Slashdot Mirror


Below-Expected Earnings For Google Posted Early, Trading Halted

An anonymous reader writes with this snippet from the BBC: "Trading in Google shares has been suspended after the internet giant released its third-quarter results early by mistake. Google blames financial printing firm RR Donnelley for filing an early draft of the results, which had been expected after the closing bell. Shares in Google were down 9% when trading in the stock was suspended. Shares had fallen as much as 10.5% at one stage. In a statement, Google said: 'Earlier this morning RR Donnelley, the financial printer, informed us that they had filed our draft 8K earnings statement without authorisation... We have ceased trading on Nasdaq while we work to finalise the document. Once it's finalised we will release our earnings, resume trading on Nasdaq and hold our earnings call as normal at 1:30 PST.'"

10 of 275 comments (clear)

  1. Dumping?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What I'd do, is wait for all the panic selling, pick up some Nov or Dec calls, and when the panic ends, folks will probably buy back in and push the price up a little. Or you could just go long.

    Panic selling always overshoots down past where the price will eventually settle.

    1. Re:Dumping?! by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 5, Funny

      What I'd do, is wait for all the panic selling, pick up some Nov or Dec calls, and when the panic ends, folks will probably buy back in and push the price up a little. Or you could just go long.

      Panic selling always overshoots down past where the price will eventually settle.

      The only thing more amazing than the fact that people manage time and time and time again to convince them selves that constantly increasing growth is sustainable, is the shock they get when it turns out not to be.

      http://www.horace.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/book-buy-sell-sell-sm.jpg

      So much for the dispassionate never erring and invisible hand of the free market.

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
  2. Bigger not better by Dupple · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oh dear

    Income this quarter is lower than the same quarter last year but overall revenues are up 45% from the same time last year. So that means that its income is less in proportion to how big it is, 19% of revenues last quarter against 37% last year. Google as a business is getting bigger but its profits are dwindling. Bigger but not better

    Moto is loosing money (the rate does seem to have slowed) on top of the 12 Bn purchase price

    Why in earth Google is releasing the new Nexus phone made by any one else other than Moto doesn't make any sense to me at all, apart from google not wishing to piss off other OEMs who aren't raking it either.

    Othe contributing factors I'd imagine are people using apps instead of browsers, so there's less opportunity for google to place ads directly and ad rates aren't as lucrative a they once were.

    As for the timing. Today or tomorrow? Wouldn't the stock have taken a dive anyway? Just off the top of my head thoughts

    --
    Watch those corners
    1. Re:Bigger not better by Sir_Sri · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Google as a business is getting bigger but its profits are dwindling. Bigger but not better

      Businesses are just giant investing services. The question for google is what is it spending all this money on, and will it have any future return that justifies the reduced income right now. Also, I'd rather own a company that acquired 10 billion dollars in assets and made one billion dollars in profit than one that made 2 billion dollars in profit - so we'll have to see just what they justify this expense on.

      Moto is loosing money (the rate does seem to have slowed) on top of the 12 Bn purchase price

      This would be the question of an asset. I never really saw google buying moto as a good plan unless there's a patent licencing scheme in the works.

      Why in earth Google is releasing the new Nexus phone made by any one else other than Moto doesn't make any sense to me at all, apart from google not wishing to piss off other OEMs who aren't raking it either.

      You answered your own question. Samsung HTC, Sony etc. all have a choice: Google, Microsoft or go their own way. Google is trying got to the top of the smartphone business by being an open platform and they don't want to fuck that up. Especially not while Microsoft is working hard to close their platform, and have surface etc. If I was samsung or HTC or Sony or the like I would find google much more tempting a partner than MS.

      As for the timing. Today or tomorrow? Wouldn't the stock have taken a dive anyway? Just off the top of my head thoughts

      Depends on what they spent the money on. That's the problem. The reason these things are secret is because an unfinished document without context could be factually wrong to start (as in the numbers may simply not be correct) or they may have significant information that needs to be included.

      From the sounds of the *final* document google views the whole thing as overall positive, they're re-investing in growth, and have seen hugely rocketing revenue overall, which is all in all good, and they suffered a bit from the USD being high relatively. So from *their* perspective this report seemed quite positive, which might be it.

      As I said, I'd rather own a company that acquired 10 billion dollars in assets and made 1 billion dollars in profit than one that made 2 billion dollars in profit and acquired no assets, and that seems to have consistently been the approach a lot of growing companies are taking.

  3. Re:im no trader but.... by AuMatar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The big deal is announcing during the day. You're supposed to announce when its closed, so people can react at the same time the next morning. That's a big fuck up that could bring the SEC down with fines.

    --
    I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  4. Re:Why halt trading? by EmagGeek · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They have to halt trading to prevent automated trading programs from selling it down to zero.

    Once there's a fast enough and large enough movement, you start getting more selling from automatic stop-loss orders, automatic short selling, and all kinds of nasty things.

    The idea of a trading halt is to prevent computer programs from destroying the economy in milliseconds. Garbage in, garbage out, you know.

  5. if the algorithms are that fragile by Chirs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    perhaps they shouldn't be allowed to trade.

  6. Re:im no trader but.... by Ghostworks · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Everyone expects reports after the bell. That way, there's time to actually read and reflect, and everyone starts on a similar footing when trading resumes in the morning. Just as importantly, everyone knows and expects that they'll start on a similar footing in the morning.

    If it were released during the trading day, there'd be pressure to analyse the document (and I use the phrase loosely here) as quickly as possible, so you can sell while it's still high or buy when it's still low, before most people have had a chance to process the new information. Most of the time, this means jumping on a single factor and reacting strongly.

    Of course, then other people wouldn't actually need read the document. They would just see the line trending, say, up and then figure that someone who can analyse better and more quickly than they has seen a value increase and is now buying. So they would buy. And why not? As long as they're on the rising edge, and can recognize a peak/plateau, they can sell at the peak and still make money. So this compressed window leads to panicked decisions based on incomplete information which is multiplied across the market. Very disruptive.

    Now, imagine if the report were not only released during trading, but _unexpectedly_ so. Not only would you have information, you would have information that the majority of actors don't have. You would have an advantage over them, one that will evaporate in a matter of minutes or hours. Once the trading halted for the day, the advantage would be lost. So they would move even more quickly and panicked than if they had been expecting the report during trading (which, of course, no one was).

    The phenomenon you describe -- trying to profit off of the correction when the initial trend is proven to be based on incorrect assumptions -- would then drag the trading artificially in the opposite direction. It's like kicking and oscillator. And, of course, there's no reason that a smaller group of investors couldn't capitalize on the over-correction, and another group on the re-correction, and so on. Maybe the price "rings" for a long, long time before it settles to a more representative value. Maybe it gets so low or high that non-linear effects ("buy at ..."/"sell at ..." directives) come into play and either dampen or excite the oscillation further. Maybe the stock just bottoms out -- that is to say, the investors buying or selling lose enough money at once that they can't make call, even though the stock they hold may have value.

    It's hard to say. But considering that it's all an artifact of traders trying to capitalize on the stupidity of other traders, and not at all a matter of the real price of the stock, it sounds like the kind of thing you want to discourage as much as possible.

    On a related note: based on the chaos caused by automated trading routines of late, I think we can expect more limits and delays on trading to be mandated in the future.

  7. Re:News sources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm the American who submitted it. Born and raised, lightly educated by comparison.
    I realize how flawed the BBC is as a British Commonwealth Corporation, in your eyes.
    I found the summary contained the most timely and pertinent information in a concise blob...
    of any major media reporting body that was running the story at the time.

    I could give two shits about 'finalise' v 'finalize', potato/potahto or other musket v. rifle instances.

    It took roughly 15 or 20 for Timothy to massage the href and post it up.

    The trading resumed 8 minutes ago.

    Time was of the fucking essence, in a sense.

  8. Re:Strange Anniversary or Black Monday by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Strange story, that. I've been investing since I was a teen, and did paper trading in grade school from stock tables.

    On Black Monday, after having just written an Economics paper for Capilano University on ethical investing, for which I'd researched true and tax book value for corporations, I realized that Apple was selling at such a low rate you couldn't lose if you bought it.

    I phoned my grandmother and told her not to panic, and to put $10,000 in Apple stock. She did. Later she gifted part of it to me. I later sold parts of that and bought and sold Microsoft stock from the proceeds, which became the 20 percent downpayment on my first house.

    Best stock day ever.

    This led me to a later decision to buy 600 shares of Ford on what turned out to be the absolute bottom of the market. Made a killing on that.

    From risk, comes opportunity.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --