Slashdot Mirror


Water Bottle Fills Itself From the Air

mbstone writes "The Namib Desert Beetle generates water from water vapor via its shell, which has alternating hydrophilic and hydrophobic bumps which channel water droplets into its mouth. Scientists at MIT developed a self-filling water bottle using this technology, and have announced a contest for the best design of a countertop water-from-air generator."

45 of 173 comments (clear)

  1. Hydrophobic? by drunkennewfiemidget · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm not hydrophobic, I have gay friends!

    1. Re:Hydrophobic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm not hydrophobic, I have gay friends!

      I'm not hydrophobic, some of my best friends are wet.

    2. Re:Hydrophobic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Some of my best friends are wetbacks!

    3. Re:Hydrophobic? by joocemann · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm just so thankful that god sent us this invention!

    4. Re:Hydrophobic? by je+ne+sais+quoi · · Score: 4, Insightful
      And what, god was supposed to have directed that company to mimic his beetle? You know, I don't usually respond to ACs but given Marco Rubio's recent comments I figured I would. Here's what he said:

      I’m not a scientist, man. I can tell you what recorded history says, I can tell you what the Bible says, but I think that’s a dispute amongst theologians and I think it has nothing to do with the gross domestic product or economic growth of the United States.

      Him, you and all the people like you couldn't be more wrong. Science and mathematics has everything to do with the economic growth of the United States. How can the U.S. compete in biotechnology if what we learn in biology courses is that god created the beetle? How can we compete in oil production if all we learn is that fossils are there to fool the unbelievers and the earth is 6000 years old? Time and evolution created both: 4.54 billion years is a LONG time, animal species can change a lot over that amount of time.

      Frankly, I think you people are all nuts, and I'd happily let you live in your bubble if not for the fact that you all are ruining my country. I think it's a real shame that our education system has failed so miserably to produce roughly 48% of the voting population who can't even do basic arithmetic (i.e., go read Ryan's or Romney's economic plans: they either don't add up or impossibly vague). This has nothing to with Democrat or Republican, you could have figure out who was the right person to vote for just by looking at which one could do basic arithmetic. This election, my vote went for logic and reason, and that fortunately prevailed, but only by 3.3% or so.

      --
      Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
    5. Re:Hydrophobic? by nickscalise · · Score: 2

      Our current president answered the question pretty similarly: "What I've said to them is that I believe that God created the universe and that the six days in the Bible may not be six days as we understand it ... it may not be 24-hour days, and that's what I believe. I know there's always a debate between those who read the Bible literally and those who don't, and I think it's a legitimate debate within the Christian community of which I'm a part. My belief is that the story that the Bible tells about God creating this magnificent Earth on which we live -- that is essentially true, that is fundamentally true. Now, whether it happened exactly as we might understand it reading the text of the Bible: That, I don't presume to know."

    6. Re:Hydrophobic? by Nezic · · Score: 2

      Him, you and all the people like you couldn't be more wrong. Science and mathematics has everything to do with the economic growth of the United States. How can the U.S. compete in biotechnology if what we learn in biology courses is that god created the beetle? How can we compete in oil production if all we learn is that fossils are there to fool the unbelievers and the earth is 6000 years old? Time and evolution created both: 4.54 billion years is a LONG time, animal species can change a lot over that amount of time.
       

      I'm not even religious, but I'm pretty sure this post is trolling (if not 'just' idiotic).

      Somehow religious people who buy into creationism are incapable of science and technology? What is the line of thinking.. "God created this creature, so I can't *possibly* bring myself to study how it works and duplicate it's function in novel technologies for mankind's use!" ?

      Is the 11th commandment something like "You shall not look too closely at my other creations," or "You shall respect the privacy of all other creatures (but you can still eat them)" ?

      And competing in fossil fuels..??? I think even the most devout church-goer knows that oil, coal, and natural gas are in the ground, and they can be quite useful if dug up or pumped out.

      The same point applies to most other areas of technology and research, caveats being areas with moral concerns such as cloning and genetic manipulation. But even with those, there are legitimate non-religious reasons to be wary of progress with a lack of understanding the long term implications.

  2. 3L per square meter per hour @ 75 percent humidity by zill · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know what they say, the bottle is half empty for pessimists and 1 year away from being full for an optimist.

  3. the spice must flow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    NBD Nano co-founder Deckard Sorensen wants this green technology available in all walks of life; installing it on people, cars, homes and anything else you can imagine.

    Next stop stillsuits.

  4. Star Wars by Omnifarious · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now we know what Luke Skywalker was repairing.

  5. Water Vaporware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sounds like vaporware to me.

  6. Milsleading title (surprise!) by John+Bokma · · Score: 4, Informative

    FTA: In the near future, it looks as if we’ll have water bottles that can capture drinkable water from the air as well.

    1. Re:Milsleading title (surprise!) by John+Bokma · · Score: 4, Funny

      I guess your browser has HTTP_X_PREFIX_ARTICLE_TITLE set to "In the near future, it looks as if we'll have a ". I can see how that makes Slashdot more pleasant to read ;-)

    2. Re:Milsleading title (surprise!) by RivenAleem · · Score: 4, Funny

      We already have this in Ireland. All you need is a funnel. Doesn't need any special properties.

  7. Re:How long before a supervillain uses this? by evil_aaronm · · Score: 2

    Only if the US government refuses to pay ONE MILLION DOLLARS!!

  8. Re:3L per square meter per hour @ 75 percent humid by zill · · Score: 5, Informative

    I did. It's roughly 0.7mL per hour for a 710mL coke bottle; takes around 40 days to fill it up.

  9. Thermodynamics by quantumphaze · · Score: 2

    Water has a specific heat vaporisation of 2260kJ/kg. So can we make a slow working refrigerator without the need for a compressor from this?

    1. Re:Thermodynamics by solanum · · Score: 2

      The bottle requires an energy input, they are using solar. The submitted article is based on a slightly fuller one: http://www.pri.org/stories/science/technology/scientist-takes-inspiration-from-natural-world-to-create-self-filling-water-bottle-12154.html

      --
      Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.
    2. Re:Thermodynamics by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 2

      The power is for forced airflow, not for the membrane.

      People already make third-world refrigerators using evaporative cooling - a large, porous, ceramic container, with another in the middle, the intermediate space filled with damp sand.

      But this is a condenser, so you're harvesting both water and heat. You want to radiate that heat away, so you can continue to collect water. This is why the beetle is black - to radiate the maximum heat away from it's body in the night, so it's carapace is nice and cool for it's water collection in the morning.

      The Dune novels include a similar device - thermoplastic orbs that are transparent in the day (to avoid heating up too much), and turn black at night, radiating their heat away so they can condense water to irrigate the plants rooted amongst them. Presumably, they are coated with Namib desert beetle coating (or something similar) :-)

  10. Re:Air Water Machine by ModernGeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is a difference between solving a problem with physics and chemistry with materials technologies, and solving one with electrical and mechanical engineering. It's like dissing the transistor because we have relays...

    --
    Sig: I stole this sig.
  11. Re:3L per square meter per hour @ 75 percent humid by TuxWithoutPants · · Score: 2

    Just in time for the return policies in most places to run out, sounds about right.

  12. The bottle requires power ... by perpenso · · Score: 3, Informative

    Windtraps could also work using condensation techniques like refrigeration, or a regenerative moisture absorber. Of course, those techniques require power.

    So does this device. From the article: "The self-filling bottle can operate using a battery or solar cell to collect and filter the water."

    1. Re:The bottle requires power ... by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 2

      The power is to blow wind over the surface. So a windtrap doesn't need the battery.

      Of course, a windtrap could have a wind-powered generator for running it's refrigeration coils. It seems that this is unnecessary with this stuff - the beetle gets by just with radiative cooling - but probably improves the efficiency of the collector surface for it to be cool.

  13. Re:Air Water Machine by perpenso · · Score: 2

    The article mentions that the bottle needs power.

  14. Re:Air Water Machine by Ozoner · · Score: 3, Informative

    The air/water machine extracts water vapour via thermal methods (eg condensation).

    There are of course other ways of collecting water if it is in droplet form (eg mist)

    see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fog_collection or google on "fog fence"

    This latter method seems to be pretty much what the beetles are doing

  15. Re:Air Water Machine by wvmarle · · Score: 2

    Of course, there are also dehumidifiers around. They're being sold where I live big time - especially in summer where you have those 100% humidity weeks (one time we had laundry hanging out for three days, it was 28-30C during the day, but after three days it was still not dry and we took it to the laundry shop to have it tumble dried! That's how bad it can get!). One objection I have is that those things use quite some electricity, or chemicals to attract water and that have to be replaced all the time.

    This sounds like a solution that does not need any external power input, nor does it need any additional chemicals. That's great, and if they can make it work would be a huge improvement. Both for creating drinking water where there is none available, and for getting the humidity down in your home when there is simply too much water in the air.

  16. Re:3L per square meter per hour @ 75 percent humid by sjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

    OTOH, my roof could easily collect more water than I use in a day.

  17. Re:Air Water Machine by wvmarle · · Score: 2

    One could maybe use a chimney, heated by the sun, to draw the air through the system. Though technically that's also an external power input of course, even though it doesn't need moving parts.

  18. Re:3L per square meter per hour @ 75 percent humid by Jorgensen · · Score: 4, Funny

    50% or 50% empty is a misnomer. Let an engineer look at it, and he'll show you an over-engineered bottle!

