Man Charged £2,000 For Medical Records Stored On Obsolete System
An anonymous reader writes "In Britain, where it is custom and practice to charge around £10 for a copy of your medical results, a patient has discovered that his copy will cost him £2,000 because the records are stored on an obsolete system that the current IT systems cannot access. Can this be good for patient care if no-one can access records dating back from a previous filing system? Perhaps we need to require all current systems to store data in a way that is vendor independent, and DRM-free, too?"
Who the hell decided to not do the format conversion when they phased out the old system?
Why should the patient have to pay 200 times as much money to access records when the difficulty isn't his fault?
The company that was incompetent and stored things in an inefficient manner should cover the cost. Charging this incompetence to the patient shouldn't be legal.
So instead of having migration costs, just charge your customers for your migration! Think about it - if you go to the bank, the teller tells you that it will cost you $2,000 to withdraw money because the system in which they store your account info is still on Windows ME! It sounds glorious. I am doing this immediately.
Oh, wait, no. I only work on ancient systems. Whoops.
So 1 person has some trouble getting some old files vs our current system where we let folks with cancer die.
Yeah, what a terrible tradeoff.
I disagree with your claim that it has failed in Canada.
It appears to be working fine, for an good example check out life expectancies.
People always die, selecting who lives based on who has the most money is immoral.
I pay my taxes happily, in the knowledge that they buy me the civilization I expect. That is the entire point.