Slashdot Mirror


Foxconn Workers On Strike Over iPhone 5 Production

itwbennett writes "That army of robotic assembly line workers we mentioned yesterday apparently can't get started soon enough. As many as 3,000-4,000 workers are on strike at Foxconn's Zhengzhou factory, upset at stricter quality control requirements with the iPhone 5 and having to work through a national holiday this week. 'According to workers, multiple iPhone 5 production lines from various factory buildings were in a state of paralysis for the entire day,' China Labor Watch said. Sina Weibo and Tencent Weibo are both blocking searches in Chinese for 'Foxconn strikes.'"

42 of 184 comments (clear)

  1. Good for them! by s.petry · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Strike, it's the only power they have. Until they get shot for being on strike that is, or run over by a tank.. this is happening in China you know..

    And actually, China lets them strike because it hurts the US more than China. It's not like Apple is going to close the slave labor camps any time soon, even if they lose a few bucks.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:Good for them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Strike, it's the only power they have. Until they get shot for being on strike that is, or run over by a tank.. this is happening in China you know..

      No, I don't know, throwing a few links would be helpful. China has few human rights when compared to developed nations, but I doubt they'd shoot random people over nothing. "Encouraging" people to not cause trouble is much more efficient in the long term (e.g. you strike you become unemployable; I'm not saying they do this, but it would work better than shooting people). And sometimes the best you can do is do nothing at all, if you push people too hard too often they might strike back.

      And actually, China lets them strike because it hurts the US more than China. It's not like Apple is going to close the slave labor camps any time soon, even if they lose a few bucks.

      Foxconn workers striking is troublesome for Foxconn, and on a lesser degree for Apple and China. But Apple is an important customer, so I'd bet the one hurt the most, by far, is Foxconn, they might even have to give some discounts to Apple if the strike continues for too long.

      I just hope the strikers manage to get something, it's about time the Chinese people can have a share of China's amazing growth.

    2. Re:Good for them! by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2

      You do know that Apple recently opened up manufacturing in Brazil, right?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    3. Re:Good for them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      You do know that Apple recently opened up manufacturing in Brazil, right?

      Apple only opened the Brazil plants because Brazil wouldn't let them sell iPhones in Brazil unless they did. Don't act like they did it out of the good of their hearts. If that law didn't exist they'd shut down the Brazilian plant faster than you can say "Saint Steve Jobs" and move it back to China.

    4. Re:Good for them! by ZorinLynx · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >Apple only opened the Brazil plants because Brazil wouldn't let them sell iPhones in Brazil unless they did.

      Anyone else think that we (the US) should follow Brazil's example?

      I mean, there it is, a perfect example of regulation bringing manufacturing jobs back to a country. We could certainly use that right now.

    5. Re:Good for them! by s.petry · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How dare you speak common sense you protectionist!

      While I agree with your point, I have seen anyone that tries to implement common sense laws to protect the US economy labelled and belittled by people that make more profit sending things overseas for cheap labor. If you speak common sense about an economy, you are silenced by propaganda. It's not about the people of the US any longer, it's about the top getting more at all costs (and no, I'm not referring to the upper 10%, more like the upper .1%.

      I wrote an article about 20 years ago which was ignored, stating that the shipping of industrial jobs overseas would kill our economy. Hell, I was not alone by a long shot. Numerous economists, philanthropists, etc.. etc.. were already warning of it way before I was. The Ford model worked, and made us prosper. Middle class people spend their money, the upper 1% does not. This is how we get and hold our positions in the economy.

      Look at Detroit and Flint. Tons of cash was there for both the upper and middle classes. Every middle class household owned 2 cars, and a mortgage. Increases in pay meant that the middle class purchased snow mobiles, boats, motorcycles, wave runners, hunting gear, fishing gear, "Big Screen TV", etc.. The middle class money tends to be very liquid.

      The upper class in Detroit owned houses they rarely stayed in. They go on trips, they don't spend locally. They invest to get more money and property, they don't purchase locally and definitely nothing trivial like a snow mobile or wave runner. If they purchased a boat, it was an investment boat and again not generating money locally. That makes sense, it's how the wealthy remain wealthy and increase wealth.

