Slashdot Mirror


Nike+ FuelBand: Possibly a Big Security Hole For Your Life

MojoKid writes "Nike+ FuelBand is a $149 wristband with LED display that tracks your daily activity, tells you how many calories you've burned, lets you know how much fuel you have left in the tank, and basically keeps track of 'every move you make.' If you think that sounds like a privacy nightmare waiting to happen, it pretty much is. A source directly connected to Nike reported an amusing, albeit startling anecdote about a guy who got caught cheating on his girlfriend because of the Nike+ FuelBand. 'They shared their activity between each other and she noticed he was active at 1-2AM, when he was supposed to be home.' That's just one scenario. What if the wristband gets lost or stolen? How much data is actually stored on these sorts of devices? And remember, you're syncing it to the cloud with an iOS or Android app."

162 comments

  1. That's more tracking than intensive probation by NixieBunny · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So... people voluntarily do this to themselves? Weird.

    --
    The determined Real Programmer can write Fortran programs in any language.
    1. Re:That's more tracking than intensive probation by jhoegl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Clearly, the guy who was wearing the band forgot to take it off when he was into his laborous other activities.
      This shows the ignorance people have of technology more than anything else.
      This is how you subjugate a populace... make sure they are ignorant, make sure they get a benefit out of something, and then hide the real reason.
      I mean, it worked for that one guy with the ring in that documentary I saw.

    2. Re:That's more tracking than intensive probation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      *sigh* The Lord of the Rings was not a documentary.

    3. Re:That's more tracking than intensive probation by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Clearly, the guy who was wearing the band forgot to take it off when he was into his laborous other activities.

      As sensitive as this thing apparently is, no data would be a sign you took it off. If eating a slice of pizza can rack up more points than an actual walk, then imagine what scratching your ass in your sleep might do.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:That's more tracking than intensive probation by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 3, Funny

      Make your hand smell bad, I guess.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    5. Re:That's more tracking than intensive probation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... people voluntarily do this to themselves? Weird.

      So...people actually think that a smartphone is any better? Weird.

    6. Re:That's more tracking than intensive probation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I assume that is has something to do with kinetics and motion, more than pulse.

      For most of the people on Slashdot they would need to make sure that choose the correct wrist to place this on. Otherwise they would see a spike during certain online activities.

      "Holy shit, were you being chased by a tiger for 45 seconds?"

    7. Re:That's more tracking than intensive probation by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      Do you spend more time eating a slice of pizza than you spend on a walk? And do you energetically move your arm back and forth continuously during the entire duration of time that you eat pizza?

      If your answer to both of those is no, then the device would not flag your pizza eating activity as more calorie burning than your walk.

      If your answer to both of those is yes, you should record yourself eating a slice and put it up on YouTube. The sheer silliness of it would probably get millions of views.

    8. Re:That's more tracking than intensive probation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hide the real reason? So you're saying this is some deep dark ploy for Nike or Big Brother to find out I'm cheating on my diet when I go to Starbucks?
       
      While you may have been modded up, I see nothing but melodramatic babble about the boogie man with no real backing on any level.

    9. Re:That's more tracking than intensive probation by jhoegl · · Score: 2

      Then why did they release three movies based on its power and then two more coming out based on its 500 years of being lost, then found?
      Some people o.O

    10. Re:That's more tracking than intensive probation by jhoegl · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the storage of the data to a cloud server, not owned, operated, or controlled by you.
      Nothing melodramatic about being cautious, but then again I dont know drama, just plausible outcomes based on historic data.

    11. Re:That's more tracking than intensive probation by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1

      Umm, i am wearing one right now. Sleeping in it just would not occur to me. Plus you have to take it off to charge it. So as a privacy thing, well the only reason it would get you in trouble would be wearing it during sex so you could get the fuel points. Not a security issue that worries me at all. Now the implants.. They might be an issue.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    12. Re:That's more tracking than intensive probation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still looking for you alluded to hidden reason, not the method. Don't even try to derail the real question, dumb motherfucker.

    13. Re:That's more tracking than intensive probation by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the storage of the data to a cloud server, not owned, operated, or controlled by you. Nothing melodramatic about being cautious, but then again I dont know drama, just plausible outcomes based on historic data.

      ...and no warrant is needed to access your data if it's stored in the cloud.

    14. Re:That's more tracking than intensive probation by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      It's the part where he voluntarily shared his info with his gf that makes this not really a security hole, just a stupid person.

    15. Re:That's more tracking than intensive probation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Holy shit, were you being chased by a tiger for 45 seconds?

      A little ambitious there, aren't you?

    16. Re:That's more tracking than intensive probation by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:That's more tracking than intensive probation by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "Clearly, the guy who was wearing the band forgot to take it off when he was into his laborous other activities."

      No, clearly you don't understand how they work. If he took it off or turned it off, it would still record all the activities before and after. He would have to disable it maybe hours before he conducted his "clandestine" activities, and wait for further hours before he enabled it again... and then someone else would still wonder about the gap time.

      But this is still basically the same "cloud" problem I've been talking about for a long time. If you put your information out there, somebody is likely to get it. And not always legally.

      If I were a business owner, there is no way in hell I'd let my books be done "online", for example, even if it's cheaper and easier. Just forget it. If things get better, maybe. Probably a long time from now.

    18. Re:That's more tracking than intensive probation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one gives a fuck. Really.

    19. Re:That's more tracking than intensive probation by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "So as a privacy thing, well the only reason it would get you in trouble would be wearing it during sex so you could get the fuel points."

      Seriously, if you think that is "the only reason" (way) it can get you in trouble, you have a major lack of imagination.

    20. Re:That's more tracking than intensive probation by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      It's still a security hole. Who has access to this data? Nike employees you don't know? Maybe one of them is an ex-girlfriend? Or maybe they do like a couple of big banks did: back things up to some external drive, then somehow "lose" them on the way to storage.

      Right. Give me a break. If you put it "in the cloud", watch your ass. Because you can be pretty sure somebody else is.

    21. Re:That's more tracking than intensive probation by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Three more coming out..

    22. Re:That's more tracking than intensive probation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Holy shit, were you being chased by a tiger for 45 seconds?"

      No.. I was wrestling with an anaconda.

  2. what is the point of this article? by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes. It keeps track of what you're doing. You know this because you can see the data it captures.

    And yes, if you share what you're doing with someone else, they might notice you aren't doing what you're supposed to be doing.

    I don't understand the constant alarmism.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:what is the point of this article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      In this case I have to agree. Total non-story.

    2. Re:what is the point of this article? by Nimey · · Score: 2

      Clickbait.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    3. Re:what is the point of this article? by fermion · · Score: 4, Insightful
      This is the most lame privacy concern ever. Anyone who can't explain the could not sleep and went for a run a 1 in the morning either deserves or wants to get caught. So yes if you like to have sex with several different people without one knowing about the other, this is a bad device to have. But really, it does track location, take pictures, or lets you input incriminating text, like "1am, left gf house, picked up a random person, took home, and achieved real satisfaction.", just as a for instance.

      You what is a real privacy and relationship killer. The pager. Can't tell you how many people have gotten into trouble because a partner read a page. Or mail. Can't tell you what receiving a postcard from a friend asking you to join on the next vacation does to a marriage. Or the phone. You never know when a spouse is going to answer by mistake. Or, seriously people, credit card bills. I mean many don't think about it, but credit card bills and receipts have gotten me into trouble on more than one occasion. Also, remember that every cell phone call you make, and Skype call for that matter, is listed in detail for anyone to see. Exactly., When. How long. Who. This is trouble in the making and no one should it. Everyone should be using a burner phone.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    4. Re:what is the point of this article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Most of these "privacy concern" articles are things that can be handled by simply going home to your wife and kids when you are supposed to. Sounds like a lot of folks with these "privacy concerns" are just trying to hide their marital affairs.

    5. Re:what is the point of this article? by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      Privacy means you can do whatever you want and people can't see! Don't you understand?! If I am dry-humping a billy goat in front of an Italian restaurant bay window, the people taking pictures of me and posting them on reddit is an INVASION OF PRIVACY!!!!!!!!11

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    6. Re:what is the point of this article? by fm6 · · Score: 1

      I think the "alarmism" comes in when the data sharing is unintentional.

    7. Re:what is the point of this article? by mrbluze · · Score: 1

      I don't understand the constant alarmism.

      Slow news day.

      --
      Do it yourself, because no one else will do it yourself. [beta blockade 10-17 Feb]
    8. Re:what is the point of this article? by Seumas · · Score: 2

      Plus, it doesn't even remotely apply to anyone on Slashdot, because it involves physical activity.

    9. Re:what is the point of this article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if I buy one and hide it in your car, Mr. Script?

    10. Re:what is the point of this article? by jamesh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Most of these "privacy concern" articles are things that can be handled by simply going home to your wife and kids when you are supposed to. Sounds like a lot of folks with these "privacy concerns" are just trying to hide their marital affairs.

      This is the problem with privacy. People take one very narrow slice of the pie and run with it. If you're cheating on your spouse and exposing him/her to disease etc then you get what you deserve, so I agree with you there, but what if you secretly liked to dress up in women's clothes and go dancing in the middle of the night, or attend late night screenings of Alan Smithee productions? Those are the sort of things that society in general would frown on but are really nobodies business but your own and your right to privacy should be protected.

      That said, if you wear one of these while doing any of the above and then share that information with the world, you're an idiot.

    11. Re:what is the point of this article? by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      I don't get it either. So if the girlfriend called, or stopped by at that time she might also have discovered he was not there.
      So what if you lost this... "hey boss, look, this guy was at the gym at 2pm..."

    12. Re:what is the point of this article? by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 2

      Hey, smooshing genitals together with people you're not married to is an inalienable right!

    13. Re:what is the point of this article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but what if you secretly liked to dress up in women's clothes and go dancing in the middle of the night, or attend late night screenings of Alan Smithee productions?

      Still,would be better to tell your wife early on, then to have her find out later.
      But that's not the main problem : the problem is that since it's stored in the cloud, it could get compromised, and someone other than those you share it with can get your data.

      For example, knowing your exact activity log can be very useful for criminals :
      - They know where you live
      - They know where and when you will be at work, and when you will be back
      - They know you go jogging the same route in the woods every evening.

      Really, all they need to do is be waiting there where you go jogging, knock you down in a place no one can see it, take your keys and empty your house.

    14. Re:what is the point of this article? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes. It keeps track of what you're doing. You know this because you can see the data it captures.

      Yes, you can see the data that it captures. What you can't see is all of the things which that data may reveal about you in the hands of someone motivated enough. Don't confuse the forest with the trees - the anecdote about the guy getting caught cheating is not about the risk of getting caught cheating, it is the risk of "20/20 hindsight." In retrospect it is obvious that his data would reveal something like that to a suspicios girlfriend. But at the time it was not so obvious, it isn't like he deliberately uploaded a message that said "having sex with another girl @1am" to the nike website.

      Pervasive data collection is extremely new, we as a society have not figured out all of the risks involved. Contrast that to "living in a small town" - because society has had millenia of experience with that situation we generally have a good understanding of the risks involved. It is going to take a lot of people finding out the hard way what the problems are with pervasive data collection before we, if we ever, come to understand the trade-offs that come along with it.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    15. Re:what is the point of this article? by zill · · Score: 1

      GP's point is that the user willingly brought the device, willingly let it record their lives, and willingly shared that data with a third party.

      If I wear a T-shirt with my root password on it, then I deserve every bad thing that's coming to me. It's not my OS' fault nor my T-shirt's fault; I only have my own stupidity to blame.

    16. Re:what is the point of this article? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, next there'll be an article about the dangers of pen and paper, as all the people keeping diaries are invading their own privacy.

