Slashdot Mirror


OnStar Gives Volt Owners What They Want: Their Data, In the Cloud

Volt owners will be able to brag about their mileage more easily now thanks to OnStar. "GM rushed work on a new API to get a popular Volt owner site back on road. You probably don't think of your car as a developer platform, but Mike Rosack did. A few days after buying his Chevy Volt, Rosack started slowly mining his driving data. But he eventually revved up his efforts and created a community platform for drivers to track their own efficiency. Today more than 1,800 Volt owners compare stats with each other, jockeying for position on Rosack's Volt Stats leader board."

13 of 92 comments (clear)

  1. developer platform by Trepidity · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You probably don't think of your car as a developer platform

    Sadly, you might soon have to, in the sense that you'll need to [pdf] keep your security patches up to date...

    1. Re:developer platform by verifine · · Score: 5, Funny

      Three buttons on the dash: Ctrl, Alt and Del

  2. Re:But, by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 4, Informative

    You get a discount for sharing it with your insurance company.

  3. And there is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yet another reason i'll never buy an onstar equipped car. Hands too much control to people you already paid once...

    They can pull the plug on this at any time. or start charging for the data. or anything else scummy you can think of.. and you can do nothing about it.

    I like computers. i really do. but i really dont want them in my car... or connected to the 'cloud'. it's stupid. If you're going that far where you need updates and connectivity for your car and official updates the dealer must install. (prius)

    You're better off just renting a car. You're going to be paying forever to drive. They might as well be responsible for way more crap than what they are now.

  4. Nissan does something similar by swillden · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nissan has a stats site for Leaf owners that compiles stats, ranks efficiencies, etc., for those who opt in. It's fairly interesting, and it does provide some motivation for driving more efficiently, which isn't a bad thing. The top drivers must only drive downhill, though. They get 22+ miles per kWh, which is insanely good.

    The Nissan site is provided and operated by Nissan, though, rather than a fan.

    There are a lot of cool things that can be done with a highly-computerized car that has its own 3G Internet connection and GPS. They're barely scratching the surface. It really makes me want to hack my car, but I don't want to void the warranty.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    1. Re:Nissan does something similar by aurashift · · Score: 5, Funny

      but I don't want to void the warranty.

      Hand in your nerd card.

  5. hope they don't bill for data roaming by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 5, Funny

    hope they don't bill for data roaming when you drive out side of the USA.

  6. Re:But, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You mean a surcharge for not sharing it with your insurance company.

  7. I was thinking to buy a Volt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But I'd like to make sure there is an opt-out (or better yet an opt-in) for this "service". I don't want my stats and/or whereabouts transmitted to anyone without my explicit knowledge/agreement.

    Can anyone who may have one of these things confirm that this private data is something I don't have to be transmitting to some random company? I noticed the word "privacy" was mentioned 2x in the article, but both times it seemed to be to satisfy OnStar's requirements.

    What's the scoop on this? It's been a while since I've bought a new car. Is this like, standard now?

  8. Re:But, by markdavis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    EXACTLY.

    I am quite pleased and proud that none of my vehicles share information with ANYONE in the "Cloud." Just because something CAN be done [that is "kewl"], doesn't necessarily make it a great idea.

  9. Re:Just stay out of the fast lane. by Nerdfest · · Score: 5, Funny

    That is the second worst poem I have ever read.

  10. GM finally gets it by voss · · Score: 4, Interesting

    enviromental friendliness...who cares
    saving the earth...yeah whatever
    nerd bragging rights and a leaderboard with a technocar----yeah baby. ;-)

  11. Re:But, by maxwell+demon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's today. Tomorrow there will be an additional charge for NOT sharing. Next year there will be a law that makes it illegal not to share.

    The difference between a discount for sharing and an additional charge for not sharing is purely semantics. Both just mean that you'll pay more if you don't share. The only difference is which price you declare as base one. If you declare the lower price as standard, the higher means an additional charge, while if you declare the higher price as standard, the lower one means a discharge. Which one you declare as base price depends only on your marketing strategy. If you think you can better compete by making your base price as low as possible, you'll take the lower price as base price and hide the extra charges for not sharing in the fine print. If you think you can better compete by giving discounts, you declare the higher price as base price and market the savings possible when sharing as loudly as possible.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.