      The lower class in Detroit were all in line to become middle class. They stood outside the auto plants applying all the time, took shop classes, got GEDs and went to school all in hopes of getting to the middle class.

      So when we sent all the middle class jobs overseas, the economy collapsed. At first, the wealthy still had money. But in short order, even they lost out. Property values dropped massively sticking everyone that owned property with huge debt and no capital. The lines stopped forming at the plants, and people started dropping like flies out of school. Now once prosperous areas in Detroit are like ghost towns.

      All of these things were called out in the 80s, before NAFTA was passed and the plants were moved first to Mexico then to China. Not by me, but by countless economists gave warnings and said "DON'T DO NAFTA!". Those guys were told that they were just being protectionist, if they were heard at all.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    6. Re:Good for them! by clarkkent09 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Chinese worker: $350/month.
      Chinese robot (if the article is correct): $175/month.
      Unionized US worker including benefits and taxes: $4000/month for doing a worse job slower.

      20,000,000 iPhone users in the US paying 4x price for their phone so that 2000 can get jobs: priceless

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    7. Re:Good for them! by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 2

      If they purchased a boat, it was an investment boat

      Stop. You're killing me here.

    8. Re:Good for them! by Moofie · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    9. Re:Good for them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Tiananmen protests were against the government, the "Communist" rule (which today is mostly just a word rather than a philosophy), and lack of free speech.
      It was also, as you mention, 23 years ago.

      These protests are against working conditions at a private employer. The Chinese government are also a lot more interested in foreign investment these days, and the wanton murder of unarmed workers is not a good way to let the world know they should move their business there.

  2. Why strike now? by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Couldnt they go on strike the day(s) of the holiday, just return the next day and start working?

    1. Re:Why strike now? by tqk · · Score: 5, Funny

      Couldnt they go on strike the day(s) of the holiday, just return the next day and start working?

      Nah. That'd mean double time and a half strike pay. It'd brick the union.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    2. Re:Why strike now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's not the holiday. It's the company's insistence that the products pass quality control. That's unheard of in Chinese manufacturing.

  3. Won't someone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Won't someone think of the hipsters?

  4. Re:But.. but.. but.. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2

    But.. but.. but... I thought by boycotting Apple I was helping the workers!!

    You know what, I totally misread the summary. It's my bad and I apologize. Please mod my post down.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  5. this bring them up to US mid 19th century by hguorbray · · Score: 5, Interesting

    when US and European Labor movements really started to assert themselves and address inequities and call the Robber Barons to task.

    China has their army and Police -US companies had Police and Pinkertons....the workers still prevailed in the end, although much has been lost recently...

    Hopefully it will not be bloody, but they deserve better than they are getting even if it means we might be paying slightly more for the next plastic POS we buy.

    I'm just sayin'

    1. Re:this bring them up to US mid 19th century by rmstar · · Score: 2

      I know, it's a euphemism for the people who actually run the businesses, anybody who creates a product or a service that people end up buying because they like the product. This word is an acknowledgement of the fact that people do not understand why running a business as opposed to being an employee often provides somebody with a better life style.

      So you are saying that a business owner by definition never does wrong or acts immorally? I mean, you are saying that calling a business owner a robber is always wrong. How about knowingly let workers handle poisonous substances for years, and then firing them when they get sick? Is that capitalist genious?

      Insisting that everybody has to live his life as a businessowner is totalitatian.

      It was fine 150 years ago, because capitalism was a fairly knew concept and few people understood it, but what is the excuse today?

      People understand it quite well. By insisting that it is perfect, you show your ignorance and lack of understanding.

      I have a question on your dash mania. I've seen that in other people of your same persuation so I wonder: is that a bug in the randroid BIOS?

  6. turns out by nimbius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the ipod's promise to revolutionize the way we live, only applies to its consumers.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  7. Re:big surprise by The+Snowman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They'll be even more unhappy once they realize that robots can do their jobs even cheaper than they can. You know it's bad when even mainstream media is picking this up. A few months ago I was watching one of those Nightline/Dateline/Whateverline evening news shows that was talking specifically about Foxconn. At the end they showed the up-and-coming robot that does the work of the Chinese workers and in half the time of a human for half the cost. The reporter asked something along the lines of "what is going to happen when businesses realize they can assemble the gadgets in the U.S. and not pay to ship them across the ocean?"

    --
    24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
  8. surprising really by v1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't see how a country with such a large workforce can have any traction in a strike? Foxconn is a huge employer over there. Their working conditions are what most westerners would describe as "sweatshops", but then so are 95% of the rest of the manufacturing plants over there, so despite being unusual for "us", it's not at all uncommon for "them".

    I wonder how long it takes for Foxconn to find another 4,000 workers willing to do the job for the pay? I simply can't believe that any of those employees weren't fully aware of what was and could be asked of them. They just want more pay for what's probably more work, and certainly longer work weeks. But if there are three people lined up behind you waiting to do that job for that pay the moment you turn your back, a strike doesn't seem like a good idea.

    Strikes and unions just don't make sense for unskilled labor. And just because it's electronics doesn't make it skilled - if you're doing something that could be replaced with a robotic arm, it's not "skilled", skilled refers to mental skills, not physical.

    I wish I had more insight into this "chinese holiday" thing though. I get the impression they take it a lot more seriously than we're giving them credit for. I see a lot of the chinese stores going on holiday all at once, it's obviously a widespread thing, maybe that five day vacation is their unwind time for the rest of the year in the sweatshop? In that case I think I can start to understand where it becomes a big deal. Kinda stupid of Apple to expect them to launch a new production line at that time, they had to see that one coming. I would expect them to have had a conversation with foxconn, "can you DO this?" And foxconn either adding a premium to the cost during that time, or sniveling and saying they'll make it happen, to keep their biggest customer. Oh to be a fly on the wall...

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:surprising really by amorsen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There aren't that many workers lining up in China any more. Well there is in the interior, but that is not where the factories are (yet). Mass migration from the interior to the coast is no longer very practical.

      When you have moved a thousand km away from home and get to see your family a few times a year, you really don't want to lose a day of holiday. You're already likely to spend a day travelling at each end of the holiday.

      Anyway, the days of doing low-wage manufacturing in China are almost over. Luckily.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    2. Re:surprising really by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Strikes and unions just don't make sense for unskilled labor. And just because it's electronics doesn't make it skilled - if you're doing something that could be replaced with a robotic arm, it's not "skilled", skilled refers to mental skills, not physical.

      Actually, unions make far more sense for unskilled laborers. As an engineer, I don't need a union to bargain for my wages. My bargaining power lies in the fact that my skills are in short supply. Companies must pay me competitive market wages because it would take them years to train someone to replace me. Contrast that with an unskilled laborer. They have no bargaining power by themselves because, by definition, they can easily be replaced by anybody else the company hires. Only by joining with all the other unskilled workers do they gain any sort of bargaining power. A single unskilled worker threatening to quit has no real effect on a factory, but the entire group of laborers can effectively shut down the factory in the short-term.

      Unions can be pretty fucked up in practice, but in theory they represent the only way unskilled laborers can gain any sort of bargaining power.

    3. Re:surprising really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Strikes and unions just don't make sense for unskilled labor. And just because it's electronics doesn't make it skilled - if you're doing something that could be replaced with a robotic arm, it's not "skilled", skilled refers to mental skills, not physical.

      The factory cities are mostly staffed by people who by and large ARE the educated work force of China. Most of the miniature assembly work is semi technical and does require training. Also you are very sadly mistaken about how important the labour movement was to the low paid work force that made North America great! Sounds like you have been drinking far too much Republican coolaid and your sensibilities are really out of whack with what is really going on.

      As long as we are led to believe that our so called "intellectual property" is more valuable than real work, the whole consumer driven economy of the so called "skilled West" is going to crash. The Mennonites have it right and knew long ago that we are headed for a disaster with a social system based solely upon unrestrained consumerism and greed. Justified by a perverse Darwinian survival of the richest economic philosophy. That is exactly why some still refuse electricity and cars, including some of my close relatives. We are dooming ourselves as a society with our stupidity and greed, the only bright lights happen when the rich start to give back some of the ridiculous amounts they have hoarded in a gesture of penance before they die. I am not saying the answer is communism like the Chinese, what I am saying is that great employers realise the true value of their employees all the way down to the ones sweeping the floor.

