Slashdot Mirror


Apple and HTC Settle Patent Dispute

An anonymous reader writes "HTC and Apple have reached a global settlement that includes the dismissal of all current lawsuits and a ten-year license agreement. The license extends to current and future patents held by both parties. The terms of the settlement are confidential. From the article: '"HTC is pleased to have resolved its dispute with Apple, so HTC can focus on innovation instead of litigation," Peter Chou, HTC's chief executive, said in a statement. Tim Cook, Apple's chief executive, also expressed relief in a statement. "We will continue to stay laser focused on product innovation," he said.'"

179 comments

  1. HTC can't compete anymore by elashish14 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    HTC uesd to be a legitimate contender, so Apple did all they could to block them from the market. With all the resources HTC has diverted to the patent wars, they can't really compete anymore and Apple probably doesn't see them as a legitimate contender. Apple probably just figures they might as well suck whatever money's left taking from them. Borrowing from the Ars article on the same topic, HTC (read: the little guys) is just the upfront victim of the patent wars.

    --
    I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
    1. Re:HTC can't compete anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't worry, patent law doesn't need reform. IBM said so.

    2. Re:HTC can't compete anymore by kelemvor4 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      HTC used to be a legitimate contender, so Apple did all they could to block them from the market. With all the resources HTC has diverted to the patent wars, they can't really compete anymore and Apple probably doesn't see them as a legitimate contender. Apple probably just figures they might as well suck whatever money's left taking from them. Borrowing from the Ars article on the same topic, HTC (read: the little guys) is just the upfront victim of the patent wars.

      HTC now is (as far as I know) now the only company with full access to apple's patents. If those patents really are as valuable as Apple claims, HTC is now in a great position to roll out some strong products. In fact, since they could make android handsets they are in a unique position to use both the Apple and Google patents. If HTC isn't in imminent danger, the next few years could be amazing for them.

    3. Re:HTC can't compete anymore by jopsen · · Score: 1

      With all the resources HTC has diverted to the patent wars, they can't really compete anymore...

      Whilst I'm sure lawyers aren't cheap, engineers aren't cheap either... And for a company with resources as HTC, I really doubt a few legal battles are a significant expenditure...

      HTC aren't nowhere near as big as Apple, but with a revenue around 9 Billion USD, I doubt a few millions for lawyers is a game changer.

    4. Re:HTC can't compete anymore by elashish14 · · Score: 2

      Not sure where you're getting those numbers. In Q3 2012, HTC recorded net income of $137 million so burning millions on unnecessary lawyer fees is in the 1-10% range of their net income. That's pretty significant and a lot of revenue which could otherwise be put towards hardware or software development. God knows a few extra engineers would certainly help push out those Android updates for more models and/or earlier. Even with a cross-licensing deal, they'll probably lose millions to Apple... who knows what they're gonna get back (don't you love when they don't disclose the terms?). Such a waste.

      Source: http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/08/htc-announces-3q-2012-financials/

      --
      I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
    5. Re:HTC can't compete anymore by icebike · · Score: 3, Informative

      HTC recorded net income of $137 million so burning millions on unnecessary lawyer fees is in the 1-10% range of their net income.

      He said revenue.
      You counter with net income.
      He's talking Yearly.
      You counter with Quarterly.

      Lets keep the discussion about the same thing, mkay?

      HTC still has revenue of 2,339.2 million /quarter or 9.3 Billion yearly. Source.

      HTCs problems stems from Management's batshit crazy investment pattern in technologies and partnerships that drain cash and return nothing. (Beets Audio). The 13 million (USD) they lost on that stuff plus the 41 million lost fighting Apple patent suits are significant, and bring down earnings from 189.6 million to 134.4. (Quarterly numbers)

      They should be plowing that money into sales efforts even if it means "bribing" the purchasing agents and management of the major carriers like some of the manufacturers do. (You didn't for a minute assume carriers choose phones based on specs/looks/price alone did you?). Even with the fanciest gear, if a Carrier won't feature your phone because you didn't fly them to some exotic vacation resort you can't make any headway.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    6. Re:HTC can't compete anymore by Raumkraut · · Score: 3, Interesting

      HTC now is (as far as I know) now the only company with full access to apple's patents.

      Interesting thought.
      If there's one thing we've learnt about Apple, it's that they don't like to share. I can't imagine that full cross-licensing of their patents (current and future!) was a desirable outcome for Apple, going into this litigation.

      Either Apple were set to lose, badly, or there's scheming afoot...

    7. Re:HTC can't compete anymore by greenbird · · Score: 2

      HTC aren't nowhere near as big as Apple, but with a revenue around 9 Billion USD, I doubt a few millions for lawyers is a game changer.

      Your base are assumptions are way, way off. From SFGate:

      Compare those accomplishments with recent investments by Apple and Google, and you'll be disappointed. Collectively, the two have spent an estimated $400 million on litigation expenses fighting the so-called "smartphone wars," a worldwide spate of patent suits that so far has done little more than enrich lawyers and reduce consumer choice in the mobile device market.

      Shockingly, both companies spent far more in the last two years simply purchasing patents - new ammunition for the patent war effort - than they invested in research and design.

      They spend more on patent wars then they do on research.

      --
      Who is John Galt?
    8. Re:HTC can't compete anymore by AaronLS · · Score: 1

      Maybe cooler heads prevailed. From one country to another the courts were ruling this way or that way. Maybe each decided the ($legal costs + penalties in losing countries) > (potentially losing market on giving competitor access to patents). We can debate which party got the short end of the deal in terms of licensing fees or competitor access to patents, but in the end it was probably a better outcome for both than to throw money in a black hole of litigation, penalties, and sales bans. I think it will be better for the consumer to. Many of those patents are pretty trivial. There's probably a few gems in there, but most are the kind of thing any experienced engineer/programmer would have come up with on their own when faced with a similar hurdle to overcome.

    9. Re:HTC can't compete anymore by dudpixel · · Score: 3, Funny

      How funny would it be if HTC made a phone that looked just like the iPhone and were sued by Samsung for copying their designs?

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    10. Re:HTC can't compete anymore by symbolset · · Score: 1

      HTC now is (as far as I know) now the only company with full access to apple's patents.

      Microsoft and Apple have a full patent cross license going back to, I believe, 1994. They are in cahoots on this whole anti-Android campaign.

      HTC ran out of fight, is all. They sold out and now will find themselves following Nokia on the road to hell. When they get there they'll get to meet Microsoft's other mobile partners.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    11. Re:HTC can't compete anymore by symbolset · · Score: 1

      They spend more on patent wars then they do on research.

      I'm sure they're as happy about that as we are.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    12. Re:HTC can't compete anymore by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      That's one possible outcome, based solely on the assumption that Apple's patents aren't useless.

      It's pretty clear at this point that Apple's patents are form over function and they reason they're where they are now is marketing and jackboot tactics. The truth of the matter is that this is just Apple setting up HTC to use as their PR bitch: "Use our patents or we'll ruin you" -> "OK" -> "Look, HTC used our patents, we play fair".

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    13. Re:HTC can't compete anymore by sgbett · · Score: 1

      Maybe they are just fulfilling their role as the new evil empire.

      Embrace, extend, extinguish.

      All they need now is a few more developers.

      --
      Invaders must die
    14. Re:HTC can't compete anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS and Nokia are effectively in a patent pool with Apple(with Apple paying cash too).

  2. Why am I reminded of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the SCO Linux licensing agreements by this?

    1. Re:Why am I reminded of by kasperd · · Score: 2

      the SCO Linux licensing agreements by this?

      Because one case was about copyright and the other was about patents?

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    2. Re:Why am I reminded of by game+kid · · Score: 1

      If, in either case, you'd need a massive war chest (of patents, money, or otherwise) and an army of lawyers just to keep your product out of Injunction Junction*, does such a detail matter for groups who want to make hardware without getting hounded by a protection-fee landmine?

      I think it doesn't matter, and that it's just as much of a icky travesty here as there. That the settle-terms are confidential here suggest the patents in question may (at least as of now) be inherently non-FRAND too. It's just a legal mess all around.

      *Any reference to this video is unintentional and purely coincidental.

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    3. Re:Why am I reminded of by psiclops · · Score: 1

      or maybe it was because one was about operating systems and the other was about smartphones.

      oh wait, just maybe it could be the similarities and not the differences that causes the connection in ones mind.

      --
      i spent five minutes thinking and all i got was this crappy sig
  3. Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could it be that HTC have started performing badly as a company, so Apple don't consider them worth the lawyer fees any more?

    1. Re:Coincidence? by rtfa-troll · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Could it be that HTC have started performing badly as a company, so Apple don't consider them worth the lawyer fees any more?