  19. Re:How broadly useful? by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Informative

    How much of the world actually encounters regular airborne water but virtually no usable rain?

    It's common for much of the year near coastlines but only in temperate zones, so it can only serve 40% or so of the world's population. Guess we should throw it over, like the electric car :)

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  20. Re:Air Water Machine by Eroen · · Score: 2

    It used to be pure condensation water, then it dripped into an AC unit that is neither designed for hygiene or has ever been cleaned. The water is certainly distilled, but on no account safe to drink.

  21. Whisky version? by Radak · · Score: 3, Funny

    Make one that does whisky and I'm sold.

  22. Re:3L per square meter per hour @ 75 percent humid by laejoh · · Score: 2

    And during that year the physicist very slowly ducks!

  23. Re:The air is not clean by tbird81 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Where could you get UV light from in the desert?

  24. I see a trend forming: by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    Self-milking cows can't be far away.

  25. Re:3L per square meter per hour @ 75 percent humid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    50% or 50% empty is a misnomer. Let an engineer look at it, and he'll show you an over-engineered bottle!

    I am an engineer and I say that it depends on the direction. While filling up the bottle is half full, while drinking it is half empty.

  26. Re:3L per square meter per hour @ 75 percent humid by Formalin · · Score: 3, Informative

    Your math is off. I don't have a 710ml bottle handy, so I did a 12oz can.

    Assuming 6.5cm * 12cm, ignoring the bottom and top surfaces, just the sides of the cylinder, I get 490 cm2, which is .049 m2.

    3l * .049 = 0.147; 147ml/h. The can will be a 40% full in an hour, in 75% RH.

    I assume the performance in drier conditions is much worse, though.

    Although, once the liquid is in the container, it loses surface area? I didnt bother reading to find out whether the inside or outside or both count. math was assuming one side.. If it is the inside surface that does the work, the increasingly covered surface will give reduced efficiency as it approaches full...

  27. Re:3L per square meter per hour @ 75 percent humid by Formalin · · Score: 4, Informative

    shit, 2pi r h, not 2 pi d h.

    so it should be 244cm2, .024m2, producing 73ml/h. Still respectable.

  28. 70% of my friends are water! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    70% of my friends are water!

  29. Desert Beetle files suit for patent infringement by einar.petersen · · Score: 2

    The BeetleJuice Law Firm on behalf of AngryBeetle Inc. today launched a patent infringement suit against MIT. Their statement reads: It might be very well that MIT has developed something clever, but this is clearly an infringement of AngryBeetle Inc.'s patented water production method. The fact that you can help millions of people is irrelevant - we want our cash now!.... AngryBeetle Inc. and BeetleJuice Law Partners - have not been available for any further comments. Thanks to Alex for inspiration ;)

    --
    MS, ALS, Aphasia ? http://globability.org - Me http://einarpetersen.com
  30. Re:Air Water Machine by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is much more efficient than the fog net, principally because the arrangement of materials means that your collection surface is fouled with water less - the droplets roll straight off the hydrophobic surface, leaving the hydrophilic surface available to attract another droplet.

    The same physical process is involved regardless of which air/water collection machine you use - it's all applied thermodynamics.

    Like another poster said, it's like the difference between relays and transistors - they both perform the same job (being a switch) but one is a much smarter use of material science and much more efficient.

  31. Re:The air is not clean by OzPeter · · Score: 2
    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  32. Re:3L per square meter per hour @ 75 percent humid by Internetuser1248 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    All of these calculations assume that the air, once the water is absorbed out of it, will flow out of the vessel and be replaced by humid air again at the optimal speed. It also requires power to operate. It may be that the power is used to pump the air which would mean the system has only one of these drawbacks, but the article is light on details so I can't be sure. It is also not a system that can be built at home. On the other hand I read an article by an engineer a few years ago that proposed a system that used piping running below the ground to cool the air and cause condensation, using a wind catcher at one end to push it through. His estimates included air flow and showed that a 10 meter long system could provide drinking water in desert air with a moderate wind for several people. I am unable to find the article again unfortunately.

    My point is that a temperature gradient is far cheaper and available to poor third world desert countries where such a system is required. This technology is neat but not all that practical. Still a combination of the two systems, ie. lining the inside of underground pipes with this substance and letting the wind push air through might have a much higher rate of condensation and could be used for commercial and military operations in the desert.

  33. Re:3L per square meter per hour @ 75 percent humid by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And now imagine instead of being a bottle, it's a dense matrix made to maximize surface area and fresh air is pushed through with a solar-powered fan to accelerate the "condensation." Sort of like an evaporative cooling chiller in reverse. It could be really useful in humid tropical areas and a good alternative to desalination plants.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  34. Re:Did not RTFA by Abstrackt · · Score: 2

    Now I just need my city to install some.... :(

    --
    They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett