Slashdot Mirror


Romney Campaign Accidentally Launches Transition Web Site

stevegee58 writes "The Mitt Romney presidential campaign accidentally launched a transition website the day after the election. Sporting a 'President Elect' seal and a catchy new tagline ('Smaller, Simpler, Smarter') , the site was up briefly before the gaffe was discovered and the site taken down. Fortunately an alert blogger, Taegan Goddard, found the errant site and published some screen shots."

42 of 185 comments (clear)

  1. Someone didn't get the memo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    That site wasn't supposed to launch until Utah secedes.

    1. Re:Someone didn't get the memo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      That site wasn't supposed to launch until Utah secedes.

      Somehow, I don't think we'll be going to war over that one.

    2. Re:Someone didn't get the memo by Reverand+Dave · · Score: 3, Funny

      He's too liberal for Utah.

      --
      I got here through a series of tubes
    3. Re:Someone didn't get the memo by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 5, Funny

      Syria is Utah's path to the sea!

    4. Re:Someone didn't get the memo by Andy+Prough · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Texas would beg to differ, I'm sure.

    5. Re:Someone didn't get the memo by jamstar7 · · Score: 2

      That site wasn't supposed to launch until Utah secedes.

      Somehow, I don't think we'll be going to war over that one.

      Well, we did before, back when it was Deseret...

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    6. Re:Someone didn't get the memo by Phreakiture · · Score: 2
      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    7. Re:Someone didn't get the memo by crazyjj · · Score: 3, Informative

      If all of those red counties unite and choose to secede, they'll control a good chunk of the oil, coal and farmland.

      Yeah, that was a large part of the Confederate States of America's reasoning too. "We've got the cotton and farmlands! The yankees will surely fall before us!"

      Guess how that turned out.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    8. Re:Someone didn't get the memo by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      Its less desirable now though

      ...since nowadays, we *can* actually fly to Mars instead, you mean?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  2. oops by russlar · · Score: 2

    He's channeling his inner Rick Perry.

    --
    Anybody want my mod points?
  3. Icing on the fail cake by sandytaru · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hopefully the Republicans can find a better candidate than a used car salesman next time. And hire a better IT staff.

    --
    Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    1. Re:Icing on the fail cake by sandytaru · · Score: 2

      Considering how many times they hit me up for money over the campaign (and I tossed in three bucks each time) they got a lot of American cash, too.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    2. Re:Icing on the fail cake by gatfirls · · Score: 2

      They should probably run a democrat.

    3. Re:Icing on the fail cake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Obozo? Really? You're some fucking libtard commie hippy trying to hide the truth of your liberal agenda.

      It turns out that his REAL name was recently discovered on a North Korean birth certificate that was written in Arabic with ink made from the ashes of holocaust victims and the constitution. It turns out to be Osama Mohammed Chinese-Invasion Terrorist Muslim Nigger bin Laden Mexican Hitler Rapes-Kids Atheist Death-To-America.

      If you didn't hate America so much, God would have told you that already.

    4. Re:Icing on the fail cake by Carewolf · · Score: 2

      They should probably run a democrat.

      Wasn't that what they tried this time, but then asked him to lie about how conservative he was?

    5. Re:Icing on the fail cake by Coisiche · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hopefully the Republicans can find a better candidate than a used car salesman next time. And hire a better IT staff.

      And don't have an agenda that only benefits a shrinking percentage of the population; or at least don't piss off the growing part of the electorate so much.

  4. Smaller, Simpler, Smarter by joh · · Score: 5, Funny

    Choose any two.

    1. Re:Smaller, Simpler, Smarter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I chose mine. Obama is smarter. Biden is simpler.

    2. Re:Smaller, Simpler, Smarter by dalias · · Score: 2

      And Romney is smaller...where it counts. :-)

    3. Re:Smaller, Simpler, Smarter by AwesomeMcgee · · Score: 4, Funny

      In the votes! Oh!

    4. Re:Smaller, Simpler, Smarter by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

      Well, technically, that's Reaganomics - it's how he "shrank" government but increased spending. Obama was handed a 1.3T deficit by the outgoing previous president (GWB signed that budget into law), and ended with a 1.1T deficit. 2013 Projected deficit by OMB is ~700B. That's a lot of scratch, but it's still less red ink than the red party.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  5. Re:LOL by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Funny

    They should hold on to the site, you never know what the final count will be once Florida finishes.

    Yeah. Florida might find another eighty electoral votes somewhere.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  6. Not a mistake, this was expected. by aurashift · · Score: 5, Funny

    Romney is famous for flip-flopping. Even if someone told him he lost, he thinks he won. And he did. That's the beauty of not taking a stance and not taking NO for an answer. God bless you Romney. God bless us all. (Except the gays)

    1. Re:Not a mistake, this was expected. by high_rolla · · Score: 2

      Or it was all part of his plan. Maybe, just maybe, if he can convince enough people that he did in fact get elected then it might just maybe come true. And if that doesn't work he can just disappear by putting his hands over his eyes and saying 'Ha! now you can't see me.'

      --
      Ryans Tutorials - A collection of technology tutorials.
  7. Haha by mozumder · · Score: 5, Funny

    that's because we liberals can do whatever we want and you conservatives can't!

    ha ha! sucks to be you!

  8. Re:LOL by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not Florida, alone, but technically, the Electoral College ballots aren't counted until early in January.

    There is a bit more leeway than one would think, although the results, as they now stand are extremely unlikely to change.

    Most states electors are bound by law if they don't vote the way they have been tasked, however, electors in the following ttates are not bound by Law to cast their vote for a specific candidate:
    ARIZONA ARKANSAS DELAWARE GEORGIA IDAHO ILLINOIS INDIANA IOWA KANSAS KENTUCKY LOUISIANA MINNESOTA MISSOURI NEW HAMPSHIRE NEW JERSEY NEW YORK NORTH DAKOTA PENNSYLVANIA RHODE ISLAND SOUTH DAKOTA TENNESSEE TEXAS UTAH WEST VIRGINIA

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  9. Re:LOL by blade8086 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh Hi Boss!

    Since I don't give a crap about your campaign, or politics, and this is the only REAL website I've ever done,
    and this site is all I did during your campaign, I thought I'd publish it live for a few hours assuming some news outlets
    would pick it up, so that I could then reference it for future work, and have important media clippings to reference
    as well. Hope you don't mind - and if I do, oh well, what are you going to do, fire me?

    Is probably what I'd say.

  10. Re:LOL by DaHat · · Score: 2

    Takes one to know one... his concession is not binding in any way (just ask Al Gore)... it's simply a respectful thing to do.

    In the unlikely event that a large batch of Obama votes turn up in Virginia, Ohio & Florida as fraudulent and the electoral college swings to him... the presidency is his, concession or not.

    Will any of the above happen? Probably not... but you show your ignorance of the system.

  11. "Fortunately" by Dan+East · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Fortunately" a blogger captured this? Why exactly is this a fortunate thing? It's not like the site shows Romney doing something wrong, or trying to cover up something. Is there something particularly great about the site design that can benefit us in some way? Perhaps it contains some great scripts that we are now fortunate to have access to?

    Someone made a mistake, and you say it is a "fortunate" that they can now be made fun of because of it. Politics aside, let's simply not act like assholes please. Also, be thankful that your mistakes don't turn into Slashdot stories.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:"Fortunately" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Fortunately" a blogger captured this? Why exactly is this a fortunate thing?

      Because it's funny, and we'd like to see it? Not everything related to politics needs to be serious.

      Someone made a mistake, and you say it is a "fortunate" that they can now be made fun of because of it. Politics aside, let's simply not act like assholes please. Also, be thankful that your mistakes don't turn into Slashdot stories.

      Everything that is funny is at somebody's expense. That's not being an asshole. Not having a sense of humor and getting offended by it is being an asshole.

    2. Re:"Fortunately" by artor3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's fortunate because it's humorous. It's like that time that Biden asked the guy in the wheelchair to stand up and greet the crowd. Momentarily funny, ultimately meaningless.