      That's certainly what tech crunch implies about HTC. Now that HTC has switched to Windows they can be considered as dead:

      This settlement with HTC is essentially a sign that Apple considers it a competitor neutralized, and that’s far from the case with Samsung.

      I think that, in the spring once Microsoft's marketing money has disappeared, HTC may start coming out with competitive Android models again and has a decent chance of a revival.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    2. Re:Coincidence? by punit_r · · Score: 5, Informative

      Could it be that HTC have started performing badly as a company, so Apple don't consider them worth the lawyer fees any more?

      That and a few more. I imagine it to be a mixture of several factors:

      1. HTC successfully managed to transfer cases to a venue away from Californian courts

      2. ITC found only one of the four / five Apple's patents to be valid and infringed by HTC devices (one related to data-tapping, i.e., detecting links, phone number etc within emails and texts)

      3. HTC won a case in Europe on similar patents, where most of Apple's patents were deemed invalid. Only one was deemed valid, and HTC was found not to infringe that.
      http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-57466424-94/u.k-judge-htc-phones-do-not-infringe-apple-patents/

      4. Judges in Delaware found that few of HTC standard essential patents to be likely valid and possibly infringed by Apple and HTC exploring seeking an injunction against iPhone 5 and new iPads using these patents.
      http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-57509251-37/u.s-judge-htc-patents-likely-valid-in-apple-suit/

      So, Apple saw a possibility of loosing the case.

      It is still significant development coming from Apple. They have repeatedly held that they are not in the business of licensing "product differentiating features". Only known licensing deal is with Microsoft and Nokia. HTC is the first company which also manufactures Android phones to have reached a settlement with Apple.

    3. Re:Coincidence? by alex67500 · · Score: 1

      Now that HTC has switched to Windows they can be considered as dead:

      Have I missed something here? The One X+ which is out in the coming days ships with Android, doesn't it?

    4. Re:Coincidence? by tuppe666 · · Score: 2

      Have I missed something here? The One X+ which is out in the coming days ships with Android, doesn't it?

      LG have benefited from dropping Microsoft and focussing on Android. HTC claimed [and I would agree with them] that one of the reasons for its drop in the market was sending a confusing message to customers with too many models. That said, If HTC is large enough to support multiple platforms. I think it *could* be a great idea, unfortunately I think creating a new market with an exciting product could have been great. I suspect sharing the 2% *Microsoft* share of the market a bad idea; choosing a failed product and trying to make it work where other companies have failed, although in context of this Article, choosing Microsoft may well have been necessary for the negotiations.

    5. Re:Coincidence? by occasional_dabbler · · Score: 2

      I remain to be convined that the Windows phone OS is dead. MSFT still has massive market presence and has a good chance of bulldozing Win 8 and all its siblings through to some sort of success. The big differentiator over previous MSFT moblile OSs is that it isn't rubbish. I have an HTC 8X and despite the very valid concerns over the app availability, the device itself is slick and gorgeous.

      I suspect that HTC's strong involvement with MSFT did have a bearing on Apple settling with them; not because they think they're going to die but because they are taking themselves out of the frontline of Jobs' jihad

      --
      "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs," I said. "we have a protractor"
    6. Re:Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      So, Apple saw a possibility of loosing the case.

      Does nobody around here know how to spell LOSE? I hate being a spelling and grammar nazi, but seriously, what the fuck?!

      loose

      Adjective: Not firmly or tightly fixed in place; detached or able to be detached: "a loose tooth".
      Synonyms: adjective. lax - slack - free

      Verb: Set free; release: "the hounds have been loosed".
      Synonyms: release - loosen - untie - unfasten - unbind - undo

      lose

      Verb: 1. Be deprived of or cease to have or retain (something): "I've lost my appetite". 2. Cause (someone) to fail to gain or retain (something): "you lost me my appointment at the university".
      Synonyms: miss - waste

    7. Re:Coincidence? by Viceice · · Score: 1

      It is a significant development. I think the death of Steve Jobs could not have come at a better time, because if he were still around, what would be the odds of Apple settling with anybody?

      Could this be the start of some major policy shifts at Apple?

      --
      Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
    8. Re:Coincidence? by AaronLS · · Score: 1

      It's a homonym. Many very intelligent people will swap them and will not notice it until they proofread. Myself and several other programmers I know whom I respect as intelligent individuals, have trouble with homonyms. I sometimes swap one/won. The two words are very different spelling and meaning, so to make such a grievous error must demonstrate a significant amount of retardation on my part. I don't even understand how I'm forming these sentences!

    9. Re:Coincidence? by symbolset · · Score: 1

      The argument that Windows 8 is going to put over Windows Phone with its similar interface and Microsoft's marketing billions misses an important point. We've been hearing that for years, and it hasn't started working yet. Windows 7 was "optimized for touch" on launch, and the following CES had 35 Windows 7 tablets on display - not one of which ever amounted to anything even though each had actual full Windows on it and would run all Windows legacy apps and connect to all your other printers and other devices too. Windows 8 is a phone interface that doesn't work well on a PC. Microsoft used to have a 40% share of mobile, and now they have at best 2%, so this strategy is so obviously negatively effective that it is suicidal. Their massive market presence didn't prevent them from falling so far off the map that they are reported as part of the "other" category now.

      What would turn the corner for them isn't massive marketing dollars. It isn't forcing everybody to use a phone interface, ruining sales of their desktop and server OS in a forlorn hope of going mobile. It isn't hiring a Bangalore blog center to post in every Internet forum "I have iPhone but am moving to the awesome Lumia 920, ditching my iPad for a SurfaceRT". It isn't buying Facebook Likes and Twitter followers and retweets. It isn't bribing people to stand in line on launch day with concert tickets, or building a three-story standup nightclub and open bar at Burning Man. It isn't bribing every tech news site on the Internet with so many advertising dollars they lose their editorial integrity. It isn't giving away a free copy of Office RT with every tablet. It could be done, but this isn't how they will succeed if they do.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    10. Re:Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LG? Never again. Last year, I bought the Optimus 2X, which was supposed to be LG's flagship phone. Within months, they'd dropped all support for it and never delivered on an ICS update as they said that they would. Not only that, but there were numerous problems that plagued the phone, such as poor GPS lock and random reboots. The only reason I haven't thrown the phone out with the trash is due to the awesome work of the guys at xda devs getting ICS and JB out for it.

      My next phone is either going to be a Samsung or a Nokia (yes, a Windows 8 phone).

    11. Re:Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it is not a homonym. Loose is pronounced as "loos" to rhyme with "moose". Lose is pronounced as "looz" to rhyme with "booze".

    12. Re:Coincidence? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Easy there AC, dont loose you're cool.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    13. Re:Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except they're not actually homonyms. Loose is pronounced with a soft or unvoiced s, lose with a hard or voiced s. I could buy the double-tap adding an extra 'o' if it happened with other characters, but in this case it's much more likely to be a case of losing one's mind by seeing it incorrectly more often than correctly.

    14. Re:Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's not a homonym.

      Pronunciation:
            Loose -> Loos
            Lose -> Looz

      Similar, but not the same.

      It's the spelling that catches people, since to them "lose" looks like it's spelled wrongly.

    15. Re:Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't a homonym. Loose is not pronounced the same way as lose--

      IPA pronunciation below:

      Lose = /luz/

      Loose = /lus/

      There are not homonyms. A for effort. F for content. Thanks for playing.

    16. Re:Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they're not homonyms. Look up "homonym" -- homonyms have the same pronunciation, but different meanings and/or spellings. "Lose" and "loose" are pronounced differently. They're just similar-looking words, not homonyms. When a poster confuses them online, I automatically downgrade my opinion of that person somewhat.

      Don't pat yourself on the back. If you can't tell "one" from "won" then there is some part of your intellect that's defective, even if you're a bright person in other ways.

    17. Re:Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm... no, they aren't homonyms. They are pronounced differently. Come on AaronLS. Let's make sure we've got our grammatical definitions right before making a claim.

      homonym [hmnm]
      n
      1. (Linguistics) one of a group of words pronounced or spelt in the same way but having different meanings Compare homograph, homophone
      2. a person with the same name as another
      3. (Life Sciences & Allied Applications / Biology) Biology a name for a species or genus that should be unique but has been used for two or more different organisms

    18. Re:Coincidence? by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      Some folks have better things to do with their time than proofread their posts. I, for one, know how to spell both lose and loose. However, spelling has nothing to do with it; What you're complaining about is grammar.

      When I write software misspelling a single word or including incorrect punctuation can have disastrous results. Some of my work is in developing machine intelligence via neural networks. What's interesting is that these artificial brains are far more forgiving that a C compiler. For example, my OCR AI can correct the very error you're posting about without notifying the user at all -- It literally knows what they meant. Meanwhile, you have an even more advanced Sentient neural network atop your shoulders yet you seem to complain far more about such errors that my AI or even my C compiler does...

