Unredacted Documents In Apple/Samsung Case, No Evidence of 'Copy' Instruction
another random user writes "Previously redacted documents presented in the Apple-Samsung case seem not to offer actual evidence that Samsung told its designers to copy the iPhone. Documents that have now been unredacted seem to show that there was never any 'copy apple' instruction. There was a push towards things that would be different, such as what is now seen in the Galaxy S3: 'Our biggest asset is our screen. It is very important that we make screen size bigger, and in the future mobile phones will absorb even the function of e-books.' Groklaw suggests, rather shockingly, that Apple's lawyers might have been a little selective in how they presented some of this evidence to the court, by picking little parts of it that offered a different shade of nuance."
The irony of Apple suing people for patent infringement is how little work Apple actually put into developing the technologies in the iPhone and in iOS (compared too all the other companies and research labs that developed said technologies)...
Ah, I remember when I was that naive. It was bliss!
Anyone who buys Apple products is a cunt. Don't be a cunt.
The irony of Apple suing people for patent infringement is how little work Apple actually put into developing the technologies in the iPhone and in iOS
I'm no Apple fan, but to say that they didn't put work into them is lying to yourself. If it was so effortless to create the iPhone/iOS experience, the existing players would have done it before the iPhone was launched. But the existing players didn't, and are either just getting around to it, or have died off.
"Redacting" a document is altering evidence.
It's pretty blatant really.
It's much like faking video evidence.
A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
What are you talking about? There was no misconduct. If there was, the judge would have kicked the guilty juror out. I think you've only seeing the fandroid perspective. Perhaps the question is, what will you do once the appeal's court confirms the judgement?
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.