Slashdot Mirror


Boxee TV's Unlimited Cloud-based DVR Holds Users Hostage To Monthly Fees

An anonymous reader writes "Boxee has announced the game-changing Boxee TV, offering live streaming TV via two on-board tuners and an industry-first 'No Limit' DVR service that allows users to record as much TV content as they want, and access it from virtually anywhere. The problem is that the unit, which records directly to the cloud, does not allow recording to a local drive, meaning users are stuck with Boxee for as long as they want to access their stored content — potentially hundreds or thousands of hours – to the tune of $14.99 per month until Boxee ups the ante. CEPro.com suggests, 'I suspect Boxee is offering unlimited storage to make users especially beholden to them. The more content you have, the less likely you are to drop the service.'"

23 of 174 comments (clear)

  1. Do any of these work with cablecards or SDV? by crazyjj · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With the exception of Tivo, I've yet to see any of these new DVR's I keep hearing about lately even mention if they work with cablecards or switched digital video. If not, what the hell would I buy one for?!? My cableco and all of the satellite networks encrypt pretty much ALL their channels now (and my cableco uses SDV extensively too). WTF good does a DVR do me if all I can get on it are a handful of over-the-air channels?

    And as far as connecting to online services, big fucking deal. My Xbox, TV, and even blu-ray player already do that. And even if this wasn't a standard feature on pretty much everything sold today (pretty sure it will be built into my next refrigerator too), I could buy a Roku box for $60 that will do that.

    Can someone please tell me what market these things are aimed at (or if any of them beside Tivo *do* actually support cablecards and SDV)?

    --
    What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    1. Re:Do any of these work with cablecards or SDV? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Insightful

      With the exception of Tivo, I've yet to see any of these new DVR's I keep hearing about lately even mention if they work with cablecards or switched digital video....WTF good does a DVR do me if all I can get on it are a handful of over-the-air channels?

      More than a decade ago, my ReplayTV had a IR transmitter to control my Dish TV box by faking remote control signals. I assume today's DVRs have something similar.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    2. Re:Do any of these work with cablecards or SDV? by ccguy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Can someone please tell me what market these things are aimed at (or if any of them beside Tivo *do* actually support cablecards and SDV)?

      Depending on the implementation it could allow to watch US TV from abroad as long as a US buddy is willing to help a bit...

      Of course if I went out of my way to organize this so I could pay to watch US TV from Spain someone would still have the balls to call me a pirate. So preemptive fuck you.

    3. Re:Do any of these work with cablecards or SDV? by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Informative

      No. ATSC only or Clear QAM, which as of this week is going away. the FCC is allowing Cable providers to encrypt everything to keep the scumbag customers from recording with unauthorized devices.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  2. Bet it doesn't upload anything by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Most people have dreadful upload rates anyway ; the asymmetric connections we receive are very much tailored for us to be consumers, not servers.

    I'll lay dollars to donuts that it doesn't upload what you record - they just have a master server which records *everything* and your Boxee just sets a row in a database that tells it what you asked it to record. This way they can offer "unlimited" storage - they just retain a single copy of each program that users record, and look to see whether they should offer it to you based on what you "recorded".

    No doubt they hope this gets around the legal limitations that have been cropping up recently with other parties offering store-and-forward services.

    1. Re:Bet it doesn't upload anything by sohmc · · Score: 2

      Having a single master copy might be difficult do in part of the "redistribute" part of copyright. It's one thing if John Q. Public records a show in his private home for later watching. It's another for John Q. Public then makes copies of that recording to distribute to friends/family/etc.

      Also, local affiliates get ad money for local businesses so I'm sure that there would be a lot of push back on this.

      What the Boxee probably does is store the recording on a small drive (40GB maybe) and then uploads it as bandwidth allows.

      --
      We don't live in Shouldland.
    2. Re:Bet it doesn't upload anything by ccguy · · Score: 2

      Well, everything for all markets?

      Well, ONE of everything that was requested ... at least. It is better than 100,000 versions of Walking Dead being stored on their servers.

      There's no such thing. There's lots of local programming, and even if we were talking of nationwide stations and shows, the commercials are different for example. My guess is that messing with commercials in any way would instantly lawyers smell blood...

    3. Re:Bet it doesn't upload anything by dean.collins · · Score: 2

      They will need to record a copy per person. CableVision had to do this in order to get around these issues a few years ago. Cheers, Dean Collins http://www.coganation.net/

  3. And this is a problem because... ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How is this different than any other cloud storage provider, with the exception that the DVR content remains "at Boxee" and can't be copied?

    This is just like any other subscription service, IMO. Why does everything have to be some damned sinister all the time?

  4. The summary is incomplete by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It forgets to mention why I'm supposed to be outraged, or upset, or concerned, or... feel anything at all about this.

    Ok, so Boxee deletes your recording if you stop paying. So what? Who cares? Don't sign up if that bothers you.

    1. Re:The summary is incomplete by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      It forgets to mention why I'm supposed to be outraged, or upset, or concerned, or... feel anything at all about this.

      Didn't you get the memo? Unless otherwise stated those are the default reactions to be assumed for any Slashdot story, along with "confused" and "horny."

