Slashdot Mirror
Phil Shapiro: Slashdot Reader, FOSS Activist, and Library Computer Guy (Video)
Phil Shapiro isn't famous, but he's a pretty good writer whose work appears regularly at opensource.com. He makes his living as the tech support person (he calls it "public nerd") at the Takoma Park Maryland Library. He has also -- see the link to his bio page above -- lived in New Delhi, India; Copenhagen, Denmark; Paris, France; and Scarsdale, New York. He got started with Linux as a "social justice" thing; because Linux and FOSS helped make it possible for people of modest means (we used to just call them "poor") to learn about computers and get on the Internet. He's still a big "computer for the masses" advocate and computer rehab volunteer. What's especially interesting about this interview (which is slightly out of sound/visual synch; you may prefer reading the transcript) is the amount of credit Phil gives Slashdot for spurring him on and getting him excited about FOSS. He also sees Slashdot as instrumental in helping start the Maker subculture. Do you agree? If so, should influencing the future of technology be Slashdot's main mission? Also: If so, how do you suggest we do it? And more specifically, do you know any other non-famous Slashdot readers (or people in general) we should talk to because they are doing interesting things?
He also sees Slashdot as instrumental in helping start the Maker subculture. Do you agree?
The software side, maybe. Slashdot leaves much to be desired on the hardware side of the necessary skills in engaging in the Maker subculture.
If so, should influencing the future of technology be Slashdot's main mission?
Regardless of my prior answer: yes, please yes, oh for the love all things noodly yes.
Also: If so, how do you suggest we do it?
Well, I know that this is popular in the comments but probably not so popular with the new Dice overlords but I will be frank for the betterment of Slashdot. Slashdot BI is bad. The people that write for it aren't bad but the material they are told to cover is bad. It represents a lot of things that are wrong with technical journalism today: buzzwords, lists, how-tos that tell you how to do nothing, focus pieces on companies and the worst part about it all is that it's largely positive "news." I suggest that you swap this out and you go here and you ask yourself why it doesn't look more like this, this or even this.
Tell me, you have this formatted page for Business Intelligence with subdirectories and paid authors and all sorts of stuff. Where, oh where, is the equivalent for Makers? What, the exposition pieces you do for Amazon's latest cloud launch bring you more revenue than a how-to on hacking USB I/O with the Raspberry Pi? Well, if that's the truth, that's the truth!
Why is it that story submission has special entry fields for book reviews but not for Make projects? You get my book reviews because you have made a space for them. I feel like there is no space for Maker stuff on Slashdot and, most importantly, there is no space for non-news maker stuff. Your commitment so far is to hit the big things and that's very cool but the Maker subculture isn't only about high value targets. It's also about the small projects and replicating projects you find all over the place like here.
Let's face it: if somebody does a learning project and uploads a video to YouTube that shows how to integrate a very specific Arduino board with a very specific LED board and puts up some ugly source code on github, it's not going to make Slashdot's front page. And most of the comments will be "I could do better" and "congratulations, you're doing what I did in fifth grade." However these are some of the resources that get Makers started and drive the community. There's tons of not-news-worthy stuff going on in the background and right now the Slashdot front page isn't the place for this nor does there even exist a subpage for it.
Slashdot is only interested in hunting elephants and bringing one in once every six months while there are Makers trying to learn how to cultivate soy beans. You could try having a subpage like BI where people can grow ideas and share tutorials no matter how inane and besotted with errors they are. But that stuff will probably have to stay off the frontpage.
And more specifically, do you know any other non-famous Slashdot readers (or people in general) we should talk to because they are doing interesting things?
Why not reach out to the other pages I linked? They're doing it right but they lack the readership. You have the readership but lack the Maker diversity. Surely there could be some value shared there?
My work here is dung.
"Influencing future technology" isn't really a thing. People are influenced by Slashdot as evidenced by this very nice gentleman and his video. Slashdot is a social space, not a technical workshop.
"Without me, my rifle is useless, without my rifle, I am useless." Making techology into this sort of monolithic, God like entity has always been a major failing in the computer geek culture. You need human's first to have technology. If no one wants to play with your neat toy, it may be very neat, but it may not be very useful.
What would Richard Feynman do, if he were here right now? He'd do some math and he'd follow through!
And the number one way to be poor in America? Get born poor.
FTFY.
The reality is those who are born poor are not going to even have anyone to teach them that stuff. The last thing they need is your sorry self righteous ass making unsolicited and ignorant comments.
I may be the exponent or the perfect "Joe the Plumber" for thousands of mid-career /.ers. Not more, not less.
Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
Trust me, if you think there are just three ways to get poor you haven't seen much of life. That, or you haven't been paying attention.
Wow. Except for having a full head of hair and not having a job, I could be mistaken for this guy. :p
We really need your help
http://www.gofundme.com/help-sherry
Being poor doesn't mean you have to stay poor. Staying poor, blame yourself. I've been dumpster diver and now am fairly secure making a half way decent wage. Being born poor is not your fault, staying poor .. well that is your fault.
Of course, it is much easier to blame the evil Republicans (or Democrats) for your poverty than it is to actually do something about it. Blame only goes so far, and that is why I'm Libertarian. Government has never actually "helped" me. More like Co-dependent.
Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
I am not poor. I have a far above median income, as did my parents.
It is much easier to blame poor people for being poor than to see what things we could change to give people a chance. The government has actually helped me a lot though, the roads and trash collection especially. I also appreciate the police protecting my property.
We were all makers then. Except, we called it Electronics.
I remember creating an FM transmitter for my term project. I asked to go to the bathroom before my turn to show off our projects, and walked behind the out-building our lab was in, then tuned into the Oldies station my teacher always listened to in the background. I keyed in my transmitter and stated that my electronics teacher "has won the student's choice award for best teacher, call in within the next 10 minutes and mention the phrase 'Chicken Doughnuts' to claim your prize! We now return you to your regularly scheduled program--". Ten minutes later my teacher was still calling the oldies station yelling at the disk jockey, "I'm the Winner! I'm [teacher's name]. 'Chicken Doughnuts'! See?!" The DJ found it hilarious enough to air "The all request hour will continue in a moment, but first, 'Chicken Doughnut' Guy, [insert my teacher's frantic exclamations], Stop calling. You've got the wrong number buddy, but thanks for the laughs."
When my turn to show my project came around, my teacher gave me an A+, and a week of detention.
Where was Slashdot?! Wouldn't they have run my "maker" story? Maybe that would have helped me gain publicity for my crowd sourced "software defined radio" projects? (hooking parallel ports up to short-wave radios a decade before you could buy a 'WIFI' device). Oh, that's right... SLASHDOT DIDN'T EXIST. However, HAL-PC (Houston area league of PC users) did, and their SIG groups were excellent forums for meeting face to face with other like-minded folks, and their BBS was full of amazing shareware.
Slashdot has never been required for common folk to be "influencing the future of technology". It's just your opinion if you think Slashdot is the best, most influential, or only 'collaborative forum'. If influencing future technologists is your goal, then start a chain of Hackerspaces & Makerspaces for folks to get together and make stuff happen. Now that the Internet exists it IS hackerspace incarnate, and Slashdot is just one of many ports, not 'The' port by any measure.
should influencing the future of technology be Slashdot's main mission?
Maintaining as high as possible a concentration of clueful posters and interested readers should be Slashdot's main mission. Then influencing the future will take care of itself.
When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
You know the best way of ensuring you're never poor? Be a complete psychopathic bastard to everyone you meet, think of nothing but money 24/7, have no hobbies, friends or lovers, don't drink or take drugs, don't spend time listening to music or watching movies or reading or looking at art or nature, never donate to charity, live off a simple vegetarian diet, don't spend money on expensive clothes or toiletries, or parking spaces.
But, above all, make sure you're born to well off parents.
To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
Go fuck yourself. Being a good parent has very little indeed to do with being rich or poor. At least in any civilized country, your kids aren't going to starve or freeze to death, and as long as they are loved they will be OK.
To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
What I wrote is that doing those three simple things gives one a greater than 80% chance of never being poor.
You do understand that 80+ is less than 100, right? You understand I never said it was a perfect guarantee, right?
Yeah, it's a good thing that correlation is the same as causation isn't it?
What you wrote is utter bollocks. Do a lot of poor people not have college dgrees, but do have one or more children? Well, duh.
To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
" roads and trash collection especially. I also appreciate the police protecting my property."
So, you bring up what government should be doing, as evidence that it should do everything it does? My city's city council, while having huge budget issues and other problems is arguing over paper or plastic bags. Can you tell me, does a plastic bag ban fix the budget issues? Meanwhile they haven't addressed fiscal problems because they are all left wing nuts running the city. Priotitys
Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
Banning plastic bags may not fix the budget issue, but it can be a help if it means less staff and cleaning of public parks. Here they have to remove plastic bags from trees pretty regularly.
I've been working on the Free Charge Controller project for the last three years. A charge controller is a black box that sits between a solar panel (or wind turbine) and a load (like a battery) and makes sure the two 'play nice' together.
The project is still very much in it's infancy, but we've been working with Jameco, and electronics part supplier, to create kits. The kit will be launching in the next day or two.
See FreeChargeController.org for more information if any Slashdoters are interested in participating.