    17. Re:what is the point of this article? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1, Insightful

      GP's point is that the user willingly brought the device, willingly let it record their lives, and willingly shared that data with a third party.

      And my point is that his decisions were not fully informed and given the lack of experience we as a society have with panopticon-type personal information gathering it is a randian pipedream to expect the average joe to be fully informed. Especially when the people selling the product have an interest in downplaying such risks in order to keep sales up.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    18. Re:what is the point of this article? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Everyone should be using a burner phone.

      Since I don't seem to have any enemies, the only people I might conceivably be worried about getting my phone data would be the authorities. I don't store anything in my phone, and they can subpoena anything else that happens to be on it. I don't need a burner phone.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:what is the point of this article? by 12WTF$ · · Score: 1

      "So, what is your root password?" **

      Hey that's MY pickup line!

      **Warning: May only be valid in British English speaking countries.

      --
      Cryonics - Keep cool and carry on.
    20. Re:what is the point of this article? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I think MojoKid might be theodp.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    21. Re:what is the point of this article? by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      The fuel band has no GPS

    22. Re:what is the point of this article? by Chrisq · · Score: 2

      Plus, it doesn't even remotely apply to anyone on Slashdot, because it involves physical activity.

      But it also involves digital watches!

    23. Re:what is the point of this article? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      If I am dry-humping a billy goat

      Perv!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    24. Re:what is the point of this article? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      And my point is that his decisions were not fully informed

      Idiots' decisions never are.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    25. Re:what is the point of this article? by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 2

      Clickbait.

      Yes. It keeps track of what you're doing. You know this because you can see the data it captures.

      And yes, if you share what you're doing with someone else, they might notice you aren't doing what you're supposed to be doing.

      I don't understand the constant alarmism.

      And the scary part is that the clickbait worked. Assuming it lives up to the hype, this is actually a rather cool product, exactly what I need.... :-D .... I wonder how accurate the calorie burn count is for different activities like static cycling, rowing or just general jogging/walking/hiking? Anybody ever used this thing? Privacy issues are a moot point, If the tracking ever gets creepy I can simply shut this thing off

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    26. Re:what is the point of this article? by DarkOx · · Score: 2

      I think he was fully informed he had just not thought things thru. The guy knew what the device did an how it worked. Its pretty open about exactly what it logs.

      Lets not conflate carelessness and idiocy with being uniformed. It should be enough from my to label something "toxic", I don't see why I have to sit you down and explain why drinking a quart of it might have negative consequences, for the folks who can't work that out for themselves its Darwinism at its best.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    27. Re:what is the point of this article? by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Well someone should get that warning at some point, and they ought to be smart enough to generalize it to the digital world. Mom gave me some good advice when I was a kid that has served me very well.

        "Never write anything down you don't want someone else to read."

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    28. Re:what is the point of this article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah and if guns are outlawed, only criminals will have guns, right?

    29. Re:what is the point of this article? by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      Yes. It keeps track of what you're doing. You know this because you can see the data it captures.

      And yes, if you share what you're doing with someone else, they might notice you aren't doing what you're supposed to be doing.

      I don't understand the constant alarmism.

      <half-humor, half-true>

      It's totally an attempt to get free circumvention / failure testing.

      Release a statement that something is scandalously related indirectly to your device, getting geeks and ones in fear of falling prey to the same failure to try and circumvent the technology or find a solution. Free testing and development.

      </half-humor, half-true>

    30. Re:what is the point of this article? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Funny, I was going to say the same thing except point out that it involved sex.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    31. Re:what is the point of this article? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Otherwise you get into the situation where people want you to label ladders as dangerous because you could fall off of them.

      Oh. Wait.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    32. Re:what is the point of this article? by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      I'm fairly sure the accelerometer in the FuelBand cannot tell what type of clothing you're wearing, nor what type of movie you're seeing. All it can show is that you moved around a lot at certain hours of the night. At worst, someone who really hated you and got that information would know when to show up to follow you around and could get a nap first rather than having to sit outside your house for hours to catch you leaving.

    33. Re:what is the point of this article? by kheldan · · Score: 1

      The "constant alarmism" that you erroneously refer to is that corporations, and likely by extension, governments, are acquiring more and more ways to track the thoughts and movements of private citizens, usually without their consent. If you don't think this is a bad thing, then you haven't thought it all the way through. How would you feel if someone wanted to install cameras and microphones in every room of your house, GPS transponders in your vehicles, and a tracking transponder on your person to be carried with you 24 hours a day? If you are OK with all that then I'm wasting my breath, but chances are you wouldn't be OK with that, and will now proceed to tell me "Nobody is going to do that, that's absurd!" but the fact of the matter is that we're not that far from all that being 100% right now. There are cameras all over the place in public places, and they're all tied into the internet for easy access. You carry a smartphone with you? Even if you somehow managed to turn the GPS receiver in it off completely, you can still be tracked with a fair degree of accuracy by which cell towers the phone is connected to (something you have no control over, often even if it's turned off). If you're like most people, you have at least a Facebook account; your posts there are data-mined constantly, obstensibly for marketing purposes, but they also tell much about your daily actitivies. Do you pay cash for everything you purchase? Probably not, you use plastic like most people do; your purchases pinpoint your location in time and space, and your purchasing habits are, like Facebook posts, analyzed for "marketing purposes" -- and can also be analyzed to determine how you think. Did your local utility company recently send you a letter of intent to change your electric and gas meters to wireless models, so, obstensibly, they don't have to send someone to visually read the meter? The power and gas company can, with that technology, get readings on demand of your power and gas usage -- which can be determined if you're home, and to a certain extent, what you're doing in your home. Further advancements in this technology will be in upcoming "smart appliances" that will be connected to the internet, allowing power companies to turn off high-usage appliances like clothes dryers and furnaces when there is a power shortage; these can also be used to further refine the ability to determine when you're home and what you're doing while there -- as well as overruling you on what you can do while you're at home by remotely controlling access to your appliances. So you see: the only elements to my original scenario, which you probably scoffed at and dismissed as paranoid ravings of a lunatic mind, is only missing one or two things: cameras and microphones in your house. But wait! That's not very far off! They want to develop televisions that have cameras and microphones in them, similar to a Kinect. Then not only will your TV viewing habits be tracked, but they'll be able to watch you watch your TV, and hear everything going in in the room, perhaps your entire house or apartment.

