Slashdot Mirror


As Gas Prices Soar So Does City Biking

Hugh Pickens writes "As California's gas prices hit record highs, the millions of dollars spent in recent years on commuter bike lanes and public transportation projects in Los Angeles, San Francisco and other major cities are being seen in a new light by many drivers. Jason Dearen reports that San Francisco is seeing a 71-percent increase in cyclists in the past five years, and Los Angeles is reporting a 32 percent increase from 2009-2011. Both findings gibe with the U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey, which found a 63 percent increase in bicycle commuters from 2000 to 2010 in the nation's 70 largest cities. 'In some ways it's a perfect storm of events that is starting to take place,' says Claire Bowin, head of policy planning for Los Angeles' planning department. Getting people out of cars 'is a very daunting task, but on other hand we have largely benefited from a growing community here that is demanding these things.' Los Angeles is building almost 1,600 miles of bike infrastructure (PDF) over the next five years. Los Angeles County's Metrolink, which features open train cars for bike riders is seeing record ridership. Changing attitudes about cars — caused by climate change — are helping these efforts as people in their twenties and thirties have adopted biking in larger numbers than previous generations (PDF)."

12 of 342 comments (clear)

  1. Its the economy stupid! by James+McGuigan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Clinton said it... "Its the economy stupid!"

    1. Re:Its the economy stupid! by hawguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If by "leading the way" you mean "stigmatizing bike riders as too poor to own a car", then you're right. I see about 1-2 people per month wearing spandex, which means they're riding recreationally. The rest are working poor...to be looked down upon, in the same way that normal Americans look down on rural residents.

      Clothing style alone doesn't determine whether a cyclist is commuting or on a recreational ride. I wear cycling clothes (padded shorts, cycling jersey) on my commute because it's far enough that regular street clothes are not as comfortable as dedicated biking clothes, and no matter what I wear I'd need to chance when I got to work, so I choose to wear cycling attire.

    2. Re:Its the economy stupid! by hawguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's what it means in China. Bike riders don't have the folding money to spend on frivolities like specialized clothes to get that extra 0.1 mph in wind resistance.

      I don't wear the clothes for any performance benefit, it's purely for utilitarian reasons. The padded shorts are much more comfortable on a long ride (plus my work pants tend to wear out at the tops of my legs due to rubbing against the seat), and they are uncomfortably warm on warm day. The bright yellow cycling jersey makes me more visible, wicks away sweat to keep me cool, and has convenient back pockets to stash things like my wallet and cell phone. Further, my city's climate tends to be foggy, so when I wear my cotton work clothes on the bike, I arrive with my clothes damp.

      If I shopped around, I could probably find cycling clothes that look more like street clothes (like baggy mountain biking shorts), but I don't really choose my commute clothes based on what people think of them - I choose based on comfort and visibility.

  2. gotta stay healthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For me, at least, biking to work us also about avoiding atrophy. Sitting in front of dual monitors for 8+ hours each day does nothing positive for my figure, so in addition to saving on gas, cycling is helping to save muscle mass.

    I suggest that you try it, too.

  3. Just Think by Gonoff · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you had the same fuel prices as we do in the UK, your "obesity epidemic" would be over,
    ($8.50 to $9 per US gallon depending on where you live)

    --
    I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
    1. Re:Just Think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yet I keep hearing about the obesity epidemic in the UK - taxation and scaremongering are NOT the ways to change behaviour.

    2. Re:Just Think by garcia · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It has nothing to do with gas for me. It has to do with other costs: car cost, maintenance, taxes, insurance. My $700 bike with free yearly tuneups for life saves me a ton. Gas for a drive 5.1 miles one way is really negligible compared to the other costs.

  4. I've been bike commuting since 2002 by EmagGeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ten years, and not because of gas prices, but because it's fun, and healthy.

    In 1999, I was 250lbs, had cholesterol over 300, moderate to severe hypertension, and was pre-diabetic. I was taking medications for all, and additional medications for other complications that were the result of my Americanized lifestyle.

    It started with walking to work, 3 miles each way. Then expanded into running 5Ks, and eventually cycling.

    Now, I'm 165lbs, and not on any medications, with normal vitals across the board. I ride my bike to work at least 3 days per week, usually going far enough out of my way to ride 30-40 miles every day - and 60-70/day on weekends.

    I think it's a travesty to sell cycling to work as a solution to a temporary problem, because people will quit the moment the problem goes away, or there is some other reason not to. Living an active lifestyle that includes daily exercise and human-powered commuting also helps solve America's obesity problem (and spiraling-out-of-control health costs) permanently. It's a shame more people won't pick it up, and that we can't bring ourselves to design towns and cities to allow for it.

    It costs far less to add 3 feet of bike lane to a road than it does to treat 1000 cases of advanced diabetes, heart disease, hypertension, cancer, and other life-ending diseases. The government and the taxpayer have a vested interest in policies that facilitate people being healthy when they reach Medicare age - not to mention the people themselves who still have to pay a heavy price for their lack of health.

  5. Unexamined Lives and All That by dangle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It took me a while to make the decision to bike to work. In retrospect, my whole life was colored by car culture. They're beautiful machines, and my friends and I spent large amounts of time talking about them and using them.

    I also finally realized that our understandable desire to make our lives more comfortable and effortless is ultimately unhealthy.

    All my notions and excuses left me, and I've been biking to work every day, unless snow and ice preclude it.

    It's such an amazing way to start and end the day, even though it's not glamorized on TV.

    On business a few years ago, a nice young man who was shuttling me into downtown Copenhagen in a company car described to me his intense interest in buying his own car, despite the tax disincentives to do so. And China is abandoning their bike culture, making single occupancy vehicle trips a sign of progress. And as an American I've found myself thinking: "It's not obligatory to copy every mistake we've made, feel free to learn from our bad examples."

  6. Re:Winter Biking? by Karljohan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Norrköping, Sweden, biking during the winter usually woks fine. The bike lanes use to be plowed quite quickly, but you need winter tires.

  7. Bizzarro World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    When Bush is president and gas hits $2 a gallon, Bush hates the poor and black people and is raising gas prices to punish the poor. When it hits $4 a gallon under Obama, the president has no control of gas prices and high gas prices are actually a benefit.

    For bonus credit, take note of all the stories around now that say renting a house is smarter than buying because they are covering up for how completely Obama destroyed the economy.

  8. Re:Biking is better by Albanach · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Deaths per mile traveled are spectacularly higher, and the bicycle always "loses" in an accident, even vs pedestrians, something to do with height of head above ground and road rash. People are notoriously bad at estimating risk, so that's no surprise that something supposedly health is actually unhealthy.

    You're "about" four times safer driving on road than biking. I realize its not politically correct but roads are for cars and motorcycles, not for bicycles. Use the correct tool for the job. Or at least buy sufficient life insurance for spouse and kids if you insist on biking.

    Statistics can be interpreted in many many ways.

    Deaths per mile are higher, deaths per hour on the road are much lower. Cycling encourages you to live close so you can reach amenities by bikes. Few cycling commuters live 20+ miles away from work, lots of car owners do.

    I commute four miles to work in 15 minutes by bike. Many others at the same location commute 10 miles in that time.

    So, if you pretend your bike is a car and do 15,000 miles a year on it, your figures might be right. Use a bike like most do and ride only a few thousand miles per year and your figures are misleading to the point of being ridiculous.