      If you live long enough, then some day you'll be conversing with a sentient machine intelligence when it makes a grammatical mistake. It will have the same disdain for your protests then as I do now.

      TL;DR: You have a fucking Brian! Why don't you fucking use it?!

  4. Really? by lennier1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    HTC thought it would be a good idea to settle with a patent troll?

    1. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are dying. They just can't afford a prolong lawsuit anymore. Apple has little to gain from killing HTC at this point (along with risking patents validity) and HTC has little to gain from the continued lawsuit. It's a settlement because both parties really have nothing to gain from continued lawsuit.

    2. Re:Really? by BasilBrush · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A patent troll is a person or company that holds patents but doesn't create products. That being the case your comment makes no sense.

    3. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It has also come to mean a company that sues competitors with bogus patents, gaming the system etc. Rounded corners anyone?

    4. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nowadays it's Foxconn that creates the products. Apple just tells them how many rows they should add when they increase the version number.

    5. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're on the internet where internet slang definitions change very very often.

      That definition of patent troll might have been valid a few years ago, but now Apple is what springs to mind when those words are mentioned.

      But they're basically the same, they both ask money for Imaginary Property they didn't research.

    6. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think the 'rounded corners' patent you refer to exists.

      There is a patent for the front and rear outlines of the iPhone 3, but that includes not just the corners but the button and screen layout as well - which, together, are a distinctive design, not simple geometry. Is that the patent you're referring to?

    7. Re:Really? by whisper_jeff · · Score: 0, Troll

      Unfortunately, on Slashdot, "patent troll" means "company I don't like using their patents".

      Apple and Microsoft often get labeled as patent trolls despite the fact that they invest large (and, by that, I mean ENORMOUS) amounts of resources in R&D and actually create numerous products but now it's cool to dislike them so, patent troll it is.

      Samsung, however, who utilizes their FRAND patents in anti-competitive ways are cool so their "victims of patent abuse". It's how things work on Slashdot now.

      I mean, really - I knew as soon as I saw the news that Apple and HTC had come to a licensing agreement that, somehow, Slashdot's crowd would find some way to vilify Apple and the majority of the comments in this thread bear that out. They reach a licensing agreement to mutually share their patents (current and future) with another company and somehow they're still perceived as the villain.

    8. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Samsung, however, who utilizes their FRAND patents in anti-competitive ways are cool so their "victims of patent abuse". It's how things work on Slashdot now.

      Oh look, this stale crap again.

      The thing about FRAND patents is that very first word "Fair". You know the licencing fees which are in line with industry standards, which each of the companies happily pay to each other to licence their FRAND patents. ... except for Apple who somehow think this is all unfair. FRAND patents are anything but anti-competitive. Quite the opposite when they are legally required to adhere to the whole "fair" bit.

      So far the only person who disagreed and thought they were anti-competitive were Apple, oh and yourself of course. Wake me up again when the courts think Samsung deserving licence fees is somehow unfair. Certainly Apple's other FRAND cases aren't going in their favour. But right now your fanboyism is flat out boring me. I'm off to bed.

    9. Re:Really? by symbolset · · Score: 1

      If you can control the words you can control the discussion. Once, long ago, IBM attempted to take control of the PC discussion by renaming motherboards "planar boards" and hard drives "fixed disks". It was a sad, cynical episode in IBM's evolution and one they've thankfully let go. Others have yet to learn the lesson that shifting the meaning of words for corporate profit has a cost in Karma that adds up.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    10. Re:Really? by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Linux used to be a special thing, it had a proficiency bar to get involved. It wasn't enough to want it, you had to actually be able to install it, and that was a filter many couldn't get over. Now Android/Linux is sold on (I checked today) 70% of the phones at WalMart. It moves more units than desktop or laptop PCs. You charge it and turn it on and it works. Fortunately there is an actual historical model for what is happening here.

      Long ago when I first used the Internet - and this is long before browsers - you had to be a military professional, a college IT student, a member of the military-industrial conspiracy (heh.) or somesuch to get direct access to the Internet at all. You had to be Serious and Educated mostly, or at least in a significant responsible position. And back then each September each college would get new students who had never heard of pulltab cancer boy and all the other Internet memes, and had to be schooled on etiquette. So September was always dreaded as the time when this stupid crap would come up again.

      And then CompuServe came online - and after that, AOL. And September came every day. AOL was the worst, and the day AOL joined the Internet is recorded as the dawn of the "Eternal September" where the Internet became annoying because fools came not in a September flood, but every day.

      Yet somehow the Internet has also become so much more than we ever dreamt of back then, as making things easy for these folk has brought innovations in utility and usability and compatibility to the few of us who were there when instead of DNS we had "The List". And so Android brings Linux people who don't know csh - but it also brings us Angry Birds Space, and office applications and replacement keyboards that scan barcodes and Android platforms we can send to the edge of space or use for our scientific control and measurement operations.

      In all I would say that democratizing Linux with Android has drawbacks, but the benefits far outweigh the costs.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    11. Re:Really? by bws111 · · Score: 1

      What a pile of revisionist crap that is. IBM had called PCBs 'planars' (because, you know, they are made up of planes) for at least 20 years before there even was a 'pc'. As for 'hard drives' (which IBM invented), there is a damn good reason they called them 'fixed disks' - because they were fixed. 'Hard disk' was an ambiguous term to IBM because there were two types of hard disk - 'fixed', where the platters, heads, and actuators are one assembly, and 'removable', where the platters are not part of the head and actuator assembly.

      So no, it was not IBM 'trying to control the discussion' or 'rename' anything, it was the PC industry trying to differentiate itself from boring old IBM that came up with the new (ambiguous and meaningless) terms.

    12. Re:Really? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      A bunch of fandroids misusing a term on Slashdot does not redefine the meaning of the term. It is a fundamental element of the term "patent troll" that it describes an individual or company that does not and does not intend to produce products featuring the patent.

    13. Re:Really? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      And predictably, you too are hit by abusive modding. Their case is that weak that they believe they can only maintain it by modding down things they don't want to hear, however true.

    14. Re:Really? by sela · · Score: 1

      I agree. Apple does create products, so they can't be patent trolls.

      Using the right terminology is of utmost importance. We need to make sure we use the right term for Apple, a big successful company which uses patents aggressively to hurt the compatition and stiffle innovation. The correct term for Apple is a patent bully.

    15. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How low slashdot has stooped.

      Indeed. Fortunately irritating offtopic fanboi white-knighting for Apple and trolling like yours makes up a fairly small minority of the comments on Slashdot.

    16. Re:Really? by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      The sad thing is that you probably honestly believe the "everybody's out to get me" conspiracy bullshit you routinely post.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    17. Re:Really? by Scowler · · Score: 1

      Why are you interfering with Slashdot's unsubstantiated Apple trolling? Take your facts and reasoning out of here!

    18. Re:Really? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I never said "everybody's out to get me". I pointed out the modding abuse. And evidence of the modding abuse is in the mods themselves.
      Modding "offtopic" does not mean "I disagree", and modding "insightful" does not mean "I disagree". Yet that is exactly how they were used here.

      You denying it in this way just makes you look party to it. You just didn't have the mod points this time.

  5. NOT HTC !! HTPUSSY !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There can be no doubt anymore !!

  6. Non-paywalled link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    The link appears to bring up a paywall for me, either that or a bunch of ad-laden crap that privoxy flushes.

    Here's a better link

  7. Re:damn, i was hoping HTC would die off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Perfect summary of every Android device.

  8. So what happens now.. by Rexdude · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    ..HTC phones come with an added Apple Tax? The article doesn't mention what the patents in question were. I have a One X, and I'll say this - If I had to choose a manufacturer skin I'd go with Sense anyday over Samsung's Touchwiz. Can't imagine what HTC might have copied off Apple if it's UI related. They have a fully customizable home screen, themes, skins, extra widgets...none of which you'll find on any iPhone.

    --
    "..One hosts to look them up, one DNS to find them, and in the darkness BIND them."
    1. Re:So what happens now.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..HTC phones come with an added Apple Tax? The article doesn't mention what the patents in question were.

      I don't think there will be an Apple tax. It's a cross-licensing agreement. HTC can use Apple patents and vice versa.

      I have a One X, and I'll say this - If I had to choose a manufacturer skin I'd go with Sense anyday over Samsung's Touchwiz. Can't imagine what HTC might have copied off Apple if it's UI related. They have a fully customizable home screen, themes, skins, extra widgets...none of which you'll find on any iPhone.

      I don't know anything about Touchwiz, but Sense sucks fairly badly. I have an HTC Sensation and I "fully customized" the home screen by installing ADW Launcher to mask the awful Sense one.

    2. Re:So what happens now.. by Rexdude · · Score: 1

      Wow, ask a question and get modded flame bait. Fucking fan boys.

      --
      "..One hosts to look them up, one DNS to find them, and in the darkness BIND them."
  9. Nice followup to Why you can't build a smartphone by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 1

    Actually, the post was "Why you can't build your own smartphone", but that didn't fit.

    It is impossible to build a smartphone without violating imaginary property laws. So no small, scrappy entrepreneur with a dream will ever be able to make one and sell it. The only people who can make smartphones are big-time players with the money to fight the lawsuits. The barrier to independent entrepreneurship to an impossible level.

  10. Good business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Want to increase productivity, reduce costs and foster innovation ?

    Just kill all the lawyers.

    1. Re:Good business by Jae686 · · Score: 1

      If I had mod points you would get +1 Insightfull

  11. What's the angle? by Qwavel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Very curious about what happened here?

    Maybe Apple gave them decent terms as long as HTC swallowed a bit of a poison pill: the patent license deal dies if HTC is purchased by, or merges with another company (Apple did something similar with RIM). The last thing Apple wants is consolidation that would make the Android ecosystem healthier.

    Or maybe MS played a role? It was reported that HTC managed to get Microsoft on side, largely by agreeing to continue to make Windows Phones'. Maybe having Microsoft on their side helped in negotiations with Apple.

    Maybe it's divide to conquer? If the weaker manufacturers in the Android ecosystem have a license to use all the basic touch screen methods, and the stronger ones don't then it could lead to greater inconsistency between Android phones and could weaken the strong players (i.e. Samsung).

    Ultimately, Apple's biggest threats are Samsung and Google/Nexus. I mention Nexus in particular because there is nothing that Apple & MS could hate more then the low margins of the Nexus devices. Whether or not the Nexus 4 itself is a success, the nexus line has become a threat to the traditionally high margins on mobile devices and it must have re-inforced Apple's determination to kill Android.

    1. Re:What's the angle? by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Funny

      Very curious about what happened here?

      Patent System Not Broken, Argues IBM's Chief Patent Counsel
      That's what happened.

      Obviously IBM couldn't have allowed a giant clusterfuck of patent lawsuits to go forward after they had just publicly said the system isn't broken.
      So they engineered two massive corporations cross-licensing their portfolios in order to fit the IBM definition of "not broken"
      If it makes you feel better, I'm sure the illuminati & free masons were involved and the reptilians were not.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:What's the angle? by retroworks · · Score: 1

      Apple's legal barrel is too hot. You can only engage a certain number of fronts in a certain number of courts and countries. And at a certain point if you win TOO many patent battles, you trigger anti-trust attention. It's not inconsistent, it's realpolitik.

      --
      Gently reply
    3. Re:What's the angle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Very curious about what happened here?"
      Nothing particularly surprising. Like in almost every patent dispute in existence, two sides ultimately came to an agreement. Big technology companies infringe other people's patents ALL THE TIME. They get away with it because they have patents of their own, which they use as negotiating leverage. Eventually both sides agree to a valuation (i.e., whose technology is worth more) and cross-license.

      Intel and AMD cross-license their technology. It just doesn't make sense for them to sue on every patent they own.

    4. Re:What's the angle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      It's obvious... HTC is negotiating and not being unreasonable. Apple plays nice with those that play nice with Apple. Samsung could have gotten the same treatment had they played ball– Apple gave them every opportunity and then some to take responsibility for their intellectual theft, but Samsung was too arrogant and ended up owing Apple a billion dollars.

    5. Re:What's the angle? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      HTC did make a bucket load of Windows Phone and Windows CE PDA's and phones back in the day, when the iPod still had a hard drive.

    6. Re:What's the angle? by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      Expect a joint strike on Samsung in 5, 4, 3, 2, ...

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    7. Re:What's the angle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude this is slashdot. How dare you not insult apple and praise innovation king Samsung!?!

    8. Re:What's the angle? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Ultimately, Apple's biggest threats are Samsung and Google/Nexus.

      Apple's biggest threat is itself. Rather than paying as much attention as possible to the care and feeding of its millions of fanatically loyal groupies, they decided to see just how many they could drive away by developing a new corporate image as a profiteering, arrogant bully that regards environmental programs as a nuisance.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    9. Re:What's the angle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the biavians were certainly involved. And they have a, uh... reptilian appearance.

  12. And everybody else? Patents like this = crime! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole situation is beyond fucked-up.

    It is not acceptable, that you have to license 250,000 patents (as stated in a recent /. "article"), just to build a mobile phone.

    Yeah, people who did years of research for a great idea deserve something back. But 1. PEOPLE. Not companies. NEVER companies. 2. if they did years of research, but their result is shit and so barely worth anything, but necessary, then they do NOT deserve to name their own crazy extortion prices, 3. rounded corners are NOT patentable, 4. ideas are not patentable! ideas "on a computer" are STILL not patentable! (because impossible to enforce in practice, not because good ideas wouldn't be worth anything. [not that anyone nowadays really would have a good idea. they all just have "engineer ideas". which are really shitty ones, that get realized anyway, because the "inventor" is an idiot who tried to work ten times as hard to make his shitty "ideas" come true, and so they are the ones coming true.])

    I, for one, won't give a fuck about patents! They stopped existing! Whatcha gonna do? Sue? Who? I am not the one who wrote that software. It is this "anonymous person on the Internet" that nobody can get at, and even if, would end up at Apple, Monsanto or another of those criminal bastard companies, so they can sue the shit out of each other.

    Patents, Copyright, Trademarks, and all that imaginary property bullshit always was a crime, and always will be!

    1. Re:And everybody else? Patents like this = crime! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can be sued for simply using unlicensed technology. It is illegal to make, sell, or use a patented technology without a license from the patent owner.

      So yes, they'll sue YOU. They don't need to find the "anonymous person on the internet" who wrote the code.

    2. Re:And everybody else? Patents like this = crime! by afgam28 · · Score: 1

      I'm not a fan of what Apple is doing in terms of litigation, but to be fair, they don't have a patent on rounded corners.

      Their claim to rounded rectangles is part of a set of design patents, which includes the home button, edge-to-edge glass, the bezel, and other design features. The problem is not so much that Samsung* copied the rounded rectangles from the iPhone, but they've copied it in addition to a whole set of other design features. Lots of other phones and computing devices have rounded rectangles, so this is not in and of itself protected. But prior to Samsung's Galaxy S, I don't think there were any phones that infringed on all of Apple's claimed patents.

      As an analogy, imagine if someone started a computer and smartphone company called "Apples". Apple then comes and complains that they've used the letters 'a', 'p', 'p', 'l' and 'e' in the same sequence as Apple has. Then a horde of angry Slashdotters comes and cries "Apple thinks they can trademark the letter 'a'!?!?!? The system is broken!!!!"

      Yes, you can make a valid argument that Apple is abusing the system. But a half-truth like Apple has patented rounded rectangles distracts from that message, and weakens the argument.

      * The rounded rectangles thing came up in the Samsung trial, not the HTC one. The HTC case is more about things like multitouch gestures like "pinch to zoom".

    3. Re:And everybody else? Patents like this = crime! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually you should pay more attention. Apple does have a patent on rounded corners, they were recently awarded a patent that specifically leaves out all features such as the home button, edge-to-edge glass, the bezel and everything else. Leaves it at just the rectangle with rounded corners.

    4. Re:And everybody else? Patents like this = crime! by afgam28 · · Score: 1

      Can you point it out? Because I can't find it. The closest thing I can find is this:

      http://arstechnica.com/apple/2012/11/apple-awarded-design-patent-for-actual-rounded-rectangle/?comments=1#comments-bar

      But this is an extremely narrow patent, which covers the exact shape of an iPad. In order to infringe, you would need to have the exact height and width and roundness of the corners. Not exactly a singular patent on rounded rectangles in general.

  13. Good news by Krokus · · Score: 1

    "We will continue to stay laser focused on product innovation"

    That's great news, Tim. You've got some catching up to do. :)

    1. Re:Good news by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Maybe Tim Cook will innovate the iPhone again and make it another half inch longer.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    2. Re:Good news by mjwx · · Score: 1

      "We will continue to stay laser focused on product innovation"

      That's great news, Tim. You've got some catching up to do. :)

      By Innovation, he of course means suing his competitors. Apple Innovation(TM)

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    3. Re:Good news by Scowler · · Score: 1

      iPhone 5 was twice as fast as its predecessor, and is faster than any leading Android phone on the market.

      But I guess that's not innovation in your world view...

    4. Re:Good news by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      iPhone 5 was twice as fast as its predecessor, and is faster than any leading Android phone on the market.

      Lying Apple shill.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  14. Re:damn, i was hoping HTC would die off by metalmaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    HTC's One series phones are a lot better

  15. Re:So what happens now by alen · · Score: 0

    That's because us iPhone owners don't care
    I change my wallpaper once every 6 months or so. I cant even remember if I even set my iPhone 5's wallpaper

  16. Re:damn, i was hoping HTC would die off by alen · · Score: 1

    that's nice

    too bad for them i like the iphone or Galaxy S3

    Samsung is android at this point. they are the only ones making money in the android phone sector. at least in the USA. everyone else is losing money

  17. Re:damn, i was hoping HTC would die off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perfect summary of what females think of you.

  18. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "We will continue to stay laser focused on product innovation,"

    As opposed to what? 'not really focused' or 'cheap torch focused'

    Cheers
    The corporate-speak Nazi

    1. Re:What? by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

      There is a rumor about that Apple does not own the patents on central parts of there iCloud technology. They are in fact held by a small company and were awarded over 5 years prior to Apples patent filing.

  19. Re:damn, i was hoping HTC would die off by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

    Samsung is android at this point. they are the only ones making money in the android phone sector. at least in the USA. everyone else is losing money

    Simply not true, Sony is making awfully inroads. In fact its counteracting loses on its PC's. Ironically LG now they have got rid of Microsoft are profitable again. Asus is posted great success with its new nexus tablets. I also believe Google are doing quite nicely, and recently are going to focus on mobile first not second. Huawei and ZTE is doing great too. Lets be honest its a smartphone market...its an Android market

    Just because your iPhone is failing, with its massive drop in market share from 23.1% to 14.9% does not mean the rest of the industry is doing badly :)

  20. Re:damn, i was hoping HTC would die off by alen · · Score: 1

    unit sales and revenue does not equal profits

    Apple and Samsung take home something like 95% of all mobile PROFITS

    for slashtarts profits is what you have left over after you build and sell your device and pay off all the costs associated with it. everyone else loses money or fights for the scraps left over

  21. Re:So what happens now by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

    That's because us iPhone owners don't care
    I change my wallpaper once every 6 months or so. I cant even remember if I even set my iPhone 5's wallpaper

    ...but the market has noticed. The market is noticing that Apple are behind on both software and hardware, and better value phones are available elsewhere, which is why Android outsells Apple 5:1.

    Maybe Apple should focus on providing a great experience so disappointing users, like those over maps will not happen again. Rather than pretending the opposition its working day and night to provide great products.

  22. Re:damn, i was hoping HTC would die off by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

    Apple and Samsung take home something like 95% of all mobile PROFITS

    LOL there is no share of profits, There are only profits...and these companies are making profits on phones. This is a lie and you can't show me the figures. Apple does overcharge its customers, but lets face it posting bullshit from the days when we still talked about the "iphone killer" simply do not fly now, even the Samsung Galaxy on its own outsells the iphone, are we meant to pretend that Google makes nothing from its play store and advertising. Bury your head in the sand, Android has hit 75% and your still claiming it to be unporfitable. You live in fantasy land.

    Ironically the days of any Apple dominance are over in pursuit of those profits. In fact in the Android market Apple is struggling to remain relevant.

  23. Android isn't free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the 15th Android-related contract.
    http://www.fosspatents.com/2012/11/apple-htc-settlement-is-already-15th.html

    Meanwhile, Federal Trade Commission staff have formally recommended that the government sue Google over anti-trust violations involving the licensing of FRAND patents.

  24. Re:damn, i was hoping HTC would die off by puto · · Score: 3, Informative

    I work for ATT and we only offer 1 sony phone at a time, especially in the last year. And they are pretty too look at, but just awful phones, that no one really buys, and when they do, they are returned rather quickly, and the ones that keep them are fraught with warranty replacements. Sony is not making any inroads in the US market.

    --
    The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
  25. Nice sound bite Tim. by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Tim Cook wouldn't know innovation if the zombie corpse of Steve Jobs rose from the dead and bit him in the face.

    1. Re:Nice sound bite Tim. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you're posting wisecracks on /. because you're just so amazingly hip and intelligent.

      I can see it's really burning slashdotters up that Apple has settled this deal. What a sorry lot you are!

  26. Yes it is. Patents abuse isn't by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

    This is the 15th Android-related contract.
    http://www.fosspatents.com/2012/11/apple-htc-settlement-is-already-15th.html

    Meanwhile, Federal Trade Commission staff have formally recommended that the government sue Google over anti-trust violations involving the licensing of FRAND patents.

    LOL android is free. Patent abuse will of course continue, with Microsoft, and Apple abusing the system for there own gains. The bottom line is Microsoft phones have hit a high of...2%, and Apples are down from 23.1% to 14.9%. Clearly they should be innovating instead of litigating.

    The reality is though Patent settlements are what the mobile industry have *always* been about. Hell its part of the reason why FRAND exists.

    1. Re:Yes it is. Patents abuse isn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFL! Sorry to burst your bubble, and that of all the other freeloaders and Apple-gangbangers on /., but Android isn't free to use in salable products, so practically speaking Android isn't free.

    2. Re:Yes it is. Patents abuse isn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Apple-HTC patent settlement arose because Android isn't free. FRAND exists to avoid patent licensing battles and to promote in-house developed technology.
      We also have Google spending billions of dollars to acquire Motorola Mobility, and the U.S. government strongly considering suing Google over anti-trust violations involving FRAND patent licensing practices, because Android isn't even free to its principal developer, Google.

  27. Re:damn, i was hoping HTC would die off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ironically the days of any Apple dominance are over in pursuit of those profits.

    Uh... you're delusional. Apple is doing better than it has ever done... wait, scratch that... Apple is now more profitable than any company in history ever. kthxbai.

  28. Re:damn, i was hoping HTC would die off by tuppe666 · · Score: 2

    Sony is not making any inroads in the US market.

    The US market is irrelevant. The world market is, and Sony are now the 4th largest manufacturer of smartphones in the world [up from 7th]. Sony phones are doing awfully well.

  29. Re:damn, i was hoping HTC would die off by tuppe666 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Uh... you're delusional. Apple is doing better than it has ever done... wait, scratch that... Apple is now more profitable than any company in history ever. kthxbai.

    Its market share in mobile phones has dropped from 23.1% to 14.9% its tablet share has dropped to 50.4%. Its ipod shares have shrunk to nothing, Android outsell Apple 5:1.

    "the days of any Apple dominance are over in pursuit of those profits" I pretty much stand by that quote. The reality is Apple is have been riding high on market dominance [real and perceived] cashing in on all the and adopter money with massive mark-ups...but these are now mature markets. Apple has nowhere to go and its massive share drop reflects that. Lets face it its an Android world now.

  30. Attack of the Clones by huckamania · · Score: 1

    Only with bigger screens, more memory and better performance. Unless there is a prohibitive per-unit cost, they will also be cheaper. Apple may have made a boo-boo.

    1. Re:Attack of the Clones by icebike · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Apple didn't make a mistake.

      They just got access to all the patents of some of the slickest phone designers with the best screens, more memory, and better performance, experienced in two different Operating Systems. You said so yourself, and then turned around an awarded the score to HTC. What kind of reasoning is that?

      Apple is the clear winner here. HTC gains only legal relief. Nothing Apple has patented is of value, except as a club to beat others with.

      The HTC ONE line of phones puts Apple to shame. Whether its the Windows Phone version or the Android version, HTC designs are top notch, even better than Samsung. HTCs problem is they have spent so much time and money fighting Apple they have nothing left to bribe the purchasing agents for the big carriers into accepting their phones (unlike Samsung).

      Apple could use HTC's expertise. I wouldn't be surprised to see Apple purchase them outright or at least gain a majority stock position. If they did that, they would have a beachhead into both Windows Phone and Android, because its easy to see that IOS is beginning its death spiral, and Apple has to do something.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    2. Re:Attack of the Clones by whisper_jeff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...because its easy to see that IOS is beginning its death spiral...

      iOS is beginning its death spiral? Are you joking? It's market percentage might be decreasing (and it seems to actually be holding pretty steady right now, going up in one quarter, down in another, and back up again) but it's unit sales continue to rise - their declining percentage is simply an indication of how fast the entire market is growing. Other manufacturers/OSes are seeing their unit sales decline but Apple most certainly isn't one of them. Their sales figures have been on a constant upward trajectory (with the only slowdowns easily attributable to consumers waiting for the new iPhone and thus delaying purchase).

      If that's a death spiral, I think a lot of companies want to be in a death spiral...

    3. Re:Attack of the Clones by SomePgmr · · Score: 2

      Apple is the clear winner here. HTC gains only legal relief. Nothing Apple has patented is of value, except as a club to beat others with.

      If that legal relief includes exemption from being beating with that club, regardless of what they do, that might well be a great competitive advantage on its own.

