): $175/month.

    Excuse moi.

    Does the robot have to be "Chinese"?

    Is the robot allowed to migrate to US of A and perhaps, get a "Green Card"?

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  39. Where's Marx when you need him? by goodmanj · · Score: 1

    It's ironic that the one country in the world most in need of a Marxist revolution is "communist" China.

  40. Blocking is useless... by darkfeline · · Score: 2

    I don't know why the Chinese government even bothers with blocking anymore...

    "Hey, did you hear about the Foxconn strikes? Do you think they're real?"
    "Dunno, lemme check" *looks up Foxconn stirkes*
    *search blocked*
    "Yep, they're real"

    1. Re:Blocking is useless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think the search results pop up a giant Newman head scolding the user when a search is filtered? Anyone searching Foxconn strikes would undoubtably end up with a series of "Foxconn strikes new grounds for new campus, creating N jobs in the region of Y" or whatever similar positive idiom would fit when actually in chinese.

  41. It's all part of the plan by mchnz · · Score: 1

    The government's economic development plans for the region is to move up market into more advanced, higher valued, manufacturing and services. Part of the plan is to is to encourage more workers rights, higher wages, increased health-care, welfare, improved education, move the workforce up market, and help force low paid manufacturing out. Lower value manufacturing is now being encouraged to move the interior regions to lift the economy and incomes there. It's all well documented and written about. It should come as no surprise that there will be some labour issues in the southern coastal regions during the transition.

    They're directing and regulating competitive market forces to achieve national growth. Milton Friedman probably wouldn't approve - but it's worked so far.

  42. Beatings will continue by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

    until morale improves.

  43. Re:This is as good a forum as any.. by home-electro.com · · Score: 1

    I did not want any smartphones because of their size, however, took galaxy s3. Although it is kind of big, it also very very thin, and very very light so even when I carry it in front pant's pocket, I barely feel it.

    Holding it could be a bit awkward, but big screen allows for big ass buttons, which makes interaction easier.

    Battery life time sucks.

  44. Oh, those Foxconn workers ... by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 1

    ... China's version of the "47 percent", no doubt.

  45. Read the small label .... by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    .. It says: "Made in China", now you.

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  46. Foxconn Denies Report of Unrest at iPhone Factory by evilcoop · · Score: 1

    Foxconn Denies Report of Unrest at iPhone Factory
    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/07/business/foxconn-denies-report-of-unrest-at-iphone-factory.html?partner=yahoofinance&_r=0

  47. by "world" you mean USA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    actually less ethical companies are making China the better place.

  48. Meanwhile in Canada... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    China should take a cue from Harper's Conservative Canadian government and simply create a new law making it illegal for them to strike, then use the OMG for the sake of the greater good of our fragile economy to justify it.