      Are you paranoid now? If so: Good. You should be. If not, then you're scoffing at me as someone desperately in need of medication and/or being locked away where I can't hurt myself or others; that's disappointing, because it means that the corporations and governments of the world have already indoctrinated you so thoroughly and completely that you may never be able to accept the truth for what it is.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    34. Re:what is the point of this article? by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1

      Was about to make a witty reply till i realized i stopped readin slashdot round about the time i got married.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    35. Re:what is the point of this article? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      100% correct. If it is illegal to have a gun and you have a gun, that makes you a criminal.

    36. Re:what is the point of this article? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Better it was a Billie goat?

    37. Re:what is the point of this article? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Lets not conflate carelessness and idiocy with being uniformed. It should be enough from my to label something "toxic", I don't see why I have to sit you down and explain why drinking a quart of it might have negative consequences,

      Wait. You JUST made that conflation in the very next sentence! The link from "toxic" to "this could kill you" is one step, that is the definition of toxic. The link from "share your heartrate and caloric burnrate with your friends" to "reveal personal secrets" is not anywhere near as direct.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    38. Re:what is the point of this article? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Then you'll see how much his car vibrates and what time it is used, since it has no GPS and can't track where its going.

    39. Re:what is the point of this article? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      You have sidestepped the question. Why do you need any of this data to be "in the cloud"???

      Why all the insistence by so many companies that your data be stored "in the cloud" when for most people, there is no good reason for it?

      But if you STILL think that's what you need, and have an iOS device, take a look at the Jawbone UP.

    40. Re:what is the point of this article? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "If I am dry-humping a billy goat in front of an Italian restaurant bay window, the people taking pictures of me and posting them on reddit is an INVASION OF PRIVACY!!!!!!!!"

      No, it's an amusing viral video.

      Seriously, do you not get the whole privacy thing? There are places in which (and things about) we have a "reasonable expectation of privacy". The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that without this, the other rights we rely on, spelled out in the Bill of Rights, could not exist.

      You can pooh-pooh privacy all you want, but that only reflects your ignorance of the topic.

    41. Re:what is the point of this article? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "I think the "alarmism" comes in when the data sharing is unintentional."

      Ahah. But how much of the data sharing is "unintentional"? Is your data exposed to a glorified clerk at the company, who wants to do admin work on it? Maybe a web developer? Maybe a manager who wants to mainly look at monthly stats but has access to all of it? Do any of your ex-girlfriends work there?

      The BIG data and privacy problems are usually behind the scenes. If people would just wrap their heads around that, we would be having much healthier discussions about this subject.

      I say this from the perspective of a web developer who has access to the data of many thousands of people I don't know, from various websites I have built and maintained. The only thing I do not know is their passwords, because as an ethical person I make sure that those are stored in a properly encrypted form.

      But guess what? If I were not ethical, I could write a program to save each encrypted password, replace it with something else I knew, access their account, do whatever I wanted, then restore everything. Even the timestamps, and server logs. Hell, it would be easy. I mean it would take a while to code it all, but there's nothing even remotely difficult about it.

      And I must have this ability, in order to build and maintain the app you so much enjoy using. So don't get to thinking there's an easy way around it. There is not.

    42. Re:what is the point of this article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easier access and data retention are two very fucking obvious reasons why you'd want data in the cloud. Has Slashdot become so incredibly fucking retarded in its userbase that they can no longer appreciate *portability*?! Oh no, Coca Cola and the US Government know that between 5pm and 6pm I exerted 50 calories. BIG BROTHER ALERT FIVE MINUTES OF HATE ARGHWARBLGARBLDSFARGEG.

    43. Re:what is the point of this article? by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      I suppose I didn't put enough "troll markers" in my post to be detected by your sarcasm detector. I'm on the same page as you

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    44. Re:what is the point of this article? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Ahah. Well, then, consider my remarks retracted.

    45. Re:what is the point of this article? by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Everyone should be using a burner phone.

      Stringer Bell, is that you?

    46. Re:what is the point of this article? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Lets[sic] not conflate carelessness and idiocy with being uniformed.

      Clearly you've never met a cop or a TSA agent.

      Or an EFL teacher.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    47. Re:what is the point of this article? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Never use blotting paper unless it's black.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  3. Just desserts? by Gothmolly · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    For being a techno-iHipster? Seriously, who needs a $149 motion tracking wristband?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Just desserts? by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

      I'd wager that all of us have quite a few things we don't need. Seems like an odd criteria to judge people by.

    2. Re:Just desserts? by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      I'd pay $150 for a wristband that could ONLY tell me accurately how many calories I've burned. That alone is a real (slight pun intended) life saver

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    3. Re:Just desserts? by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'd pay $150 for a wristband that could ONLY tell me accurately how many calories I've burned.

      Well, this can't do that. In fact, it can't do much of anything.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Just desserts? by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 1

      http://www.bodymedia.com/

      Also: You're Welcome.

      --
      Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
    5. Re:Just desserts? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      For being a techno-iHipster? Seriously, who needs a $149 motion tracking wristband?

      iHipster? So the iOS users of this product are different than the Android users somehow?

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    6. Re:Just desserts? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      So the iOS users of this product are different than the Android users

      I think so. Didn't the guy in the article got caught cheating with a girl?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    7. Re:Just desserts? by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      For being a techno-iHipster? Seriously, who needs a $149 motion tracking wristband?