    4. Re:Attack of the Clones by icebike · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I said BEGINNING its death spiral. That you can't see a trend right before your very eyes says more about you than Apple.

      Top Execs fired at apple for major maps failures.
      Deliberate production caps on new releases just so they can say they sold out.
      Iphone 5 sales faltering.
      3 out of 4 smartphones purchases are Android.

      Apple needs a refresh. Their initial sale clime with every new release is merely eating their own young, reselling to the same customer base while quietly running buy-back programs to take their old units off the street.

      You are confusing deployed numbers with new new purchases which blinds you to trends. With a 3 year head start, Apple has a lot of faithful, who re-buy Apple each time. But New (first time) smartphone phone buyers are going 54% to Android and a distant 36% to Apple. The irresistible lure of Apple has worn off.

      The market is calling TOP for Apple right now.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    5. Re:Attack of the Clones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HTC does actually make a pretty decent phone. I have an HTC phone and I only have two complaints about it: HTC makes crappy radios, and Sense can be annoying at times.

    6. Re:Attack of the Clones by icebike · · Score: 0

      Never had a problem with their radios. (Presumably you mean the radios in their phones, which of course, they don't make).

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    7. Re:Attack of the Clones by icebike · · Score: 3, Informative

      Deliberate production caps on new releases just so they can say they sold out.

      Citation, please. Provide it or shut the fuck up.

      http://news.techeye.net/mobile/apple-pulls-out-all-the-marketing-stops

      There you go.
      I here it helps if you put your hand over your ears and sing LA LALA LA real loud.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    8. Re:Attack of the Clones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HTC doesn't make radios at all, they buy parts just like every other smartphone manufacturer.

    9. Re:Attack of the Clones by zieroh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's not a citation. That's speculation. Just some asshat (much like yourself) who thinks they know what's involved in a global rollout of a mass-market product.

      You don't. Neither does he. Try again.

      --
      People who say "sheeple" have about as much sophistication as an AOL user, and in fact are probably actually AOL users.
    10. Re:Attack of the Clones by icebike · · Score: 1

      Its as authoritative as you, fella.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    11. Re:Attack of the Clones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I said BEGINNING its death spiral. That you can't see a trend right before your very eyes says more about you than Apple.

      Top Execs fired at apple for major maps failures.
      Deliberate production caps on new releases just so they can say they sold out.
      Iphone 5 sales faltering.
      3 out of 4 smartphones purchases are Android.

      Your "faltering sales" link is from September and says the iPhone 4s sold 4 million in it's first week, and the iPhone 5 sold 5 million in its first week, falling short of expectations of 6-8 million. What ground were those expectations based on? Would you like to comment on the iPhone 5 selling more in its first week than the previous model? No, I think you were intentionally being disingenuous, you creep.

      Android is replacing dumbphones. You can get an Android phone for free with contract renewal, so most people just wind up with them. That's why despite having more users, they spend less money in the Android market ecosystem. Everyone knew this would happen and Apple would not race to the bottom, I don't know why anyone would be bragging about raw numbers of Android devices shipped.

      Talk about RDF...

    12. Re:Attack of the Clones by Aryden · · Score: 1

      Other manufacturers/OSes are seeing their unit sales decline but Apple most certainly isn't one of them

      You might want to ask Samsung about that one.

    13. Re:Attack of the Clones by Aryden · · Score: 1

      HTC HD2 as my backup phone. Used it from launch til I got my SG3. Rooted running android. It's still a great phone.

    14. Re:Attack of the Clones by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 0

      That you can't see a trend right before your very eyes

      Take some of your wisdom. If you think in any way that iPhone 5 sales are somehow faltering, when they are selling every single one they can build, and have a waiting list for those not yet built, you are delusional.
      It's Android that's in trouble. Google has ceded true control to the carriers, they are Samsung's bitch, and now HTC can take Aliyun, iPhone it up, and start chopping away at Android's underside.

    15. Re:Attack of the Clones by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 2

      Somebody else's speculation instead of your own does not a citation make. Apple is being hurt by the production shortfall. They're losing some sales because of it and pissing off people who are waiting.

    16. Re:Attack of the Clones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Its as authoritative as you, fella.

      And yet you've dismissed him as an idiot, blinded by ideological devotion to Apple.

      So what you're saying is, you have no citation to support your claim, but your feelings were hurt that anybody would dare to challenge your statements of fact. That about right?

    17. Re:Attack of the Clones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its as authoritative as you, fella.

      So you agree that it's not authoritative and should not have been used as a citation.

    18. Re:Attack of the Clones by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      iOS itself, not the iPhones. iOS reached its current maturity years ago and has only filled in its whiskers in the time since. It's starting to get grey and long in the tooth, with a bit of pudge around the center. It really should've considered working more to stay in shape.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    19. Re:Attack of the Clones by whisper_jeff · · Score: 1

      I didn't say "every other manufacturers" - I said " other manufacturers". I was referring to manufacturers like RIM and Nokia and HTC who are seeing their unit sales decline.

    20. Re:Attack of the Clones by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      Does this mean that HTC can now make phones with rounded corners?

    21. Re:Attack of the Clones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My first post ever... how was this modded a 5?

      I said BEGINNING its death spiral. That you can't see a trend right before your very eyes says more about you than Apple.

      Right back at you.

      Top Execs fired at apple for major maps failures.

      This is not a bad thing for Apple. Firing people who do a terrible job is a good thing.

      Deliberate production caps on new releases just so they can say they sold out.

      Even after looking at your source... this is a load of crap. Do you have any idea how long it takes to get production ramped up to ship the first 5 million units? I would say this is an operational reality, not a marketing decision to have shortages.

      Iphone 5 sales faltering.

      This article said nothing of faltering sales. It said some analysts took a dartboard approach toward estimating sales.

      Samsung is ecstatic about selling 16 million GS3's in a quarter. Apple sold 5 million iphones in a week. But sure, iphone sales are 'faltering'...

      3 out of 4 smartphones purchases are Android.

      Apple isn't looking to have the highest market share. The highest market share of smartphones (now that they are mainstream and more phone buyers are choosing smartphones) will be the smartphones that are free on contract. Android phones can be had free on contract, iphones can't. Apple doesn't care about not having the highest market share of smartphones. Samsung isn't looking for the GS3 to have the highest market share either. They both want profits, not highest market share.

      Apple needs a refresh. Their initial sale clime with every new release is merely eating their own young, reselling to the same customer base while quietly running buy-back programs to take their old units off the street.

      You are confusing deployed numbers with new new purchases which blinds you to trends. With a 3 year head start, Apple has a lot of faithful, who re-buy Apple each time. But New (first time) smartphone phone buyers are going 54% to Android and a distant 36% to Apple. The irresistible lure of Apple has worn off.

      The market is calling TOP for Apple right now.

      The market is not calling top for Apple right now. Large investors are beating down the price of AAPL, so they can get in at a lower price. It happens all the time, and it is easier to do when a bunch of reviews come out saying that Apple has terrible quality on the iphone, that maps sucks, that they don't have widgets, etc...

      Clearly, consumers have a different take on 'quality' than the reviewers do.

      For the record, I have only owned android phones, have had an ipad and a Galaxy Tab 10.1 (which I currently use). I recently bought an HTC One X. Not a fanboy by any means, but to say Apple is in the beginnings of a death spiral is lunacy. They are on track to sell close to 50 million iphones this quarter. That's quite a death rattle.

      Disclosure: I am long AAPL.

    22. Re:Attack of the Clones by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Iphone 5 sales faltering [opposingviews.com].

      I love hating Apple as much as the next guy, but "sales faltering" 1 week after the product launch? And a launch that onlysold 5 million? Maybe you could say they were faltering after a month or two of sales. But not after a week.

    23. Re:Attack of the Clones by zieroh · · Score: 1

      I didn't make the allegation. I demanded some evidence for said allegation.

      Surely you see the difference.

      No, strike that. You almost certainly don't.

      --
      People who say "sheeple" have about as much sophistication as an AOL user, and in fact are probably actually AOL users.
    24. Re:Attack of the Clones by icebike · · Score: 1

      That you can't see a trend right before your very eyes

      Take some of your wisdom. If you think in any way that iPhone 5 sales are somehow faltering, when they are selling every single one they can build, and have a waiting list for those not yet built, you are delusional.

      It's Android that's in trouble.

      Look son, I understand the medicine tastes bad, but you have to take it for your own good.

      http://www.androidcentral.com/android-claims-72-mobile-market-sales-q3-2012

      Android accounted for 72.4% of mobile sales worldwide, which is up from 52.5% at the same time last year.

      By comparison, iOS is down to 13.9% from 15%, RIM is down 5.3% from 11%, and Microsoft is up a smidge to 2.4% from 1.5%, though Bada is hilariously beating it with a 3% share. The overall mobile market declined 3.1%, but smartphone growth increased 46.9% year over year.

