Cancer-Detecting Bra Could One Day Surpass Mammograms In Accuracy

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Cancer-Detecting Bra Could One Day Surpass Mammograms In Accuracy

Posted by samzenpus on Monday October 15, 2012 @07:40AM from the doctor-clothes dept.

fangmcgee writes "Reno-based First Warning Systems is working on a new bra that could detect if you are developing breast cancer. Integrated sensors and a data controller regularly monitor your breasts and can watch for irregularities which may signal the growth of tumors. Tests so far are showing that the bra is far superior and may be able to detect cancerous growth up to 6 years sooner than self-exams or mammograms."

10 of 110 comments (clear)

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

Victoria has a secret by Eightbitgnosis · 2012-10-15 07:44 · Score: 5, Funny

but the secret is now cancer :(
1. Re:Victoria has a secret by Rei · 2012-10-15 08:52 · Score: 4, Insightful
  
  What I'm wondering is, what is the concept here, that you wear the same bra every day? Or do you have a dozen separate anti-cancer bras, and if so, how expensive are these things expected to be? And how do you wash them? And when they wear out, does the data transfer to the next bra? Does it have to be recalibrated? Does it come in different types (for example, some people prefer underwire, some hate them)? Will I have to plug in and charge my bra every day?
  Just seeing some potential real-life challenges here...
  
  --
  People said I was dumb, but I proved them.
2. Re:Victoria has a secret by aardwolf64 · 2012-10-15 08:56 · Score: 4, Interesting
  
  From the article, around $1,000 each and only for high risk patients.
  Still, they don't don't have to be worn every day... what kind of granularity do you want? You could wear it once a week and still be way ahead of the game.
3. Re:Victoria has a secret by Belial6 · 2012-10-15 10:05 · Score: 5, Funny
  
  Good news! It's a suppository!
Re:special request by csnydermvpsoft · 2012-10-15 07:47 · Score: 5, Insightful

If you stopped staring at her chest, maybe she'd eventually give you the chance to examine her bra more closely...
Misread that by rot26 · 2012-10-15 07:49 · Score: 5, Funny

At first I thought it said "bro". My bad.

--

To ensure perfect aim, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target
1. Re:Misread that by mcmonkey · 2012-10-15 08:05 · Score: 4, Funny
  
  At first I thought it said "bro".
  It's the "manzier"!
Machine has a fatal flaw which reduces accuracy by Anonymous Coward · 2012-10-15 07:58 · Score: 4, Interesting

This machine has a fatal flaw which will decrease it's maximum possible accuracy to only 96.8% (3.2% undetected): It will only be worn by women.
I for one... by BradyB · 2012-10-15 08:29 · Score: 4, Funny

I for one welcome our under wire overlords.

--

Good is never enough, when you dream of being great!
Re:Men by MyLongNickName · 2012-10-15 08:44 · Score: 5, Informative

A little more info
* Breast cancer is the second leading cancer killer of women, behind lung cancer
* Prostate cancer is the second leading cancer killer of men, behind lung cancer
* Death rate for prostate cancer is slightly higher in men than breast cancer is for women
* Median death age for breast cancer is 68, median death age for prostate is 80
* Prostate cancer tends to be detected later and develops slower.
* Prostate cancer is likely underreported because men don't go to Doctor as often.

--
See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year