Slashdot Mirror


A Piezoelectric Pacemaker That Is Powered By Your Heartbeat

MrSeb writes "Engineers at the University of Michigan have created a pacemaker that is powered by the beating of your heart — no batteries required. The technology behind this new infinite-duration pacemaker is piezoelectricity. Piezoelectricity is is literally 'pressure electricity,' and it relates to certain materials that generate tiny amounts of electricity when deformed by an external force — which, in the case of the perpetual pacemaker, the vibrations in your chest as your heart pumps blood around your body. Piezoelectric devices generate very small amounts of power — on the order of tens of milliwatts — but it turns out that pacemakers require very little power. In testing, the researchers' energy harvester generated 10 times the required the power to keep a pacemaker firing. Currently, pacemakers are battery powered — and the battery generally need to be replaced every few years, which requires surgery. According M. Amin Karami, the lead researcher, 'Many of the patients are children who live with pacemakers for many years,' he said. 'You can imagine how many operations they are spared if this new technology is implemented.' This piezoelectric energy harvester is about half the size of a conventional battery, too, which is presumably a good thing."

14 of 84 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Before somebody asks . . . by msauve · · Score: 2, Informative

    No, that's not the reason. A UPS has to be able to replace the full power provided by the main when in use. A pacemaker only needs to provide a small trigger signal, which is much smaller than the output of the heart itself.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  2. About that Surgery by 1967mustangman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just to be clear the replacement surgery on a pacemaker is almost always done on an outpatient basis with local anesthetic.

    --
    Madre de Dios! Es El Pollo Diablo! -- Captain Blondebeard
    1. Re:About that Surgery by ortholattice · · Score: 2

      Yes, it is outpatient, but it can cost $45,000 to replace the battery.

    2. Re:About that Surgery by drooling-dog · · Score: 4, Funny

      I didn't know that Apple made pacemakers...

    3. Re:About that Surgery by erice · · Score: 4, Funny

      I didn't know that Apple made pacemakers...

      Don't be silly. Apple would never allow you to change the battery.

  3. Re:So.. by tomhath · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's right. It comes with a lifetime guarantee.

  4. Re:Before somebody asks . . . by Tacticus.v1 · · Score: 2

    More like a usb watchdog that restarts the server if it dies.

    the UPS analogy is very wrong

  5. Re:Before somebody asks . . . by demonlapin · · Score: 2

    The problem is that it's really great for one set of patients - kids who have had their heart's natural pacemaker disrupted due to abnormalities that arose during development - but not much use in the larger population of patients who need pacemakers (generally elderly adults with bad hearts), because the adults so often get a combined pacemaker/defibrillator. And there's no way it can generate enough power to defibrillate someone.

  6. Re:Before somebody asks . . . by arth1 · · Score: 2

    I would imagine it must have a rechargeable battery (I'd say large capacitor, but they tout how small it is), or else it would cease to send a signal if your heart skipped a beat, which kind of defeats the purpose of a pacemaker, I should think?

    Anyhow, aren't there other and more reliable methods to generate small amounts of electricity inside the body, considering that the patient's heart is confirmed not to be reliable (or else why implant a pacemaker?). Temperature differentials and chemical reactions to name two.

    I am also not a doctor, but why do they put pacemakers of this nature (i.e. the kind that only ticks the heart and can't provide shocks) in the chest? Why not where it can be easily accessed and recharged, e.g. by an induction charger - the same methods we use to charge toothbrushes and some phones - without having to do surgery to change batteries every couple of years?

  7. Re:Disastrous feedback loop possible. by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 2
    also, that is why I put the phrase 'jump start' in double quotes as so: "jump start", to indicate that I was making little air-double-quotes around the phrase as I said it, so as to imply "no it's not really jump-starting, it's just resynchronizing the asynchronous non-entrained fibrillation occuring in the myocardiocytes so that once we've jolted them, an entrained signal can propagate in the correct direction and allow the correct temporal propagation of myocardial contractility so as to squeeze the blood through the atria and ventricles unless of course their is some dead myocardium around which a re-entrant circus rhythm can form leading to aberrant cardiac-signal propagation and irregular heart rhythms." But that seemed like too much to squeeze in.

    ;>)

    Anyway, the key point is that the power needs might be great enough that such a mechano-electric harvester might take too long to store enough "juice" to be able to send out multiple defibrillatory stimuli. But I don't know about many of the numbers or parameters/variables involved in this particular system or other systems like it:

    -- how much less power you need to apply directly to the heart as opposed to stimulating with an externally defibrillator applied to the chest wall,

    -- I don't know what the efficiency of the piezo-electric system per heartbeat or the amount of current and voltage generated by it per heart-beat,

    -- i don't know the efficiency of the electrochemical battery system that could be used with it,

    but I'm wondering if it could generate enough power to be useful or not. C'est tout.

  8. Re:Before somebody asks . . . by TheLink · · Score: 2

    OK it's like the electronic engine management stuff (ECU etc) that keeps your car engine running well. As long as the car engine runs, it turns the alternator which supplies energy to the electronics and tops up the battery.

    And just like you can restart a car engine using the stored battery charge, in theory you might be able to use this tech to store enough charge to shock the heart to restart it in case it stops (an ICD with a battery that's kept charged by the heartbeat).

    --
  9. Re:Train analogy by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 2
    I did not "add the constraint that no battery is allowed" (quoting you there). Here's the quote of my GP post (quoting me now): "i don't know the efficiency of the electrochemical battery system that could be used with it,"

    .

    I specifically mentioned electrochemical battery there, and in my original post I mentioned both using a capacitor and/or a rechargeable battery. So whomever you're complaining about adding that constraint, it certainly wasn't me. I got no problems with ze batteries, okay?

  10. Re:Before somebody asks . . . by ArcadeMan · · Score: 3, Funny

    The UPS analogy is wrong indeed. Let's use FedEx instead.

  11. Re:Solar powered flashlight by camperdave · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Heartbeat powered pacemaker is as useful as a solar powered flashlight.

    In other words, very useful. The typical flashlight will have a charge time of about 6 hours while providing 8 hours of light. They can penetrate up to 50 meters in the dark, and can be visible up to 2 kilometres. The cell life of the solar energy cells can be as long as 20 years! Exactly what you need in an emergency. Similarly, a heartbeat powered pacemaker can trigger heartbeats (note: trigger, not power. The beat itself is still chemically powered, like all other muscles) for a lifetime.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!