      Five million means nothing, Samsung sold 30 million units of the GS3 is a roughly the same period, and they are just one manufacturer.

      Apple Stock has dropped 150 points in the last couple weeks. Its OVER. The market knows its OVER. The innovation has stopped. Maps doesn't work. New phones released don't even the latest technology on board. The screen is pathetic next to top Android models. And the OS is the the same old warmed over childish garbage it was back on the first iphone.

      If Android is in trouble, I'll have a double helping of that trouble.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    25. Re:Attack of the Clones by icebike · · Score: 1
      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    26. Re:Attack of the Clones by icebike · · Score: 1

      Your "faltering sales" link is from September and says the iPhone 4s sold 4 million in it's first week, and the iPhone 5 sold 5 million in its first week,

      Here, have some more recent figures. http://www.androidcentral.com/android-claims-72-mobile-market-sales-q3-2012

      Android is replacing iPhones, not dumb phones. The overall handset market is SHRINKING, not growing any longer. 5 million iPhone 5's sold in about the same time that Samsung sold 30 million Galaxy S3 phones.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  31. Re:damn, i was hoping HTC would die off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your figures need citations... looks like you're talking about the US only, where, indeed, Apple is in third place. Despite this, in 2012 alone, Apple has had more growth in mobile marketshare than any other single company, and their marketshare will continue to grow. But you go ahead and believe what you want in your twisted fantasy world, because outside of that, your worst nightmares are coming true.

  32. I don't expect HTC to release a Nexus device by blind+biker · · Score: 1

    For two reasons, I thin HTC won't be commissioned by Google to make a Nexus device:
    1. HTC is on its last legs, more or less. They are ready to make deals with any and all, and their willingness to have prominent Windows phones is a sign of that (I know Samsung also makes Windows phones, but in case of Samsung, they are just symbolic gestures). That makes HTC a liability, to the Android ecosystem.

    2. The deal with Apple likely includes a poison pill, and Google may not want to touch HTC anymore.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:I don't expect HTC to release a Nexus device by tuppe666 · · Score: 2

      1. HTC is on its last legs, more or less.

      Not sure where this nonsense really came from, HTC were *very* successful last year on the back of Android, now other companies are producing more compelling products, and it sells less [there are other reasons], but HTC is still profitable, its just it has the same cost of sales...with lower sales. They are very far from their last legs. They are not Nokia.

      As for Microsoft HTC was originally the goto manufacturer for Microsoft phones,and I don't think they ever stopped [even samsung make micosoft phones]. If they are successful they have the opportunity to steal that 2% windows market share!? from Nokia.

      I agree that patents and/or patent protection is what this deal...and the new Microsoft phones are about [and that they are happening as HTC is weakened], but information is sparse. HTC still sell a lot of smartphones, and most of those are Android. Its going to be an Android manufacturer for a long time to come.

      ;) personally I would love to see a Nokia Nexus.

    2. Re:I don't expect HTC to release a Nexus device by mjwx · · Score: 1

      1. HTC is on its last legs, more or less.

      Not sure where this nonsense really came from, HTC were *very* successful last year on the back of Android, now other companies are producing more compelling products, and it sells less [there are other reasons], but HTC is still profitable, its just it has the same cost of sales...with lower sales. They are very far from their last legs. They are not Nokia.

      HTC has made a few decisions over the last year that has put them offside with consumers. Locked bootloaders, sense becoming more bloated, the elimination of the Z series (keyboard phones) and slow updates[1] have made them less desirable. HTC did very well with the Desire range of phones putting them into the hands and minds of average consumers. Due to the problems mentioned above and lacklustre new offerings (until the One line) they have lost the initiative to Samsung and Sony. The lack of a low end phone that competes with the LG Optimus Spirt and Samsung Galaxy Ace has also hurt them.

      But HTC is still strong and the writing is far from the wall. What HTC needs to do is:
      1. Bootloaders, unlock them.
      2. Update fast, update often.
      3. Have a series of phones with a common template (such as the Desire/Desire HD/Desire Z).

      [1] To be 100% fair, carriers tend to delay updates more than HTC.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  33. Re:damn, i was hoping HTC would die off by tuppe666 · · Score: 3

    Your figures need citations... looks like you're talking about the US only, where, indeed, Apple is in third place. Despite this, in 2012 alone, Apple has had more growth in mobile marketshare than any other single company, and their marketshare will continue to grow. But you go ahead and believe what you want in your twisted fantasy world, because outside of that, your worst nightmares are coming true.

    I am using IDC's latest figures.

    https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS23771812 for mobile

    https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS23772412 for tablets

    To put Apples market decile of 23.1% to 14.9% in some sort of perspective Android grew its market share from 52.8% to 75%.

    Clearly I had no trouble backing up my figures. Perhaps you should have used an Android device to check your facts. Then you wouldn't look so foolish.

  34. LTE patents by Mr_Silver · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My bet is that they came to an agreement because HTC hold some LTE patents that Apple need:

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  35. HTC's issue with Android are due to Design Choice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can t speak for eveyone - but I had an HTC phone as my first android phone. It was OK and it wasnt enough to put me off HTC. HOWEVER... when I went looking for a new model to replace it I took my bad experiences with the phone with me when I was looking. I wanted a phone with an SD Card (micro) slot. My new phone runs a 64 GB micro SD card. That makes a huge difference over a 16GG non expandable phone.

    Power was (and is) an issue on weekend days when Im using the phone a lot and Im not near a power point - so I looked for the biggest battery and reviews that said good battery life. (and since then - Ive added the ability to access and change the battery - I now carry 2 spare Batteries in my backpack. They provide me with MORE power than I can use in a day NO MATTER what I do or run on the phone.

    To a lesser degree - but still something I looked for were CPU speed - and all the models I looked at just lagged a little bit behind the best - memory (no better than anyone else) and the Camera - Ive stopped carrying my point and shoot camera's because although my android phone ISNT as good - its easy, fast, always on me and I can upload any pics I take - on the spot. HTC's cameras just didnt seem to match the others....

    The locking down of the bootloaders also DID NOT impress me - although its a decision they have backed away from - but with me and others it made the company seem customer unfriendly.

    Where HTC DID seem to excel was in audio quality but that wasnt something I care enough about (I wear out headphones every few months and so I dont spend the money on headphones to make audio the decisive quality. WHAT DO OTHERS THINK. Why are you not buying HTC phones ?

  36. Re:damn, i was hoping HTC would die off by korean.ian · · Score: 1

    But you are comparing 1 company (Apple) to the multiple companies who sell Android devices (Samsung, LG, Sony, Google themselves and now apparently HTC). Certainly, Apple's market share has shrunk as other companies enter the market wit competitive products. This does not however, spell the imminent demise of Apple. if we look at Apple's quarterly report from the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, we can see they actually improved profit year-on-year.

    As to your comment downthread about global smart phone sales, well it seems Apple is doing alright there.
    http://www.forbes.com/sites/ericsavitz/2012/06/15/apple-samsung-55-of-global-smartphone-sales-90-of-profits/

  37. Product innovation by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    Apple's flagship product is thug lawsuits. Apple will continue business as usual.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  38. Re:damn, i was hoping HTC would die off by tuppe666 · · Score: 2

    But you are comparing 1 company (Apple) to the multiple companies who sell Android devices (Samsung, LG, Sony, Google themselves and now apparently HTC). Certainly, Apple's market share has shrunk as other companies enter the market wit competitive products. This does not however, spell the imminent demise of Apple.

    I will ignore your out of date figures. we are now have quarter 3 figures published, and again you have failed to supply a breakdown of profits for smartphones, or even an explanation of how the current figure is worked out [seriously they do not exist]. Please do not twist my comments into what they are not. I have nowhere claimed there Apples "imminent demise", I personally believe they have failed to make the transition from new market to mature market, and its already started to hurt them.

    I would love a breakdown of profit by company on a hardware and content combined basis, but you again fail to supply a list. A mythical figure combing Apple with Samsung is equally a nonsense especially when trying to prove Apples relevance.

    The bottom line is Apple is losing Market share, and its desire to keep its massive profits is the problem.The very thing you are trying to defend.

  39. Re:damn, i was hoping HTC would die off by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/ericsavitz/2012/06/15/apple-samsung-55-of-global-smartphone-sales-90-of-profits/

    In case I haven't enphasised how stupid and out of date this post I include this quote from the original article "“At this point in the year, Nokia will have to grow its Windows Phone business 5000% in 2012 just to offset its declines in Symbian shipments,” says Michael Morgan, senior analyst, devices, applications & content.