      Really, he wanted his wife to find out but couldn't bring himself to tell her directly. $149 was a price he was willing to pay to reveal his secret.

      /humor

    8. Re:Just desserts? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      No, just that he had a girlfriend. He could have been cheating on her with a guy.

  4. As per the Cowboy Neal comment by Turminder+Xuss · · Score: 2

    Fear the automated Facebook status updating and Tweeting of every step.

    --
    You seem to regard science as some kind of dodge... or hustle.
  5. I guess I'm weird... by TWX · · Score: 1

    ...because I don't have a whole lot of sympathy for cheaters, and the choice in a story citing the privacy issues as felt by a cheater don't really give me any feeling of a cause.

    And, if you choose to use a tracking device then you should know that you're subjecting yourself to being tracked. Nearly all of us do with our cell phones, but some go much further, with things like those insurance trackers, or leaving the GPS enabled on the phone, or the like.

    If there were a way to have a smartphone without having the ability to be tracked, I think that a lot of people would sign up for that. Unfortunately all that we can now do is hope that the companies that we have agreements with follow the law and only surrender information when it's requested through warrants, which doesn't seem to be the policy these days.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  6. This is FUD by DesertBlade · · Score: 5, Informative

    I actually own a Fuelband, unlike to poster and the original story. It is basically a pedometer, sensing motion, nothing else. No or any other thing to guide them to my house. It sends information to the cloud, but has a lot less info than facebook. You can actually sign up for an account its free and see how little is actually stored. I be more worried about the data on my phone or in my wallet, both which will lead someone to my house, than on this thing.

    --
    Half of writing history is hiding the truth.
    1. Re:This is FUD by Nimey · · Score: 5, Funny

      pedometer

      o.0 That's disgusting!

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    2. Re:This is FUD by commlinx · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the clarification. I'd assumed from TFS it was GPS data.

      It probably makes the anecdote suspect as well unless he's a good cheater but poor liar. I assume the sort of people who buy these products are the kind who might have trouble sleeping and end up doing a little excercise or go for a jog in the early hours.

    3. Re:This is FUD by Sarten-X · · Score: 4, Funny

      Didn't you read the summary? It tracks every move you make, just like GPS vehicle trackers, RFID door keys, and a jingle bell on your kid's shoelace. Clearly this is something worthy of widespread panic.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    4. Re:This is FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is what a pedometer is supposed to do. Please lookup what a pedometer is.

    5. Re:This is FUD by bluemonq · · Score: 1

      Is it really that friggin' difficult to read the summary? 'They shared their activity between each other and she noticed he was active at 1-2AM, when he was supposed to be home.' She didn't gain access to his location, he gained access to the fact that he was moving around. Presumably on most days, he would be asleep, as opposed to being active.

    6. Re:This is FUD by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      I believe that is called sarcasm. Perhaps you should look it up?

    7. Re:This is FUD by aliquis · · Score: 1

      pedometer

      o.0 That's disgusting!

      And a huge breach of my privacy. Now everyone can see it only reads 3 inches.

    8. Re:This is FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure a pedometer isn't supposed to track every motion you make. I'm usually more interested in my daily walking and running distance, and not say a combined walking distance and number of letters typed at the keyboard count.

    9. Re:This is FUD by chrismcb · · Score: 1
      every move you make,

      I know you are trying to pedantic, but it doesn't actually track your every move... It tracks whether you are active or not. That is much different than a GPS device tracking your every move.

    10. Re:This is FUD by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      What I want to know is why was he still wearing it during sex?

    11. Re:This is FUD by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Didn't you read the summary? It tracks every move you make, just like GPS vehicle trackers, RFID door keys, and a jingle bell on your kid's shoelace. Clearly this is something worthy of widespread panic.

      Not just every move you make - also (per the summary) it tracks every step you take, every vow you break, and every smile you fake.

      It'll be watching you.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    12. Re:This is FUD by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      pedometer

      o.0 That's disgusting!

      So *THAT* is what this "cheating" story is about!

    13. Re:This is FUD by kheldan · · Score: 1

      ..and see how little is stored

      You mean: How little they SHOW you is stored. You have no idea how much data it's actually generating. You also are ignoring the fact that it can tell when you're active and when you're not, and that data is determined using accelerometers; with a starting location and time (not hard to determine with some datamining of most people's Facebook posts) you could generate a map of someone's movements to a fair degree of accuracy. Inertial navigation isn't a new idea or technology, it's just made easier by modern electronics.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    14. Re:This is FUD by kheldan · · Score: 1

      The irony to your comment, which was intended to be funny I'm sure, is that that Police song wasn't a love song like you might think it to be -- it's a direct reference to George Orwell's 1984.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    15. Re:This is FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... everyone can see it only reads 3 inches.

      As an under-endowed lover, I just want to point out, that's only how much he waved it about. The motion of the ocean doesn't tell us the size of the boat.

    16. Re:This is FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He made a mistake...the error code was ID-10-T.

  7. Fitbit does some of this, but no location tracking by aurizon · · Score: 1, Informative

    It is a high end pedometer, that you can link to friends, total stairs climbed etc, quite good actually. Operates on low power wifi as well as a charging dock, runs for 7-10 days between charges.

    Best you read about it here. http://www.fitbit.com/home

  8. Re:Are you serious? by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 1

    +1 Off-topic. Thanks.

  9. I wont be using this piece of crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So why would I want to share that kind of information? If you want to know what I'm up, you're going to need a whole
    lot of cameras and sensors all over the place, because I am surely not going to help you by wearing a tracking device.
    Obviously this is to gather location and activity data, both for medical "research" and for research into personal mobility.
    Nike: Go fuck yourselves.

    1. Re:I wont be using this piece of crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nike, and the rest of the universe couldn't possibly care any less about you jacking off in your moms basement

  10. Re:Fitbit does some of this, but no location track by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a Fitbit. It's just a fun way to track some of my activity levels. I do heavy compound lifts 3 times a week/try to make it a habit to walk a lot, take the stairs etc on off days. I also like to track my calories, thus giving me an idea of what my intake and output is daily. Yes it's overkill, no it's not necessary, but I find it fun to track these things and it has certainly made my weight loss/strength gain goals much easier to achieve.