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    2. Re:The summary is incomplete by tool462 · · Score: 2

      Which, btw, has led to some very odd fetishes. To this day, I can't get off unless my wife reads SCO v. IBM legal briefs to me...

  5. Redirect the data? by stickrnan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If the device has to go through your own network, can't you just redirect the upload address to one of your own choosing?

  6. Dumb headline by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

    Holding users hostage? Jesus, things are getting desperate in these tough economic times.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  7. Amazon Cloud - Unlimited MP3 storage??? NOT! by zidium · · Score: 5, Interesting

    OK,

    About a year and a half ago, I received an offer to store unlimited numbers of MP3s on Amazon Cloud services. I was under the understanding that this would be good for the duration of my account, a perk of being an early adopter of Amazon Cloud Player.

    Then last month, I got a nasty email saying that my "trial" was over, that I was 20 GB over the new limit (200 "songs") and that I would have to pay every month for the service to keep the songs.

    That's why no one should sign up w/ Boxee assuming their unlimited offer will always be there. One day they're going to wake up and either suffer more money or lose content.

    --
    Slashdot Valentines Beta Massacre: iT WORKED! The boycotts killed Beta!!
  8. Re:Fuck Boxee by mat.power · · Score: 2

    Why you gotta be so mean to Boxxy?

  9. Cablecard is currently an anti-feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    WTF good does a DVR do me if all I can get on it are a handful of over-the-air channels?

    It's all about framing. You say that, and I say "WTF good does cable/satellite TV do me, if I can't watch it on a DVR?"

    I record OTA shows; that's about half my TV. The advertisers who pay to run ads during those shows, have some (though not all, I'll admit) of their ads seen. The advertisers who pay to run ads during shows that are only transmitted encrypted, are never seen because I watch all that stuff through ad-free torrents. (So if you have an ad to run, make sure you place your order with someone who can actually show your ad to people -- i.e. not cable or satellite channels.)

    Cablecard is irrelevant, because no half-decent DVR will ever have the capacity to work with Cablecard. It's illegal and a contract violation to work with Cablecard while not sucking. Ergo, it's a negative bullet point on a DVR feature list, which tells everyone the DVR is crippled. Why would anyone say their product sucks?

    If you are frustrated by the lack of tools that work with your cableco, there is an answer: cancel your subscription. Stop paying them. If they ever decide they want your money, they will step forward and promise a plaintext service. Then everyone (viewers, cablecos, advertisers) will win. For now, the time is not right, because you're still paying them. You lose, advertisers lose, and cableco wins.

    1. Re:Cablecard is currently an anti-feature by sqlrob · · Score: 2

      So it actually pays attention to the flag? That's DRM.

  10. Pay to rent more boxes by tepples · · Score: 3, Insightful

    unless the box from your cable company has multiple outputs for each tuner, you'll be limited to recording a single program at a time.

    I think cable companies just want customers to pay to rent more boxes in order to record more simultaneous channels.

    1. Re:Pay to rent more boxes by davester666 · · Score: 2

      No. Cable companies want you to use a cable box, in particular, one that they provide so they can sell information about you. Like what channels you watch and when, what shows you record and if you watch them, and so on.

      This stuff is WAY more valuable than Nielson info, because it's what you actually watch, not what you have written down/or logged on their separate device.

      And if they can also get you to pay them for the privilege of tracking you [by forcing you to buy/rent the tracking device from them], so much the better.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  11. Three reasons for schedules by tepples · · Score: 2

    It's like a bad hack to adapt 20th century TV schedules into 21st century content distribution. Why not just get rid of the stupid schedules completely?

    Three reasons:

    • First, twentieth century TV schedules encourage people to subscribe so that they can follow water cooler conversation at work the next morning.
    • Second, distribution contracts still in effect may date back to the twentieth century.
    • Third, viewers still expect some programs to be broadcast with less than a 60 second delay, such as sports and political talk shows.
  12. Re:Duh... by jellomizer · · Score: 2

    Normal use of service base commerce.

    You have unlimited storage. Storage isn't free, unlimited means you may be storing a lot of stuff. So after you stop paying what options do you have.
    1. Download you stuff... If that is an option you are going to be paying a lot of money for what? Old TV Shows?
    2. They will offer all there stuff for free. Sure as a customer is is a good deal, however that means there is an infrastructure for you to access your old stuff. Now to offset they will need to either advertise.
    3. One time lump storage sum. Still it goes down to it is a freakin TV show.

    You are paying for a service. Once you are no longer paying for the service, you loose it. There are far greater problems with the economy then a company not offering services to non-paying members. Especially for just recorded TV shows.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  13. Re:Fuck Boxee by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was an enthusiastic user of Boxee in their early days and ran it on top of Ubuntu. But the basically gave the finger to the entire community. I also bought a Boxee Box as I thought it could be a cheap way to easily stream movies off my main XBMC box. It's not good for that, either. File scraping is a nightmare. They add nothing to XBMC and, as a matter of fact, take a lot of stuff out that makes XBMC terrific. For instance Boxee's file scraping isn't good for anything other than straight mainstream viewers. If you like anime then you're SOL. You can only use their scraper.

    There is *nothing* out there even remotely close to the quality of regular XBMC. When they get their Android version perfected there is going to be a flood of cheap XBMC boxes base don Android that really will be high quality. Boxee is not the way to go.