    Q3 Microsoft Phone 2%

  40. Re:damn, i was hoping HTC would die off by ShnowDoggie · · Score: 1

    Where are you reading this? From your own source *Top Six Smartphone Mobile Operating Systems, Shipments, and Market Share, Q3 2012 (Preliminary) (Units in Millions) :
    OS
    3Q12 Shipments 26.9
    3Q12 Market Share14.9%
    3Q11 Shipments 17.1
    3Q11 Market Share13.8%
    Year-Over-Year Change 57.3%

    That is an increase from 13.8 to 14.9%. Not a decrease.

  41. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HTC is pleased to have resolved its dispute with Apple, so HTC can focus on innovation instead of litigation," Peter Chou, HTC's chief executive, said in a statement. Tim Cook, Apple's chief executive, also expressed relief in a statement. "We will continue to stay laser focused on product innovation,"

    That's hilarious! HTC is. HTC is pleased. Yeah, HTC. HTC can FINALLY focus on innovation instead of litigation.

    Isn't focusing almost exclusively on litigation APPLE'S thing?

  42. Re:damn, i was hoping HTC would die off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tuppe666 is a notorious fantasy land troll... do not let the facts stand in his way, he has an axe to spin

  43. Bad News for Android and Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article sums it up the best: http://www.androidanalyse.com/is-the-htc-apple-deal-a-good-thing-for-android/ - Apple is not going to soften up on Android at all.

  44. Re:Nice followup to Why you can't build a smartpho by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

    Even if ip rights weren't a problem, making sure your spiffy new phone doesn't blow up or having the kind of industrial capacity to build these things are bigger barriers to entry.

    Try again.

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  45. Re:damn, i was hoping HTC would die off by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

    Your figures need citations... looks like you're talking about the US only, where, indeed, Apple is in third place. Despite this, in 2012 alone, Apple has had more growth in mobile marketshare than any other single company, and their marketshare will continue to grow. But you go ahead and believe what you want in your twisted fantasy world, because outside of that, your worst nightmares are coming true.

    I am using IDC's latest figures.

    https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS23771812 for mobile

    https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS23772412 for tablets

    To put Apples market decile of 23.1% to 14.9% in some sort of perspective Android grew its market share from 52.8% to 75%.

    Clearly I had no trouble backing up my figures. Perhaps you should have used an Android device to check your facts. Then you wouldn't look so foolish.

    Sasy the right guy - not only have you not provided a source for your 23.1% number, you also showed that in the quarter people waited for the iPhone 5 to come out, Apple has grown its market share by over a percentage point.

    As for tablets, that number by IDC is always quite suspect (Samsung outselling the Nexus tablets and Kindles combined?)- but even then, in the quarter of iPad killers (finally) and before the iPad Mini, Apple still dominates the market.

    --
    Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  46. Re:damn, i was hoping HTC would die off by symbolset · · Score: 1

    Sony will be lucky to see the end of 2014 as an independent company. They have made a habit of strategic error and poor customer service.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  47. Re:damn, i was hoping HTC would die off by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

    I would love a breakdown of profit by company on a hardware and content combined basis, but you again fail to supply a list. A mythical figure combing Apple with Samsung is equally a nonsense especially when trying to prove Apples relevance.

    The last numbers I saw had Apple with 71% of the profits, Samsung with 37% of the profits, HTC with 1.x% of the profits and [everyone else] is *losing money.

    *which is how the profits add up to >100%

    The bottom line is Apple is losing Market share, and its desire to keep its massive profits is the problem.

    15% of the market = 71% of the smartphone industry profits
    We should all be so lucky to have such a record to defend.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  48. Re:damn, i was hoping HTC would die off by symbolset · · Score: 1

    The comparison is valid. Apple is, like all companies, competing against all of the rest of the world. If 10,000 companies each take on average 0.01% mobile market share with Android, there is no market share left for Apple.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  49. Re:damn, i was hoping HTC would die off by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

    That is an increase from 13.8 to 14.9%. Not a decrease.

    Unfortunately the iPhone is not a Christmas tree, last years Q3 is not representative of this years Q3. Phones aren't seasonal. Look at the *interactive* graph at the bottom. More worrying For Apple than anything is Q312 actually contained the launch of the iPhone5.

  50. Re:damn, i was hoping HTC would die off by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

    not only have you not provided a source for your 23.1% number, you also showed that in the quarter people waited for the iPhone 5 to come out

    Interactive graph too difficult for you to look at. Move your mouse over it. If a graph is too difficult for you to read, simply look at previous IDC figures. :). FYI it wasn't the quarter people where waiting for the iPhone to come out....it was the quarter the iPhone did come out :).

  51. Re:damn, i was hoping HTC would die off by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

    The last numbers I saw had Apple with 71% of the profits, Samsung with 37% of the profits, HTC with 1.x% of the profits and [everyone else] is *losing money.

    *which is how the profits add up to >100%

    Again show me the working. I would love to see it :). I want to see solid figures. As I said its a poor guestimate by a fanboy, quoted by other fanboys.

  52. Re:damn, i was hoping HTC would die off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sony phones are doing awfully. Well!

    You made a mistake in punctuation. I fixed it for you. You're welcome.

  53. Re:damn, i was hoping HTC would die off by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

    You made a mistake in punctuation. I fixed it for you. You're welcome.

    This is a quote from Sony Global Earning release. Maybe you should leave my comments alone.

    "Sales increased 112.1% year-on-year (a 125% increase on a constant currency basis) to 300.4 billion yen (3,851 million U.S. dollars). This increase was primarily due to the consolidation of Sony Mobile from February 2012, partially offset by significantly lower sales of PCs resulting from a decline in unit sales."

    http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/IR/financial/fr/index.html

  54. iPod shares by tepples · · Score: 1

    Its ipod shares have shrunk to nothing

    What exactly did you mean by this? What product has taken over the 4"-class Wi-Fi tablet market from the iPod touch?

    1. Re:iPod shares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its ipod shares have shrunk to nothing

      What exactly did you mean by this? What product has taken over the 4"-class Wi-Fi tablet market from the iPod touch?

      LMFAO

  55. About features common to Android phones by tepples · · Score: 1

    or maybe it was because one was about operating systems and the other was about smartphones.

    They're both about operating systems, as I understand it. Some of the features that Apple claimed are common to all smartphones that run the Android operating system.

  56. USA = 2/3 of industrialized anglophone market by tepples · · Score: 1

    The US market is irrelevant

    The major English-speaking markets as I understand them are the United States, Canada, Great Britain, Ireland, Australia, and New Zealand. Two-thirds of the population of these countries lives in the United States. Slashdot is also operated and hosted in the United States. So how does this make the United States market irrelevant for the purpose of a Slashdot discussion?

  57. HTC angling to assume Samsung's role for Apple? by daboochmeister · · Score: 1

    So Samsung is on its way out as a supplier in the Apple chain ... and HTC has design expertise on at least the LCD panels front. Could this all be part of HTC angling to win the supply chain inside track for Apple?

    --
    "Ahh! I see you're in that indeterminate Schrodinger state where - oh, uh ... never mind." Dave Bucci
  58. Tim Cook doesn't know optics by cellocgw · · Score: 1

    We will continue to stay laser focused on product innovation

    Actually, because laser beams have a gaussian intensity cross-section, they are a pain in the ass to focus. He'd get a much tighter focus spot with plain old regular light (or even better, UV, since the diffraction spot scales with wavelength).

    So there.

    --
    https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
  59. Re:damn, i was hoping HTC would die off by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

    Comparing previous IDC figures with current figures for previous quarters show they are full of it. BRTW: who will you insult after the results for this quarter are out?

    --
    Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  60. Re:damn, i was hoping HTC would die off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, keep telling yourself that Sony is "doing awfully well" in the phone space. The increase was primarily due to "consolidation of Sony Mobile" - in other words, "we purchased it and made it a wholly owned subsidiary, and so now their numbers show up in our statements."

    They're not ACTUALLY selling more, they just get to claim the sales from what WAS a previously independent company as their own on their statements.

    Also, citing "sales" figures rather than "profits" is retarded, because if you're losing money with every sale, you sure as fuck aren't making it up in volume. Sony is not making any significant profits out of the phone market, and soon will exit the market altogether.

    Dipshit.

  61. Which OS other than Android has DFSG free apps? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Slashdot is overrun with loudmouth fandroids who are on some kind of god-given mission to prove to everyone around them that Android is The Way and the Truth (or something like that)

    So what is The Way and the Truth? Assume for a moment that someone wants to buy a mobile device and run applications distributed under a free software license on it. The device's operating system would have to meet these two requirements:

    1. It comes on phones and pocket-size tablets sold in major English-speaking markets as of 2012.
    2. It does not require a recurring fee to develop your own applications or otherwise use applications not available on the store operated by the operating system's publisher.

    What mobile operating system other than Android meets these two requirements?