Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Why KDE Plasma Makes Sense For Linux Gaming

Posted by timothy on from the compatibility-matters dept.

sfcrazy writes "Martin Gräßlin, a lead KDE developer, addresses some queries around a topic bugging Gnome and Unity users — the fallback mode. In this post he says that 'having the non-composited mode around allows us to do things like turning compositing off when running games or heavy OpenGL based applications such as Blender. So if you want to get some of the now finally available games for Linux, KDE Plasma should be your primary choice to enjoy the game. I have also heard of users switching to KDE Plasma because we still provide non OpenGL based setups.'"

4 of 152 comments (clear)

  1. Alternative: XFCE by gagol · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I much prefer the simplicity and conservatism of XFCE4. Can optionally use compositing too and no need to relearn interface.

    --
    Tomorrow is another day...
    1. Re:Alternative: XFCE by Threni · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I switched to (Linux Mint 13) KDE precisely because I didn't want to learn a new interface (Unity). It's great. I used XFCE and LXDE previously, having read of their great suitability for lower end hardware, but..well, I don't have any low end hardware. I have nothing special but it runs KDE perfectly, and it looks great. I can't be bothered to learn all the ins and outs of it - I launch stuff via what I'll always call the 'start menu' or shortcuts or from the 'task bar' - but it's good to know that there's more to it if I could be bothered to learn it. The point is, nobodies forcing me to use it. There seem to be a rash of these Mac-like OSes these days (including the hilarious Windows 8) - I don't quite understand the appeal.

    2. Re:Alternative: XFCE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There seem to be a rash of these Mac-like OSes these days (including the hilarious Windows 8) - I don't quite understand the appeal.

      That's because you (like most of us here) learned about computers using devices with separate keyboard, mouse and screen. We are currently at the tipping point where more youth learn about computers through devices with only a touchscreen (phones, tablets) and have never used a laptop.

      That tipping point is driving interfaces that cater to the touchscreen user experience, even though those interfaces don't allow for as much interaction as UIs driven by the keyboard/mouse/screen user experience.

    3. Re:Alternative: XFCE by Inigo+Montoya · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's very likely, as interfaces evolve, that we will have specialized "developer" versions of these interfaces. These developer versions enable you to be creative, and to do all that you need to do to make an application that is primarily targeted at these newer interfaces, including having keyboard access, pen, 3d input mice, multiple monitors, system simulators, etc...

      This is already the case with game consoles; There is always a developer version of the hardware.

      In time, I expect the same from an OS targeted for end-users.