Slashdot Mirror


Bill Gates Talks Windows Future, Touch Interfaces

Nerval's Lobster writes "In a YouTube interview released by Microsoft, co-founder Bill Gates offered a few hints of where Microsoft plans on taking Windows in coming years. 'It's evolving literally to be a single platform,' he said, referring to how Windows 8 and Windows Phone 8 share a kernel, file system, graphics support, and other elements. At least in theory, that will allow developers to port apps from the desktop/tablet OS to the smartphone OS with relatively little work. The two operating systems already share the same design aesthetic, with Start screens composed of colorful tiles linked to applications. Gates also praised natural user interfaces — which include touch and voice — while taking a subtle dig at Apple's iPad and other tablets on the market. 'People want to consume their mail, reading, video anywhere, and they want it to be awfully simple,' he said. 'But you want to incorporate touch without giving up the kind of mouse, keyboard capability that's just so natural in most settings.'"

8 of 198 comments (clear)

  1. One or the other by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you try to "incorporate touch without giving up the kind of mouse, keyboard capability that's just so natural in most settings.", you end up with Windows 8, Unity, and others I don't even want to know about. Keep touch interfaces out of my desktop, please.

    1. Re:One or the other by flirno · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Some. Not all.

      Touch is great for accessing and consuming content.

      Touch is currently horrendous for producing or modifying content.

      These are not yet 'unified' avenues of usage as yet.

    2. Re:One or the other by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Touch is also heavily dependent on the distance between user and monitor.

      Basically, if you have to move your shoulder *at all* to reach the display, that repetitive motion will get very tiresome very quickly.

      Tablet/phone: Touch works great.

      Laptop with keyboard: Touch is just so-so. Even with the notebook right on your lap, you have to move your shoulder a bit to reach it. If it's on a desktop in front of you, it gets worse.

      Workstation with large monitor: Touch is horrible. I don't want to move my 30" monitor any closer to me, and I don't want to reach way out to it.

    3. Re:One or the other by Synerg1y · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Also requires A LOT of screen cleaner... an excellent investment opportunity for anybody that believes that touch screens will skyrocket in popularity in the near future.

  2. An absolutely critical product? by OldKingCole · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Maybe for Microsoft's survival.

    The surface ARM is no more than another netbook (remember those? TABLETS replaced them), and the surface x86 version is just another ultra portable with touch screen support.

    As far as Window 8 is concerned, Microsoft is used to shoving its products by leveraging its monopoly in the OEM market. The case with mobile devices however is very different. Microsoft HAS to prove Windows 8 is worth all the fuss (comparing to existing Android and iOS), with the only advantage (which is yet to be tested) of having apps for your Windows based x86 share information with their ARM counterparts (please spare the build-once for both platforms BS). This synchronization may have been a killer app in the early mobile device days, but today information is synchronized across all platforms quite easily.

    Microsoft is definitely all-in on this one, if people adopt Windows 8 as a mobile OS, we may very well see Windows taking over the mobile devices market. If it won't, it's only a matter of time until desktop OS's (or at least Windows OS for most desktops) is obsolete, and so will be Microsoft.

    Only time will tell, but my money is on a colossal failure for Microsoft

  3. Re:Like Apple? by gmack · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nothing to do with Luck. Microsoft's mistake was assuming people wanted a desktop experience on a device too small for it to be effective. They have now come to their senses and come up with a good cell phone experience but now want to do the opposite and inflict a mobile interface on their desktop users.

    As for Apple: The core kernel may be similar but their interfaces are completely different between desktop and mobile.

  4. Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    who doesnt want to put fingerprints all over my freaking monitor?

  5. Re:Like Apple? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why did it turn out just to be "lucky" for Apple?

    Lucky because Apple HR got the right "Steve" and Microsoft pickup up the wrong one. 50:50 chance.

    A near thing, you realize.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!