      When good employers are being forced by a companies like Walmart to pay less wages or off shore to survive it only goes to prove that our economic system is broken and will only crash down on our heads as very soon we will not be able to pay off our debts and our income to debt ratio will become unsustainable.

    4. Re:surprising really by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 2

      "I wish I had more insight into this "chinese holiday" thing though. I get the impression they take it a lot more seriously than we're giving them credit for. I see a lot of the chinese stores going on holiday all at once, it's obviously a widespread thing, maybe that five day vacation is their unwind time for the rest of the year in the sweatshop?"

      Try this BBC video, "China's 'left behind' children growing up without parents" (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19787240).

      From the accompanying text: "For many people in China, the mid-autumn festival and National Day holiday, falling within days of each other this year, means a week off work and a chance to spend time with friends and family."

      I'm not sure if this is the same holiday the workers are striking over. But this could be a hint that Chinese workers do take their holidays seriously. If you're underpaid and you know you're underpaid, a day or two with your loved ones would be Mastercard priceless. After all, they're one of the reasons you left the farm.

    5. Re:surprising really by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      A single unskilled worker threatening to quit has no real effect on a factory, but the entire group of laborers can effectively shut down the factory in the short-term.

      And because they are unskilled in an economy where people are looking for work you can let them all go and head out to the job market to replace them.

      You have to remember lock-outs are just as viable as strikes in industrial dispute. A short term loss is easily absorbed if you manage to suppress the rising cost of your workforce. It's amazing how quickly people back down when they don't bring a paycheck home at the end of the day.

      Where I work this was done. The workforce threatened to strike every day and rarely actually striked completely disrupting our production planning. End result is every day they threatened to strike they were locked out. After a few days of no pay the union caved.

      Don't assume because someone is an organised group they are all powerful.

    6. Re:surprising really by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      And because they are unskilled in an economy where people are looking for work you can let them all go and head out to the job market to replace them.

      New people still need to be shown how to do the job, even for unskilled roles. And will take a few days to get up to speed. Not a problem when you're replacing one at a time. But if they all go at once, there's no experienced ones to train the new ones. And where you're taking a workforce of thousands, even if management know how to do all the jobs, it's going to take them a long time to get a new workforce trained and up to speed.

      It's amazing how quickly people back down when they don't bring a paycheck home at the end of the day.

      The UK miner's strike lasted a year.

  9. Re:big surprise by Charliemopps · · Score: 4, Funny

    But in the US they have a high tax rate, and aren't allowed to just dump their waste in the local river... so that wont happen anyway.

  10. Re:This is as good a forum as any.. by tuppe666 · · Score: 2

    I've seen a lot of people with iPhones and Samsung Galaxy S3s. Whenever I see a Galaxy S3, I think, how in the fuck can you actually USE that thing? So my question is, do you have first hand experience with the S3, and is it just too ridiculously big?

    I'd rather have an Android but will gladly go to the iPhone if it means getting a rocking phone that actually fits in my pocket and doesn't make me look like a dork.

    I believe that Android phones come in a variety of shapes and sizes. You may not believe it is true that there is not one true phone. Android phones come with keyboards; projectors; even larger sizes [and smaller ones]; at every price point; game pads; waterpoofing; 2 sim slots. Personally I quite like the HTC S for a good android phone with a smaller screen. ...but then this is another off topic post to try and detract from worker abuse at Apples manufactures.

  11. Re:big surprise by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Which American companies actually pay American Taxes? Not Google, Apple, Microsoft, General Electric, or any other large company that has the resources to hire good accountants. The cost of waste disposal for an assembly line probably isn't that much.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  12. Re:Like Wearing Fur by Aardpig · · Score: 2

    The butthurt is strong in this one, O Master!

    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
  13. 1st Anniversary of Steve Jobs' Death by theodp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Neat coincidence, no?