    Same with this Nike thing-- maybe it's not YOUR thing, but some people like to track this shit. Let them have their fun.

  11. wow - 1 hour! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The guy managed to be active for a whole hour? surely either the data cannot be trusted or he should be issued a medal

  12. Re:Are you serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reminds me of "The Great Rock and Roll Swindle" album.

  13. Re:Are you serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You, sir, are a pathetic loser.

  14. Share account information + cheat = caught. Duh by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Hmm, so if you explicitly share your information with someone in a trusting relationship, then you break that trust and screw them over, you might get caught. The person you gave the information to might see something in the information you gave them. Where's the news in this? Just like if you share a phone account with your GF and you're calling another woman at 1AM, she might notice. Duh. Don't fake trust (like by sharing an account) and then go cheat on her. This warning was documented over 2000 years ago.

    1. Re:Share account information + cheat = caught. Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, so if you explicitly share your information with someone in a trusting relationship, then you break that trust and screw them over, you might get caught. The person you gave the information to might see something in the information you gave them. Where's the news in this?

      Just like if you share a phone account with your GF and you're calling another woman at 1AM, she might notice. Duh. Don't fake trust (like by sharing an account) and then go cheat on her. This warning was documented over 2000 years ago.

      You know the average reasoning on this one... If she bothered to ask questions and suspect he was doing something wrong in the first place, and paid real attention to it, she suspected he was cheating already.

      Combine that with the "she went for a hot guy and expected she was going to lose him to someone else" typical behavior.

      It doesn't say in the article, but I bet ya she was in her early-mid 20s.

  15. Re:Fitbit does some of this, but no location track by fishybell · · Score: 2

    Having the fitbit myself I can say yes, I can share that I'm active in the middle of the night with some torrid affair, or, being slightly aware of my actions, just take it off during said torrid affair. I can then just say I forgot to push the sleep button the night of indiscretion, and nothing more than that would ever be known (assuming I actually were having an affair, or had a girlfriend/wife to have an affair with....geez, when did FUD become so depressing...).

    --
    ><));>
  16. Wrist activity? by jamesh · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you wear the thing on your wrist and it detects motion then I would have thought that the excuse "I woke up in the middle of the night and was thinking about you" would have been plausible...

    1. Re:Wrist activity? by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      ...was thinking about you

      A, that's the polite way to call this kind of activity!

    2. Re:Wrist activity? by notknown86 · · Score: 2

      Does that count as "holding it wrong"?

    3. Re:Wrist activity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is exactly as ridiculous as "Click like if you would never cheat on your girlfriend" So I see you didnt click like , therefore you are cheating or "It took you 15 minutes to get home, Google maps says it take 12, WHO IS SHE?!?!?!"

      Avoiding one situation is surely important enough to not exercise.. totally FSKING ridiculous!

  17. This reminds me of the time . . . by Seumas · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of the time I tried to use Google Latitude, but it seemed to require that you update your location in new locations. Since I live and work at home, it was always "here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here" and Latitude simply didn't grok it.

    Long story short: Google discriminates against hermits.

    1. Re:This reminds me of the time . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So do i!

      Now go outside so i can get some good location data!

  18. Precisely the problem by Sun · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Most of these "privacy concern" articles are things that can be handled by simply going home to your wife and kids when you are supposed to. Sounds like a lot of folks with these "privacy concerns" are just trying to hide their marital affairs.

    Or, the way law enforcement usually phrase this, "if you are doing nothing wrong, you have nothing to hide".

    While I agree with the original commenter that this story is lame, because people see exactly what is logged, this comment is precisely why privacy matters.

    Giving up privacy means pushing people toward conformity. Everyone are pressured to behave the same, because any deviation from what is normal is immediately shown to everyone. This means complete stagnation.

    I have never cheated on a partner. Furthermore, I have had a partner cheat on me, and the feeling is horrid. Having said that, a society in which cheating is impossible is not one I would like to live in.

    Shachar

  19. Re:Are you serious? by edibobb · · Score: 1

    What? No melody?

  20. Personal Experience? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, it looks like mojokid got caught out on being a two-timer. Good riddance.

  21. Fitbit uploading to Twitter by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Several of my friends use Fitbits, and one of them has it set to upload to Twitter with her daily distance count. (Wow, she puts on a lot of miles!) I don't know if it's providing more detail at her fitbit website, or if all the detail stays on her home computer (I'm guessing the latter.)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  22. Re:Fitbit does some of this, but no location track by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was thinking of getting this until I realized there was no Android app...

  23. Google Maps runner-tracking applications by billstewart · · Score: 1

    There are some really nice applications out there for runners to track their regular runs and display them on Google Maps, and while I can see the appeal of having all that information sometimes, I'm not really thrilled with making it available to Google or whoever else has access to it. It sounds like a really good job for a PC-based mapping program.

    I would assume that by now these things are implemented as iPhone/Android apps that use the GPS locations (or maybe less-granular cellular locations) so your phone will track you in real time while you're running, as well as showing your heartbeat and playing your music. And we'll start seeing lots more user interface and user experience, and the apps may track you more intensively than Angry Birds if you don't watch carefully.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Google Maps runner-tracking applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah the fuelband sure seems to be nothing in compared to stuff like:
      Endomondo

    2. Re:Google Maps runner-tracking applications by SecurityGuy · · Score: 1

      I would assume that by now these things are implemented as iPhone/Android apps that use the GPS locations (or maybe less-granular cellular locations) so your phone will track you in real time while you're running, as well as showing your heartbeat and playing your music.

      Exactly true. The same is true of any of the Garmin, Polar, or whatever other brand you like GPS fitness watches. They record exactly where and when you are and a bunch of other data (depending on model). The key is simple: if you don't want this sort of data recorded about you and stored on a web site, don't buy and use a device that records and stores data like this on a web site.

      I understand when people get their panties in a bunch when some device does this unexpectedly, but this really isn't one of those times. The guy in TFS just bought a device that records his physical activity, shares said data with his girlfriend, and then got caught cheating on her because of it. This isn't an unexpected betrayal by technology. The guy was just a dumbass.

    3. Re:Google Maps runner-tracking applications by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      I use an app/service called MapMyRide that, well, maps my bike rides. It's a useful way for plotting out routes, keeping track of speed and training progress, rough estimate of calories burned, etc. Yes, I could manually keep track of this information, but the app is more useful, and it gives me route ideas based on other peoples' data (which isn't shared unless you tell it to share).

      My question is: In what way does giving Google, MapMyRide, or a different service access to my bike ride data hurt me in any way? How does it put me at risk--for anything? We're not talking sensitive information here. I don't want ridiculous hypothetical situations, like "crazy guy finds people to murder by looking at bike route data", I want something I should actually be concerned about. Defending your privacy is all well and good, but there are also times where it doesn't matter.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    4. Re:Google Maps runner-tracking applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Defending your privacy is all well and good, but there are also times where it doesn't matter.

      And that is exactly the attitude that allows for a creeping erosion of privacy and human rights.

    5. Re:Google Maps runner-tracking applications by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      Is it? I don't have a Facebook account. I don't "tweet" (though I do have a Twitter account for the sole purpose of following the Curiosity rover account). I don't even allow Microsoft, Google, and Apple to collect anonymous usage statistics. I take my privacy seriously, but I'm also realistic about what does and what does not constitute an invasion of the same.

      Key to my decision of "surrendering" this (unimportant) data is the fact that the service wouldn't work without it.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    6. Re:Google Maps runner-tracking applications by sunderland56 · · Score: 1

      Yes, the guy was clearly an idiot. Much smarter: leave your Nike fuelband and your iPhone on your nightside table when you sneak out. Then, when accused of cheating, you can pull down the data from the cloud, and *prove* you were at home sleeping.

    7. Re:Google Maps runner-tracking applications by sunderland56 · · Score: 1

      The first thing it does is to tie your online identity to a physical location. (Not sure about MapMyRide - but the (far better) Strava fuzzes your "home" location to help prevent this - but you can still pin down someone's home address within about 1 km. Unless you've chosen a fake name, public property records will give the exact location.

      If you've set up your profile with a bike description, and it' s a nice one, now I know you have an expensive bike, and I know your address.

      I can also go through your ride history, and see if there's a consistent time when you're not home. People with nice bikes usually have other nice stuff to steal.

    8. Re:Google Maps runner-tracking applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (though I do have a Twitter account for the sole purpose of following the Curiosity rover account)

      Glad someone else signed up for Twitter for the sole purpose of following the Curiosity rover account!
      For a moment there I thought it might have made me a geek or something

    9. Re:Google Maps runner-tracking applications by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "Yes, the guy was clearly an idiot. Much smarter: leave your Nike fuelband and your iPhone on your nightside table when you sneak out. Then, when accused of cheating, you can pull down the data from the cloud, and *prove* you were at home sleeping."

      Except that your pulse rate will be 0, and your body temperature will be 70F.

      Yeah. That's the ticket.

  24. people problem, not technology. by Barryke · · Score: 1

    Thats not a technology problem, its a human problem.

    What a stupid example.

    --
    Hivemind harvest in progress..
  25. Re:lamest.... slashdot ... article... ever by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

    facepalm.

    It should have been "Ask Slashdot: What do I tell my girlfriend when...".

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  26. Caught by his girlfriend? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

    Was it Petraeus making it with his wife?

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  27. He didn't take it off intentionally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly, he was so determined to lose calories that he made some extra work out during he night... And how do you work out if not with Nike+?

  28. It's simple by WankerWeasel · · Score: 1

    How about you just don't cheat on your partner and you should be fine. I have an UP. It's great (other than they break all the times requiring them to be replaced by Jawbone. I'm on my 10th). No worries about privacy. I choose to share the info I choose to share with others. Just like I choose to share the pictures I choose to share on Facebook. Should I lost my UP (pretty hard when it's firmly wrapped around your wrist all the time), people can't get the info from it. If you plug the band into a new iPhone, the app will alert you that the band has not been synced with that phone before. It then gives you the option to sync it with the new phone (which wipes any previous data) or to cancel.

  29. i dont think the poster understands what privacy i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    See, a breach in privacy is when people find out personal information about you that you DIDNT share with them. When youre just stupid and share things you shouldnt, thats your own fault!

  30. Hang on a minute... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    tells you how many calories you've burned, lets you know how much fuel you have left in the tank,

    If you live in pretty much any Western country, you have not burned enough calories and you've got way more than you need left in the tank.

    Stop dicking about with gadgets and get back on that bike. Seriously, it's a lovely day outside and you need to pedal off all that overprocessed greasy food.

  31. Breaking news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guy who shares tracking information gets tracked by person he shared it with.

    Next story, girlfriend goes through boyfriends SMS messages and...

    1. Re:Breaking news by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      And of course: Guy who voluntarily carries a tracking device doesn't remove it in situations where he doesn't want to be tracked.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  32. 'What if the wristband gets lost or stolen?' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then you will be able to track the perpetrator down. It's not a bug, it's a feature.

  33. Re:Fitbit does some of this, but no location track by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is an Android app. It's not great, and really just acts as a mobile version of the desktop site, but it exists.

  34. eh by buddyglass · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a non-issue to me. If you're going to cheat then take it off first.

  35. Re:what is the point of this article? GOOD POINT by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 1

    It's not about people failing to trust one another. It's about people trolling the Internet bored looking for exciting stories about hypothetical people who fail to trust one another, it's all about the blip in heart rate at 1AM, just the thought of that is supposed to make us go HMMMM... and trigger that lizard brain yearn for romantic gossip and gushing tabloid release.

    Empirical test of hypothesis: for example, does this event generate tabloid excitement and sexual innuendo if I tell you it supposedly happened 'at 1AM'...?

    "One day, a student caregiver noticed Figaro pushing a stone pebble through the aviary wire mesh, where it fell on a wood structural beam. Unable to retrieve the stone with his foot, Figaro then fetched a piece of bamboo and again attempted to retrieve the stone using the bamboo stick. ... "

    Wow! What a rush.

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
  36. Micormanaging calories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Micromanaging your calorie intake is a rediculous way to live your day. Just remember to get on the bike or go for a jog, and don't eat so much fatty and sugary foods.

  37. Oh God!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Some technology that you use volenteerily to track your own movement...check
    Someone stupid enough not to monitor their own information like a responsible adult...check
    Someone stupid enough to share said data...check
    = Stupid article on Slashdot about the destruction of privacy!

    a. The user tracks their own data
    b. The government is not involved, and will still need a court order to get that data
    c. The user is not forced to use the wrist watch
    d. THIS IS NOT A BREACH OF PRIVACY SLASHDOT

    I think we should combine Gizmondo and Slashdot into Gizdot so that I can have all the bullshit tech articles in one location saving me time and bandwidth.

  38. Re:Fitbit does some of this, but no location track by rhsanborn · · Score: 1

    Fitbit and Fuelband to essentially the same thing. FuelBand doesn't do GPS either. If you wear your FitBit in bed, or had it on when you went to the girlfriends house at 1am and then share that data with your wife, you too can be caught in exactly the same way the FuelBand guy was. I too have a FitBit and I do wear it to bed (it's supposed to track the quality of your sleep).

  39. Re:lamest.... slashdot ... article... ever by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

    facepalm.

    It should have been "Ask Slashdot: What do I tell my girlfriend when...".

    Damn solar flares screwing with that device's memory. Grumble grumble. :)

  40. a nicer by nimbius · · Score: 1

    and certainly open source alternative to this is cronometer, http://www.cronometer.com/

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  41. Pics in article by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

    If you look at the images in the article...

    I wonder if this activity fell under the "Best Day," "Longest Streak," and "Weekday Bests" categories?

  42. NONSENSE!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have one of these and LOVE it!

    How exactly is it "tracking" me? All it's doing it collecting accelerometer data... that's it! No GPS, no audio, no video, no still images... If somebody REALLY wants to see that I'm active at 1am, good for them!

    In the case of the idiot who got caught cheating - Don't cheat if you don't want to get caught!

    About the only way I could see this data getting abused is if somebody saw it and noticed that I'm usually asleep from 12am-7am, and figured that would be a good time to break into my house... Otherwise, WTF could you POSSIBLY use this data for???

  43. Stupid, useless technology to start with by kheldan · · Score: 3, Informative

    You cannot even begin to accurately gauge calories burned merely from the available data of movement, gender, age, height and weight. I've seen some heart rate monitor watches that allow you to enter your VO2Max (the measurement of how much oxygen your blood can transport) into it to increase the accuracy, but even then there are still broad assumptions made, making the calories burned a highly inaccurate number. Some of you may be familiar with treadmills, elliptical cross-trainers, and other equipment at your local gym that purport to tell you how many calories you burned while using them; they are so grossly inaccurate as to be utterly useless, and worse, report their inaccurate guesses way on the high side, to keep you motivated to use their machine, thinking you're doing much better at burning off excess fat than you really are. This "technology" from Nike has to be at least as bad at guessing calories burned than even the treadmill at the gym, likely worse. Now, realizing this, you come to understand that all you're doing by wearing this is allowing your activity to be tracked. I assume there is a website you upload the data to? All it needs now is a GPS receiver's data, and you have fairly complete tracking of your activities, 24 hours a day; for arguments' sake, we'll say that your smartphone, which most people have attached to them like an appendage, has a GPS receiver you can't turn off (which in most cases you can't). Why would you do this voluntarily? As described in the featured article someone has already had their life affected in a negative way by this device. My advice to anyone who owns this device right now is to destroy it immediately.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    1. Re:Stupid, useless technology to start with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as the figures are consistent, there's still quite a bit of value to them in terms of tracking activity over time etc.

    2. Re:Stupid, useless technology to start with by kheldan · · Score: 1

      I don't agree with that at all. Bad data is worse than no data at all. People get foxed into spending all sorts of time, money, and energy on useless products based on dodgy-at-best science (if not outright lies), and in the end many of them conclude that it just isn't possible for them to be healthy. It's a dangerous trend that can't be allowed to continue.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  44. How is this a securty hole? by hobarrera · · Score: 1

    How is this a securty hole?
    To begin with, I imagine they meant "privacy", not "security".
    Secondly, what actually happened in this case is that the user shared the infomation logged by a device to his GF, and she found out about it.
    With that same argument, I can make a 1990 photo camera into a "privacy hole" - if I use it while cheating on my GF and then show her the data (pictures), she'll find out what I did.

  45. Yes, people do this voluntarily to themselves. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called risk/reward. For some of us non-consipiracists out there, a product like this (or Facebook, or using the Internet, or doing a pub-crawl in front of all the CC TVs) has benefits that far outweigh any supposed privacy risks. I'll stop now, because I know this will be modded flame-bait and not many of you can think outside of your own little world-views.

  46. Not paranoid != they're not out to get you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't confuse having no enemies with having no enemies that you know of.

    I for one aren't right keen on you, though frankly you aren't worth the waer on my air jordan's to walk two blocks to stuff your cock through a hole in an asbestos tile, set up y a mirror so you can see it and incinerate the tiny thing.

  47. Re:This is Sting by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    # every breath you take.
    every cake you bake,
    every earth you quake,
    I'll be watching yoooooohhhhh /#

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."