Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

House Subcommittee Holds Hearing On TSA's "Scanner Shuffle"

Posted by samzenpus on from the who's-to-blame dept.

OverTheGeicoE writes "The Homeland Security Subcommittee on Transportation Security held a hearing on TSA's recent decision to move X-ray body scanners from major airports to smaller ones, which the subcommittee refers to as a 'Scanner Shuffle.' John Sanders, TSA's assistant administrator for security capabilities, testified that 91 scanners recently removed from major airports were now in storage due to 'privacy concerns.' Although TSA originally planned to relocate the scanners to smaller airports, those plans have been shelved because smaller airports don't have room for them. The subcommitteee is also investigating allegations that the machines' manufacturer, Rapiscan, 'may have falsified tests of software intended to stop the machines from recording graphic images of travelers' (VIDEO). Coincidentally, shares of Rapiscan's parent company, OSI Systems Inc., dropped in value almost 25% today, its biggest intraday decline in about 12 years. If wrongdoing is proven, Rapiscan could face fines, prison terms and a ban on government contracting, according to a former head of federal procurement."

13 of 134 comments (clear)

  1. RAPEscan by TheNastyInThePasty · · Score: 5, Funny

    I never noticed how poorly the scanner machine's company was named...

    --
    The best thing about UDP jokes is I don't care if you get them or not
  2. boing, boing, boing... by slick7 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can hear the rubber stamp bouncing now.

    --
    The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
  3. should be CFA not TSA by swschrad · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the cluster fuck agency. seems they are consistently boorish, idiotic in rulemaking, inconsistent, and being called out as leaders in group comedy, instead of as an effective security force.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:should be CFA not TSA by Mitreya · · Score: 5, Interesting

      seems they are consistently boorish, idiotic in rulemaking, inconsistent, and being called out as leaders in group comedy, instead of as an effective security force.

      You are missing the most important part

      There are NO demonstrable results that anyone in TSA could show for the last 11 years. The 2-3 half-assed terrorist attempts (shoe bomber, etc.) have been stopped by other passengers. TSA accomplishments are rivaled only by the anti-terrorist rock (though TSA is significantly more expensive)

      I asked this before and I will ask again -- how does an agency exist/expand/get funding without demonstrating any results whatsoever? One could dislike CIA/FBI/IRS, but one could at least point to something beneficial that they actually do.

  4. The TSA is still a thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What I don't understand is why the TSA still exists. Everybody hates it and it costs us a ridiculous amount of money. Every time I've uttered the phrase "security theater" around normals, they've heard it before and agree with it. Why haven't any politicians jumped at the chance to cut it like the cancer it is and score major points with their electorate?

    Is corruption really the answer, or am I missing something, here?

    1. Re:The TSA is still a thing? by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Everybody hates it and it costs us a ridiculous amount of money.

      That ridiculous cost to us is ridiculous profits to somebody else. That somebody can in turn give to any politician who wishes to eliminate the TSA up to 2500 reasons per election cycle to change their mind.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    2. Re:The TSA is still a thing? by sjames · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's all in how you ask the question. On the one hand, you can ask "Do you support airport security or should we quit discriminating against terrorists?". On the other you can ask "Should pre-schoolers be groped by strangers in the airport?". You can also pre-load with a bunch of obvious yes or obvious no questions to get the answers you want. For that matter, you can tilt the stats by asking (or not asking) people who don't fly.

      As a whole though, I'll bet few, if any Americans actually support the TSA's current methods, especially groping children and irradiating pregnant women.

    3. Re:The TSA is still a thing? by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's all in how you ask the question.

      I absolutely agree with you. On the other hand, I've encountered lots of crazy people (including here in Slashdot) who seem to terrified that an unseen hoard of terrorists are eager to jump on planes and blow them up if we all don't take off our shoes and belts, take the special baggie out of our luggage with our mini-shampoo in it, and do "the special pose" for the new scanners. I've even had serious people here -- not trolls -- tell me that we need to be worried about terrorists shooting lasers at planes from the ground at airports. (I wish I were kidding.)

      The government and media has done a great job of convincing people that this invisible hoard exists. And with all that disinformation, any poll is going to be biased in weird ways away from a rational response. In that light, it would not surprise me that the GP's assertion was true and that a large number of Americans are afraid enough to be in favor of the TSA overall.

    4. Re:The TSA is still a thing? by strength_of_10_men · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because no one wants to be "that guy" that killed the TSA in case another terrorist takes down an airplane. Simple CYA thinking. Until we, as a nation, make it clear that the TSA is unacceptable, things will just carry on. And from my last visit to the airport, the people seem to be accepting it just fine.

    5. Re:The TSA is still a thing? by smpoole7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > A majority think it's doing a good job.

      The vast majority of Americans never fly. All they know is that there haven't been any more airplanes crashing into buildings. Ergo, they conclude that the TSA must be working.

      If they did fly regularly, and ever watched some little kid screaming because the TSA agent was groping and touching them "where mom and dad told me never to let anyone touch me," they'd change their opinions in an instant.

      Sad, but true.

      --
      Cogito, igitur comedam pizza.
  5. Re:Translation please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think the translation is something like this:

    Two reasons:
    A) They are a new agency that was thrown together overnight, and might have been fine if "B" hadn't occurred:
    B) They were put under Homeland security which apparently can't do anything right.

    Dissolve Homeland security, move the money into CIA and FBI and move the TSA out on it's own so we are left with three Bureaus.
    Also maintain the agency separation policy.

    Or something like that.

  6. To avoid the backscatter Xray by jnmontario · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I flew out of Minneapolis a few weeks ago and while on the way down I didn't have to go through the scanner (in Canada we use millimeter wave and always have), they had the backscatter in the airport. I simply, and politely, asked to have my kids go through the metal detector along-side the backscatter instead since I didn't want them to get a blast of xrays. "No problem" said the TSA person (who BTW was incredibly nice and reasonable about the whole thing). In fact, the whole fam. got processed through the metal detector instead. They DID confiscate the ~3 oz. of my kids' toothpaste however. Security theater.

  7. Re:I've got a question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    As someone who does like forced humiliation, the TSA is not on my Goddess's safe list of loaner dommes, either. Hell, they haven't even asked me for my safeword. If I'm going to be abused, violated, and driven through some sort of humiliating sexual theatre act using spurious medical equipment, I at least want it to be by a competent Domme, and not some crackpot psychopaths who are doing it because of their own subconsious demons.