Judge Issues Temporary Order Blocking Expulsion For Refusing To Wear RFID Tag

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Judge Issues Temporary Order Blocking Expulsion For Refusing To Wear RFID Tag

Posted by Unknown on Friday November 23, 2012 @05:24AM from the dang-terrorist-judges dept.

An anonymous reader writes with an update about the student refusing to wear an RFID badge in Texas. From the article: "A district court judge for Bexar County has granted a temporary restraining order (TRO) to ensure that Andrea Hernandez, a San Antonio high school student from John Jay High School's Science and Engineering Academy, can continue her studies pending an upcoming trial. The Northside Independent School District (NISD) in Texas recently informed the sophomore student that she would be suspended for refusing to wear a 'Smart' Student ID card embedded with a Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) tracking chip."

22 of 305 comments (clear)

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

From the original article... by History's+Coming+To · 2012-11-23 05:27 · Score: 2, Insightful

The student was offered a security card with no battery and chip, but still refused. I'd have some sympathy if the college hadn't offered this option, but as it stands it's simply refusal to wear an ID badge and has nothing to do with RFID tracking...good luck to her when it comes to finding a job with any company that uses ID badges of any description.

--
Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
1. Re:From the original article... by Penguinisto · 2012-11-23 05:34 · Score: 5, Insightful
  
  You missed the part where the school also required that the parents and student must vocally support the RFID program, even with a crippled badge.
  You also missed the part where wearing said badge -crippled or not- implies acceptance of the program to the other students, forcing compliance.
  
  --
  Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
2. Re:From the original article... by TubeSteak · 2012-11-23 06:03 · Score: 5, Insightful
  
  If a student is absent more than X days, the school is denied funding for that student (and it's easier ot just expel them and wipe their hands clean than anything).
  They schools also play games where students get transferred to another school, so that they don't count on the rolls and the clock is reset for the second school.
  Ultimately, education starts at home.
  
  --
  [Fuck Beta]
  o0t!
3. Re:From the original article... by interkin3tic · 2012-11-23 06:03 · Score: 5, Insightful
  
  A lot of people don't stand up for their rights just for themselves, they stand up for the rights of all. "We'll give you an exception because you made some noise, but we're still going to press ahead with this utterly pointless scheme to chip every student" is not really a victory.
  
  And, as others have pointed out, it would require them to endorse it.
4. Re:From the original article... by slashmydots · 2012-11-23 06:26 · Score: 3, Insightful
  
  Exactly. It's all about removing the chip, not ditching the lanyard/card thing. Nowhere did they mention not putting adhesive Faraday screen on the back of it and in the lining of their jacket, lol. Try reading that chip now. I'd be more than happy to leave it in there in that case.
5. Re:From the original article... by mysidia · 2012-11-23 06:33 · Score: 4, Insightful
  
  The student was offered a security card with no battery and chip, but still refused. I'd have some sympathy if the college hadn't offered this option
  And you'd have some sympathy for Rosa parks, if the driver hadn't offered her the option of standing, instead of leaving the bus?
  It might be work, if the college promised to have no battery, chip, or RFID in the cards of all students.
  Otherwise, it's just a continuation of the status quo.
  Attempting to work out an exception for the person with the courage to refuse and mount a legal challenge with great personal cost, without changing the rules for everyone, doesn't rectify the social injustice; it just results in a situation that is even more unfair,....
  Oh, and also.... if you have one or two people with no RFID chip, they will be easy to track.
  I'm surprised they don't work out a deal with that company that lets business monitor foot traffic in their stores by tracking individual cell phones.
6. Re:From the original article... by jeffasselin · 2012-11-23 07:46 · Score: 3, Insightful
  
  "Everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Brother"
  
  --
  If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
7. Re:From the original article... by theArtificial · 2012-11-23 09:03 · Score: 2, Insightful
  
  But this RFID card is mandatory, which is the problem.
  Attending this school is a choice, their religious beliefs are what are an issue here.
  
  --
  Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
8. Re:From the original article... by ArcadeMan · 2012-11-23 09:37 · Score: 3, Insightful
  
  Not being tagged like a criminal or an animal is a religious belief?
  
  --
  Get free satoshi (Bitcoin) and Dogecoins
Number by Anonymous Coward · 2012-11-23 05:31 · Score: 3, Insightful

Why not just make the ID a number tatooed onto the forearm, papers please, Oh Godwined
What's the big deal? by cob666 · 2012-11-23 05:33 · Score: 2, Insightful

I personally don't see any problem with students having to wear RFID badges while they are at school.