      It's not like anyone's feelings are getting hurt here. The IT guy who posted it goofed, but no one knows or cares who he is. The posting doesn't reflect on Romney at all, and even if it did, so what? His political career is over regardless, and all he's got left is his piles of money, good health, and loving family. Do you really think he cares if people poke fun at one of staffer's slip-ups?

    3. Re:"Fortunately" by siddesu · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, it is, for one thing, providing a very interesting glimpse into the mindset of the people who ran Romney's campaign. I also recall them talking about their transition team in early July. Add to that the famous unprepared Romney speech, and you get quite a diagnosis.

      I personally have a hard time believing they were so detached from reality all the way through the campaign that they'd focus on inessential tasks like selecting a transition team early and preparing this mockup rather than focussing on the platform and their campaign.

      It is really telling how close to lunacy the Republican party leadership is.

      Which is sad, really, as weak competition in politics only further lowers the quality of politicians. Adverse selection in action, so to speak.

    4. Re:"Fortunately" by siddesu · · Score: 2

      Yeah, it was math vs. gut feeling this time too, and math won again.

    5. Re:"Fortunately" by fm6 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Fortunately" because it's interesting to see what they planned. And because it says a lot about their mindset that the only contingency they had planned for was victory.

      I've always been fascinated by a document that turned up in Dwight Eisenhower's papers. It was a letter to his superiors taking sole responsibility for the failure of the D-Day invasion! Of course, he never sent it, because the damn thing succeeded, and he got credit for it, which is as it should be. But it says a lot about him that he was ready to face the very real possibility of total failure, at a huge cost.

      Contrast this with the current Republican crowd that always cherry-pick their facts to support what they want to believe. (And I mean you, Carl Rove.) Maybe, just maybe, the stupidity of this is finally going to become apparent, and we can go back to having political arguments that are based on honest differences of opinion instead of Destroy The Enemy at All Costs crap.

    6. Re:"Fortunately" by argStyopa · · Score: 2

      FWIW it would have been pretty incompetent if they DIDN'T have such a site prepared. (shrug)

      --
      -Styopa
    7. Re:"Fortunately" by nine-times · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Fortunately" a blogger captured this? Why exactly is this a fortunate thing?

      Because it's just this kind of gaffe that could cost Romney the election!

  12. Re:LOL by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In the unlikely event that a large batch of Obama votes turn up in Virginia, Ohio & Florida as fraudulent and the electoral college swings to him... the presidency is his, concession or not.

    That would be the largest legal battle the country has ever seen. Given that Romney's campaign shut down so quickly that staffers found their credit cards had been canceled when they tried to pay for cabs on the way home from campaign headquarters, I kind of doubt he has the machinery in place for that kind of fight.

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  13. Re:Can we forget about him? by Raenex · · Score: 4, Funny

    Shouldn't Ted Nugent be dead or in prison by now?

  14. Re:LOL by PraiseBob · · Score: 2

    You should check your math-
    Ohio is worth 18, Virginia 13, and Florida 29. That totals to 60. Obama is (estimated) to have 332 electoral votes, and Romney has 206.
    Swapping out 60 votes still leaves them at 272 to 266.

  15. Re:LOL by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 2

    In the unlikely event that a large batch of Obama votes turn up in Virginia, Ohio & Florida as fraudulent and the electoral college swings to him... the presidency is his, concession or not.

    That would be the largest legal battle the country has ever seen. Given that Romney's campaign shut down so quickly that staffers found their credit cards had been canceled when they tried to pay for cabs on the way home from campaign headquarters, I kind of doubt he has the machinery in place for that kind of fight.

    Perhaps he's saving that money for the legal fees. ;-)

  16. Re:LOL by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The electors are picked by the state parties. They're die-hard partisans who've drunk more of the campaign kool-aid than anyone. It's not like people who have been working to elect Obama for years are suddenly going to change their minds and vote for Romney or vice versa.

    In the rare instances when electors have switched their votes, it's usually been for someone else in the same party and wouldn't affect the outcome of the election. For instance, there's been speculation that some of the Romney electors might cast votes for Ron Paul, but obviously that wouldn't change Obama's numbers either way.