    1. Re:1st Anniversary of Steve Jobs' Death by jmac_the_man · · Score: 2

      What holiday do you think they're celebrating?

  14. Re:I hope you fucking hipsters are proud by m0nkyman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Gladly. Please point me to a cell phone that is made 100% in the first world and I will immediately buy it.

    --
    ~ a low user id is no indication I have a clue what I'm talking about.
  15. Re:big surprise by tomhath · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I suppose if you call billions of dollars paid in taxes as nothing, then yea, GE paid nothing. Pretty sure it's the same with the other companies, but you can research it yourself.

  16. Re:big surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That article doesn't really say quite what you're asserting that it does.

  17. Re:big surprise by Tough+Love · · Score: 4, Funny

    They'll be even more unhappy once they realize that robots can do their jobs even cheaper than they can.

    Don't be silly, they'll be building the robots.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  18. Quality control issues by juicegg · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's more relevant information about the reasons for the strike: http://www.businessinsider.com/foxconn-workers-go-on-strike-2012-10 The important bit is that workers are striking not because they are against stricter quality, but because tighter quality checks meant they must work harder to produce iPhone components presumably at the same rate as earlier models. And they were told to do this without additional training.Victory for workers would mean Foxconn hiring more workers and less exhausting working pace for all workers there.

    1. Re:Quality control issues by PeanutButterBreath · · Score: 2

      The important bit is that workers are striking not because they are against stricter quality, but because tighter quality checks meant they must work harder to produce iPhone components presumably at the same rate as earlier models.

      And what better way to increase quality than to squeeze more productivity out of workers?

  19. Re:big surprise by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    http://www.ctj.org/taxjusticedigest/archive/2012/02/press_release_general_electric.php

    General Electric's (GE) annual SEC 10-K filing for 2011 (filed February 24, 2012) reveals that the company paid at most two percent of its $80.2 billion in U.S. pretax profits in federal income taxes over the last 10 years.

    Following revelations in March 2011 that GE paid no federal income taxes in 2010 and in fact enjoyed $3.3 billion in net tax benefits, GE told AFP (3/29/2011), "GE did not pay US federal taxes last year because we did not owe any." But don't worry, GE told Dow Jones Newswires (3/28/2011), "our 2011 tax rate is slated to return to more normal levels with GE Capital's recovery."

    As it turns out, however, in 2011 GE's effective federal income tax rate was only 11.3 percent, less than a third the official 35 percent corporate tax rate.

    "I don't think most Americans would consider 11.3 percent, not to mention GE's long-term effective rate of 1.8 percent, to be 'normal,' " said Bob McIntyre, director of Citizens for Tax Justice. "But for GE, taxes are something to be avoided rather than paid."

    Pretty sure it's the same with the other companies, but you can research it yourself.

    GE is one of 280 profitable Fortune 500 companies profiled in "Corporate Taxpayers and Corporate Tax Dodgers, 2008-2010." The report shows GE is one of 30 major U.S. corporations that paid zero -- or less -- in federal income taxes in the last three years. The full report, a joint project of Citizens for Tax Justice and the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, is at http://ctj.org/corporatetaxdodgers/.

    The difference between the 47% of Americans who don't pay federal income taxes and GE, is that GE makes billions of dollars per year.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  20. Re:big surprise by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Pretty sure it's the same with the other companies, but you can research it yourself.

    No, just for the big ones. The small ones have to pay a lot more.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  21. Re:big surprise by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't forget payroll taxes, fuck this doublespeak. The implication is that they don't pay any taxes, this needs to be actively combated.

    FFS. Payroll taxes and State taxes do not go towards paying down the Federal Deficit.
    GE does not do its part in paying the tax that would prevent the bankruptcy of America.

    Your pedantry does nothing to advance a solution.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  22. Blocking is useless... by darkfeline · · Score: 2

    I don't know why the Chinese government even bothers with blocking anymore...

    "Hey, did you hear about the Foxconn strikes? Do you think they're real?"
    "Dunno, lemme check" *looks up Foxconn stirkes*
    *search blocked*
    "Yep, they're real"