--
Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law - Aleister Crowley
1. Re:What's the big deal? by Kingofearth · 2012-11-23 05:37 · Score: 5, Insightful
  
  Yes, let's condition our children to be treated like cattle. I'm sure that will do wonders for our free society!
2. Re:What's the big deal? by Paran · 2012-11-23 05:39 · Score: 4, Insightful
  
  Then allow them to chip your children and stay away from mine.
3. Re:What's the big deal? by Runaway1956 · 2012-11-23 06:07 · Score: 4, Insightful
  
  , the Code of Conduct superseded legal rights. You can sign away legal rights in a contract.
  Utter bogus bullshit. You BELIEVED that nonsense? It's been ruled, again and again, that you cannot sign away any of your rights with a contract. No TOS, no code of conduct, no contract, no employer's regulations, NOTHING supersedes your rights as established by law. Life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, the right to be secure in your person and your home, all of that is LAW, and nothing supersedes it.
  Good God, how can ANYONE roll over and play dead, just because some arrogant bastard tells them to? This is America, not some warlord's regime in the outback of Africa.
  
  --
  "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
4. Re:What's the big deal? by Jethro · 2012-11-23 06:27 · Score: 4, Insightful
  
  I fear that your attitude will be the prevailing one. In the future I foresee myself being the outcast because I /don't/ share everything about my entire life on Facebook/Twitter/Whatever, because I don't let my cellphone announce where I am at all times.
  I'm not worried about the government tracking me. Hell, if they want to, they will. There's not a lot I can do about it. It's everything ELSE tracking me. It's vast databases containing vast amounts of information about all of us. It's large corporations who use you and I as products.
  Look, I hate getting those things in the mail addressed to "Resident". But I hate even more the ones addressed to me directly, from people I've never heard about. And how do those happen? Because someone somewhere took YOUR privacy and sold it.
  You say "you are no one". Untrue. You are data. Data people can use. Data people can make money off. If you're ok being treated as a product, that's your business. I am not.
  
  --
  
  In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
5. Re:What's the big deal? by spire3661 · 2012-11-23 06:35 · Score: 5, Insightful
  
  Work is not school. They are not equivalent and you would do very well to remember that. What adults CHOOSE to do when they enter the workplace is VASTLY different from forcing it on a child. I dont know about you, but i have always had the ability to walk away from a job i dont like, kids dont have that option. Are you starting to see the fundamental difference?
  
  --
  Good-bye
6. Re:What's the big deal? by lgw · 2012-11-23 08:05 · Score: 4, Insightful
  
  The school wants the kids to fake attendance. That th secret here. US schools are paid by attendance. Teachers taking roll call is too hard to fake without overt fraud. An electronic system allows (and greatly motivates) the students to devise systems to fake attendance, which the school can then act surprised about when the system is discovered. Much better money that way.
  
  --
  Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
Re:I can understand her by TheRealMindChild · 2012-11-23 05:41 · Score: 4, Insightful

You took the ball and ran the wrong way. This has nothing to do with fear of radio transmissions of any kind. It is about privacy and principle

--

"When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
I'm sorry.... I don't see the problem. by mark-t · 2012-11-23 06:29 · Score: 3, Insightful

If the student's religion requires that they not wear such articles, then I think it's a pretty clear case that the student should not be going to that school.
Schools, even public ones, are permitted to have dress codes, and wearing a specially issued id tag on your clothes while you are on school property is really not that big a deal. There's shouldn't be concern about being tracked off of school property because because one's location through RFID can only be tracked if they are in close proximity of an RFID reader that understands what the tag is, and who it belongs to. The RFID readers which are connected to the database of RFID tags owned by the school aren't going to be anywhere but on school property, so that's the only place where one is ever going to be tracked.
There should be no more concern that this could be used to invade somebody's privacy than an RFID card issued to an employee to get into a company building during non-office hours could reasonably represent a privacy invasion for that employee.

--
File under 'M' for 'Manic ranting'
Re:Simple Science by qbast · 2012-11-23 07:01 · Score: 5, Insightful

And get expelled for destruction of school property, great idea.
Then is there never a time to say "enough?" by Press2ToContinue · 2012-11-23 07:11 · Score: 5, Insightful

Is it always a good idea then to stay at the back of the bus? Just because it happens ubiquitously throughout society, then we should never make a stand?

--
Sent from my ENIAC
Outside Agencies by AF_Cheddar_Head · 2012-11-23 07:34 · Score: 4, Insightful

Don't forget that if each kid is required to carry their RFID card whenever they are in school they will also carry that card the vast majority of the time. Now I own a store and want to know when a certain student enters my store what prevents me from installing RFID readers in my store and reading the cards and developing a database from there.
For example: when ever card number NNNNN is in the store I have more shoplifting so I ban the student carrying that card from my store with no proof they stole anything.
We could go on from there.